
Ethereum is powering Wall Street's future. The crypto scene at Cannes shows how far it's come
The Ethereum Community Conference, or EthCC, took over the beachside town that was swarming with crypto founders, developers, and some of the institutional giants now building atop the infrastructure.
The crypto elite climbed the iconic red-carpeted steps of the Palais des Festivals — a cinematic landmark now repurposed as the stage for Ethereum's flagship European event.
"The atmosphere this year was palpable in Cannes," said Bettina Boon Falleur, the powerhouse behind EthCC for the past seven years. "The prestige of the location, combined with the quality of talks, has reinforced Ethereum's stature and purpose in the wider ecosystem."
Private parties sprawled across cliffside estates and exclusive resorts, but the conversations were less about price action and more about the blockchain's evolving role as the back-end of global finance.
EthCC, now in its eighth year, has tracked Ethereum's trajectory from scrappy experiment to institutional backbone.
"That impact was unmistakable this year," Falleur said. "From Robinhood embracing decentralized finance infrastructure via Arbitrum to local governments like the City of Cannes exploring deeper integration with the crypto economy."
Indeed, one of the boldest moves came this week from Robinhood, which became the first publicly traded U.S. company to launch tokenized stocks on-chain.
At a product showcase held inside a Belle Époque mansion overlooking the sea, Robinhood unveiled a sweeping new crypto strategy — including the ability for European users to trade tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs via Arbitrum, a Layer 2 network built on Ethereum.
The announcement helped push Robinhood stock past $100 for the first time, capping off a week of fresh all-time highs and a more than 30% rally since being snubbed by the S&P 500 during a recent rebalance.
Ether, the token native to the Ethereum blockchain, was up nearly 6% on the week and several public equities tied to the blockchain have rallied alongside it.
BitMine Immersion Technologies, a company that mines bitcoin, gained more than 1,200% since announcing it would make ether its primary treasury reserve asset. Bit Digital, which recently exited bitcoin mining to "become a pure play" ethereum staking and treasury company, gained more than 34% this week. And SharpLink Gaming, which added more than $20 million in ether to its balance sheet this week, jumped more than 28% on Thursday.
Ether ETF inflows are rising again too — a sign that institutional investors are warming back up.
Ether is still down more than 20% this year and lags far behind bitcoin in market cap and adoption. But funds tracking ETH have seen two straight months of mostly net inflows, according to CoinGlass data. Still, ether ETFs total just $11 billion — compared to $138 billion in bitcoin ETFs.
Institutions aren't betting on Ethereum for hype — they're betting on infrastructure.
Even as prices stall and the network faces headwinds from slower base layer revenues and faster rivals like Solana, the momentum is shifting toward utility.
"Ethereum is getting plugged into these core transactional systems," Paul Brody, global blockchain leader at EY, told CNBC on the sidelines of EthCC. "Investors, savers, people moving money — they are going to start shifting from some of the older mechanisms of doing this into Ethereum ecosystems that can do these transactions faster, cheaper, but also very importantly, with significant new functionality attached to it."
Deutsche Bank recently announced it's building a tokenization platform on zkSync — a faster, cheaper blockchain built on top of Ethereum — to help asset managers issue and manage tokenized funds, stablecoins, and other real-world assets while meeting regulatory and data protection requirements.
Coinbase and Kraken are also racing to own the crossover between traditional stocks and crypto.
Coinbase has filed with the SEC to offer trading in tokenized public equities, a move that would diversify its revenue stream and bring it into more direct competition with brokerages like Robinhood and eToro.
Kraken announced plans to offer 24/7 trading of U.S. stock tokens in select overseas markets.
BlackRock's tokenized money market fund, BUIDL — launched on Ethereum last year — offers qualified investors on-chain access to yield with redemptions settled in USDC in real time.
Stablecoins, meanwhile, continue to serve as the backbone of Ethereum's financial layer.
Circle's USDC — the second-largest stablecoin — still settles around 65% of its volume on Ethereum's rails. According to CoinGecko's latest "State of Stablecoins" report, Ethereum accounts for nearly 50% of stablecoin market share.
"The builders and contributors at EthCC aren't chasing the next bull run," Falleur said, "they're laying the groundwork to make Ethereum home for the next billion users."
