Iran, Israel and US agree that Islamic Republic nuclear sites were 'badly damaged' despite leaked intel report
"Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure," Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baghaei told Al Jazeera.
Israel's Defense Forces Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir said its assessment is that Iran's nuclear program has been "significantly damaged," while Israel's Atomic Energy Commission described the U.S. strikes as "devastating."
"The devastating U.S. strike on Fordo destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable," Israel's Atomic Energy Commission said. "We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, has set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years."
It added: "The achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get access to nuclear material."
And as for the United States, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Dan "Razin" Caine said that initial battle damage assessments indicate that "all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction."
"More than 125 U.S. aircraft participated in this mission, including B-2 stealth bombers, multiple flights of fourth and fifth generation fighters, dozens and dozens of air refueling tankers, a guided missile submarine, and a full array of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance aircraft, as well as hundreds of maintenance and operational professionals," Caine said in a press briefing.
And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that "given the 30,000 pounds of explosions and the capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordow."
"Any assessment that tells you otherwise is speculating with other motives," Hegseth said.
The agreement on the assessment of damage between the United States, Israel and Iran comes amid a report that cited leaked low-confidence intelligence from one intelligence agency that suggested the U.S. strikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear sites.
A Defense Intelligence Agency source told Fox News that the "low confidence" assessment was based on just "one day's worth of intelligence reporting."
More intelligence has been gathered in the days since through other sources and methods, according to the source.
"This is a preliminary, low-confidence report and will continue to be refined as additional intelligence becomes available," the Defense Intelligence Agency said. "We are working with the appropriate authorities to investigate the unauthorized disclosure of classified information."
And Secretary of State Marco Rubio blasted the report and said that Iran's nuclear program "today looks nothing like it did just a week ago."
"That story is a false story, and it's one that really shouldn't be re-reported because it doesn't accurately reflect what's happening," Rubio said. "Everything underneath that mountain is in bad shape."
Rubio also added that "there is no way Iran comes to the table if somehow nothing had happened."
"This was complete and total obliteration. They are in bad shape," Rubio said. "They are way behind today compared to where they were just seven days ago because of what President Trump did."
Even the International Atomic Energy Agency's Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi assessed that "very significant damage is expected to have occurred."
"At the Esfahan nuclear site, additional buildings were hit, with the US confirming their use of cruise missiles," he said, according to prepared remarks for the International Atomic Energy Agency.
"Affected buildings include some related to the uranium conversion process," he said. "Also at this site, entrances to tunnels used for the storage of enriched material appear to have been hit. At the Natanz enrichment site, the Fuel Enrichment Plant was hit, with the U.S. confirming that it used ground-penetrating munitions."
Meanwhile, Trump has been in the Netherlands at the NATO Summit, where he was met with praise from allies on his "decisive" action in Iran.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte praised Trump as a "man of strength" and a "man of peace" during Wednesday's summit.
"I just want to recognize your decisive action on Iran," Rutte said at the start of his joint remarks with the president. "You are a man of strength, but you are also a man of peace. And the fact that you are now also successful in getting this ceasefire done between Israel and Iran — I really want to commend you for that. I think this is important for the whole world."
The president on Wednesday declared that the United States would strike Iran again if the country attempts to rebuild its nuclear program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gold, silver become legal tender in Texas under new law
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Texas has joined a growing movement of states establishing gold and silver currency systems, after Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1056 into law on June 29, creating what supporters call the most comprehensive precious metals transaction framework in the nation. The legislation allows Texans to use precious metals stored in the state-run Texas Bullion Depository for every day purchases through debit cards and mobile applications, positioning Texas alongside Arkansas, Florida, and Missouri as states advancing precious metals currency legislation this year. 'I signed a law authorizing Texans to use gold & silver as legal tender in day-to-day financial transactions,' Abbott announced via X. 'It fulfills the promise of Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution.' The law, which takes effect in phases beginning September 2026, enables the Texas Comptroller to establish electronic systems that convert gold and silver holdings into U.S dollars at the point of sale. The full transactional currency system will be operational by May 1, 2027. During legislative hearings in March, supporters framed the measure as protection against inflation and a return to constitutional money principles. 'Money is three things, according to the Federal Reserve, it's a unit of account, it's a means of exchange, and it's a store of value,' testified Kevin Freeman, an economist and author. 'U.S. dollars are very good at one and two. They're good units of account and means of exchange, but a store of value, the dollar's lost, based on inflation statistics, 95% of its value in my lifetime.' Freeman cited strong public support, noting that Texas Proposition 7 received backing from '1.6 million voters. 