
Letters to the Editor: The 'lived experience expertise' of survivors is invaluable
My gratitude to Mark and David Ryan is in equal measure to my deep respect for what they have achieved.
Over the past 30 years, numerous similar inquiries have been carried out. Academic, clinical, and legal expertise has been an important part of the development and progress of these inquiries.
What has had less space is 'lived experience expertise' — the expertise of survivors, the ones who lived through what was done to them by others.
In June 2025, researchers at Trinity College published a substantive report, Transforming Justice Responses to Non-recent Institutional Abuses, prepared by Anne-Marie McAlinden, Marie Keenan, and James Gallen.
Their report assessed past inquiries — in Ireland, the UK, and beyond — with this in mind.
Their research has shown clearly that the inclusion of lived experience expertise at all stages of such inquiries, as active agents, improves outcomes for everyone concerned.
Survivors were excluded from setting the terms of reference of the commission of investigation, in spite of our requests to be participants in that process.
Nothing about us, nothing without us.
I urge the Irish Government, and everyone in our elected assemblies, to take on board the wisdom and expertise of the academics, legal experts, and clinicians.
Survivors deserve nothing less.
Corneilius Crowley, Address with the editor
Happy campers
As a campervan owner, I have often used the facility at Cobh, I find it great. My partner and I have travelled all over Europe in the last 10 years or so and have a lot of experience of how good the facilities are on the continent.
Ireland is still lagging behind Europe in this area, county councils around Ireland are missing a great opportunity to raise revenue and encourage camper tourism.
Campsites in Ireland are too expensive, the owners won't let you service your van (empty grey/ black waste, refill fresh water) for a small fee (€5/€10) unless you want to stay overnight.
In lots of towns in Europe, they provide this facility free or for a €2/€5 charge. It's great to see that Cork County Council is thinking outside the box. Well done! We're looking forward to visiting new sites when they open.
Eddie Tierney, Rathgar, Dublin
Tourism no-brainer
Campervan parks are badly needed.
Youghal is a prime tourist destination, and campervans are the vehicle of choice for many tourists.
Similar seaside towns on the continent have them, and they are great assets to these places.
Campervanners are a community in their own right, they bring business to the town and are in nobody's way, provided they're given proper facilities.
It's an absolute no-brainer, in my opinion.
Utta Hogan, Youghal, Cork
Government all at sea over cables
It seems very deceitful of the Government to invite us to take part in a survey on maritime security to protect undersea cables, the property of private industries, from little or no threat, when, at the same time, it has failed to enact the long-promised and essential Marine Protected Areas Bill.
Surely, it would be easier, more urgent, and more appropriate to establish areas of marine protection for the health and biodiversity of our waters, within our own territory, than to spend our money trying to protect cables that run thousands of miles outside of our territory and area of responsibility.
This Government seems to have the will and the money for the protection of undersea cables, but not the will or the money to protect the very life of the seas around our island home.
Marian Naughton Naas, Co Kildare
Aiding corruption
Between €500m and €1bn has been spent by Ireland on development aid to Mozambique over the past 30 years — despite it being one of the most corrupt governments in Africa. Yet Irish media expends far more energy scrutinising the Dáil bicycle shed than this long-running misuse of taxpayer funds.
Mozambique became a priority for Irish Aid in 1996. Some of the funding may have achieved limited success in niche areas, but it has also propped up a rapacious elite.
Frelimo, the ruling party, has clung to power for nearly 50 years, overseeing increasingly fraudulent elections. In the most recent vote, more than 50 protesters were reportedly shot by police.
Irish Aid to Mozambique was over €40m annually until 2016, when a $2bn corruption scandal involving the Frelimo government — exposed largely by the US — came to light. Since then, the aid has been halved, but €20m a year still flows in.
I spent 14 years working in education in Mozambique and met many of the Irish embassy staff. Most were aware of the rampant corruption, but felt bound by the system: 'The money has been allocated — we have to spend it.'
They are career diplomats, not policymakers, and no doubt their private reports paint a clearer picture.
While Irish Aid's brochures highlight contributions to health, education, and governance, the reality is less reassuring. Transparency International reports increasing corruption. Mozambique's ranking on the UN Human Development Index is falling. Meanwhile, the ruling elite grows richer and ever more detached from the needs of ordinary citizens.
I'm not against development aid — far from it. But we owe it to taxpayers and to the poor themselves to be more discerning. Why is the Irish media silent on this long-running farce?
It's time we stop turning a blind eye and recognise our complicity in enabling corrupt regimes.
Donal Conlon, Paris, France
Our waters matter
It's disappointing to read that our Government has failed to legislate to exclude large trawlers from Irish coastal waters.
We live on a beautiful island, surrounded by rich, diverse, and abundant seas; at a minimum you would expect our politicians to do all in their power to protect what we have — not just for those of us alive now, but for future generations.
