Govt's $6b announcement has nothing new
The Labour Party is pouring cold water on the government's latest announcement that $6 billion worth of infrastructure work will start before Christmas.
Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop on Sunday said billions of dollars' worth of significant plans would get underway in the coming months.
Those projects included the Hutt Valley Te Whare Ahuru Acute Mental Health Unit, interim works for the State Highway 22 Drury Corridor Upgrade and the Brougham Street upgrade in Christchurch.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said that it was really important to start infrastructure projects before Christmas to help get people into work.
"There's a lot of work to do, we are coming out of a three-year recession, we have made some progress in the first quarter, but we have to drive growth, growth, growth," he told Morning Report.
Luxon said the government was doing everything it could to get infrastructure underway through measures such as RMA reform and fast track legislation.
But Labour's Infrastructure spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said all the projects the government identified had previously been announced, some by the last government, before being put on hold.
He told Morning Report the infrastructure sector needed certainty of not just projects that had been announced but new projects.
"A bit of certainty to keep their jobs, keep people in work or attract them back."
Luxon said with regard to Labour's record he recalled a hospital project which he said was launched in 2018 which had not started.
"You can talk about projects, or you can do them and our record on projects is really good."
High interest rates caused by high inflation under the last government's watch made it hard for construction businesses because they had to borrow money for development, Luxon said.
Infrastructure New Zealand's Nick Leggett said after a year of layoffs there were signs of confidence returning, but the sector needed consistency.
"What we have got to ensure is that pipeline doesn't pause, that irrespective of future changes, economic changes, changes in government, we need stronger commitments from both sides of Parliament to keep projects going," he said.
Leggett said that included improving already built infrastructure and new projects.
Bishop said there were almost $4b of roading projects in the list of work getting underway, including the Ōtaki to north of Levin expressway, the Melling interchange, the Waihoehoe Road upgrade, and the new Ōmanawa bridge on SH29.
The projects would create thousands of jobs and lift productivity by getting people and freight to their destinations quickly and safely, Bishop said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Education Ministry says new curriculums are much clearer
The Education Ministry said the new curriculums were much clearer about what needed to be taught each year. Photo: 123RF The Education Ministry says its staff have a clear understanding of what the term 'knowledge-rich' means. A ministry document from March warned its work on the new school curriculum was suffering because it did not have a clear definition of the term, which was central to the entire project. But the ministry's acting curriculum centre hautu (leader) Pauline Cleaver told RNZ's Midday Report it was not a problem. "It's fully understood by our team and our PLD [professional learning and development], alongside the curriculum that we've already produced is working really well and our response from teachers about the English curriculum for Year 1 to 8 and the maths is going really well. People are really seeing what a knowledge-rich curriculum looks like," she said. Cleaver said the already-published curriculums were examples of knowledge-rich. "It's really well structured, it's got clear content. The things that we want young people to know and the things that we want them to know how to do, they're sequenced in a year-by-year way so that the knowledge builds over time and they get a nice coherent learning pathway. That the learning is managed and taught in nice structured ways, such as you see through our structured literacy programmes and their teachers have real clarity on what needs to be taught and what students should be learning at any particular point on the pathway." She said the new curriculums were much clearer about what needed to be taught each year. But Principals Federation president Leanne Otene told RNZ the curriculum changes were chaotic and imploding. She said the government was changing too much, too fast and the training for teachers and principals was insufficient. "We've had multiple announcements, and they're disconnected initiatives and they are creating chaos," she said. Otene said primary schools were teaching new English and maths curriculums without sufficient training and without assessment tools to test children's achievement against the new curriculums. She said the key ideas underpinning the curriculum change, science of learning and knowledge rich were "mentioned everywhere, defined nowhere" PPTA vice-president Kieran Gainsford said at a recent meeting of subject association leaders, many were worried that the government had not provided a clear explanation of what it meant by terms like "science of learning" and "knowledge-rich curriculum". "It leaves schools and teachers in almost a hopeless position. If we're supposed to implement a new curriculum, we want to do a good job. We want to do the best for the young people in front of us. But if we're given such unclear guidance, that leaves us in a very difficult position to be able to do that," he said. Meanwhile, Cleaver told RNZ the ministry was using AI to help with background work on the curriculum. "We have used AI to help us synthesise a range of research, what other countries are doing, how we're comparing with the content we're choosing to make sure we're doing the best job possible. It's not a replacement for our writers. It's information that our writers can use to be more effective at making sure we get this right," she said. "It's not writing the curriculum now. We have real teachers, real educators writing the content." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
'Topping up $300 a week': How much money do property investors actually make?
