Stingray attack off SA coast leaves woman with 16cm barb near artery in arm
Pam Bennett was among a group of four conducting a survey of marine life at Treasure Cove on South Australia's southern Yorke Peninsula, partly in response to the unusual number of fish deaths along other parts of the state's coastline.
The Minlaton woman, who had to undergo surgery to have the barb removed, said she was snorkelling less than 50 metres offshore when she realised she was over the top of a stingray, and "quickly swam out of the way".
"It wasn't long after that that I felt the barb go into my arm," she said.
"I actually didn't see that stingray — he had come from behind, I think. He had actually attacked.
"That's not their normal behaviour."
The barb had to be surgically removed at the Royal Adelaide Hospital.
(
Supplied: Pam Bennett
)
Ms Bennett said her fellow snorkellers laid her on her back and floated her to shore, and that "blood was spurting out quite a bit" from the wound just above her right elbow.
"It was agony [but] at the time it felt like a dog bite, not that I've ever been bitten by a dog, but it was what I imagine it would feel like,"
she said.
"I kind of expected them to take the wetsuit off and see teeth marks."
Ms Bennett was taken to hospital in Yorketown and then flown to Adelaide.
(
Supplied: Pam Bennett
)
Before being flown to Adelaide, where she had the barb removed, the 68-year-old was taken to Yorketown Hospital.
"I was absolutely astounded by the x-ray. It showed a dagger going in at my elbow and coming out almost under my arm,"
she said.
"It was actually laying alongside the brachial artery but it didn't penetrate the artery.
"I could have been a Steve Irwin.
"In hindsight, I feel like I've won the lottery because I'm amazed it was me and not a young child."
The barb was embedded 16 centimetres into Ms Bennett's arm, and came within a whisker of an artery.
(
Supplied: Pam Bennett
)
Among those who had been snorkelling with Ms Bennett was marine biologist and environmentalist Mike Bossley.
"We had to get Pam out of the water, she was bleeding quite heavily, but she's a very brave woman and didn't panic or anything," he told ABC Radio Adelaide.
'Window into the future'
Dr Bossley said he returned to Treasure Cove last week because of the alarming number of animal deaths and unusual incidents along other stretches of South Australia's coast.
Photo shows
The remains of a large puffed up globe fish sit on the sand of a surf beach.
As sharks, rays, and other marine life continue to wash up on South Australian beaches, citizen scientists are urged to record the scale of the lingering marine algal bloom event.
Those deaths have been blamed on a
There have been reports of
"The first thing we noticed was lots of dead animals on the beach," he said.
"
As soon as we got in the water we immediately saw there were quite a number of dead fiddler rays as well, which are kind of like a cross between a ray and a shark, and the water was kind of thick and slimy.
"
In April, an
Yesterday, a
"We've had a marine heatwave for weeks and weeks now, and I'm not sure — I don't think anybody knows yet — what the exact mechanism is between the warm water and the deaths," Dr Bossley said.
"It appears that the bloom of the microalgae … is part of the picture, but exactly how that's affecting the sharks and rays I think is not quite clear yet.
"I've never seen anything like this — it's a wasteland out there. It's scary.
"
It makes me feel like I've had a window into the future of what's going to happen to our oceans with climate change and it's very depressing.
"
Researchers to conduct post-mortem
Primary Industries Minister Clare Scriven said a necropsy would be conducted on the shark that washed up yesterday.
"SARDI [South Australian Research and Development Institute] will analyse the organs of the shark that died yesterday, they'll look at the general condition and take samples," Ms Scriven said.
"The water temperatures are about 2.5 degrees warmer than usual, and of course there's been very calm marine conditions overall.
"What we see with algal blooms usually is that they dissipate after a little while when there's some reasonably strong winds and swells, but because we haven't had that, the algal bloom is continuing to be present and moving around different parts of the coastline."
Ms Scriven rejected any suggestion the desalination plant at Port Stanvac, which has boosted its output, had contributed to the bloom.
"Brine's not associated with greater algal growth," she said.
'Home in time to vote'
Ms Bennett was full of praise for the "amazing" and "brilliant" hospital staff who treated her and removed the barb, which she intends to keep "as a trophy".