Even as newer blockchains tout faster speeds and lower fees, Ethereum is proving its staying power as a trusted network.
Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum's co-founder, told CNBC in Cannes that there is an assumption that institutions only care about scale and speed — but in practice, it's the opposite.
"A lot of institutions basically tell us to our faces that they value Ethereum because it's stable and dependable, because it doesn't go down," he said.
Buterin added that firms often ask about privacy and other long-term features — the kinds of concerns that institutions, he said, "really value."
Tomasz Stańczak, the new co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, said institutions are choosing Ethereum for the same core reasons.
"Ten years without stopping for a moment. Ten years of upgrades, with a huge dedication to security and censorship resistance," he said.
He added that when institutions send orders to the market, they want to be "absolutely sure that their order is treated fairly, that nobody has preference, that the transaction actually is executed at the time when it's delivered."
Those guarantees have become increasingly valuable as stablecoins and tokenized assets move into the mainstream.
The Senate's recent passage of the GENIUS Act, along with Circle's IPO, gave the industry a regulatory tailwind and helped reinforce Ethereum's role as the infrastructure layer for tokenized finance.
Ethereum's core values — neutrality, security, and censorship resistance — are emerging as competitive advantages.
The real test now is whether Ethereum can scale without losing its values.
"We don't just want to succeed," Buterin said from the mainstage of the Palais this week. "We want to be something that is worthy of succeeding."
He said the hope is that future generations will look back and see a network that truly delivered openness, freedom, and permissionless access to the masses.
But the week didn't end in the conference halls, it closed with tradition. On the balcony of Villa Montana, overlooking the Bay of Cannes, the rAAVE party lit up.
White-clad guests sipped cocktails as the DJ spun by the pool, haze curling from smoke machines.
This year, Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov and DeFi icon Stani Kulechov, founder of Aave, stood atop the balcony overlooking the crowd and the light-dotted skyline of Cannes.
It was a fitting snapshot of the momentum behind Ethereum's institutional rise and symbolic of Web3's shift from niche experiment to financial mainstay.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Best Crypto Investments Besides Bitcoin for the Rest of 2025
While Bitcoin continues to dominate headlines and portfolios with its impressive institutional adoption, investors are shifting their focus toward promising altcoins that could deliver significant returns over time. Read Next: Learn More: If you're looking to diversify your crypto portfolio, here are some of the best altcoins to consider for the rest of this year. Ethereum remains the second-largest cryptocurrency by market cap. While ETH's holding ratio dipped earlier this year, it has rebounded, signaling renewed interest. The network's ongoing upgrades and its dominance in DeFi, NFTs, and decentralized applications (dApps) make it an attractive alternative. With the potential for layer-2 scaling solutions, Ethereum could see increased institutional interest. Despite a recent dip in portfolio holdings down from 2.72% in November 2024 to 1.76% as of May 2025, Solana remains an attractive long-term investment. Solana's capacity to handle high-volume applications while keeping costs low is continuing to attract developers building DeFi projects and NFT platforms. Although some institutional capital has rotated out of SOL and into XRP, this dip could offer a buying opportunity for long-term investors looking for a better entry point. Ripple is gaining a lot of attention this year. The percentage of XRP held in portfolios doubled from 1.29% in November 2024 to 2.42% as of May because investors believe an XRP exchange-traded fund (ETF) might be approved soon, which could push the price up. XRP is also gaining attention for its fast and low-cost cross-border payments, making it a serious contender for real-world financial use cases, especially in global remittances. Chainlink continues to expand its role as the leading decentralized oracle network, connecting blockchain applications with real-world data. As DeFi and Web3 applications grow, so does the need for reliable oracles. This alone makes Chainlink worth considering adding to your crypto portfolio. TRON doesn't get as much attention as Ethereum or Solana, but it's quietly become one of the most used blockchains, especially for sending stablecoins like USDT. Its network supports smart contracts and apps, just like Ethereum, but it's cheaper to use. Additionally, Canary Capital filed for a TRON ETF with staking features in April 2025, which could attract institutional investors if approved by the SEC. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on 5 Best Crypto Investments Besides Bitcoin for the Rest of 2025

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Nvidia-backed stock sends a quiet shockwave through the AI world
