logo
Ireland's new age check system kicks in and seeks to stop children accessing ‘adult' video

Ireland's new age check system kicks in and seeks to stop children accessing ‘adult' video

The Journal4 days ago
A NEW AGE verification system which seeks to prevent children from accessing 'adult-only' video content on sites such as Instagram and TikTok has come into place.
The age verification system is contained in
Part B of the Online Safety Code from Ireland's media regulator Coimisiún na Meán.
The code, which aims to address harmful and illegal content, applies to video-sharing platforms whose EU headquarters are in Ireland.
Many of these platforms are household names and includes Facebook and Instagram, as well as YouTube, TikTok, X, and Reddit.
However, this means many other major platforms, such as Snapchat, is outside of the remit of the Code and is instead subject to UK online safety legislation.
CyberSafeKids meanwhile noted that children will still have unrestricted access to harmful or pornographic content provided by other commercial operators outside of the Code's remit,
which falls instead under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA).
The new age verification system seeks to provide an 'effective method of age assurance' that will prevent children from accessing pornography or extreme violence.
Other restricted categories include cyberbullying, promotion of eating and feeding disorders, promotion of self-harm and suicide, dangerous challenges, and incitement to hatred or violence.
In the Code, Coimisiún na Meán notes that 'merely asking users whether they are over 18 will not be enough'.
It added that platforms will 'need to use appropriate forms of age verification to protect children from video and associated content which may impair their physical, mental or moral development'.
The Code requires video sharing platforms to implement 'effective age assurance measures' to ensure that 'adult-only video content cannot normally be seen by children'.
The Code does not mandate a specific type of age verification method but notes that an age assurance measure 'based solely on self-declaration of age by users of the service shall not be an effective measure'.
Advertisement
The video sharing platform is also required to have an 'easy-to-use and effective procedure for the handling and resolution of complaints' around age verification and related issues.
Platforms are also required to provide parental controls that enable parents or guardians to set time limits in respect of video content and to restrict children from viewing video uploaded or shared by users unknown to the child.
The Code was formally adopted last November but platforms were given nine months to make any changes that were needed to their online systems.
CyberSafeKids described today as a 'milestone that formally shifts legal responsibility onto tech companies to protect children online'.
It added that this move 'finally places a clear obligation on platforms to face the reality that underage users are accessing harmful content daily on their platforms, and to implement effective safeguards'.
While Coimisiún na Meán has not mandated a specific type of age verification system, CyberSafeKids said the nine-month implementation period has allowed 'more than enough time to develop robust age verification systems other than self-declaration'.
Meanwhile, CyberSafeKids
expressed concern that the Code does not cover the recommender algorithm system.
The recommender system is an algorithm that uses data to suggest items that a social media user might be interested in.
However, CyberSafeKids warns that 'much harmful content coming through a child's feed originates from this'.
The Irish Council for Civil Liberties previously warned that recommender systems 'push hate and extremism into people's feeds and inject content that glorifies self-harm and suicide into children's feeds'.
CyberSafeKids has called for the Code to be reviewed within 12 to 24 months.
'If the Code has failed to reduce underage access to harmful content, stronger measures must be implemented to keep children safe,' said CyberSafeKids.
'Financial penalties should be quickly and fully imposed for non-compliance, in line with the legislation.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vine comeback? Elon Musk teases return with a 'desecrating' twist
Vine comeback? Elon Musk teases return with a 'desecrating' twist

Extra.ie​

time5 hours ago

  • Extra.ie​

Vine comeback? Elon Musk teases return with a 'desecrating' twist

Elon Musk has announced that he is planning to bring back the iconic social media platform Vine – but with a not so iconic twist. Vine, which was essentially the 2010's version of TikTok, was acquired by Twitter in 2012 and had its plug pulled in 2017. Vine launched an iOS app in 2013 and quickly followed it with a Windows and Android version. The concept was that users could make quick, six-second videos that could easily be shared on other social media platforms. Musk's announcement was greeted by responses like 'Why does he ruin everything he touches?' Pic: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images The app itself was not only used to upload content but could also be used to browse uploaded videos and find other creators. It set the tone for the likes of Instagram Reels and TikTok. Its slow shut down began in 2016 when Twitter took down the mobile app and disabled uploads to the platform. Despite it having over 200 million active users at one stage, Twitter did not know how to effectively monetize the popular app and couldn't pay content creators to stick around. Musk has involved AI in a lot of his recent ventures. Pic:Existing content was still viewable for a few more months but on January 17, 2017, it officially no longer existed. However, it now looks like Vine could be brought back from the dead but not in a way that many of the nostalgic lovers of the app will want. Elon Musk tweeted: 'We're bringing back Vine, but in AI form.' We're bringing back Vine, but in AI form — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 24, 2025 The owner of X, formerly Twitter, didn't give any further explanation of what that could mean or what it could look like. X users were quick to share how they feel about an AI version of Vine and – as usual – they made their feelings about Elon abundantly clear. One user wrote: 'Why does he ruin everything he touches?' Another added: 'Stop forcing AI to our faces.' A third shared: 'He just has to ruin everything omfg.' Yet another agreed: 'He better not desecrate Vine like this… A whole app for 6 second AI slop?' Considering how much Elon has tried to make his AI assistant 'Grok' work on X since he bought Twitter, it comes as no surprise that he would try to dedicate a whole other app to glamourising AI. Thoughts? Feelings? Opinions?