76 and a half percent voted in favor of this, this type of transaction.' Jason Cozens, founder of Glint, a company already operating gold-backed payment cards, demonstrated the technology's feasibility during committee testimony. 'When I paid for instance, on Delta Airlines, I paid for my flight, I paid seven grams of gold. They had no idea that I was paying with gold,' Cozens told lawmakers. 'The governor's club in Tallahassee, dinner for a few of us, cost 1.9 grams of gold. They just accept MasterCard. They have no idea that I'm paying with gold.' Cozens emphasized that merchants face no additional costs or system changes, as the technology operates through existing MasterCard networks. However, there are concerns the law could face constitutional challenges. During a hearing for the bill, Victoria North, representing the Texas Comptroller's office, warned that implementing HB 1056 could expose state employees to criminal liability due to conflicts with federal currency laws. 'The United States, has the sole power to coin money. Under the Constitution, and if anyone, individual or state assumes to supplant the medium of exchange adopted by our government, or assumes to compete with the United States government, in this regard, a violation of these statutes would follow,' North testified, citing federal court precedent. North acknowledged she does not specialize in constitutional law and called HB 1056 'the only one' among bills she's reviewed that raises constitutional concerns. The bill's author, Rep. Mark Dorazio, R-San Antonio, argued the system doesn't 'coin money' but rather facilitates use of existing legal tender as permitted by the Constitution. 'In short, this bill makes gold and silver functional money,' Dorazio said during committee hearings, demonstrating his own Glint card. 'We view this as a continuation of Chairman Capriglione's 1984, regular session House Bill 483, which created the Texas bullion depository.' Arkansas, Florida and Missouri have also enacted similar bills this year, building on a movement that began with Utah's legal tender law in 2011 and Oklahoma's legislation in 2014. The Texas measure distinguishes itself through its electronic payment infrastructure, allowing practical everyday use rather than merely symbolic recognition of gold and silver as alternative money. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Katie Miller—who left Trump's White House with Elon Musk—surfaces at xAI
On Wednesday evening, Elon Musk's xAI sent a rare email to reporters—alerting them that it had received a much-anticipated permit to use gas-powered turbines at its Memphis data center despite blowback from the surrounding community about pollution. The notice was unusual. For one, it's rare for xAI—the company that includes X, formerly Twitter, or any of Musk's other wide array of ventures—to ever engage with the media. Musk famously disbanded the media relations teams across all of his companies years ago, and they now only communicate with the public via social media posts and retain full control of the narrative. xAI has repeatedly ignored reporters' questions, including from Fortune, about its operations in Memphis or its use of generators that critics say spew toxic pollution. But there was something else unusual about the email: It was from Katie Miller, wife of Stephen Miller, President Donald Trump's deputy chief of staff. Katie Miller, a seasoned political operative and communications manager, was among Musk's highest-profile allegiants while he was a White House adviser and at the Department of Government Efficiency. Trump's Press Secretary, Karoline Leavitt, has credited Katie Miller as 'a critical reason DOGE was able to get off the ground.' But as the alliance between Trump and Musk frayed, Katie Miller exited the White House at the end of May, reportedly to work full-time for Musk at his various ventures, according to CNN. Stephen and Katie Miller have not spoken publicly about her departure from the White House, nor her work with Musk. Katie Miller's departure from the White House set off a wave of palace intrigue over the fact that Stephen Miller remained with Trump while Katie now worked for his estranged cost-cutter in-chief. The relationship between Trump and Musk has only gotten worse since Katie Miller left, with Musk recently threatening to fund a rival political party to the Republicans while Trump has raised the possibility of retaliating against Musk's companies and taking a 'look' at deporting him. xAI has, evidently, become one of Katie Miller's areas of focus. The email she sent on Wednesday came from her xAI email address, and Miller's account on X has featured news and updates about xAI, including its new permit, in addition to posts about Tesla and statements criticizing media outlets. In Katie Miller's email to reporters, she provided information about evaluations of pollution that regulators had conducted at xAI's supercomputer site in Memphis. She also included a rare statement from xAI about the new permit that had been issued by the Shelby County Health Department. 'xAI welcomes today's decision by the Shelby County Health Department,' she wrote. 'Our onsite power generation will be equipped with state-of-the-art emissions control technology, making this facility the lowest emitting of its kind in the country. We look forward to being a valued partner to the Memphis Community for years to come.' Katie Miller also sent at least one other email to reporters at the end of June, pointing out that the City of Memphis had conducted an independent third-party study at sites near the xAI data center and had found no dangerous pollutant levels. Miller didn't immediately respond to Fortune's questions about the nature of her work with xAI and whether she was working with any of Musk's other companies, which include Tesla and SpaceX. This story was originally featured on
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Monetary Innovation And The Blockchain Can Solve Our Debt Crisis
