Atlanta BeltLine unveils driverless vehicle program. Not everyone is happy about it
The proposed $3 million pilot plan would bring autonomous vehicles to the southwest trail.
'This project will provide service between the Atlanta Beltline Southwest Trail at the Lee + White Entertainment District and MARTA's West End Station and the Atlanta University Center,' Clyde Higgs, President & CEO of Atlanta BeltLine, said.
The vehicles would not go on the trail, but they would operate between MARTA and the BeltLine.
RELATED STORIES:
Atlanta mayor announces changing 'vision' of streetcar, Beltline access at MARTA board meeting
Light rail transit system could be moving people along the Atlanta BeltLine by 2028
MARTA board approves plan to extend Atlanta Streetcar to Beltline
Beltline Rail Now sent out a lengthy statement on Monday night, saying they applauded the city's 'commitment to innovation' but wondered why their plan to put light rail along the BeltLine was pulled by the city.
'In study after study, engineers have landed on light rail running alongside the trail as the best transit mode for the Beltline,' Beltline Rail Now Chairman Matthew Rao said. 'So naturally, we're mystified to see ABI roll out... cars. Actually, passenger vans. That sit in traffic. With no driver. But also no fixed schedule, no dedicated right of way, and no capacity to move more than a few people at a time. Just in time for the biggest sporting event on Earth, the FIFA World Cup. Did I mention they can't carry bikes or baby strollers? Groundbreaking.'
'Beltline Rail Now urges city leaders to prioritize long-term transit infrastructure that meets the scale of Atlanta's needs—not one-off pilot projects with the footprint of a large SUV,' a news release from Beltline Rail Now said.
If approved, it would feature four driverless vehicles from Beep and would start service in January.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
📈 Chelsea reborn, wild spending finally makes sense thanks to Maresca🙏
Chelsea won the World Cup, earned an additional €105 million, but most importantly, they were reborn this season thanks to Maresca and perhaps their market as well. Chelsea's market strategy can be briefly described as follows: "Buy young talents with low salaries, distribute payments over long contracts, evaluate players and sell those who have not performed to make a profit thanks to their age." A phrase perfectly synthesized by BBC journalist Nizaar Kinsella. Advertisement A modus operandi that in the long run may make sense, but initially required enormous, excessive investments. And only in the last season did it begin to bear fruit thanks to the best choice made by Chelsea in recent years: Enzo Maresca. ❗Market: unbalanced, expensive and improving From summer 2022 to today, Chelsea has spent over €2 billion on the market, and the direction since January 2023 has been clear: focus on young players, test them, or loan them out to maintain their value. In fact, about 90% of the purchases in recent years are Under 23: 33 players bought, 21 of whom have already left or could do so by this summer. Advertisement And in this sea of purchases, a part has lost a lot of its value: we're talking about players like Mudryk (€100M), Sterling (€57M), Joao Felix (€52M), Disasi (€45M), Datro Fofana (€12M), and others. To which we add Nkunku and - for now - Romeo Lavia, but due to injuries that have penalized them. Some have become pillars: Caicedo, E. Fernandez and Cole Palmer, for example. While others have clearly increased their value despite the general perception that they are part of Chelsea's "crazy" expenses. 📈 But many increase in value We're talking about players like Nicolas Jackson (paid €37 million and doubled in value), Madueke (paid €35M and now close to Arsenal for over €50M), Angelo (paid €15 and sold for €25), Petrovic (paid €16 and almost sold for €29), Renato Veiga (paid €14 and now valued at over €25M) to which we add other names. Advertisement And the strategy doesn't seem to have changed: the purchases of Joao Pedro (€63M), Delap (€30M), and Bynoe-Gittens (€64M) go in the same direction: young, paid a lot, and on whom to build the future. Or, at most, resell them in a short time without going too negative. 