"[They] sent me for a CT scan and then took me to theatre and then untangled the barb from my muscle," she said.
She said she had been left with a "bit of bruising and a sore arm" and was discharged from hospital on Saturday.
"They got me home in time to vote," she joked.
A stingray washed up at Treasure Cove on Yorke Peninsula, near where Pam Bennett's arm was pierced.
(
Supplied: Pam Bennett
)
Despite her injury, Ms Bennett said her love of stingrays was undiminished.
"Normally they're just shy, placid, beautiful creatures,"
she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
17 hours ago
- Perth Now
'Tightrope' for men in childcare amid calls for ban
The role of men in the early childhood sector is being questioned after horrific allegations of child sexual abuse at multiple childcare centres across Melbourne. But a ban on male early childhood educators is not the right solution, experts say, as it would not address systemic issues facing the sector. Hundreds of Melbourne families have been told to have their children tested for infectious diseases after childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown was charged with more than 70 sex offences against children. While caution about men working closely with children was justified, banning men from the sector would have an adverse effect, University of South Australia early childhood education senior lecturer Martyn Mills-Bayne said. "Children need to have a diverse group of adults around them in childcare and in life," he told AAP. "Young boys and girls need to see good men around them who are demonstrating how to be in the world ... if you take men out of that, kids won't have access to those good relationships demonstrated by male educators." About eight per cent of early childhood educators are male, but that figure includes those who don't work with children directly. The best estimate is that male educators make up between two and four per cent of the workforce. Early childhood education advocate Lisa Bryant said the role of gender in the sector should be discussed as it was known that the perpetrators of child sexual abuse were most often men. "Yet it isn't something that's openly talked about ... because we know that we need educators who are male in the sector," she said. Dr Mills-Bayne said the majority of male educators were already hyper-vigilant about how they do their jobs. "It's often a tightrope that male workers are walking to protect the children and themselves," he said. "It's something that most men who choose to study and work in early childhood education are inherently aware of that they are viewed in a certain way and that they stand out as an odd thing to see in a childcare centre." South Australian pre-school educator Ryan, who asked for his full name to be withheld for privacy reasons, said there was still a traditional view that female educators were more compassionate and nurturing. "I come to work and I try to operate in a capacity that I can support the children in the same way as a female educator," he said. "I'm always conscious of my interactions with children, still offering that warmth and support but just being aware." Ryan said he would be deeply saddened if there was a ban placed on male childcare workers as for many children these educators were the only male role model in their life. Dr Mills-Bayne agreed the issues within the childcare sector were systemic and Australia needed to re-examine early learning. More vigorous police checks, CCTV in centres and a national register for early childhood eductors were all ways to stop people slipping through the cracks, he said. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Herald Sun
2 days ago
- Herald Sun
Richmond settles with Ty Zantuck over ‘horribly wrong' back treatment claim
Don't miss out on the headlines from Police & Courts. Followed categories will be added to My News. Zantuck, who played 68 games for the Tigers between 2000 and 2004, sued the club and two of its doctors, alleging they breached their duty of care. On Wednesday, his South Australian lawyer, Greg Griffin, said the years' long legal battle had been a 'difficult process' but a confidential settlement had been reached. 'All parties are happy to see it finished,' he said. Richmond declined to comment when approached by the Herald Sun. In 2022, a Supreme Court judge granted an extension on the statute of limitation on Zantuck's claim. Justice Mary-Jane Ierodiaconou found the alleged conduct of the football club was 'egregious' and had effectively left Zantuck's 'life crippled'. In court documents, Zantuck claimed his back injury stemmed from a training camp in the Grampians in 2001 where he was required to carry a 30kg backpack despite earlier being diagnosed with stress fractures to his lower back. The former defender claimed to have received between 15 to 20 epidurals, as well as dozens of local anaesthetic injections, in a bid to keep him playing. The court previously heard Zantuck had met with a law firm almost a decade earlier about his back injuries. They told him there was 'nothing the solicitors could do to assist him because no one had ever successfully sued the AFL and its clubs'. 'I'm still traumatised by the whole thing,' Zantuck told an earlier hearing. He alleged the doctors at the football club got his treatment 'horribly wrong' and the injections had 'ruined the muscles in my body'. 'I still love the Richmond Football Club, my two sons barrack for them,' Zantuck said. 'I just think they got the treatment horribly wrong.' Zantuck lodged a separate concussion claim, alleging he was allowed to continue to train and play AFL despite suffering repeated on-field head knocks which had not properly healed. The Herald Sun understands that case is still before the courts.
