Jay Feely, former NFL kicker and current broadcaster wants Stephen A. Smith to run for President
Former
NFL
kicker and current Arizona congressional candidate
Jay Feely
has found himself not only defending his conservative values but also advocating for an unconventional voice from across the aisle—ESPN's
Stephen A. Smith
. During a candid appearance on NewsNation's The Hill, Feely made headlines by expressing enthusiasm for Smith's potential run for the
2028 presidential election
as a Democrat, calling him an 'excellent communicator' with the ability to make a 'gut value connection' with Americans.
Stephen A. Smith gets unexpected presidential endorsement from ex-NFL kicker Jay Feely
Jay Feely, who recently launched a congressional campaign to replace Rep. Andy Biggs in Arizona's 5th District, believes that American politics is in dire need of individuals who aren't molded by the traditional political establishment. His support for Stephen A. Smith, though they likely hold opposing views, was rooted in his belief in the power of communication and authenticity.
'I respect his talent that he has in communicating, because he is an excellent communicator, and he has a way of making that gut value connection with people,' Feely said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Scarlett Johansson, 40, Shows Off Her Real Size In A New Vacation Photos
33 Bridges
Undo
'I would revel in sitting on the opposite side of Stephen A. Smith on a debate stage and us going at it when it comes to political issues and matters that the American people really care about, rather than just sports issues,' he added. His comment wasn't just about admiration—it was a nod to the deeper need for honest, passionate dialogue in today's political climate.
While Feely is a staunch supporter of former President
Donald Trump
, he insists that political affiliation is secondary to character and conviction. 'It's really about being able to have a vision, communicate that vision and for American people to believe in you,' he stated. 'I think what the American people want the most, they want transparency, and they want people to be honest about what they believe.'
A former NFL journeyman who played for teams like the Atlanta Falcons and Arizona Cardinals, Feely transitioned into a media role as a sports analyst after retiring from football. However, it was a near-tragic moment—the attempted assassination of Trump at a campaign rally—that served as the turning point for Feely. It made him rethink his place in American democracy and compelled him to take action.
'What he's trying to do, to get rid of [diversity, equity and inclusion], to change … gender laws and protect our girls, should be applauded by everyone,' Feely said of Trump. 'And you know, I'll be one of those guys that fights for his agenda, believes in his agenda and is an advocate for him.'
Feely's campaign emphasizes service over self-interest, echoing his approach during his NFL days. 'That's what I did when I was playing football, trying to use that platform. That's what I'll do when I'm in politics in Congress, is try to represent my constituents and represent this country and try to make us better.'
With roots deeply planted in Arizona and a passion for pushing the country forward, Feely is not only shaking up the race with his candidacy but also with his unexpected support for voices like Smith's. Whether across the field or across the aisle, Feely believes that the future of politics lies in sincerity, substance, and the courage to break the mold.
