Fairphone 6 lands a perfect 10 for repairability
Dutch company Fairphone continues to lead the charge on consumer- and planet-friendly electronics, proving that a great phone doesn't have to be impossible to repair or environmentally unsustainable. The Fairphone 6 has just been released, coming two years after the last generation of the phone built to last. The folks over at iFixit wasted no time in conducting a teardown of this new entry to see how it stacks up against previous generations. The Fairphone 6 scored a perfect 10 out of 10, like every generation of Fairphone bar the very first.
Fairphones are modular, and have been designed with easy repair in mind, but there is one change from the previous generations that makes things harder. Whereas the last few Fairphones have used hard batteries that could be flipped out with your fingernail, the new handset packs a soft-pouch cell that's thinner than its predecessors. That's slimmed the phone down, but it does mean the battery is now held in place with five screws.
It's the same with every other component on the handset, since none of the components are held in with glue. The lack of adhesives does account for the phone's IP 55 rating, which is lower than the rest of the industry. But given you can't exactly get Samsung to send you a video guide telling you how to open your phone with nothing more than a T5 Torx screwdriver, so there's give and take.
iFixit is quick to point out that the Fairphone 6 isn't a bleeding-edge smartphone, nor is it intended to be. It's designed from the ground up to be as sustainable and repair-friendly as possible, and this means some trade-offs compared with flagship devices. The Fairphone 6's use of USB 2.0, a less pixel-dense screen, and only 8GB of RAM are all necessary design choices when built with longer life cycles in mind. Nevertheless, this almost certainly won't affect the day-to-day use of the handset for most consumers, and owning a device you can truly repair yourself just might be worth it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
32 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Privacy is blockchain's missing link—and America's opportunity to lead
In my last job, I was fortunate to join Circle as one of the earliest employees. And as blockchain technologies evolved over recent years, edging closer to mainstream adoption, I noticed a deep contradiction has emerged. The transparency that defines public blockchains—the very feature designed to build trust—has become their Achilles' heel. Every transaction on-chain is etched into a public ledger for all to see. This means that user addresses, financial behavior, and asset holdings are exposed permanently and immutably. In traditional financial systems, such data is closely guarded. In crypto, it's open by default. This is not just a theoretical concern. The lack of privacy on public blockchains is exposing individuals to real-world risks: profiling, extortion, digital surveillance, and even physical threats. Anyone with a blockchain wallet is a potential target—whether they are a Ukrainian citizen receiving aid, a whistleblower relying on digital assets for safety, or a consumer simply transacting online. The stakes are escalating. According to Chainalysis, nearly $46 billion worth of crypto was transferred through illicit channels in 2023, with many transactions linked to sanctioned entities. Blockchain's radical transparency makes tracing those funds technically feasible, but it also means innocent users may be swept up in guilt-by-association logic, flagged by automated compliance systems, or monitored by adversarial nation-states exploiting open ledgers for intelligence purposes. Subscribe to the Daily newsletter. Fast Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters We are at an inflection point. On one hand, blockchain has evolved from an experimental idea into a foundational layer for decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, cross-border payments, and digital identity. On the other, the absence of privacy threatens to stall its momentum. Without privacy guarantees, Web3 won't scale into a secure, inclusive internet economy—it will remain a risky, self-surveilling shadow of its potential. It's not just user safety at stake. Institutional adoption, long seen as the tipping point for crypto's maturation, is lagging in part because privacy solutions are underdeveloped. Financial institutions and enterprises cannot embrace systems that force them to reveal business-sensitive transactions to competitors and regulators alike. Privacy is not the enemy of compliance; it's a prerequisite for serious engagement. The road ahead The good news? A path forward exists. Recent regulatory tailwinds—particularly in the United States—point to a growing willingness to integrate blockchain into the regulated financial system. Lawmakers are increasingly exploring frameworks for stablecoins, digital asset custody, and decentralized finance. And with the emergence of advanced cryptographic tools such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), we now have the technical foundation to reconcile transparency with confidentiality. Zero-knowledge cryptography allows users to prove the validity of information—such as identity or solvency—without revealing the underlying data. In practical terms, this means users can comply with regulations (e.g., AML, KYC) without exposing every transaction to the world. ZKPs are already being piloted by privacy-forward networks and could become the industry standard if policy and investment align. And alignment is possible. In 2024, the European Union began implementing its Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation, while Hong Kong and the UAE continue developing regulated environments for digital assets. Yet the U.S. retains a unique advantage: its history of open innovation, its global financial leadership, and its robust civil liberties tradition. If it embraces blockchain privacy not just as a feature