CoreWeave (CRWV) is the Nvidia (NVDA) -backed AI stock that's been one of the biggest winners on Wall Street this year. What started as a crypto side hustle was the best-performing AI tech IPO of 2025, up four times since its March debut. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Moreover, its power-packed alliance with Nvidia means it gets access to the hottest GPUs first, a key differentiator as everyone scrambles for AI computing. Now, with July 3's headline-grabbing move in the books, this Nvidia-backed AI stock is showing just how it plans to scale up while shaking up the cloud hierarchy in the process. Image source:Starting as a crypto mining outfit, CoreWeave is now one of the buzziest names in the AI gold rush. Launched in 2017 as Atlantic Crypto, the New Jersey business rode the incredible Ethereum wave before pulling back sharply a couple of years later. It then rebranded and leaned hard into building out GPU-packed data centers, right when the generative AI boom was catching fire. Fast-forward to today: CoreWeave runs dozens of tailor-made data centers across the U.S. and Europe, offering plug-and-play access to Nvidia's hottest GPUs. The big-ticket customers can sidestep the need to build in-house hardware fortresses by renting CoreWeave's racks for their model training and inference needs. Related: Google's quiet AI win spells trouble for Amazon Corweave's big competitive edge is its tight partnership with Nvidia, which owns roughly 5% of CoreWeave, funneling its cutting-edge GPUs to the upstart first. No wonder has noticed. CoreWeave's IPO in March has been 2025's biggest tech story, pricing at $40 per share and raising about $1.5 billion. Since then, its stock has skyrocketed over 270%, peaking above $166 in June. Behind that surge is serious financial traction. In the first quarter, CoreWeave brought in $981.6 million in sales, comfortably beating Wall Street's $852.9 million estimate. More Tech Stock News: Analyst reboots IonQ stock price target for surprising reasonApple could make big change to Siri, delight fansVeteran analyst issues big Broadcom call, shakes up AI stock race It's sitting on a massive $25.9 billion revenue backlog, expecting to post full-year sales of $4.9 billion to $5.1 billion, beating analyst calls near $4.6 billion. Specifically, its massive five-year, $11.9 billion contract with OpenAI (plus an extension) and its new role supporting Google Cloud's compute push have caught the tech world's attention. Also, CoreWeave plans to spend more than $23 billion this year on new facilities as it doubles down on its generative AI bet. CoreWeave just fired a massive shot across the hyperscaler battlefield, and Wall Street took notice. The AI cloud player is first to the party, rolling out the highly anticipated Nvidia GB300 NVL72. This powerful liquid-cooled, rack-scale AI juggernaut is built to train the most advanced models on the planet. For investors, this is far from being a usual hardware upgrade. It's a clear sign that CoreWeave is punching above its weight as it stamps its authority in the hotly competitive AI arms race. The stock's 9% pop on July 3 says plenty about how Wall Street sees this move. Related: Veteran analyst drops bold new call on Nvidia stock Tech heads, take note that the NVL72 runs on Nvidia's robust Blackwell chips, stuffing 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Arm Grace CPUs into Dell's custom-built rack system. That essentially translates into a system that's 10 times faster in responsiveness and five times quicker than its predecessor. That's no less than a game-changer for businesses training multi-trillion parameter models, the same level of AI that will push the pace on the next wave of chatbots and agentic AI. Being first means CoreWeave gets early bragging rights and a likely bump in real-world client workloads. For its godfather in Nvidia, it clearly shows that the Blackwell ecosystem is hitting real-world racks, powering next-gen AI tech. Moreover, Nvidia partners like Dell and Supermicro are also riding the Blackwell wave. Supermicro just showed off 30 enterprise AI solutions built on the same tech for the European market as it looks to dominate global AI factories. Related: Veteran analyst offers eye-popping Nvidia, Microsoft stock prediction The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Wrong and more wrong: How America's ‘experts' burned their last shreds of credibility
The first six months of the Trump administration have not been kind to the experts and the degree-holding classes. Almost daily during the tariff hysterias of March, we were told by university economists and most of the PhDs employed in investment and finance that the United States was headed toward a downward, if not recessionary, spiral. Most economists lectured that trade deficits did not really matter. Advertisement Or they insisted that the cures to reduce them were worse than the $1.1 trillion deficit itself. They reminded us that free, rather than fair, trade alone ensured prosperity. So, the result of Trump's foolhardy tariff talk would be an impending recession. Advertisement America would soon suffer rising joblessness, inflation — or rather a return to stagflation — and likely little, if any, increase in tariff revenue as trade volume declined. Instead, recent