Starmer says fixing welfare is a 'moral imperative'
Sir Keir Starmer has said the UK's benefits system is broken and fixing it is a "moral imperative", a day after a backbench Labour revolt saw him forced into a U-turn on welfare cuts.
The prime minister told the Welsh Labour Party conference in Llandudno that the government would not take away the welfare "safety net that vulnerable people rely on".
But he said he could not let benefits "become a snare for those who can and want to work".
Despite the government's concession on its plans to reform welfare, some Labour MPs want further changes, while the Unite union has called for the proposal to be dropped altogether ahead of a vote on Tuesday.
PM's benefit cuts U-turn leaves backbenchers feeling bruised
We've got the right balance, says PM after benefits U-turn
Faisal Islam: How much will U-turn on disability benefits cost?
The BBC understands whips and cabinet ministers - including Wes Streeting, Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves - have been phoning or texting Labour MPs over the weekend, going through the names of the initial rebels in a bid to get an accurate assessment of potential voting.
Some MPs are saying they have yet to make their mind up on how to vote and are awaiting a statement on Monday from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall that will spell out government concessions.
Speaking at the conference in north Wales on Saturday, Sir Keir said fixing the "broken" benefits system needed to be done because it was "failing people every day", leaving "a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control".
"Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way," he added.
The government's initial plans, aimed at bringing down the welfare bill, would have made it harder for people to claim personal independence payment (Pip), a benefit paid to 3.7 million people with long-term physical or mental health conditions.
But following a rebellion among Labour MPs and the likelihood the government would be defeated in the Commons, the government announced the stricter criteria would only apply to new claimants.
It reversed its plans to freeze the health-related component of universal credit, and the payment will now rise in line with inflation for existing recipients.
Ministers will also carry out a review of the Pip assessment process, with input from disability organisations.
A £1bn support package to help people into work, originally scheduled for 2029, will be fast-tracked.
A new "reasoned amendment" to the bill will be put down on Monday by rebel MPs, which will reflect government concessions but is expected to be similar to the now-withdrawn earlier amendment that sought to block changes to the benefits system.
The BBC understands that around 50 Labour MPs currently back that new amendment.
That number is likely to increase but the expectation is it will not reach the 80-plus needed to put the government in danger of defeat. However it would still represent a significant rebellion.
Rebel MPs are also expected to hold a briefing on Monday night at Westminster with various disability charities.
Labour MP Diane Abbott earlier told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that she thought the result of a vote on the new plans would be tight, partly because backbenchers are still "upset about the lack of consultation" and because of "the notion of a two-tier benefit system".
But former Labour justice secretary Lord Falconer told the programme that "sensible" changes to the welfare reforms were "pretty significant", and that he believed opposition among Labour MPs was "shrinking and shrinking".
Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP who chairs the Work and Pensions Select Committee, told the BBC on Friday: "The concessions are a good start, they are very good concessions and they will protect existing claimants.
"However there are still concerns about new claimants. It would not be right for me not to do anything just to spare the prime minister an inconvenience."
Ahead of Sir Keir's conference speech, Unite called for the "entire welfare bill to be dropped and for the government to start again", with general secretary Sharon Graham accusing Labour of "attacking the most vulnerable in our society".
"The government's latest plans for disabled benefits cuts are divisive and sinister," she said.