Meta to halt political advertising in EU from October, cites EU rules
Meta to halt political advertising in EU from October, cites EU rules

Irish Independent

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Meta to halt political advertising in EU from October, cites EU rules

Meta's announcement echoed Alphabet unit Google's decision announced last November, underscoring Big Tech's pushback against EU rules aimed at reining in their power and making sure that they are more accountable and transparent. The European Union legislation, called the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising regulation and which will apply from October 10, was triggered by concerns about disinformation and foreign interference in elections across the 27-country bloc. The law requires Big Tech companies to clearly label political advertising on their platforms, who paid for it and how much, as well as which elections are being targeted, or risk fines up to 6% of their annual turnover. "From early October 2025, we will no longer allow political, electoral and social issue ads on our platforms in the EU," Meta said in a blog post. "This is a difficult decision - one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation, which introduces significant operational challenges and legal uncertainties," it said. Meta said the EU rules would ultimately hurt Europeans. "We believe that personalised ads are critical to a wide range of advertisers, including those engaged on campaigns to inform voters about important social issues that shape public discourse," it said. "Regulations, like the TTPA, significantly undermine our ability to offer these services, not only impacting effectiveness of advertisers' outreach but also the ability of voters to access comprehensive information." Meta's Facebook and Instagram are currently being investigated by the European Commission over their suspected failure to tackle disinformation and deceptive advertising in the run-up to the 2024 European Parliament elections. The EU probe is under the Digital Services Act, which requires Big Tech to do more to counter illegal and harmful content on their platforms or risk fines of as much as 6% of their global annual turnover. ByteDance's TikTok is also in the EU crosshairs over its suspected failure to tackle election interference, notably in the Romanian presidential vote last November. (Reuters)

Meta to pull political ads in EU in response to new disinformation rules
Meta to pull political ads in EU in response to new disinformation rules

Irish Times

time6 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Meta to pull political ads in EU in response to new disinformation rules

Meta will stop running political advertising in the EU from October, criticising 'unworkable requirements' under a new European law designed to increase transparency in digital campaigning. On Friday, the social media giant said it would no longer allow ads related to 'political, electoral and social issues' on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. The move comes ahead of the full implementation of the EU's Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising regulation, which introducing conditions on how online platforms serve political content to users. The regulation is designed to address concerns around information manipulation and foreign interference in elections, as well as the processing of personal data for political advertising. READ MORE It forms part of a broader push by Brussels to safeguard the democratic process and limit disinformation online. While the regulation is already in force, most provisions will only start to apply in October. Meta's move is in keeping with a more confrontational approach the US tech giant has taken with European regulators since Donald Trump was elected. The group has become one of the most vocal US tech companies criticising the EU's digital rule book, which has become a flashpoint in transatlantic trade talks and a target of criticism from the Trump administration. Meta said the TTPA regulation introduces 'significant operational challenges and legal uncertainties' and has thus decided to no longer allow such ads on its platforms in the EU. This limitation only applies to ads, so people or candidates can still post about or discuss politics on Meta's platforms. 'We continue to believe online political advertising is a vital part of modern politics, connecting people to important information about the politicians that represent them, and ensuring candidates have a cost-effective way of reaching their audiences,' the company said in a post. Meta's decision follows a similar decision by Google, which said last year it would stop political advertising before the regulation enters into force. 'Once again, we're seeing Europe's regulatory regime effectively remove popular products and services from the market, reducing choice and competition,' Meta said. The European Commission has several investigations running as to whether Meta is in breach of the bloc's Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act. Earlier this month, Meta also said it would not sign the EU's artificial intelligence code of practice, a set of guidelines that help companies follow the AI Act's rules around general-purpose AI that come into effect in early August. Meta said the code introduced legal uncertainties and goes far beyond the scope of the AI Act, but other leading US groups such as OpenAI and Anthropic have pledged to sign up to it. --Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store