The Advertiser
7 days ago
- The Advertiser
How do you want your medical professionals to be using AI
The healthcare industry is no stranger to innovation. "Once in a generation" discoveries like penicillin, anaesthesia, and mRNA vaccines have had huge impacts on health outcomes. The smallpox vaccine alone is estimated to have saved over 200 million lives. Today, we are on the precipice of a medical revolution that could increase the frequency of these "once in a generation" scientific breakthroughs - the introduction of artificial intelligence. For an industry bogged down in administrative tasks, AI can serve as a trusty assistant to ensure highly skilled, talented medical professionals have more time to spend on patient care. Already medical research, diagnoses, operational procedures, clinical results, and patient care are beginning to leverage data and AI. For healthcare professionals, the automation of administrative tasks is already helping hospitals and primary care with workflow efficiency. In medical research, the ability to analyse massive data sets in previously unimaginable timeframes is supporting clinical studies. Recently, Stanford University (Nature, 2023) researchers used deep learning algorithms to analyse retinal scans, achieving a staggering 95 per cent accuracy in detecting diabetic retinopathy, a leading cause of blindness. The analysis of large datasets could also lead to early detection of health conditions, particularly in childhood neurological conditions which benefit from early intervention. Detection often relies on subtle cues that may go under the radar. In these cases, AI can help to pick up these early indicators. On a wider scale, AI also has the potential to completely change public health intelligence. In our own backyard, the South Australian government recently announced a $28 million program to implement AI applications across the public sector. Healthcare is a priority for the program, with evidence showing it can reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and allow health workers to spend more time on clinical care. This is being replicated across the world, with hospitals, state governments and global groups such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) all expanding the use of AI to help capture, analyse, and forecast health trends. While Australia's AI ambitions are high, uncertainty remains over what shape federal legislation will take. There are calls from some quarters to adopt stricter, more prescriptive laws similar to the EU. Others argue in favour of leaning in and embracing the new AI frontier. Despite this, the federal government clearly sees AI's potential in healthcare with almost $30 million being invested for research into new ways AI could transform the sector. As organisations - including hospitals and healthcare providers - wait for policy clarity, they should put the foundations in place to hit the ground running once those questions are answered. For AI to reach its revolutionary potential, organisations need to have a robust data strategy in place. In healthcare, the benefits from the use of AI and machine learning are higher than in many other industries, but that means the stakes are higher, too. One of the biggest concerns in adopting AI is its potential for incorrect, inaccurate or potentially harmful predictions. We know the technology thrives on finding patterns in large volumes of data, but this is only possible when the data it consumes is clean, accurate and well-structured. That requires reliable and scalable infrastructure that makes data easy to use, simple to connect, and - above all - trusted. Yet in many healthcare environments, information is siloed across departments, facilities, and even countries. For AI to be implemented effectively, collapsing data silos into one location must be a priority. AI's predictive nature is restricted to the data it has access to. Biases, errors, or missing information in this data can lead to the AI model providing false information. READ MORE: The Centrelink recipients fighting for survival who you mightn't have heard of This is why public-facing AI models often make mistakes or hallucinate - the information they draw from is too vast and disorganised. In healthcare, such hallucinations could be life-threatening. AI tools in the healthcare industry must therefore be anchored by trusted, rigorously validated data sets to maximise accuracy and ensure the outputs are factual and dependable. Healthcare organisations, whether public or private health providers, health insurance, or medical research facilities, must all have a centralised view of the organisation's data to ensure any use of AI is gathering context and information from a complete and trusted data source. Some of Australia's largest healthcare firms, such as Telstra Health, are already expanding technology partnerships to ensure its digital ecosystem can support modernisation, without losing focus on customer care. Regardless of which route Australia's AI policy takes, AI is not going anywhere. In healthcare, more than any other industry, the benefits could be truly profound, particularly when it comes to medical research. By setting the data foundations in place, organisations can build on their AI success to date and extract the full potential the technology has to offer once policy questions are answered. Once all the pieces are in