but as infrastructure—akin to encryption on the internet—it can set a global standard. advertisement The stakes for leadership are high. In a world defined by rising geopolitical tension, blockchain privacy is becoming a matter of national security. Adversarial governments are already using blockchain analytics to trace and target users, conduct financial espionage, and undermine dissident movements. Without privacy, blockchains risk becoming tools of surveillance rather than instruments of freedom. At the same time, user demand for private, secure financial tools is surging. A recent survey by the Electric Coin Company found that 84% of crypto users consider privacy to be a critical feature of digital finance. And among developers, privacy-preserving technology is one of the fastest-growing areas of investment, according to Electric Capital's 2023 developer report. A host of solutions So what can be done? First, policymakers must move past the false binary of privacy versus compliance. These are not mutually exclusive goals. Clear guidelines that embrace advanced cryptography, establish safe harbors for privacy-preserving innovation, and differentiate between consumer protection and surveillance will enable the next generation of secure digital finance. Second, industry leaders need to elevate privacy to the level of consensus mechanisms, scalability, and user experience. Just as we wouldn't launch a blockchain without validating transactions or securing the network, we shouldn't deploy them without protecting users. Privacy must be a baseline, not a bonus. Finally, public-private collaboration is essential. The early internet thrived because of cooperation between universities, startups, civil society, and government. Blockchain deserves the same collaborative energy. By fostering research, funding privacy innovation, and supporting interoperability standards, the U.S. can lead the world in building a safer, more trustworthy digital economy. In the end, privacy is not a fringe concern. It is the cornerstone of user trust, the foundation of financial inclusion, and the safeguard of democratic values in the digital age. Blockchain has the potential to reshape the global financial system—but only if we build it securely. The time to act is now.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Apple takes fight against $587 million EU antitrust fine to court
By Foo Yun Chee BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Apple took a challenge against EU regulators to Europe's second highest court on Monday after they fined it 500 million euros ($587 million) earlier this year for breaching landmark rules aimed at curbing the power of Big Tech. The European Commission in a decision in April said the iPhone maker's technical and commercial restrictions that prevent app developers from steering users to cheaper deals outside the App Store breached the Digital Markets Act. ($1 = 0.8522 euros) Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
41 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Here's how far-right extremists hide in TikTok's earworms
Far-right extremists are exploiting TikTok 's 'use-this-sound' feature as a Trojan horse for hate speech, with most of the offending videos staying online for months, according to new research published in arXiv, Cornell University's preprint server. Marloes Geboers of the University of Amsterdam and Marcus Bösch at Heinrich-Heine University in Düsseldorf scraped thousands of clips from German, British, and Dutch TikTok feeds. They found that over three-quarters of videos using extremist audio were still accessible four months after they were first captured. Bösch says the project began when a familiar synth-pop loop transported him 'straight back to the 1990s.' 'Friends had a Nazi song on an actual tape,' he says. 'Thirty years later it was on TikTok, and kids were filming their walk to school to that soundtrack.' Tracking that song through TikTok led the researchers to dozens of trends in which seemingly harmless memes—such as users guessing what comes next in a song—masked what Bösch describes as 'brutal, racist, misogynist and death fantasy lyrics.' The researchers then set up new, clean TikTok accounts trained to follow right-wing content in the three countries and began scrolling for extremist posts. Their research uncovered extremist creators attaching hateful messages to everything from club classics by Gigi D'Agostino or Aqua to folk songs and even AI -generated tracks designed for niche audiences. 'There's Nazi techno, Nazi pop, Nazi folk—something for everyone,' Bösch explains. The goal was to lead users toward off-platform content intended to indoctrinate them into Nazi ideology. The team later checked the flagged videos two and four months after detection to see if they were still live. TikTok's moderation appears to struggle with audio-driven hate content. While the platform's data indicates that text-based slurs are often removed promptly, 86% of videos featuring a racist song the authors call 'Türke' remained online months later. Even overtly offensive material can evade detection: Bösch says he 'stumbled upon a Hitler speech' reused in over 1,000 videos, often accompanied by visuals from Nazi propaganda. 'You can't argue that's hard to see, hear or feel,' he says. 'It shouldn't be too hard to actually find these.' In a statement to Fast Company, a TikTok spokesperson says the company employs a combination of technology and human moderation to detect and remove content that promotes hate speech or hateful ideologies, and says 94% of such content is taken down before it's ever reported. 'We continuously strengthen our enforcement by updating our detection tools, consulting experts, and partnering with local organizations,' the spokesperson adds. Though Bösch acknowledges the challenges of moderating a platform at TikTok's scale, he believes more can be done. 'If a German court has banned a song, it shouldn't be too hard to try and ban this song,' he says.
