HC takes note of Kedar crash, seeks state response
A division bench comprising Chief Justice G Narendar and Justice Alok Kumar Verma sought an explanation from the state administration regarding the recurring helicopter accidents and prevailing safety lapses in the Char Dham region.
Chief Standing Counsel Chandrashekhar Rawat informed the court that the state govt had suspended all helicopter services related to the Char Dham Yatra following the latest crash as a precautionary measure to ensure the safety of pilgrims.
During the proceedings, the court observed that at least one helicopter crash occurs annually during the Char Dham Yatra and expressed concern over the persistent safety risks associated with aviation operations in the region.
Stressing the need for a comprehensive policy on helicopter operations, the court noted that the high-altitude Himalayan terrain is subject to rapidly changing weather conditions and that the post-monsoon dryness typical of the region may pose additional operational challenges.
It emphasised that helicopter operators must be thoroughly familiar with both mountainous and lowland weather and visibility patterns.
The June 15 crash marks the fifth such incident involving helicopters on the Char Dham route in the past 39 days. On June 7, a Kestrel Aviation helicopter carrying six pilgrims crash-landed on the Guptkashi-Gaurikund highway near Barasu. The pilot sustained injuries, but all passengers were unharmed.
Authorities suspect a technical snag led to the emergency landing.
Earlier, on May 17, a Sanjeevani air ambulance operated by AIIMS-Rishikesh crash-landed near the Kedarnath helipad after its tail struck the ground during landing. The pilot, a doctor, and a nurse onboard escaped unhurt. Officials said the helicopter attempted to land on an adjacent ground due to a technical issue.
On May 12, a helicopter returning from Badrinath to Sersi made an emergency landing on the grounds of a school in Ukhimath due to poor visibility. No casualties were reported.
On May 8, when a chopper operated by Aero Trans Service Pvt Ltd crashed near Gangnani in Uttarkashi district, killing six people, including five pilgrims and the pilot, and injuring one passenger.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Breaking News Live July 23: Leaders of ex-Pak PM Imran Khan's PTI handed 10-year jail term in May 9 riot cases
00:57 (IST) Jul 23 The Supreme Court will hear on Thursday an appeal filed by Maharashtra govt challenging the Bombay high court judgment acquitting all 12 accused, five of whom were sentenced to death by the trial court, in the July 11, 2006 Mumbai train blasts that left 187 dead and 824 injured. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta told a bench led by CJI B R Gavai that the state had filed an appeal against the verdict and said, 'It has serious ramifications. Can it be listed for hearing on Wednesday?' CJI Gavai said he learnt from news reports that 8 accused have already been released from prison. The SG said that was true, but the petition required urgent hearing. Finding additional SG Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare alongside the SG, the CJI said, 'It was Thakare who had argued the case before the HC. We will list the petition for hearing the day after tomorrow.' The govt in its appeal said the HC misdirected itself into trivialities and misread cogent evidence, leading to failure of justice. It said confessions of the accused persons, admissible under MCOCA, were discarded by HC on technicalities even when they formed a chain of events and outlined the conspiracy to launch the sinister attack on Mumbai suburban trains, which were full of people returning from offices, and cause maximum loss of lives.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Audit had found 1.39cr fraud in 2016-17 as well
Thiruvananthapuram: Amid the ongoing investigation into financial irregularities at the Venganoor Rural Cooperative Development Society, the probe team has confirmed that a fraud of Rs 1.39 crore — first flagged during the society's 2016–17 audit — remains under investigation. Following corruption allegations in that year, the cooperative department had conducted an audit and unearthed the large-scale fraud. However, the case is yet to reach closure and the crime branch is continuing the probe. Meanwhile, Kovalam police have arrested KS Sajan (64), the society's secretary and Ramesh Kumar (51), its vice-president, in connection with fresh cases filed by depositors. The complainants alleged they were denied access to their deposits and the interest due to them. Both accused were remanded to judicial custody after being produced in court. Their bail pleas had been earlier rejected by the HC. Police said the society's president Satheesh Kumar, accountant, staff, and other board members—also accused—are currently absconding. "The case based on the 2016–17 audit report is being investigated by the city crime branch after detecting a Rs 1.39 crore fraud. The new cases are based on complaints from depositors who were defrauded. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo by Taboola by Taboola Since the accused are the same in both instances, we may hand over the new cases to the crime branch once the total financial loss crosses Rs 1 crore. So far, over 10 cases have been registered and more complaints are being received," said a police officer. Preliminary findings suggest that the accused used society funds to purchase properties and invest in personal businesses, many of which ran into losses. As a result, interest payments to depositors were halted. The probe also revealed that large loans were taken under benami names and repayments on these loans have also stopped.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
No evidence of negligence: HC quashes rash driving case against student
Mumbai: The Bombay high court has quashed a criminal case against a man who drove his car allegedly in a rash and negligent manner during the Covid-19 lockdown along Marine Drive. "The alleged incident occurred during the pandemic on a Sunday morning at around 7.15 am. Due to the pandemic, very few vehicles and people were on the road. Therefore, in our view, the allegations against the petitioner about rash and negligent driving to cause hurt is unlikely to happen, and there is no evidence on record to that effect," said Justices Ajay Gadkari and Rajesh Patil on July 18. Churchgate resident, 24-year-old Raaid Khan, a student, was booked by Marine Drive police under IPC Section 279 (rash driving on a public way). The FIR, lodged on the complaint of a police constable, stated that on June 14, 2020, five cars were being driven recklessly and negligently from Mafatlal Bath Junction at Chowpatty to NCPA and from there towards Churchgate junction by taking "crazy turns," thus endangering the lives of the drivers as well as others. Khan was arrested and released on bail. Since after filing of the chargesheet four years ago nothing happend, Khan moved HC to quash the case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The At-Home Belly Shrinker: Just 1 Teaspoon, Empty Stomach purefitnow Learn More Undo You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai Senior advocate Manjula Rao, for Khan, argued that the roads were completely empty and it was no one's case that a life was endangered or injury was caused to a person or property. The judges said it is an admitted fact that the alleged incident occurred during the pandemic period around 7.15 am. "There is no doubt that there is no loss to life or to any other property due to the alleged driving of the petitioner and the other co-accused," Justice Patil dictated the order for the bench. The judges noted that witness statements did not disclose Khan was seen driving rashly and negligently. Except for a "bald statement" that he was driving negligently, "there was no evidence to substantiate the charge" under Section 279. Referring to Section 184 (driving dangerously) of the Motor Vehicles Act, they said it was not the prosecution's case that Khan was driving at a very high speed. "The only allegation is that the car was being driven in a 'zig-zag' manner," they added. The judges said "no case of commission of offence alleged is made out" and "it would be an abuse of process of law to continue the present proceedings" against Khan. They directed him to pay Rs 2 lakh cost to the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa's Advocate Academy and Research Center within two weeks.