🤑 Youth sector? A source of income Beyond the money from the property and revenue, these expenses were also sustained by the sales of products from the youth academy: valued as unsuitable or seen as necessary sales to carry forward this market strategy. From 2023 to 2025, Chelsea earned around €230 million from the sale of players from the Academy: Mason Mount, Maatsen, Conor Gallagher, and Lewis-Hall are perfect examples. 👍Maresca put everything together Within such an aggressive and risky strategy, the choice of coach is crucial, who must have the great ability to make young players grow, give them a tactical direction, and not be afraid to bench players without looking at the purchase price. Advertisement Maresca has managed to do all this. He brought Chelsea back to the top positions in the standings and found qualification in the Champions League, in addition to winning the Conference League (not a very complex result) and winning the Club World Cup. Under his management, he carefully chose who to sacrifice (Gallagher, Sterling, and now Madueke, for example) and who to sell: Chelsea's transfer management is under his supervision, and some "random" purchases from the past are unlikely to be repeated. And if the impact of Joao Pedro in the Club World Cup is an indication, the Blues can rest easy. The team is also happy with his method, expressed perfectly by this phrase: "He's a top coach, and that's why we're in the final, thanks to him, and I'm also talking about next season's Champions League qualification. He created a good team, a good energy among us, we're very happy", words by Malo Gusto. Certainly not a phenomenon, but worth more than when he was purchased: a fully achieved goal. This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇮🇹 here. 📸 PAUL ELLIS - AFP or licensors
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
High-speed train linking NYC to Los Angeles proposed ahead of FIFA World Cup
A high-speed rail line hopes to connect Los Angeles to New York City in time for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. A proposal — dubbed 'The Transcontinental Chief' and pitched to Amtrak as well as President Trump and his secretary of transportation, Sean Duffy — would shoot riders between the country's two biggest cities in just 72 hours. Delaware-based Ameristar Rail said it would use existing infrastructure owned by Amtrak and other regional rail lines passing through major cities like Kansas City, Chicago and Philadelphia rather than launch a massive and costly new public project. Advertisement It would be funded by private investors — not taxpayers — and would carry vehicles as well as passengers, modeled after Europe's truck transport trains, Ameristar said. A proposed high-speed rail line could soon connect Los Angeles to New York City in under 72 hours. 'The Transcontinental Chief will be a great opportunity for Amtrak to team up with the private sector to confront the challenges of its money-losing long-distance trains and create opportunities to usher in a profitable Golden Age of rail travel for passengers and truckers, with the ingenuity of free enterprise, as we celebrate our great nation's 250th birthday next year,' Scott Spencer, AmeriStarRail's chief operating officer, wrote in a letter to Amtrak, according to Newsweek. Advertisement AmeriStarRail hopes to have it running by May 10, 2026 — in time for the FIFA World Cup, which is being hosted across North America, with the finals at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. The plan has been pitched to President Trump and Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy, the paper reported. The Trump administration has been notified of the proposal, which would utilize already-existing rail infrastructure. muratart – Ameristar leaders said taxpayers will not foot the project, which would be funded by private investors. Advertisement 'Subject to operating agreements with the host railroads (BNSF, Norfolk Southern and New Jersey Transit) the Transcontinental Chief can start operations on National Train Day, Sunday, May 10, 2026 to begin serving tourists for America 250 celebrations and the 2026 FIFA World Cup,' a spokesperson said. 'The Transcontinental Chief can be privately operated and funded, without new congressional legislation or additional federal spending.' Amtrak has not yet responded to the proposal, according to Newsweek.