You actually had to have this stuff in reserve to be a "national bank" in the United States. A ... More one-hundred dollar Civil War government bond is dated August 19, 1861. What is our debt crisis again? The federal government has $38 trillion in its own debt securities outstanding. Is that it, is that the crisis? Yes and no. It is not necessarily a crisis that the federal government has to pay back this very large amount of money. Given that the government generally does not do great things with its money, tying its spending priorities to debt service is probably a positive. Now if Congress tries to raise taxes in a panic to try to address paying the debt off, indeed this would be a disaster. Good: the debt makes the government spend its money on debt service; bad: the debt might prompt the feds to raise taxes. So we really haven't gotten anywhere about identifying what this debt crisis is. Here's another problem with it: the huge debt means that federal treasury bonds are the world's benchmark security. Everyone in finance, or at least in academic finance, always talks about how treasuries represent the 'riskless security' in the market. All the interest rates and premia in the markets, across the variety of private securities, base themselves on the alternative of absolutely, positively getting your money back when you own treasuries. Treasuries have an invaluable function in the markets. They provide a foundation for all other security values. Treasuries provide a reference point, an essential one, for the pricing of assets, in that when you buy another asset, you know you need a premium, because treasuries are riskless. Now we've got a problem. Are we to believe that across these centuries now of the industrial and technological revolutions, after all the incredible modern progress of the economy since 1750, the private sector has not created of its own accord a means of pricing financial securities such that it needs government bonds as a point of reference? Talk about market failure. The private sector would be at sea unless treasuries existed to rationalize the pricing of financial assets? Obviously such a conclusion is ridiculous. Of course the private sector can price assets correctly of its own accord, and if riskless securities are necessary for this purpose, the private sector can produce them. But the private sector is not producing them—because the government is camping on the market. Here is the problem with the huge debt: its mammoth-ness has prevented the flowering of the private securities market. The industrial revolution proved that the private sector can produce an unimaginable range of products. If people want stuff, producers will find a way. This is one of the advantages of shrinking government—we get to behold what the private sector is capable of, once the big tax-and-spend blunderbuss goes on a weight-loss expedition. In our book Free Money, we discuss the history of government-bond issuers' jealousy of the private market's ability to produce the range of financial securities. This is the primary reason that there have been banking panics in American history. Governments federal, state, and local in the United States dating back two hundred years have always tried to require banks to hold a healthy portion of their own bonds. A bank could get a license, or not face taxation, or otherwise be permitted to operate, if the major element in its reserves were bonds the government knew it would be tricky to market without a captured customer. Over time, therefore, banks as a rule had all sorts of government bonds on their books. Everybody in the banking system all but had to accept these things, these otherwise utterly undesired governments, and they became similar to cash. Since every banking institution needed them, they traded at par and approached, especially in the federal case, the status of 'riskless.' Wasn't that special? The private sector was innovating like mad, and developing a perfectly self-regulating banking subsector to minister to explosive economic growth, and the government stepped in to require that its presence be felt in every example of, every institution within, that banking system. Had the government chilled out in the old days, the market would have developed a base reserve security asset. We never got there, because the government had to have bonds out there (for what reason, goodness knows). The huge federal debt elbowed out the creation of a fully diverse securities market, in particular one that included riskless securities: this, at last, is the problem with our huge debt. In Free Money, we propose that once you have a monetary innovation machine the likes of Bitcoin, the notion that the federal government must be necessary to issue a base financial asset for the markets becomes preposterous. The diversification of financial securities under blockchain protocols is precisely the specialty of these protocols. As Bitcoin and crypto generally progress and progress, we should expect that approximations of riskless securities emerge from the process. As this eventuality takes hold, demand for federal debt instruments should go down. The private sector will reclaim its prerogative to create the entire range of necessary financial assets, including the kind of financial asset for which government bonds presume they are the only alternative. When this development is at hand, the financial markets will have increased their efficiency, with notable real effects in the economy and with respect to the prosperity of the nation and the globe. Unless—you knew this was coming—the government tries to halt the process by requirements, accounting standards mandates, and all the rest, making a market for government bonds that private blockchain securities could fulfill no problem at all. This of course will represent an efficiency loss and a hit to the general prosperity. We have been living with this efficiency loss, sad to say, as the debt got so big. There is no need—thank you, blockchain—for us to live with it any more. And if therefore the government defaults because demand for treasuries wanes in favor of approximately riskless blockchain securities? So what, the world will have approximately riskless securities via the blockchain, and any damage from the default would consequently be minor. Come on, future, arrive! In Free Money we give primacy of place to the remarkable speech Alan Greenspan of the Federal Reserve gave in 2001, as the federal debt outstanding was plummeting, in which the man said that it would be poignant if federal debt securities bit the dust, as private securities innovation picked up the slack. You bet they would. Surely one of the main reasons we have such a large debt is that government, in its narrow self-interest, wants to impede the full development of private financial securities. Do try to be of better character, government, and shrink yourself, starting with your silly 'benchmark' debt instruments.
