Effect of US funding cuts on HIV programmes
Professor Salim Abdool Karim is the Director of the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Can South Africa's HIV fight survive US funding blows?
South Africa's HIV programme, once sustained by US support, is at risk. Without replacement funding, South Africa could see a 38% increase in Aids-related deaths by 2028 and up to 150,000 HIV infections. With some frontline services collapsing and mobile clinics funded by US emergency fund Pepfar lying idle, it's feared many of South Africa's eight-million people living with HIV might forgo their treatment. The average person with HIV in South Africa is aged 41, which means treatment access isn't just about survival; it's about protecting our workforce. But there's a promising breakthrough: the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the HIV prevention jab, lenacapavir, and it could be registered in South Africa by early 2026. Health minister Aaron Motsoaledi told Health Beat he'll find the money to buy the jab if donors can't help. But how much should we pay for it?
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Can foreign nationals use public healthcare services in South Africa?
THE question of who has the right to access public healthcare services in South Africa, specifically whether foreign nationals can use them, has been raised by the actions of some groups that physically prevented foreign nationals from accessing healthcare facilities across the country. Incidents of foreign nationals being prevented from accessing public healthcare facilities by these groups have been reported from across the country, and on Tuesday the Addington Hospital Gateway Clinic was one such site where the March and March movement carried out its campaign of turning away foreign nationals from the facility. Also read: 'South Africans first': March and March blocks access to Addington Clinic, checks IDs at gate Different organisations and institutions, including non-government bodies, have throughout the years indicated that, according to the South African Constitution, everyone has the right to have access to public healthcare services. Chapter 2: Bill of Rights, Section 27 of the Constitution reads: (1) Everyone has the right to have access to — (a) health care services, including reproductive health care; (3) No one may be refused emergency medical treatment. In its educational booklet on migration and non-nationals, the South African Human Rights Commission states that: 'Access to public health care facilities is another challenge that non-nationals encounter, mainly due to a lack of awareness on the part of some frontline health care staff. Section 27 of the Constitution entitles everyone to access basic health care services and no one may be denied emergency medical treatment. This means even undocumented migrants may not be refused emergency medical treatment on the basis of their lack of documentation; but they may be held liable to pay fees for any other health services. The National Health Act, 61 of 2003 provides that children below the age of six and pregnant or lactating women can access free health care services, irrespective of their documentation status or nationality. The right to health care can, however, be limited for everyone, depending on the availability of resources.' For more from Berea Mail, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Click to subscribe to our newsletter – here At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
TimesLIVE
14 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
'Half SA's Covid-19 patients suffered long-term mental problems'
Researchers have found that more than half of South Africans infected with Covid-19 experienced lasting mental and cognitive health issues long after their recovery — some for as long as up to two years later. The research, conducted by the University of Cape Town and published in the journal Brain, Behaviour & Immunity — Health, followed 97 people who tested positive for Covid-19 during the first three waves of the pandemic. These people — ranging from those who had no symptoms to those who were critically ill — were interviewed at least six months after they were infected to assess ongoing neuropsychiatric symptoms like anxiety, fatigue and memory problems. Lead researcher Prof Jonny Peter said they found that illness severity didn't necessarily predict who would go on to experience these long-term effects. Even people who had mild or no symptoms reported problems months later. 'Nearly half of the participants showed signs of cognitive or memory difficulties on standard screening tests, and over 50% reported ongoing fatigue or mental health challenges,' he said. 'The team also looked for early warning signs in the blood — specific proteins or markers taken during the patients' illness that might help predict who would develop these persistent symptoms.' Peter said no clear patterns emerged.