data show increases in tariff revenue. Personal real income and savings were up. Job creation exceeded prognoses. Advertisement There was no surge in inflation. The supposedly 'crashed' stock market reached historic highs. Common-sense Americans might not have been surprised: The prior stock market frenzy was predicated on what was, in theory, supposed to have happened rather than what was likely to occur. Advertisement After all, if tariffs were so toxic and surpluses irrelevant, why did our affluent European and Asian trading rivals insist on both surpluses and protective tariffs? Most Americans recalled that the mere threat of tariffs and Trump's jawboning had led to several trillion dollars in promised foreign investment and at least some plans to relocate manufacturing and assembly back to the United States. Would that change in direction not lead to business optimism and eventually more jobs? Would countries purposely running up huge surpluses through asymmetrical trade practices not have far more to lose in negotiations than those suffering gargantuan deficits? Were Trump's art-of-the-deal threats of prohibitive tariffs not mere starting points in negotiations that would eventually lead to likely agreements more favorable to the United States than in the past, and moderate rather than punitive tariffs? Would not the value of the huge American consumer market mean that our trade partners, who were racking up substantial surpluses, would agree they could afford modest tariffs and trim their substantial profit margins rather than suicidally price themselves out of a lucrative market entirely? Illegal immigration: wrong again Economists and bureaucrats were equally wrong on the border. We were told for four years that only 'comprehensive immigration reform' would stop illegal immigration. Advertisement Most Americans differed: They knew firsthand we had more than enough immigration laws, but had elected as President Joe Biden, who deliberately destroyed borders and had no intention of enforcing existing laws. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! When Trump promised he would ensure that, instead of 10,000 foreign nationals entering illegally each day, within a month no one would, our experts scoffed. But if the border patrol went from ignoring or even aiding illegal immigrants to stopping them right at the border, why would such a prediction be wrong? Advertisement Those favoring a reduction in illegal immigration and deportations also argued that crime would fall, and citizen job opportunities would increase, given an estimated 500,000 aliens with criminal records had entered illegally during the Biden administration, while millions of other illegal aliens were working off the books, for cash, and often at reduced wages. Indeed, once the border was closed tightly, hundreds of thousands were returned to their countries, and employers began turning to US citizens. Job opportunities did increase. Crime did go down. Advertisement Legal-only immigration regained its preferred status over illegal entry. Trump talked of trying voluntary deportation — again to wide ridicule from immigration 'experts.' But why would not a million illegal aliens wish to return home 'voluntarily' — if they were given free flights, a $1,000 bonus and, most importantly, a chance later to reapply for legal entry once they arrived home? Iran fears came to naught Many of our national security experts warned that taking out Iran's nuclear sites was a fool's errand. Advertisement It would supposedly unleash a Middle East tsunami of instability. It would cause a wave of terrorism. It would send oil prices skyrocketing. It would not work, ensuring Iran would soon reply with nuclear weapons. In fact, oil prices decreased after the American bombing. A twenty-five-minute entrance into Iranian airspace and bombing led to a ceasefire, not a conflagration. As for a big power standoff, World War III and 30,000 dead, common sense asked why China would wish the Strait of Hormuz to close, given that it imports half of all Middle Eastern oil produced? Why would Russia — bogged down in Ukraine and suffering nearly a million casualties — wish to mix it up in Iran, after ignominiously fleeing Syria and the fall of its Assad clients? Russia usually thinks of Russia, period. It does not lament when tensions elsewhere are expected to spike oil prices. Why would Russia resupply Iran's destroyed Russian-made anti-aircraft systems, when it was desperate to ward off Ukrainian air attacks on its homeland, and Iran would likely again lose any imported replacements? As for waves of terror, Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis have suffered enormous losses from Israel. Their leadership has been decapitated; their streams of Iranian money have been mostly truncated. Why would they rush to Iran's side to war with Israel, when Iran did not come to their aid when they were battling and losing to the Israelis? Has a theater-wide war really ever started when one side entered and left enemy territory in 25 minutes, suffering no casualties and likely killing few of the enemy? As far as the extent of damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure, why should we believe our expert pundit class? Prior to the American and Israeli bombing, many of