place, the next "once in a generation" discovery could be just a few clicks away. The healthcare industry is no stranger to innovation. "Once in a generation" discoveries like penicillin, anaesthesia, and mRNA vaccines have had huge impacts on health outcomes. The smallpox vaccine alone is estimated to have saved over 200 million lives. Today, we are on the precipice of a medical revolution that could increase the frequency of these "once in a generation" scientific breakthroughs - the introduction of artificial intelligence. For an industry bogged down in administrative tasks, AI can serve as a trusty assistant to ensure highly skilled, talented medical professionals have more time to spend on patient care. Already medical research, diagnoses, operational procedures, clinical results, and patient care are beginning to leverage data and AI. For healthcare professionals, the automation of administrative tasks is already helping hospitals and primary care with workflow efficiency. In medical research, the ability to analyse massive data sets in previously unimaginable timeframes is supporting clinical studies. Recently, Stanford University (Nature, 2023) researchers used deep learning algorithms to analyse retinal scans, achieving a staggering 95 per cent accuracy in detecting diabetic retinopathy, a leading cause of blindness. The analysis of large datasets could also lead to early detection of health conditions, particularly in childhood neurological conditions which benefit from early intervention. Detection often relies on subtle cues that may go under the radar. In these cases, AI can help to pick up these early indicators. On a wider scale, AI also has the potential to completely change public health intelligence. In our own backyard, the South Australian government recently announced a $28 million program to implement AI applications across the public sector. Healthcare is a priority for the program, with evidence showing it can reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and allow health workers to spend more time on clinical care. This is being replicated across the world, with hospitals, state governments and global groups such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) all expanding the use of AI to help capture, analyse, and forecast health trends. While Australia's AI ambitions are high, uncertainty remains over what shape federal legislation will take. There are calls from some quarters to adopt stricter, more prescriptive laws similar to the EU. Others argue in favour of leaning in and embracing the new AI frontier. Despite this, the federal government clearly sees AI's potential in healthcare with almost $30 million being invested for research into new ways AI could transform the sector. As organisations - including hospitals and healthcare providers - wait for policy clarity, they should put the foundations in place to hit the ground running once those questions are answered. For AI to reach its revolutionary potential, organisations need to have a robust data strategy in place. In healthcare, the benefits from the use of AI and machine learning are higher than in many other industries, but that means the stakes are higher, too. One of the biggest concerns in adopting AI is its potential for incorrect, inaccurate or potentially harmful predictions. We know the technology thrives on finding patterns in large volumes of data, but this is only possible when the data it consumes is clean, accurate and well-structured. That requires reliable and scalable infrastructure that makes data easy to use, simple to connect, and - above all - trusted. Yet in many healthcare environments, information is siloed across departments, facilities, and even countries. For AI to be implemented effectively, collapsing data silos into one location must be a priority. AI's predictive nature is restricted to the data it has access to. Biases, errors, or missing information in this data can lead to the AI model providing false information. READ MORE: The Centrelink recipients fighting for survival who you mightn't have heard of This is why public-facing AI models often make mistakes or hallucinate - the information they draw from is too vast and disorganised. In healthcare, such hallucinations could be life-threatening. AI tools in the healthcare industry must therefore be anchored by trusted, rigorously validated data sets to maximise accuracy and ensure the outputs are factual and dependable. Healthcare organisations, whether public or private health providers, health insurance, or medical research facilities, must all have a centralised view of the organisation's data to ensure any use of AI is gathering context and information from a complete and trusted data source. Some of Australia's largest healthcare firms, such as Telstra Health, are already expanding technology partnerships to ensure its digital ecosystem can support modernisation, without losing focus on customer care. Regardless of which route Australia's AI policy takes, AI is not going anywhere. In healthcare, more than any other industry, the benefits could be truly profound, particularly when it comes to medical research. By setting the data foundations in place, organisations can build on their AI success to date and extract the full potential the technology has to offer once policy questions are answered. Once all the pieces are in place, the next "once in a