FM to face questions over winter fuel payment recovery from better-off pensioners
On Wednesday, the Scottish Government set out plans for a slightly more generous winter fuel payment, with some households receiving up to £5 more than other areas of the UK.
The benefit will be made available to all Scottish pensioners with an income below £35,000.
However, Scottish ministers said they are in discussion with the UK Government to recover payments from pensioners with income over £35,000 a year through the tax system – matching the UK government system.
Speaking to STV News on Wednesday, social justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville said ending the universal aspect of the benefit would ensure the payments were helping those with the greatest need.
The First Minister is likely to face scrutiny for the decision on Thursday.
Tory MSP Maurice Golden is also set to challenge the First Minister to respond to reports that up to 100 truckloads of Scotland's waste will be moved each day to England as a result of the landfill ban on biodegradable waste.
The Scottish Tories have been critical of the reports, calling on the SNP to 'get a grip of this situation' before the ban comes into force in December.
The First Minister will also be asked about the Government's most recent position on University funding.
Labour MSP Pam Duncan-Glancy is preparing to ask the First Minister about his Government's up-to-date position on funding Scotland's universities.
The question comes less than 24 hours after MSPs were told Scotland's colleges have been left in a 'fragile' state following years of underinvestment.
Angela Cox, chair of the Colleges Principals Group at Colleges Scotland, told Holyrood's Education Committee on Wednesday that the further education sector was 'hanging on by our fingernails'.
FMQs will be streamed live from Holyrood at noon on Thursday.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on the Afghan leak superinjunction: a dangerous precedent is set
One of many extraordinary features of the data breach that put tens of thousands of Afghan lives in jeopardy is the length of time between the original leak and the government taking action. The email containing a highly sensitive dataset was sent from a Ministry of Defence computer in February 2022. Ministers were not aware of the problem until August 2023. The fact that the MoD's systems were lax enough for the error to have been made is worrying enough. The delayed response is more alarming still. And then there is the disturbing mechanism by which the whole scandal was kept from the public eye. There was an argument on safety grounds for keeping the existence of the leaked list secret. Applicants to the Afghan relocations and assistance policy (Arap), a scheme to expedite asylum for people who had worked with British forces in the country, would be natural targets for vengeful Taliban hit squads. A judge deemed the risk severe enough to grant the MoD's request for an injunction on reporting the breach and upgraded it to a 'superinjunction' – a prohibition on reporting the existence of reporting restrictions. This powerful suppressive tool is usually associated with cases of celebrities guarding their privacy, and even then it is controversial. There is no known precedent for its deployment to protect the government from scrutiny in a case of manifest public interest. Mr Justice Robin Knowles took the view that the Arap applicants' right to safety should take precedence over the freedom of the press to report the leak. That may have been a worthy argument in 2023 – but not in perpetuity. However, ministers regularly sought to renew the superinjunction, citing increasingly spurious premises. It was almost removed in May 2024, but restored on appeal. It was only lifted this week after an internal government review, commissioned by the defence secretary, John Healey, found that being identified in the data breach should no longer be considered a matter of life and death. It would 'simply be another factor in exacerbating a person's existing vulnerability'. How, why and when the balance of risk shifted is unclear. It happened over many years under multiple defence secretaries, straddling a change of government. Over the same period, hundreds of millions of pounds were spent on an emergency resettlement scheme for people affected by the data breach – an expensive policy on a matter of great political sensitivity run entirely below the radar of parliamentary scrutiny or any other mechanism of accountability. Meanwhile, many of the legal arguments that led to renewal of the superinjunction were held in closed court. The grounds for keeping the blanket of secrecy in place were themselves wrapped in an extra layer of secrecy. Such a process goes against fundamental principles of open justice. In an era of depleted trust in politics, its deployment to keep a serious scandal from public view is also corrosive of democracy. A dangerous precedent has been set. Lifting the superinjunction doesn't in itself bring transparency. But it does at least permit overdue questions about how the data breach happened, the timeliness and effectiveness of the MoD's response, and why no one has been held to account. The current Labour government was not responsible for keeping the public in the dark for so long, but it will be judged on its willingness to let the light in now. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
No wonder the Liberal Democrat brand colour is yellow