them warned that Iran was not on the verge of obtaining a nuclear weapon, and therefore, there was little need for any such preemptive action. Then, post facto, the same experts flipped. Now they claimed, after the bombing severely damaged most Iranian nuclear sites, that there was an increased threat, given that some enriched uranium (which they had previously discounted) surely had survived and thus marked a new existential danger of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Was Trump really going to 'blow up,' 'destroy' or 'cripple' NATO, as our diplomatic experts insisted, when his first-term jawboning led from six to twenty-three nations meeting their 2% of GDP defense-spending promises? Given two ongoing theater-wide wars, given Trump's past correct predictions about the dangers of the Nord Stream II pipeline, given the vulnerability of an anemic NATO to Russian expansionism, and given that Russian leader Vladimir Putin did not invade during Trump's first term, unlike the three presidencies before and after his own, why wouldn't NATO agree to rearm with 5%, and appreciate Trump's efforts both to bolster the capability of the alliance and the need to end the Ukraine war? Why the 'experts' repeatedly fail Why were our 'scientific' pollsters so wrong in the last three presidential elections, and so at odds with the clearly discernible electoral shifts in the general electorate? Where were crackpot ideas like defund the police, transgender males in women's sports and open borders first born and nurtured? Answer: the university, and higher education in general. The list of wrongheaded, groupthink, and degreed expertise could be vastly expanded. We remember the '51 intelligence authorities' who swore the Hunter Biden laptop was 'likely' cooked up by the Russians. Our best and brightest economists signed letters insisting that Biden's multitrillion-dollar wasteful spending would not result in inflation spikes. Our global warming professors' past predictions should have ensured that Americans were now boiling, with tidal waves destroying beachfront communities, including Barack Obama's two multimillion-dollar estates. Our legal eagles, after learning nothing from the bogus Mueller investigation and adolescent Steele dossier, but with impressive Ivy League degrees, pontificated for years that Trump by now would be in jail for life, given 91 'walls-are-closing-in' and 'bombshell' indictments. So why are the degreed classes so wrong, and yet so arrogantly never learn anything from their past flawed predictions? One, our experts usually receive degrees from our supposedly marquee universities. But as we are now learning from long overdue autopsies of institutionalized campus racial bias, neo-racial segregation, 50%-plus price-gouging surcharges on federal grants, and rabid antisemitism, higher education in America has become anti-Enlightenment. Universities now wage war against free-thinkers, free speech, free expression and anything that freely questions the deductive groupthink of the diversity/equity/inclusion commissariat, and global warming orthodoxies. The degreed expert classes emerge from universities whose faculties are 90 to 95% left-wing and whose administrations are overstaffed and terrified of their radical students. The wonder is not that the experts are incompetent and biased, but that there are a brave few who are not. Two, Trump drove the degreed class insane to the degree it could no longer, even if it were willing and able (and it was not), offer empirical assessments of his policies. From his crude speech to his orange skin to his Queens accent to his MAGA base to his remarkable counterintuitive successes and to his disdain for the bicoastal elite, our embarrassing experts would rather be dead wrong and anti-Trump than correct in their assessments — if they in any small way helped Trump. Three, universities are not just biased, but increasingly mediocre and ever more isolated from working Americans and their commonsense approaches to problem solving. PhD programs in general are not as rigorous as they were even two decades ago. Grading, assessments, and evaluations in professional schools must increasingly weigh non-meritocratic criteria, given their admissions and hiring protocols are not based on disinterested evaluation of past work and expertise. The vast endowments of elite campuses, the huge profit-making foreign enrollments, and the assured, steady stream of hundreds of billions of dollars in federal aid created a sense of fiscal unreality, moral smugness, unearned superiority and ultimately, blindness to just how isolated and disliked the professoriate had become. But the public has caught on that too many Ivy-League presidents were increasingly a mediocre, if not incompetent, bunch. Most university economists could not run a small business. The military academies did not always turn out the best generals and admirals. The most engaging biographers were not professors. And plumbers and electricians were usually more skilled in their trades than most journalist graduates were in their reporting. Add it all up, and the reputation of our predictors, prognosticators and experts has been radically devalued — to the point of utter worthlessness. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.