I don't really get a sense that our island and its environment matter a whole lot to TDs.
We are constantly being told how rich a country we are, we paint the world green every St Patrick's Day, there's no end to the 'hard sell' of our little nation.
So why not put our money where our mouth is, and endeavour to make our land, air, sea, and water 'best in class', a place that will nurture all of us now and for generations to come.
Anne Quinlan, Clondalkin, Dublin 22
Explaining sea snot
With the good weather on us, a lot of concern is being raised by the smothering of our coastal areas with what is called sea lettuce or sea snot. This is great, because it calls for an explanation.
Fifty years ago, the vast majority of our river tributaries and streams were fully open to the sunlight and hosted a vibrant growth of green ranunculus crowsfoot weed, on which the whole riparian ecosystem was based, be it fish or bird.
This weed would have sequestered any passing molecule or nitrogen or phosphorus, and all the fine silts and muds. These streams, of which nationally we have over 30,000km, are now just shaded out, eutrophied drains.
Nicholas Grubb, Dromana, Cappoquin
Nitrates indulgence
Drought conditions have been declared in 12 counties and 31 catchment areas, yet our Government — so happy to give lip service to environmental protection — is in negotiations with the EU to extend the nitrates derogation for dairy farms.
Should that wrong-headed objective be achieved, Ireland would be the only EU country where that indulgence endures. If it is achieved, it would inevitably exacerbate the negative impact modern farming has on water quality — no matter what the agri-food lobby argues.
Sometimes the self-destructive insanity plays out in plain view.
Jack Power, Inniscarra, Cork
Burden on owners
John Tierney's idea of dog-walking loops on farms is well-meaning, but risks placing a burden on farmers rather than where it belongs — on irresponsible dog owners.
Livestock-worrying, fouling, and trespass aren't caused by farmers, but by a minority of dog owners who refuse to control their animals. Farmers shouldn't have to adapt their land to fix this.
Responsible dog ownership, not more obligations for farmers, is the real solution. Until that's addressed, conflict will continue, through no fault of those who work the land.
Richard Vickery, Midleton, Cork
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
29 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Irish exporters likely to face baseline US tariffs higher than 10pc, says Barclays
Mr Trump has threatened a 30pc rate on imports from the EU from August 1, but negotiations will continue in the meantime and it is expected that a headline agreement will be in place by the new deadline. Given that Mr Trump appears to have rejected the current draft US-EU deal, which would have kept the tariff rate at the current 10pc and exempted some goods such as aircraft, European businesses need to brace themselves for a higher rate, Barclays has warned. 'While we do not foreclose the possibility that the US and EU can still reach a provisional agreement by August 1 that maintains the average tariff on most EU goods at 10pc, we think it may be more likely than not that the tariff on the EU increases from 10pc, but short of 30pc,' it says. 'We also expect more sectoral tariffs to be announced, which could cover a largefraction of EU exports to the US.' As Mr Trump has been preparing tariffs of 15pc to 20pc on other countries, Barclays says this 'suggests to us that it may be more likely' he will fix on a number in this range for the EU as well. Many Irish businesses are already 'materially hurting' from the current regime of 10pc, according to Ibec. Fergal O'Brien, a director at the lobby group, said low-margin businesses were particularly affected, and also hit by the weakness of the dollar. 'The 10pc tariffs is layered on top of the existing tariffs, and particularly in the case of the food and dairy industry, those are quite chunky,' he said. 'The most tangible impact has been in the drinks sector. 'We still have close to 90pc of distillery capacity mothballed at the moment.' Mr O'Brien said that following the announcement of a 20pc 'reciprocal' tariff by Mr Trump on April 2, the so-called Liberation Day, some firms in the life-sciences sector considered putting staff on immediate short-term work after having contracts in the US cancelled. 'If you go to 30pc, that would raise a lot more issues in terms of the ongoing viability of supply from Ireland, or Irish companies continuing to sell into the US. We think 30pc, if that did transpire, which we don't think it will, would be extremely damaging.' Markets largely shrugged yesterday in response to Mr Trump's threat on Saturday, when he also threatened Mexico with a 30pc tariff from August 1. The Iseq in Dublin finished down almost 1pc on the day, with the stocks usually most reactive to tariff announcements disproportionately affected. Ryanair was down 1.6pc, similar to AIB, while Bank of Ireland was down 1.36pc. Also down was the Kingspan group, whose share price fell by 1.46pc. The biggest fall was experienced by Uniphar, down 1.7pc. Other European stocks also slipped in early trading, but recovered most of their losses by the end of the day. The Cac in France fell by just 0.2pc overall, while the Dax in Germany closed only 0.4pc lower, having been 1.2pc down earlier. The overall Stoxx Europe 600 index, which includes some non-EU markets, was only 0.1pc down on the day. By contrast, the FTSE index gained 0.6pc. The UK has an outline trade deal in place with the US, with a baseline 10pc tariff, leaving it largely immune from fluctuations in Mr Trump's trade policy. US stock indexes had even risen slightly by lunchtime, reflecting the fact many investors think Mr Trump won't ultimately follow through on his threats. The euro also remained unchanged against the dollar.