Lib Dem victor Kevin McKay makes his speech after the Fountainbridge/Craiglockhart by-election result was announced How uplifting it was to read the local Liberal Democrat leader Ed Thornley's column in Monday's Evening News, congratulating his party's winning candidate in the Craiglockhart by-election and welcoming the new councillor to 'the best job I've ever had'. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Given that Councillor Thornley's other job is a member of the Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton's staff, his bar might be set rather low, but it is indeed a great privilege and honour to be elected to Edinburgh City Council. But done properly it can come at a cost. Few people would put in the kind of shift required of councillors to get even just the basics of the job right – helping constituents, reading thousands of pages of reports, night and weekend work with no time off in lieu – for the available allowance of just over £25,000 if it meant giving up other better-paid work. Nobody should enter politics for the money, but be motivated by the desire to make things better for the voters who place their trust in you. I know my old business suffered because I needed to spend so much time on council duties, especially at the height of the campaign to save Currie High School. The responsibilities only increase in administration, but that's what everyone who stands for election should be aiming for, because you can achieve an awful lot more in power than in opposition. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But after recent by-elections put Edinburgh's Lib Dem group in position to take control of the city council, they have shown a marked reluctance to express any enthusiasm for so, instead just saying they will take the summer recess to think things over. Cllr Thornley used his column to tell readers how well-known his new colleague Kevin McKay is in Craiglockhart, not how he was looking forward to heading a new administration after the summer as the leader of a 14-strong group. There was nothing about putting Lib Dem priorities, whatever they are, at the top of the council's agenda, as Lib Dem voters are be entitled to expect. Not a word of what he and Cllr McKay are actually going to do. In truth, they seem to be little more than a disparate collection of community activists whose purpose is to prop up a lame duck Labour administration, force Labour to accept some of their local budget ideas, accept no responsibility whatsoever for the subsequent outcomes and sit on the fence whenever possible. A perfect illustration is the treatment of their Edinburgh West MP Christine Jardine, sacked from her front bench position as equalities spokesperson last week because she defied party orders to abstain over a Conservative amendment to reduce some benefits. I would have rather she had not voted against the motion, but at least she had the courage of her convictions and got off the fence. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Unless something changes, they will have conned voters into believing they were voting for a Lib Dem-run council but instead got some shady puppet regime operating under cover of darkness. The electorate expects the winner to take the spoils but to do otherwise, to hand them back to avoid accountability for the difficult decisions authorities must take, is an act of gross political cowardice or cynicism. Neither is a good look. No wonder the Lib Dem brand colour is yellow. Sue Webber is a Scottish Conservative MSP for Lothian
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Improved parental leave good for business
Only 59 per cent of new fathers take paternity leave Having become a dad for the second time earlier this year, I know all too well the stresses and pressures on new parents. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... After welcoming my new daughter to my family in January, I became the first Cabinet minister to take full paternity leave. I was glad to receive the support of colleagues to do so. Many are still regularly in touch to ask about the tears and tantrums, but I tell them I haven't had time to pay attention to John Swinney's latest reshuffle. There's no greater joy than welcoming a new addition to your family. But it's demanding, too, both emotionally and physically, and it takes time to adjust to a new life and bond with the new baby. Mums need space, time and support to recover. But the current system of parental leave isn't working. Only 59 per cent of new fathers take paternity leave, take-up of shared parental leave remains very low and many new parents find the system too complicated and difficult to navigate. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As part of this government's new deal for working people, we want to make things easier for working parents. That's why at the start of this month the government launched a full review of parental leave to make the system fairer, easier to use, and fit for the modern world of work. It will gather perspectives from parents, employers and experts across the country, and I'm glad to see that it has already received the backing of organisations like the Dad Shift and Pregnant Then Screwed. The review comes alongside the government's landmark Employment Rights Bill, which will end exploitative zero-hour contracts, ban fire and rehire and strengthen the enforcement of employment protections. Workers in Scotland are set to benefit more than workers in other parts of the UK, with a higher proportion of the workforce in Scotland on zero-hours contracts and in insecure employment. The bill will also support working families by making existing entitlements to paternity leave and unpaid parental leave available from the first day of employment, strengthening rights to request flexible working, and introducing new protections against dismissal for pregnant women, mothers on maternity leave, and mothers who return to work after a period of maternity leave. A recent survey by Pregnant Then Screwed suggests that 12 per cent of new mothers in the UK have been dismissed or made redundant whilst pregnant or having recently returned from maternity leave. That's a shocking figure and shows that the system needs reform. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Making the world of work more family-friendly is crucially important if we want the economy to grow. Research shows that an improved parental leave system can boost the economy by billions of pounds, meaning higher living standards and more money in people's pockets, delivering on this government's Plan for Change. Before entering politics, I ran small businesses. I know that a fairer deal at work means employees who are happier and more productive. It's good for business. Throughout history, Labour governments have always made working people better off and families more secure. This one is no different. Ian Murray is MP for Edinburgh South and Secretary of State for Scotland
