Protesters, airplane watchers gather in Alberta as leaders head to G7
Corbin Johnson wants to catch a glimpse of the plane carrying U.S. President Donald Trump.
'Air Force 1 is certainly the gold standard, but I think myself and everyone else is very excited to see all the other aircraft are coming,' Johnson said Saturday, as he checked out a viewing area of the airport.
The spot is also one of three designated demonstration zones that police have set up in Calgary, with another in Banff.
Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting G7 leaders from the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan and Italy, who were expected to arrive Sunday for the start of the three-day summit in Kananaskis, southwest of Calgary in the Rocky Mountains. Some leaders of non-member countries, including Ukraine and India, are also set to attend.
Story continues below advertisement
Johnson, a camera around his neck, said he posts all his plane photos on Instagram.
'My love of airplanes, I would say started right here, where we're standing. My parents would take me here to plane spot and look at all the planes that would come through here,' he said.
'This is absolutely my number 1 hobby. It's something you can make as full time as you kind of want to.'
View image in full screen
Plane spotter Corbin Johnson is shown at the Calgary International Airport on Saturday, June 14, 2025. With world leaders arriving in Calgary for the G7 leaders' summit in Kananaskis, Alta., airplane enthusiasts are setting up shop at the Calgary airport in hopes of seeing some exciting aircraft. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Bill Graveland. BG
Jaidon Phelps, 20, is an aspiring pilot that works at WestJet. He was at the viewing area at 6 a.m. on Sunday.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'It's just cool to be part of what's going on and see what aircraft are coming in from all of the various nations that are participating and most importantly to see if we can get Air Force 1,' he said.
Story continues below advertisement
'It's just the magnitude of what it is. Something you've always wanted to see.'
The community of plane spotters tends to share intel, with some people noting early Sunday that the Japanese delegation was already Canada-bound. There was also discussion of the best location to see the planes come in.
As the leaders were scheduled to arrive hundreds of protesters from several different groups rallied in front of Calgary City Hall, another of the designated protest zones in the city.
Standing out was a definite anti-Trump bias with signs including 'Yankee Go Home,' 'Elbows Up' and 'True North Strong and Peeved.'
1:55
RCMP unveils security operation plans for G7 summit
Leanne MacKenzie said she lived in California for 20 years before coming back to Canada, and is disturbed by the situation involving the National Guard there.
Story continues below advertisement
Trump ordered the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles after protesters fighting federal immigration enforcement raids last week blocked a freeway and set cars on fire.
California's governor has opposed the deployments and the state has filed a lawsuit to stop them.
'Since Trump is supposedly here for the G7 I'm coming out today to protest fascism in the U.S.A.,' MacKenzie said.
'My understanding is this protest is being livestreamed. I'm sure he's going to look the other way because he's the biggest baby on the planet but I'm doing what I possibly can to make a difference and this is the only way I can at this point.'
Self-described grandmother Lesley Boyer was sitting in her wheelchair with a sign that had an expletive disparaging Trump.
'Both of my grandfathers fought fascists and I'm very concerned about (Trump's) 51st state comment and I'm very afraid that he may actually try something,' she said.
Though domestic air traffic continues to flow normally, it's far from business as usual at the Calgary airport this weekend.
2:09
Air restrictions over Calgary, Kananaskis for G7 Leaders' Summit
Police said they have received indications that protesters are expected, and the demonstrations are to be broadcast on TVs set up for the leaders in Kananaskis.
Story continues below advertisement
RCMP Chief Supt. David Hall said he just wants the protests to be peaceful.
'We know it's important for people to have their message seen and heard by the world leaders, and it's for this reason we've established live feeds,' he said.
'We police behaviours and not beliefs. And so I'd just encourage everyone to look to conduct any demonstration activity over the next few days in a lawful, peaceful and safe manner.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
NATO spending plan challenging for Canada
Opinion How much is $150 billion as an annual government expense? It's three times the annual Canada Health Transfer, the mechanism Ottawa uses to support provincial health care. In fact, $150 billion as an annual expenditure dwarfs the entirety of federal transfers each year ($100 billion) for health, social programs and equalization. In other words, it's a lot of money. However, it's also apparently the price of keeping one particularly bombastic president at bay. Adrian Wyld / The Canadian Press files Prime Minister Mark Carney U.S. President Donald Trump has frequently stated that a massive increase in defence spending is table stakes for getting preferential treatment on trade issues. The connection between defence spending and trade was made patently clear last week in The Hague, where the leaders of NATO countries held their annual summit. NATO has been on tenterhooks since January, when Trump warned member nations that if they did not meet the (then) two per cent of GDP spending target, the world's biggest defence spender would abandon the alliance. Trump complained, and with some justification, that some NATO countries (including Canada) are failing to meet the existing target. Canada currently spends just over $62.7 billion on defence. In one of his first acts, Prime Minister Mark Carney pumped another $9 billion into the defence budget, which pushed Canada to the two per cent threshold. However, just as Canada finally fulfilled its NATO spending obligation, the target moved. Late last month, NATO nations endorsed a plan — first suggested by Trump — to increase defence spending to five per cent of GDP over the next decade, broken down into 3.5 per cent on direct military spending (troops, weapons, munitions) and 1.5 per cent on 'militarily adjacent' things such as roads and bridges, emergency health care and cybersecurity. For Canada, the new target would eventually mean $150 billion annually on direct and adjacent military spending. Carney said that over the next five years, Canada can demonstrate increased military spending rather easily in the adjacent category of projects, which could include investments in ports, highways, telecommunications and the development of critical minerals. It's the direct military spending that has the potential to cast a long shadow over the federal budget. Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. Carney said if Canadians support the new spending target, it will mean 'considerations about what less the federal government can do in certain cases.' What federal programs could be impacted? Carney would not say, but when you're measuring increased defence spending in the tens of billions of dollars, you would need to start taking away from Ottawa's other hefty budget lines: transfers to the provinces, infrastructure spending and such programs as Employment Insurance, the Canada Child Benefit and federal pension funds. There is lots of wiggle room in this 10-year commitment. NATO leaders created a 10-year runway to achieve the new spending target knowing full well that in about three and a half years, Trump should cease to be president ('should,' because Trump has mused about finding a way to sidestep term limits). Should a Trump acolyte continue his legacy, it's quite likely the pressure to increase military spending will continue. However, there is one very important caveat in this equation that should be considered: the U.S. currently does not meet the new five per cent target. The U.S. spends roughly 3.5 per cent of GDP on its military, which is the most among NATO allies but still hundreds of billions of dollars below the new target. The U.S. will have to endure a domestic debate about whether this kind of spending is acceptable, even in a world that has been ravaged by conflict. It is often said that time heals all wounds. Perhaps time could, as well, play a major role reducing the need to spend more money on the tools of war by spending a bit more time and money on finding ways to stabilize global security.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
What Trump's deportation obsession means for Haiti
Opinion Life just got a whole lot more precarious for roughly 211,000 Haitians residing legally in the U.S. under temporary humanitarian parole status. And the chief source of that fear and danger is U.S. President Donald Trump, who has now even banned Haitians from entering the U.S. Yes, Trump campaigned in 2024 on securing the U.S.-Mexico border, stopping desperate migrants from Latin America from entering the U.S. illegally and initiating a mass deportation of the undocumented already living in America. But did anyone in the Trump administration even bother to think about what the life-altering implications of such a policy prescription would be? I'm sure that they did, though not in the compassionate way that you might think. The hard truth is that Trump's White House does not care one whit about these hundreds of thousands of frightened Haitians living in South Florida. Scaring them to death, targeting them with ICE raids and random stoppages is all part of coercing them into self-deportation via psychological warfare. Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump was within his executive purview to terminate a humanitarian parole/immigration program — instituted by the former Joe Biden administration in early 2023 to stem the flood of irregular migrants at the border — which protected some 530,000 Venezuelans, Cubans, Nicaraguans and Haitians from deportation. This judicial decision will have huge ramifications for migrant families (and their families still living in impoverished Haiti and dependent on remittances from America), communities, employers and even local businesses in the U.S. But I'm convinced that Trump and his acolytes – to say nothing of his MAGA base – have already dismissed these concerns as insignificant. When it comes to the current occupants of the White House, domestic politics trumps compassion, humanity and economics all the time. Those Haitians living in the U.S. will now have, from the official June 9 notice of termination, a 30-day window to leave the country. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security can, however, begin deportation proceedings at any time during those 30 days. Some Haitians may be in a position to apply for an alternative immigration status – such as temporary protected status, political asylum or take their chances and remain in the U.S. without the proper documentation. There are also some ongoing legal challenges, but it's hard to imagine that those will go in favour of the migrants. With Trump's presidency, you have to think that he will fight hard to block all of these last-ditch efforts. But is Haiti really a place where people should be forcibly returned? To be sure, the nightmarish conditions on the ground are horrendous, while the heavily armed gangs (and marauding self-defence brigades) are mobilizing to expand their control and territorial footprint as the country cries out for international intervention and compassion. Without any viable legal options, though, these Haitians will have little choice but to return to violence-wracked Haiti – the most impoverished country in the Western Hemisphere. But then what will they do? How do they keep body and soul together? Will they move to Canada? In the words of Ida Sawyer, the director of Human Rights Watch's crisis, conflict and arms division: 'Haitians, for example, could be sent back to Port-au-Prince, where they could be subjected to killings, kidnappings, forced recruitment, and widespread sexual violence by criminal gangs who control nearly all the capital, and where more than half the population suffers from acute hunger.' I've been asking myself another key question: if the situation in Haiti gets worse, will this still not precipitate a mass exodus of Haitian migrants heading toward the U.S.? Wednesdays Columnist Jen Zoratti looks at what's next in arts, life and pop culture. An early June editorial in the Miami Herald was close to the mark: 'People shouldn't be forced to return to a dictatorship in Venezuela, or gang rule in Haiti, because of the whim of a particular president.' It went on to call for a 'rational approach to immigration and deportation rather than one falsely based on fear or even prejudice.' So what does the deportation of Haitians say about the Trump Administration? For one thing, it clearly demonstrates that human rights considerations don't factor into its policy thinking. And that strongly suggests that Trump has no qualms about wheeling and dealing with governments in the world that don't respect human rights and basic freedoms. Equally important, as Haitian expatriate Tessa Petit, the executive director of the Florida Immigrant Coalition, remarked angrily: 'To the American people, I say this: It's us now, but your turn will come. If you don't look, speak, or act a certain way, your turn will come. You are allowing precedents that will change your world forever.' As for the world of those Haitian migrants, their whole lives have just been turned upside down. They can't stay in the U.S. and they greatly fear the danger and violence that awaits them in crisis-ridden Haiti. No wonder that many of them view this horrible situation as a potential death sentence. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Timmins grants Freedom of the City to Algonquin Regiment
Northern Ontario Watch The Algonquin Regiment received the Freedom of the City in a ceremony marking its 125th anniversary in Timmins. Mayor Michelle Boileau praised the unit's service, calling the honour a symbol of trust.
