Firearms recovered during excavation in park
The administration of Union Council Surjani Town was carrying out renovation of Sunrise Park in Sector L-1. During the excavation to construct a jogging track, workers found suspicious bundles buried in the ground. They informed the administration who called the police, who opened the bundles and found various types of non-functional firearms, including rifles and bullets.
DIG West Irfan Baloch stated that the recovered weapons included five SMGs, one LMG, and hundreds of bullets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aussie rangers caught unlawfully using 'cruel' devices on native animals
Australian authorities have admitted to unlawfully using a controversial device to capture dingoes so they could be killed, despite the possession and practice being 'in breach' of their own animal welfare rules. The ACT Government confirmed the mistake with Yahoo News, revealing it permitted soft-jaw traps to be used for years, even after it passed an amendment in 2019 that prohibited them. When stepped on, the trap's jaws snap tightly around the animal's foot, keeping it in a fixed position until a routine check is made, sometimes causing it pain for hours. Unlike steel-jawed traps, they have padding to lessen damage to the animal's limb, and they are commonly used for dingo control in other states. The practice of trapping dingoes on public land was never hidden. But it's understood that until recently, the territory authorities didn't realise the method was now banned. Most animal welfare groups oppose the traps, with Humane World for Animals (formerly Humane Society International) claims they are 'inherently cruel, cause intense stress, injury, and prolonged suffering'. While Deakin University ecologist Professor Euan Ritchie said governments have 'far better ways' to manage dingoes humanely. Alix Livingstone from wildlife protection organisation Defend the Wild described them as "outdated". Why are dingoes trapped? Dingoes are regarded as a separate species from domestic dogs, and they have notable behavioural differences, including howling like wolves. DNA testing across Australia suggests there is very little hybridisation between dogs and dingoes. Despite being culturally important to Indigenous people and playing an important ecological role as an apex predator, state and territory governments around Australia routinely trap, shoot and poison dingoes on public land that borders farmland, due to concerns they kill sheep. Two notable places they are protected are K'gari in Queensland and a small, critically endangered population in Victoria's northwest. How was the illegal trapping discovered? In July, a confidential source alerted Yahoo about conflicting descriptions of soft-jaw traps in ACT government documents. Their possession and use were explicitly prohibited as prescribed items alongside shock collars and cockfighting spurs under the Animal Weflare Act and the associated Animal Welfare Regulation. Yet another government document, the ACT Pest Animal Management Strategy, described them as an 'effective technique' to control wild dogs, which is a common term used to describe dingoes. On July 23 this year, Yahoo posed six questions to Parks and Conservation Services (PCS), which manages dingo control, about its use of soft-jaw traps. It did not respond directly and instead emailed a short statement from the government. 'The ACT Government is currently reviewing the legislation and the appropriateness of the regulatory settings regarding the management of overabundant wildlife in the ACT,' it said. For over a week, further requests for comment did not receive a response. Government amends laws and resumes dingo trapping Concerns about the use of soft-jaw traps were raised at an uncomfortable time for the ACT government. It is in the process of updating the Nature Conservation Act to change the status of dingoes from a pest species to a controlled native animal, giving it a similar status to eastern grey kangaroos. And this has upset some farmers who fear it could make it harder to control dingoes, and the matter was raised during budget estimates on Friday. After PCS was told it was illegally using traps, it suspended their use for weeks. But it quietly began working on amending legislation. On July 31, a new regulatory change was published by the government, creating an exemption for the use of soft-jaw traps by permit holders and conservation officers. Then on August 1, as the law came into effect, it resumed dialogue with Yahoo, responding to new questions by issuing a lengthy statement. 'The use of soft-jaw traps by [PCS], primarily for controlling pest animals or overabundant native wildlife under the Biosecurity Act 2023, was recently found to be in breach of the Animal Welfare Act 1992 and its associated Regulation,' it said in part. 'Although PCS had used these traps for many years as part of their pest management activities, an amendment in 2019 added soft-jaw traps to the list of prohibited items under the Animal Welfare Regulation 2001, rendering their continued use unlawful.' It then explained its decision to resume their use, claiming they are "essential for effective dingo control". "To resolve the issue, the ACT Government has amended the Animal Welfare Regulation to include exemptions to the possession and use of soft-jaw traps," it said. Government urged to consider 'humane' control methods The government said soft-jaw traps are used in accordance with national animal welfare standards, including the National Code of Practice for the humane control of dingoes and that daily inspections and prompt euthanasia ensure "humane treatment". But the decision to amend legislation rather than adhere to established animal welfare protections has frustrated a number of leading experts and ecologists. Humane World for Animals Dr Renae Charalambous described the change as 'deeply troubling'. 