Also Read:
Stephen A. Smith shuts down hopes of Shedeur Sanders starting for Browns in Week 1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
UN Lays Out Survival Plan as Trump Threatens to Slash Funding
Secretary General Antonio Guterres is slashing more than $700 million in spending and laying plans to overhaul the United Nations as its largest sponsor, the US, pulls back support. Guterres's plan calls for 20% cuts in expenditures and employment, which would bring its budget, now $3.7 billion, to the lowest since 2018. About 3,000 jobs would be cut. Officially, the reform program is pegged to the UN's 80th anniversary, not the new US administration. But the scale of the reductions reflects the threat to US support, which traditionally accounts for 22% of the organization's budget. President Donald Trump has suspended that funding and pulled out of several UN bodies already, with a broader review expected to lead to further cuts. 'We're not going to be part of organizations that pursue policies that hamper the United States,' Deputy State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott told reporters Thursday. The planned cuts at the UN come as the Trump administration has eliminated tens of billions of dollars in foreign aid as part of its drive to focus on what it sees as US interests. Conflicts from the Mideast to Ukraine and Africa have added to the need for global assistance. After years of financial struggles, the UN under Guterres already was planning to make sweeping structural changes. He warned in January it was facing 'a full-blown liquidity crisis.' Overall, spending across the UN system is expected to fall to the lowest level in about a decade - down as much as $20 billion from its high in 2023. 'UN 80 is in large part a reaction from the Secretary General to the kind of challenges posed by the second Trump administration,' said Eugene Chen, senior fellow at New York University's Center on International Cooperation. Guterres is expected to release details of his overhaul plans in a budget in September. The plan calls for restructuring many of its programs. Guterres controls the UN's regular budget, which is only a fraction of the total expenditures of its affiliates. Facing funding shortages of their own, agencies like UNICEF and UNESCO are also planning major cutbacks. The Trump administration already has stopped funds from going into the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, withdrawn from the UN Human Rights Council and left UNESCO. Guterres' plan has also drawn criticism, both from Trump allies and inside the UN. 'There are some things that the UN does that arguably should be increased in terms of resources,' said Brett Schaefer, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute. 'And then there are some things that the UN shouldn't be decreasing but eliminating altogether.' He cited the UN's nuclear watchdog and the World Food Program as contributing significantly to US interests and singled out the Food and Agriculture Organization and Human Rights Council as having mandates at odds with American policy. Meanwhile, UN staff in Geneva announced last week they passed a motion of no confidence in Guterres and the plan. 'Staff felt its slash and burn approach lacked focus, had no strategic purpose, and was making the UN more top-heavy and bloated,' Ian Richards, president of the UN Staff Union in Geneva, posted on LinkedIn about the UN 80 report. That vote has largely symbolic importance, according to NYU's Chen. Still, Guterres' efforts to get ahead of the inevitable cuts that reductions in US support will bring could help the UN adapt, he added. 'Maybe that's a silver lining,' Chen said. 'We'll all be primed for reform.' With assistance from Eric Martin. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No review of pacts, duty on US goods': MEA on speculation over India's response to Trump's tariff; 'disinformation being spread'
MEA FactCheck NEW DELHI: The ministry of external affairs on Sunday debunked claims doing the rounds on social media that "India is considering suspending or reviewing certain bilateral agreements with the United States if hostile economic policies continue". Posting a snapshot from two X handles -- Middle Eastern Affairs and China in English, the foreign ministry said: "Disinformation being spread on X". — MEAFactCheck (@MEAFactCheck) This comes at a time when India-US trade relations hit a bump after US President Donald Trump declared a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, even as both nations continue to negotiate a trade deal. Trump also warned of additional penalties on India for buying Russian arms and oil and expressed displeasure over BRICS, of which India is a member, and called India a "dead economy". Meanwhile, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday made a strong appeal for reviving the spirit of Swadeshi, urging Indians to prioritise locally-made products and stand united in the face of growing global economic uncertainty. Speaking at a public meeting in his Varanasi Lok Sabha constituency, PM Modi warned that the world economy is entering a phase of instability and unpredictability. Calling for a nationwide movement to support indigenous industry, the Prime Minister said the time had come for every Indian, across political lines, to rise above partisanship and back the local economy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trapani: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo "This is not just about Modi saying it, every Indian should say this, if we want India to become the third-largest economy, every political party and every leader, keeping aside their hesitations, must work in the nation's interest and awaken the spirit of Swadeshi among the people," he said.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
'No foreign students should be in the country right now,' says Steve Bannon: What it means for your H-1B visa and future in the US