Irish Independent
29 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Donald Trump's outlook may make securing EU trade deal impossible
After Donald Trump caught the bloc on the hop with the threat of 30pc tariffs on the EU, Mr Donohoe was quoted as saying there was now 'unsubstantial uncertainty' regarding the outlook for the economy. While Ireland faced new challenges, it did so on a 'solid footing'. But EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic, who has been leading negotiations for the bloc, was far more downbeat. Blanket tariffs of 30pc would practically 'prohibit' the future flow of trade from Europe to the US. 'It will be almost impossible to continue trading as we are used to in a transatlantic relationship,' Mr Sefcovic said. And in Frankfurt, the potential havoc from Mr Trump's bombshell was also made plain. It would cause 'toxic uncertainty' for companies on both sides of the Atlantic, German machinery and equipment manufacturers association VDMA said. Billionaire Warren Buffet once said: 'Risk comes from not knowing what you're doing.' And thanks to Mr Trump's intervention, no one on either the EU or US negotiating teams can have the foggiest notion what the next move could be. According to insiders, significant progress in closing in on agreement, across a sea of complex detail, had been achieved. But Mr Trump's announcement has undermined the whole process, eroding trust and confidence. It was sufficient for Danish foreign minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen to reveal ministers were now discussing deployment of 'the big bazooka' – otherwise known as the 'Anti-Coercion Instrument' (ACI). This would enable the EU to hit the US where it hurts. While Washington complains about the goods trade deficit between the bloc and the US (€198bn) it never mentions the surplus it enjoys in services. Were Brussels to press the red button on the ACI , it would be fair game for all to be hit. From an Irish perspective, this could mean that pharma and tech could also be targeted. A crippling trade war that can only do harm ought to be avoided. But can it be, given there is an idealogical wall between the sides as Mr Trump is constitutionally opposed to free and open trading? In a process where a mastery of detail and awareness of the intricacies involved is crucial to success, Mr Trump's bulldozing entrance into the process has rattled it to its foundations. Neither he nor his team have shown much evidence of respect for the minutiae or nuance involved. In his letter to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, informing her of the tariff threat; Mr Trump said rates 'may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country'. That he and his advisers were either unaware that the EU is not a country, or were insufficiently interested to check, has to be a worry in itself.


Irish Independent
29 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Cut the Vat rate on new apartments to 5pc, Ibec proposes
In a pre-budget submission, Ibec says there is a clear social need to improve the viability of apartment building in Ireland, as completions fell by 25pc last year and the construction pipeline has slowed to a crawl. 'Direct costs imposed by the State, such as Vat and development levies, are the most direct mechanism to reduce costs of delivery in the very short term,' the submission said. Sales of new apartments by developers currently qualify for a reduced Vat rate of 13.5pc. Development levies are paid to councils, and are intended to fund infrastructure such as water and roads. Each council sets its own rate. The levies were suspended for a time last year, leading to a temporary spike in the number of housing commencements. Gerard Brady, the chief economist at Ibec, said its proposal would cut the cost of building an apartment by €50,000 to €60,000, and would cost the Exchequer about €86m overall. 'It's hard to know how many apartments will be built this year at all, because of viability,' he said. 'The regulatory changes on redesigning will lead to more apartments in the long run, but developers might need to go back to planning, so the number might slow in the short term.' On the general economic position, Ibec said the budget-day package should be a maximum of €3bn net this year, with about €232m of new measures paid for out of the National Training Fund surplus and €1.3bn in new infrastructure spending. 'The current environment at a global level is one of slower growth and an increased risk of instability in global debt markets,' the submission said. 'Ireland is in a good position in terms of our headline debt and deficits. However, much of this position has been funded by a single source – corporate tax.' Ibec pointed out that the Irish government has collected €113bn in corporate tax revenues since 2019. While some countries that are investment hubs – such as Switzerland and the Netherlands – have also seen significant rises in corporate tax, Ireland is an outlier. The amount of corporate tax per worker here has risen from $3,080 in 2014, which was broadly in line with similar countries, to $9,743 in 2023. If Ireland had stayed in line with the likes of Switzerland and the Netherlands, it would have collected €45bn less in tax over that decade. 'If Ireland only collected a similar amount of corporate tax per worker as comparable economies, then every worker in the country would need to pay €4,000 per year more in income or other taxes,' it said. 'In Ibec's view, a sensible economic policy would aim to return to a balance of income over expenditure, were our corporate tax receipts to be realigned with other mid-sized globalised economies. In 2025, that gap is around €5bn.' Ibec is proposing an improvement to the R&D tax credit as a way of attracting and embedding high-value activity in Ireland.