generation" discovery could be just a few clicks away. The healthcare industry is no stranger to innovation. "Once in a generation" discoveries like penicillin, anaesthesia, and mRNA vaccines have had huge impacts on health outcomes. The smallpox vaccine alone is estimated to have saved over 200 million lives. Today, we are on the precipice of a medical revolution that could increase the frequency of these "once in a generation" scientific breakthroughs - the introduction of artificial intelligence. For an industry bogged down in administrative tasks, AI can serve as a trusty assistant to ensure highly skilled, talented medical professionals have more time to spend on patient care. Already medical research, diagnoses, operational procedures, clinical results, and patient care are beginning to leverage data and AI. For healthcare professionals, the automation of administrative tasks is already helping hospitals and primary care with workflow efficiency. In medical research, the ability to analyse massive data sets in previously unimaginable timeframes is supporting clinical studies. Recently, Stanford University (Nature, 2023) researchers used deep learning algorithms to analyse retinal scans, achieving a staggering 95 per cent accuracy in detecting diabetic retinopathy, a leading cause of blindness. The analysis of large datasets could also lead to early detection of health conditions, particularly in childhood neurological conditions which benefit from early intervention. Detection often relies on subtle cues that may go under the radar. In these cases, AI can help to pick up these early indicators. On a wider scale, AI also has the potential to completely change public health intelligence. In our own backyard, the South Australian government recently announced a $28 million program to implement AI applications across the public sector. Healthcare is a priority for the program, with evidence showing it can reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and allow health workers to spend more time on clinical care. This is being replicated across the world, with hospitals, state governments and global groups such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) all expanding the use of AI to help capture, analyse, and forecast health trends. While Australia's AI ambitions are high, uncertainty remains over what shape federal legislation will take. There are calls from some quarters to adopt stricter, more prescriptive laws similar to the EU. Others argue in favour of leaning in and embracing the new AI frontier. Despite this, the federal government clearly sees AI's potential in healthcare with almost $30 million being invested for research into new ways AI could transform the sector. As organisations - including hospitals and healthcare providers - wait for policy clarity, they should put the foundations in place to hit the ground running once those questions are answered. For AI to reach its revolutionary potential, organisations need to have a robust data strategy in place. In healthcare, the benefits from the use of AI and machine learning are higher than in many other industries, but that means the stakes are higher, too. One of the biggest concerns in adopting AI is its potential for incorrect, inaccurate or potentially harmful predictions. We know the technology thrives on finding patterns in large volumes of data, but this is only possible when the data it consumes is clean, accurate and well-structured. That requires reliable and scalable infrastructure that makes data easy to use, simple to connect, and - above all - trusted. Yet in many healthcare environments, information is siloed across departments, facilities, and even countries. For AI to be implemented effectively, collapsing data silos into one location must be a priority. AI's predictive nature is restricted to the data it has access to. Biases, errors, or missing information in this data can lead to the AI model providing false information. READ MORE: The Centrelink recipients fighting for survival who you mightn't have heard of This is why public-facing AI models often make mistakes or hallucinate - the information they draw from is too vast and disorganised. In healthcare, such hallucinations could be life-threatening. AI tools in the healthcare industry must therefore be anchored by trusted, rigorously validated data sets to maximise accuracy and ensure the outputs are factual and dependable. Healthcare organisations, whether public or private health providers, health insurance, or medical research facilities, must all have a centralised view of the organisation's data to ensure any use of AI is gathering context and information from a complete and trusted data source. Some of Australia's largest healthcare firms, such as Telstra Health, are already expanding technology partnerships to ensure its digital ecosystem can support modernisation, without losing focus on customer care. Regardless of which route Australia's AI policy takes, AI is not going anywhere. In healthcare, more than any other industry, the benefits could be truly profound, particularly when it comes to medical research. By setting the data foundations in place, organisations can build on their AI success to date and extract the full potential the technology has to offer once policy questions are answered. Once all the pieces are in place, the next "once in a generation" discovery