As the United States re-enters a tumultuous debate on immigration and workforce priorities, a controversial remark from one of President Donald Trump's closest former advisers has reignited alarm among international students and skilled foreign workers alike. Steve Bannon, a former White House chief strategist and staunch advocate of Trump-era nationalism, made an incendiary call for what he described as a 'complete purge' of foreign students from the country. Speaking on a podcast, Bannon stated, 'I don't think you should have any foreign students in the country right now,' warning that the continued presence of international students is elbowing out opportunities for American youth. His remarks signal more than rhetoric—they potentially foreshadow the revival of a hardline immigration agenda under a possible second Trump administration. A call for an exit visa, not a green card Bannon's suggestion wasn't merely to restrict future inflow, but to ensure that international students currently studying in the US leave immediately after graduation. 'Instead of stapling a green card to their diploma,' he said, 'you staple an exit visa. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It? Memory Health Learn More Undo Boom, you are out of here.' Such a stance, if echoed in policy, would upend the current post-study visa pipeline. At present, the F-1 student visa often serves as a bridge to Optional Practical Training (OPT), and later, H-1B sponsorship, a route that many foreign graduates from US universities depend on to begin their careers. Bannon's comments challenge this pathway head-on, positioning international students as an economic threat rather than an asset. What does it mean for H-1B visa holders? While Bannon's comments targeted students, the implications extend deep into the realm of skilled immigration, particularly the H-1B visa program. The United States approved nearly 400,000 H-1B visas in 2024, according to recent figures, with the majority being extensions for current visa holders working at tech giants such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. Despite widespread layoffs across the tech sector, approximately 80,000 jobs cut this year, according to foreign workers continue to dominate the tech workforce. This dynamic has stoked resentment among some American workers and fueled narratives like Bannon's, which argue that the system favors outsiders at the expense of domestic job seekers. Compounding this, Vice President JD Vance recently warned tech firms that it is 'unacceptable' to lay off Americans while hiring foreigners, signaling bipartisan political scrutiny of the H-1B process. The politics of global talent and national allegiance Bannon's framing of global talent acquisition as a form of 'imperialism' invokes deeper ideological currents. 'Absorbing all the talent from across the world is not going to make the world better,' he said. 'That's how the British ran their empire.' The remark reflects a broader nativist sentiment: That the US, rather than acting as a global hub for merit and innovation, should focus inward, preserving opportunity for its own citizens. This worldview has gained ground in recent years, particularly as the political Right paints immigration not just as a demographic issue, but as an economic and cultural one. Labour market signals raise the stakes The release of the July jobs report according to US media reports, which showed a steep decline in employment growth, with just 73,000 jobs added and 258,000 cut from previous months' data, adds fuel to Bannon's argument. A sluggish labour market could create the perfect storm for populist calls to restrict foreign labor, even as economists argue that immigrants often fill critical skill gaps. While many tech firms defend their hiring practices as a necessity in a globalized, AI-driven economy, the optics of high foreign hiring amid domestic layoffs present a narrative that could be weaponized politically in the months ahead. A warning shot or a policy preview? Bannon may not currently hold a government post, but his remarks often serve as ideological test balloons for upcoming Republican agendas. With Trump increasingly surrounding himself with loyalists ahead of the 2026 election cycle, Bannon's statements cannot be dismissed as fringe commentary. If this vision materializes into policy, foreign students could face rapid changes, from visa restrictions and shortened work authorization periods to tightened scrutiny of university enrolments. In short, the traditional American dream for international students may be in jeopardy. What international students and H-1B hopefuls should do now Given the intensifying rhetoric, foreign students and workers are advised to stay informed and proactive: Monitor policy shifts : Immigration policy may change swiftly under a future administration. Keep abreast of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and USCIS updates. Strengthen employment documentation : Ensure all OPT, CPT, and H-1B filings are airtight and well-documented. Explore alternative pathways : Consider options in Canada, Europe, or Australia if uncertainty persists in the US visa policy. Engage with advocacy groups : Organizations such as NAFSA, and local student coalitions can offer legal updates and resources. The future of meritocracy or a turn toward nationalism? At its heart, the debate over international students and H-1B visas is a debate about what kind of nation the US wants to be: A bastion of global meritocracy or a closed system prioritizing national loyalty over global integration. Steve Bannon's words may seem extreme, but they reflect a sentiment that is gaining traction, and one that could soon translate into real-world consequences for the hundreds of thousands who cross oceans in search of opportunity. As the political winds shift, one thing is clear: For international students and skilled immigrants in America, the stakes have never been higher. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