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Club World Cup marked by empty seats, searing heat, weather-delayed matches and Chelsea victory
An expanded Club World Cup marked by empty seats, slashed ticket prices, searing heat, weather-delayed matches and a criticized field surface ended in a surprise victory by Chelsea, the fourth-best team in the Premier League. Among the lasting lessons was FIFA's decision to dramatically drop ticket costs as some kickoff times approached, which could impact decisions by fans thinking of attending next year's World Cup. FIFA lowered the cost to attend the Chelsea-Fluminense semifinal at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, to $13.40 from $473.90, then dropped the Chelsea-Paris Saint-Germain final from $330 to $199.60. There will be 104 matches at next year's expanded 48-nation World Cup and many are likely to be on weekday afternoons. FIFA has not said whether it will use dynamic pricing and refused to comment on discounting. The 63 matches drew 2.49 million, about 62% of the listed capacity. FIFA refused to disclose tournament capacities of venues, focusing on tickets sold rather than about 1.5 million unfilled seats, and would not address price cuts. FIFA president Gianni Infantino assessed the expanded tournament he championed, saying: "it is already most successful club competition in the world.' Former Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp was less enthusiastic, telling the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag it was 'the worst idea ever implemented in football" because of demands on players as a result of the extended season. PSG played its 65th competitive match and Chelsea its 64th since starting in mid-August. Each team will have 33-35 days off before 2025-26 openers. 'I told my players that I had the feeling that this competition will become just as important or even more important than the Champions League,' Chelsea manager Enzo Maresco said. Maresca called the heat dangerous. Borussia Dortmund coach Niko Kovač said the grass at MetLife Stadium, site of next year's World Cup final, was so short "it's more a golf green, so you can putt here.' Tiny U.S. television audience The streaming service DAZN bought world rights and sublicensed 24 of the 63 matches to TNT Sports, which averaged 418,000 viewers for the first 23 matches with English-language commentary on TNT, TBS and truTV. Seventeen matches sublicensed to TelevisaUnivision with Spanish commentary averaged 551,000. By comparison, NBC's networks averaged 510,000 viewers per match window for the Premier League in 2024-25, regular-season Major League Baseball is averaging 1,841,000 this year on Fox and 1.74 million on the cable network ESPN. The NFL averaged 17.5 million during the 2024 regular season. DAZN has not yet released figures but says it will during the week. Hot seat Temperature was over 90 degrees (32 Celsius) for many matches, with humidity that made it feel more than 100 (38). 'Honestly, the heat is incredible,' Chelsea midfielder Enzo Fernandez said. 'Playing in this temperature is very dangerous.' Six games were delayed by weather for a total of 8 hours, 29 minutes, raising questions over the suitability of the U.S. for next year's World Cup during a time of global warming. Only four of the 11 U.S. World Cup venues have roofs, and including one that isn't temperature controlled. 'Players have played in these conditions before, but I think it doesn't make it easy and it doesn't make it as enjoyable, for sure,' said former Wales captain Gareth Bale, who attended the semifinals and final. 'It's one of those things and there's no real way around it.' At the 1994 World Cup in the U.S., just seven of 52 games had night local time starts in order to broadcast matches during evenings for Europe television. Missing champions While FIFA hyped the tournament as a competition of the best teams in the world, it didn't include the current champions of England (Liverpool), Spain (Barcelona), Italy (Napoli), Portugal (Sporting Lisbon) and Austria (Sturm Graz) among the dozen European clubs in the 32-nation field. Lionel Messi's Inter Miami got an invite even though it has never won the MLS title. Player welfare For the top players, the Club World Cup meant they likely faced three consecutive years of summer tournaments, following the European Championship and Copa America last year and leading to the World Cup for national teams in 2026. Manchester City manager Pep Guardiola said impact of the new tournament might not be known until midway through next season. 'I may say: 'So listen, we are a disaster. We are exhausted. The World Cup destroyed us,'' he admitted. Bayern Munich and Germany star Jamal Musiala likely faces months out of action after sustaining a fractured fibula and broken and dislocated ankle in his team's quarterfinal defeat to PSG. A global game FIFA wanted the Club World Cup to help grow the sport globally and shine a light on teams outside of Europe's most popular leagues. Brazilian teams excelled, with all four entrants advancing to the knockout stage. Botafogo produced one of the upsets of the tournament by beating PSG in the group phase, while Fluminense reached the semifinals. Saudi Arabia's Al Hilal advanced to the quarterfinals and eliminated Manchester City. Lionel Messi led Inter Miami to the round of 16, including Major League Soccer's first competitive win against European opposition, defeating Porto in the group phase. Other U.S. teams Seattle Sounders and LA FC were less impressive — with both teams exiting at the group stage, winless. New Zealand's Auckland City lost 10-0 to Bayern, while a game between South Africa's Mamelodi Sundowns and South Korea's Ulsan drew just 3,412 fans. A question of quality