could be just a few clicks away. The healthcare industry is no stranger to innovation. "Once in a generation" discoveries like penicillin, anaesthesia, and mRNA vaccines have had huge impacts on health outcomes. The smallpox vaccine alone is estimated to have saved over 200 million lives. Today, we are on the precipice of a medical revolution that could increase the frequency of these "once in a generation" scientific breakthroughs - the introduction of artificial intelligence. For an industry bogged down in administrative tasks, AI can serve as a trusty assistant to ensure highly skilled, talented medical professionals have more time to spend on patient care. Already medical research, diagnoses, operational procedures, clinical results, and patient care are beginning to leverage data and AI. For healthcare professionals, the automation of administrative tasks is already helping hospitals and primary care with workflow efficiency. In medical research, the ability to analyse massive data sets in previously unimaginable timeframes is supporting clinical studies. Recently, Stanford University (Nature, 2023) researchers used deep learning algorithms to analyse retinal scans, achieving a staggering 95 per cent accuracy in detecting diabetic retinopathy, a leading cause of blindness. The analysis of large datasets could also lead to early detection of health conditions, particularly in childhood neurological conditions which benefit from early intervention. Detection often relies on subtle cues that may go under the radar. In these cases, AI can help to pick up these early indicators. On a wider scale, AI also has the potential to completely change public health intelligence. In our own backyard, the South Australian government recently announced a $28 million program to implement AI applications across the public sector. Healthcare is a priority for the program, with evidence showing it can reduce costs, improve operational efficiency, and allow health workers to spend more time on clinical care. This is being replicated across the world, with hospitals, state governments and global groups such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) all expanding the use of AI to help capture, analyse, and forecast health trends. While Australia's AI ambitions are high, uncertainty remains over what shape federal legislation will take. There are calls from some quarters to adopt stricter, more prescriptive laws similar to the EU. Others argue in favour of leaning in and embracing the new AI frontier. Despite this, the federal government clearly sees AI's potential in healthcare with almost $30 million being invested for research into new ways AI could transform the sector. As organisations - including hospitals and healthcare providers - wait for policy clarity, they should put the foundations in place to hit the ground running once those questions are answered. For AI to reach its revolutionary potential, organisations need to have a robust data strategy in place. In healthcare, the benefits from the use of AI and machine learning are higher than in many other industries, but that means the stakes are higher, too. One of the biggest concerns in adopting AI is its potential for incorrect, inaccurate or potentially harmful predictions. We know the technology thrives on finding patterns in large volumes of data, but this is only possible when the data it consumes is clean, accurate and well-structured. That requires reliable and scalable infrastructure that makes data easy to use, simple to connect, and - above all - trusted. Yet in many healthcare environments, information is siloed across departments, facilities, and even countries. For AI to be implemented effectively, collapsing data silos into one location must be a priority. AI's predictive nature is restricted to the data it has access to. Biases, errors, or missing information in this data can lead to the AI model providing false information. READ MORE: The Centrelink recipients fighting for survival who you mightn't have heard of This is why public-facing AI models often make mistakes or hallucinate - the information they draw from is too vast and disorganised. In healthcare, such hallucinations could be life-threatening. AI tools in the healthcare industry must therefore be anchored by trusted, rigorously validated data sets to maximise accuracy and ensure the outputs are factual and dependable. Healthcare organisations, whether public or private health providers, health insurance, or medical research facilities, must all have a centralised view of the organisation's data to ensure any use of AI is gathering context and information from a complete and trusted data source. Some of Australia's largest healthcare firms, such as Telstra Health, are already expanding technology partnerships to ensure its digital ecosystem can support modernisation, without losing focus on customer care. Regardless of which route Australia's AI policy takes, AI is not going anywhere. In healthcare, more than any other industry, the benefits could be truly profound, particularly when it comes to medical research. By setting the data foundations in place, organisations can build on their AI success to date and extract the full potential the technology has to offer once policy questions are answered. Once all the pieces are in place, the next "once in a generation" discovery could be just a few clicks away.