Last year more than 50,000 property investors were making losses on their portfolios. (File photo) Photo: Unsplash/ Artful Homes A big chunk of property investors do not make money from their investments - and those who do are pulling in an average of less than $16,000 a year. RNZ revealed last year, more than 50,000 of the roughly 120,000 property investors in the country were making losses on their property portfolios. Now, new data released under the Official Information Act has shown even those with a profit were making a limited amount. In the 2024 tax year, the average rental income made across all entities reporting a profit was $15,680. Based on the average house price, that is a return of 1.7 percent. Individuals were making $13,240 and trusts $26,490. The year before, the average income was $15,590. A year earlier, it was $16,680 and in 2021, $14,800. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said it highlighted people were not investing in property for cash yields but for other reasons. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said capital gains was a motivator for investors. Photo: Supplied Those included being able to borrow from the bank to invest in property in a way that other investments were not able to, and the lack of tax on properties not captured by the bright line test. "The real motivation is capital gains - because the cash return means tenants aren't the main business, the house is. "Roughly, if your cash earning yield is 1.7 percent, and let's say the cost of equity is 10 percent - probably a bit higher in NZ, then investors are assuming house prices will increase by over 8 percent a year forever. "So we have this weird setup, that encourages people to make a pretty serious financial bet, through tax and banking regulation, and cultural norms." Including capital gains, investors would have made 6.6 percent a year on average over the past five years. In 2022, they would have had a 19 percent return, and in 2021, 15. percent, before recording total losses in the most recent two years. He calculated investors would have made an average $179,672 in the 2021/22 year, thanks to capital gains, and $111.464 the year before. But they would have lost almost $85,000 in the 2023 year and another $21,362 in the 2024. NZ Property Investors Federation spokesperson Matt Ball said he was not surprised by the data. "We have one rental property ourselves and I'm putting in $300 a week at the moment because I'm stuck on an interest rate of 6.65 percent. "But we've been doing that for the last year, 18 months. We'll make a loss just because that's how it is." He said property investment was not "winning Lotto". "It's hard work and to make money out of it you have to put in some effort. You can't just buy a place and sit down and watch the money roll in. "That's why if you can add a bedroom or upgrade it so you get a bit of rent of rent or whatever, do some work to it, that's the goal." He said 85 percent of property investors had another job. "I think if you could put the money into other investments you'd probably be getting a strong income… the leverage is the difference, I can't borrow $1 million to put into shares." Sarina Gibbon, general manager at Auckland Property Investors Association said some investors would be operating across multiple entities. "Since FY22, when interest deductibility started being phased out, the IRD hasn't been privy to the economic reality of investing, let alone reporting it accurately. It has been reporting legislated distortion. In FY24, landlords could only deduct 50 percent of interest costs. Cash-poor portfolios got pumped into the system and spat out as paper-rich operations. "So, no, the numbers are not surprisingly low; they are deceptively high. We are taxing revenue, not profit. This sort of tax distortion is nothing else but political theatre. Here's the irony, though: flawed as the policy was, it did rewire investor behaviour from accumulating to improving. "Sure, more deductible repairs and upgrades led to better-quality housing, but also higher rents. So the adversarial policy borne out of flawed design and bad leadership cornered investors into action to benefit their tenants and no one else." She said now investors could claim their home loan interest against their income again and interest rates had fallen, there was some breathing room. "In the long term, I expect investment to be more dynamic, yield-focused and taxable income from the investor cohort to grow." Property investment coach Steve Goodey said investors starting out would usually make losses but people who had been investing for a while would often have properties without mortgages. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Luxon snaps back: 'I'm not taking any lectures from frickin Chris Hipkins'
By Craig McCulloch of RNZ Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has challenged Labour to front up with any policy at all as he comes under pressure over National's struggling childcare support scheme. The comment was made after Labour revealed just 153 families had received the maximum FamilyBoost rebate - well short of National's pre-election promise that 21,000 families would be eligible for the full amount. Speaking on his way into a caucus meeting this morning, Luxon rejected Labour's characterisation of the policy as a failure. "I'm not taking any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party," he told reporters. "They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess. "You can stand on the other side and criticise as much as you like, but I don't see any policy from Labour." Luxon said 60,000 families had received some support from the FamilyBoost policy and another 20,000 would soon be eligible due to recent tweaks to the eligibility settings. "Isn't that great? We have put a programme in place which Labour didn't support, didn't vote, don't back, because they don't back low-and-middle-income working New Zealanders." The former Labour government extended cheaper childcare to parents of two-year-olds, giving them access to 20 hours a week of free early childhood education. On taking office, the coalition reversed that policy and instead rolled out its more targeted FamilyBoost scheme - a weekly rebate on childcare costs. 'Absolute flop' Responding to Luxon's comments, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said National's refusal to admit the FamilyBoost scheme was "an absolute flop" showed it was completely out of touch. "They're getting really desperate. On a daily basis, they're attacking me and attacking the Labour Party rather than talking about their own track record." He defended Labour's lack of public policy, saying that would all be laid out in full before next year's general election. "We're not even close to an election campaign at the moment," Hipkins said. "But unlike him, when we go into the election campaign next year, I will make sure that the policies that we have add up." Labour wanted to see the government's next Budget before it outlined significant policies which would cost money, he said, and suggested a lot of policy work was under way in the background. "The National Party desperately wants to talk about the Labour Party's policy at the moment because their own policies are turning into an absolute disaster zone." National also came under criticism when it was in opposition for a paucity of policy heading into the 2023 election year, but it had released elements of its tax plan and several discussion documents indicating a direction of travel.
