Aussies should have the right to ‘choose the sex' of their baby, IVF doctor says
According to IVF specialist Daniel Potter, it was infantilising for medical professionals to not disclose embryo-related information, and the government should not be involved in such a personal decision.
'I don't really see what the harm is, and people that are obviously highly motivated to be parents, you know, pursuing what they see as life, liberty and happiness ... their version of happiness, not the government's version,' he said.
Currently, sex selective IVF is banned in Australia on ethical grounds.
The procedure is only allowed on medical grounds such as genetic disorders associated with gender.
It is estimated that hundreds of Australians travel overseas each year to gain access to the procedure, which is becoming increasingly more socially acceptable in Australia.
'I respect everybody's opinion, and I think that just because you disagree with something, doesn't mean other people shouldn't be able to do it,' Potter, who appeared on Sunrise on Thursday, said.
'I think it's almost treating them like children .... (to say) we have this information, but we are not going to disclose it to you, because we are concerned you will use this information to make a choice that we might not agree with.
'What right do they have to tell you what to do with your life?'
The demand for the service has doubled, according to Sunrise.
'The conversation here in Australia, I think, it's ripe to happen,' Potter said.
'I don't know, ask yourselves why, if someone here in Australia does in vitro fertilisation, they know the gender of the embryos, but they won't disclose it to them, and this is information that may or may not be important to that person or that couple.
'But it seems to me that it should be their information to make decisions about their life and what they feel makes them happy.'
'Mix of opinions'
Influencer Caitlin Bailey has sparked debate after travelling to the United States to access sex selective IVF.
She spent $45,000 on the procedure, which allowed her to conceive a girl.
The Melbourne-based single mother, due to give birth in August, already has two naturally conceived boys and a girl, aged between one and five.
'I have three children already. I have a girl and two boys. And I just had this longing and this desire to have another baby girl,' Bailey told Sunrise on Thursday.
'So, I looked into it, and I found a company called Gender Selection Australia and I went through them, and they linked me in with Dr Potter, and it kind of all went from there.'
Bailey said she has received a mix of feedback.
'To be honest, I have had overwhelmingly had positive feedback, but of course no two people are the same.
'Everyone is unique. Always no matter what you do is there will be positives and negatives and people who do and don't agree.
'There have been people who voiced their concerns, or they might not agree, but I just usually say that's my choice and my life and what you do in your life, as long as you are not hurting anyone, then you do you.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
7 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Popular sunscreen brands Banana Boat and Hawaiian Tropic sued over ‘reef friendly' claims
Two of Australia's biggest sunscreen brands are under fire, accused of misleading the public with claims their products were 'reef friendly'. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has taken aim at Edgewell Personal Care Australia and its US-based parent company, Edgewell Personal Care Company (Edgewell PCC), accusing them of making false or misleading environmental claims over a four-year period. 'We allege that Edgewell engaged in greenwashing by making claims about the environmental benefits of Hawaiian Tropic and Banana Boat sunscreens that it had no reasonable or scientific basis to make,' ACCC Deputy Chair Catriona Lowe said. The ACCC alleges Edgewell marketed more than 90 sunscreen products as 'reef friendly' between August 2020 and December 2024 across packaging, websites, social media, and catalogues despite including chemicals known or suspected to harm reefs, coral, and marine life. Some of the products featured a logo containing the words 'reef friendly'' alongside an image of a coral, ACCC said. Edgewell's claim its sunscreens were environmentally safe was based on the absence of two chemicals named oxybenzone and octinoxate. Both are common chemical UV filters found in many sunscreens and other personal care products. They are used to absorb ultraviolet (UV) radiation and protect the skin from sun damage. Several countries, including the US state of Hawaii, have banned them due to concerns over their impact on health and the environment, particularly on coral reefs. Oxybenzone is proven to inhibit coral reproduction and can reduce testosterone levels in men. The chemical lingers in the body and has been found in amniotic fluid, urine, and blood, experts said. It has also been found in the breast milk of both human and dolphin mothers. While the absence of oxybenzone and octinoxate is positive due to their known harmful effects, the ACCC alleges the products still contained other chemicals such as octocrylene, homosalate, 4-methylbenzylidene camphor, also known as 4-MBC or enzacamene, and avobenzone which can also cause harm to reefs and marine life. The watchdog said, the company was aware of studies and literature warning of the potential environmental impacts of these chemicals, but failed to commission any of their own testing. 'Many consumers consider environmental factors when purchasing products,' Lowe said. 'By engaging in this alleged greenwashing, we say Edgewell deprived consumers of the ability to make an informed decision and may have prevented them from purchasing a different brand of sunscreen that did not contain chemicals which risked causing harm to reefs. 'We believe this conduct was widespread and risked potentially misleading a large number of consumers. 'The sunscreen products were supplied throughout Australia over a period of four years, including in large stores and online websites.' Marketing continued in Australia despite proven risks The ACCC further alleges Edgewell PCC removed the 'reef friendly' claims from its US sunscreen products as early as 2020 due to mounting scientific and regulatory pressure, yet allowed the same marketing to continue in Australia until December 2024. This could raise questions about whether Australian consumers were treated with the same level of transparency. The watchdog is now seeking penalties, declarations, injunctions, costs and other orders from the Federal Court. 'Businesses should not shy away from promoting the environmental credentials of their products, but they must be able to substantiate any claims, for example through reputable third-party certification or reliable scientific reports,' Lowe said. Edgewell PCC is one of the world's largest personal care companies and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Its Australian arm supplies Hawaiian Tropic and Banana Boat sunscreens across the country. The court action comes after ACCC guidance issued in 2023 warning businesses against vague or unproven environmental claims as part of a wider crackdown on greenwashing. It follows consumer group Choice testing 20 sunscreens with SPF 50 or 50+ labels and finding only four met the standards.
Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Urgent health warning as New South Wales man fights for life after contracting state's first case of rare virus from bat bite
Authorities have issued an urgent health warning as a northern NSW man fights for life in hospital after contracting the state's first confirmed case of Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV). ABLV is typically spread from bats to humans when the virus in the animal's saliva enters the body through a bite or scratch. The illness, which can be fatal if left untreated, is a considered to be closely related to the rabies virus. NSW Health confirmed the man, who is aged in his 50s, contracted lyssavirus after being bitten by a bat several months ago. Despite seeking treatment following the bite, the man is currently in a critical condition in hospital. Director in Health Protection at NSW Health Keira Glasgow described the situation as "very tragic", particularly given the man sought treatment following his injury. "Further investigation is underway to understand whether other exposures or factors played a role in his illness," Ms Glasgow said in a statement on Wednesday. "We know 118 people required medical assessment after being bitten or scratched by bats in 2024, but this is the first confirmed case of the virus in NSW, and the fourth case in Australia. "It is incredibly rare for the virus to transmit to humans, but once symptoms of lyssavirus start in people who are scratched or bitten by an infected bat, sadly there is no effective treatment." Ms Glasgow urged people to assume any bat in Australia can carry lyssavirus, adding urgent medical assessment is crucial if a person is bitten or scratched by the animal. "You will need to wash the wound thoroughly for 15 minutes right away with soap and water and apply an antiseptic with anti-virus action, such as betadine, and allow it to dry," she said. "You will then require treatment with rabies immunoglobulin and rabies vaccine." Australian bat lyssavirus can be carried by species of flying foxes, fruit bats and insect-eating microbats. NSW Health has reminded Australians the best form of protected from infection is to not touch bats. Members of the community should contact their local wildlife rescue group or trained experts at wildlife rescue organisation WIRES if they notice a bat in distress. "If you see a bat in distress, injured or trapped on the ground, do not try to rescue it," health authorities said. The community can contact WIRES via 1300 094 737 or find a licensed wildlife rehabilitation provider on the NSW government's website.
West Australian
13 hours ago
- West Australian
Cancer Council WA encourages Great Southern people to sign up for Dry July fundraiser for free support line
Cancer Council WA is encouraging people in the Great Southern to quit alcohol for a month and pick up a hot drink for this year's Dry July fundraiser. In a bid to raise crucial funds for the 13 11 20 Cancer Information and Support Line, a free Australian service, the Cancer Council WA encourages Great Southerners to sign up for Dry July 2025. Helping more than 37,000 Australians last year, the number provides a free confidential service by experienced cancer nurses providing emotional and practical support in coping with treatment and side effects as well as end of life. There's also advice on risk reduction and early detection. Cancer Council WA's Great Southern education officer Bruce Beamish said Dry July was a great way to raise funds for an important cause that supported nearly 5800 people Statewide in 2024. 'This service is not government-funded, it is funded through the generosity of donors and fundraisers,' he said. 'The service connects West Australians with relevant support, information and resources to help them through their cancer journey.' Mr Beamish said that participating in Dry July also yielded a range of health benefits. 'Going dry for July is a great opportunity to look at how you can reduce your overall alcohol use,' he said. 'Alcohol is a cause of cancer, research shows that every year more than 3500 cases of cancer can be attributed to alcohol use, such as mouth, pharynx, larynx, oesophagus, liver, bowel and breast cancer in women. 'There is no safe level of alcohol use, as any level increases the risk of developing an alcohol-caused cancer. The more you drink, and the more often you drink, the greater your risk. 'To reduce your cancer risk, reduce your drinking.' To sign up to Dry July visit and for more information about the Cancer Council's support services, visit or call 13 11 20.