"Creating a two-tier system where younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education, is morally wrong."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nuclear waste near nature reserve plan ongoing
Residents and politicians have hit out at plans to allow radioactive waste to be disposed of at a landfill site near a nature reserve and town. The site, on Huntsman Drive in Port Clarence, Stockton, run by Augean, already disposes of a range of hazardous waste but requires permission to deal with nuclear material. Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen said the plans were wrong in 2019 when they were first put to the Environment Agency (EA) and were "still wrong now". But Augean said risk assessments demonstrated the proposals "would not harm people in the local area or the environment". The EA previously asked for more information about the plan in September 2020 and it has now opened a public consultation, which will close on 4 August. Lord Houchen said: "We absolutely want new nuclear power and we are working hard to deliver this - but I will not allow Teesside to be seen as a dumping ground for the country's waste. "I will continue to stand firmly against any plan, and I urge everyone to make their voices heard loud and clear in this consultation." An Augean spokesperson said there had been an ongoing exchange of information with the EA since submitting the application in 2019, including a "wide range of risk assessments" which "demonstrate the proposals would not harm people in the local area or the environment in the short or long term". "The determination process involves complex and rigorous scrutiny of the application, requiring a significant amount of technical input from Augean and EA," the spokesperson added. They said Augean was committed to working with the local community to help them gain a better understanding and feel more confident about the safety of the proposed project. An open day will be held at the site on 15 July from 15:00 to 19:00 BST. Stockton North MP Chris McDonald said he had been contacted by a number of concerned residents about the renewed proposal. He said: "People across Stockton, Billingham and Norton have made it clear in the past that our area should not be used to dump waste that others do not want. "While the EA is reviewing a revised safety case, it is vital that local communities are fully heard." Councillor Sue Little from Seaton Carew said that she thought the idea was "very worrying" and feared local flooding could pose a contamination risk. The EA said it welcomed new comments on the revised plan. Gary Wallace, area environment manager, said: "It's important the community has the opportunity to review the revised environmental safety case, which has changed significantly since the original public consultation. "Our technical assessment is ongoing and once we have reviewed the documents and information from the consultation we will make a draft decision on the application." Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Consultation opens on radioactive waste proposal Vacuum found in nuclear vault never meant to open Environment Agency
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paperwork will not bog down new PCs, vows officer
New community police officers in Suffolk would not get "bogged down" with paperwork, an inspector vowed. The county's police force was allocated £1.8m to fund an extra 26 constables on the beat. Insp Tim Scott invited residents to lead their local policing agenda by raising concerns with officers. It came as Suffolk Police Federation chairman Darren Harris warned the new hires were a "sticking plaster" solution to retention issues faced by the force. The money was awarded as part of a government drive for more visible policing, with a pot of £200m being dished out nationally. In the Suffolk town of Newmarket, it would help to pay for two more community police officers, bringing its total up to five. Management at the Guineas Shopping Centre had called for more patrols due to "persistent shoplifting and aggression" faced by tenants. Natalie Robinson, from Love Newmarket BID, welcomed the pending arrival of new officers. "Seeing police officers on the ground, going into those businesses and talking about issues does make a real impact," she added. Some of the community-based officers will be new recruits, while others will be redeployed from elsewhere in the force. Insp Scott said they would be "specifically ring-fenced for highly visible policing" and therefore freed up from paperwork. "They're not bogged down, they've got the time to proactively get out into the community," he insisted. However, Mr Harris remained cautious about wider issues faced by the force. "Where are these officers going to come from, because we're short of numbers as it is?," he asked. "Retention of existing officers is something the federation is continually highlighting and officers leaving the profession is a serious concern." He welcomed the investment but warned: "I feel like they're just sticking a plaster on a gaping wound." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. 'Could an illegal e-bike kill someone? Absolutely' Investment fraud cost county £5m in 2024 - police Police U-turn on retaining community officers Suffolk Constabulary
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Welfare cuts are dangerous, campaigner says
A disability campaigner said personal independence payments (Pip) were "not a gift" and called proposed changes to them "dangerous and unacceptable". Crips Against Cuts Northants was formed in March after the government proposed changes to the welfare bill which would have made it harder for people to claim the payments. On Tuesday MPs will vote on the issue, after the prime minister was forced into a u-turn over concerns the cuts were rushed and would hurt vulnerable people. Charlie Lincoln said: "What they are really doing is condemning future disabled people... they will be receiving less support for no reason other than timing." Ms Lincoln from Northampton, has multiple health conditions including autism, ADHD and Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Without the payments, the 29-year-old said she would struggle with expenses including transport, carers fees and maintaining the house she rents. She has been made homeless twice and worries that without the payments, this could happen again. The reforms are designed to reduce the overall working-age welfare bill by about £5bn a year by the end of the decade. The benefit, which is paid to people with a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability, is set to be reduced by 50% in cash terms for new claimants from April 2026. Speaking at a conference in north Wales, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing a "broken" benefits system needed to be done because it was "failing people every day". He said: "Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way." Whereas Bowie, 17, who is autistic, ADHD and has undiagnosed poly cystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), they believe the cuts are "extremely dangerous and are going to hurt thousands of people". While Pip aims to create a level playing field, they think this will create a two-tier system. They said: "It's ridiculous for the average person to understand the system. "It's been extremely stressful not knowing if my government, a Labour government at that, are going to stop us from living like the rest of society, it's a very scary feeling... trying to remain optimistic that we can change it is a struggle to say the least." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X. Welfare concessions to be set out before key vote Starmer says fixing welfare is a 'moral imperative' How much will the government's planned welfare cuts save?