'Rather than bringing their wildlife management practices into line with the law and community expectations, the government has amended the legislation to suit its own operational needs,' she said. "The use of these traps to manage native species like dingoes is particularly disturbing. Dingoes are a native apex predator, not a 'pest', and lethal control methods like trapping and killing fail to provide long-term solutions to conflicts with livestock." In many cases, traps can kill or harm non-target native wildlife, including birds, wombats, and goannas. Due to the risks they pose to animal welfare, Professor Euan Ritchie warned trapping can also harm and, in some cases, said 'strong considerations' needed to be made about where and when they were used. 'Leg-hold traps can cause a range of impacts on dingoes, ranging from relatively minor and short-lived pain and discomfort, through to more severe pain and distress, swelling, dehydration, bruising, lacerations, dislocations, and fractures,' he told Yahoo. Continuing, he said there are 'better ways' to manage dingoes that are more humane than trapping, shooting and poisoning, and that more investment was needed in alternative methods. 'Strategic fencing, but not large barrier fencing, has a role. So too does the appropriate use of guardian dogs and donkeys, which have been demonstrated to be effective in Australia, and around the world,' he said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
10-year-old boy ditched at airport by parents who realized his passport was expired upon arrival at airport
An unnamed mother and father allegedly abandoned a 10-year-old boy at an airport in Spain and boarded without him after realizing his passport was expired In a scene one airport staffer described as "utterly surreal,' a couple allegedly abandoned their 10‑year‑old son at a Spanish airport after discovering his travel documents were invalid. With the boy's Spanish passport expired and no visa in hand, the parents reportedly opted to board their flight anyway—arranging for a relative to meet and collect him at the terminal while they departed. An airport staffer claims to have witnessed the incident According to Lilian—a staff coordinator who shared the incident in a TikTok video now viewed by hundreds of thousands—the child told authorities his parents were already on board and en route to their home country for vacation. When airport and police personnel located the boy alone, they immediately informed the plane's pilot, who then asked passengers if anyone had left a child behind. No one came forward. Eventually, officers identified the parents, who were traveling with another younger child. They were taken to the airport's police station—along with the boy—after authorities removed their six suitcases from the flight. Lilian questioned how someone could calmly board a plane and leave a 10‑year‑old unattended, even with assurances a relative would arrive within an hour or more. The fate of the parents is still unknown It's not yet known whether the parents have been formally charged or faced any legal consequences. Their nationality hasn't been disclosed, and the claims remain unverified beyond the coordinator's TikTok account. Not the 1st case of children left behind or unattended at airports Back in 2018, a couple in Germany forgot their five-year-old daughter at Berlin's Stuttgart Airport, claiming they'd each thought the other parent had taken charge of her. More recently, an unattended two-year-old was swept away on a luggage conveyor belt and dropped down a chute at New Jersey's Newark Liberty International Airport in late May. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lionel Messi's bodyguard banned from Leagues Cup after entering field in postgame confrontation
Lionel Messi's bodyguard Yassine Cheuko apparently took his job a little too seriously at the Leagues Cup. After a postgame confrontation in which Cheuko ran onto the field to push some Atlas players away from the Inter Miami star, the League Cup disciplinary committee announced it was banning him from all technical areas for the rest of the tournament, which runs through Aug. 31, and fining Inter Miami an undisclosed amount of money. The full statement: After the July 30 Inter Miami CF vs. Club Atlas match, a member of Inter Miami's club delegation displayed improper conduct by entering restricted areas without an official event credential. In accordance with the Leagues Cup 2025 Tournament Regulations, the Disciplinary Committee has suspended the individual involved from all technical areas for the remainder of Leagues Cup 2025 and issued an undisclosed fine to Inter Miami CF. ESPN identified the member of Inter Miami's delegation as Cheuko. The incident occurred on Wednesday after Inter Miami's 2-1 win over Atlas. Several players congregated at midfield, with Cheuko entering the fray to physically break up the confrontation. He is the bald man with a short beard and black Miami T-shirt in the video below. Atlas players were not happy about Cheuko's intervention, with defender Matheus Doria calling for the rules to be applied in this case via ESPN: "We already know that our board works very well and will take care of the issue. I understand that Messi's bodyguard is there to protect Messi from a possible entry by a fan, I don't know, but between players, he doesn't have that permission," said Doria. "It's not up to us to say much or give our opinion on the matter, but the board and those in charge of the Leagues Cup have already seen it and will take charge of what can and can't be done because as long as it protects not only Messi but the other players, and the physical integrity of the players who are there, that's fine. But if it's for other issues, no one will agree, but it's not up to me to do anything." Cheuko has been a fixture at Messi's side since his days at Paris Saint-Germain. Contrary to past reports, he is not a former Navy SEAL or professional MMA fighter, but he has entered the field in the past to protect the eight-time Ballon d'Or winner. In April, Inter Miami banned Cheuko from being on the sidelines during MLS matches, though he remains an employee of the team.
