Offices are about to get very, very grouchy
A year and a half later, she's still looking. Virtually no one has been hiring across tech, and the few jobs she's found were offering salaries far below what she's looking to earn. And now, as Donald Trump's tariffs have thrown the economy into turmoil and uncertainty, she fears it will take even longer to move on from her employer. That means she has to keep going to work, day after day, to a job she no longer wants to do. She feels herself getting more and more bitter — and she admits she's become pretty checked out on the job. "I'm just over it," she says.
Much attention has been paid to the fear that Trump's trade war will stoke inflation. But his on-again, off-again tariffs are already having another, more immediate effect: They're discouraging employers from hiring. White-collar professionals like Kathleen are finding themselves stuck in jobs they've been trying to leave for years, creating a simmering brew of pent-up frustration and low morale. Last year, employee engagement dropped to its lowest level in a decade — and the chaos created by Trump's tariffs could soon make the mounting dissatisfaction even worse.
"People are increasingly grumpy because they can't change jobs," says Guy Berger, the director of economic research at the Burning Glass Institute. "Even in a relatively optimistic case, this could go on for a while."
An unmotivated workforce isn't just bad for workers — it's bad for their employers. Studies have shown that employee disengagement results in lower sales, higher customer dissatisfaction, and smaller profits. Gallup estimates that low engagement is already costing businesses trillions of dollars worldwide — a bill that's likely to climb as more and more employees sour on jobs they're unable to leave.
What's more, an extended standstill can choke off economic growth. A healthy job market needs a certain amount of churn to move workers into jobs that make better use of their talents. Otherwise people get stuck in jobs they've outgrown, earning lower wages than their experience and skills merit. A job market that's frozen in place can slow economic growth for years to come.
Ever since the pandemic, when layoffs hit the fastest pace since the Great Depression, companies have struggled to stabilize their staffing levels. Economists have been calling the current hiring standstill the Big Stay. Late last year, that appeared to be coming to an end as a growing share of employers reported that they were preparing to hire more workers. But ever since Trump took office, it has started to look like the Big Stay could become the Endless Stay. "Firms that were planning on expanding are putting those expansion plans on ice," says Berger. "Some baseline level of uncertainty is now semipermanently in the mix. A lot of things that people thought were previously outside the realm of reality have suddenly become big risks."
A customer support manager I'll call Dean started looking for a new job seven months ago. He realized that he'd hit a ceiling at the tech company he works for, and he was eager for a new challenge. "I know I'm being underutilized," he says. "I don't want my skills to get rusty." Late last year, he was starting to feel optimistic he would land something soon. But now he's worried his search could stretch out a lot longer — perhaps through Trump's entire presidency.
"How do I make it through this storm?" he says. "Do I sit still, or do I go back on the hunt? I can't just wait it out for this to pass. This is the new world we're in."
The economic uncertainty also means that employees who are fed up at work can't afford to quit their jobs without having another lined up. Laurie, an auditor at an energy company, has been so miserable that she has saved up what she calls a "fuck you fund" — enough money to rage-quit her job if things got really bad. The fund is big enough to tide her over for up to a year, which she thought would give her more than enough time to find a new job. But not anymore. "I'm afraid the economy is turning to shit right now," she says. "Realistically, if you leave now, you could very possibly be unemployed for more than a year."
All this prolonged unhappiness doesn't just affect the employees who feel stuck in their jobs — it makes the office unpleasant for everyone. People can't acknowledge they're fed up with work, but their unspoken frustration comes out in other ways. "My tolerance level for bullshit is so low now," Laurie says. "My patience is wearing thin." Kathleen, who used to pride herself on her positivity, worries that her resentment is starting to seep through. "I just have a shorter fuse," she says. "I used to be happy to put in the extra mile. And I'm just not willing to do that anymore." It's like the office version of being in an unhappy marriage. If your coworkers feel trapped, it's hard for anyone to enjoy themselves.
Companies, of course, aren't powerless in a frozen job market. As the Big Stay threatens to turn into the Endless Stay, some employers can opt to shake things up — effectively forcing some churn into the labor market by firing old employees to make room to hire new ones. Companies like Meta and Microsoft appear to be doing exactly that, pushing out those they deem to be " low performers" while simultaneously going on a hiring blitz for AI engineers. Dissatisfaction at work, after all, can come from above as well as below.
But the new round of layoffs has left employees who are ready to move on feeling even more trapped. Having no job, they know, is way worse than being stuck in a mediocre one. Kathleen, the sales manager, has seen what it's like for her friends who are unemployed. She knows she's lucky to be earning enough money to pay her mortgage and send her kids to summer camp, even if she doesn't love doing the job that earns her that money.
Some people might be fine with that — treating a job as just a job — but Kathleen has always been an overachiever. She loves putting everything she has into work. She misses feeling that drive, and she knows she'll feel it again once she's in the right job. And that, in a nutshell, is the ultimate price we're paying for the Endless Stay. With everyone stuck in place, we're unable to tap into the kind of enthusiasm that inspires everyone to bring their best selves to their jobs, and to give it their all. Maybe a lot of low performers are just performers who are feeling low.
"I want to put the work in," Kathleen says. "I want to do all the stuff. It's been a long time since I've felt that kind of fire. I'm starting to wonder if it will ever get better."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UN chief urges tech sector to power data centers with renewables
By Valerie Volcovici WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.N. Secretary General António Guterres on Tuesday called on tech companies to power the build out of data centers with 100% renewable energy by 2030, even as the industry turns to gas and coal-fired power plants to meet surging demand. The secretary general made his case for why he believes energy-hungry data centers should lock in a future of clean energy, saying the transition to renewable energy is inevitable, even as some countries and companies still embrace fossil fuels. "The future is being built in the cloud," Guterres said in a speech at the United Nations' headquarters in New York. "It must be powered by the sun, the wind, and the promise of a better world." His appeal to technology companies comes a day before U.S. President Donald Trump unveils his administration's AI Action Plan, which is expected to contain a number of executive actions aimed at easing restrictions on land use and energy production to unleash artificial intelligence development. Trump has declared a national energy emergency to address the vast amounts of energy needed by data centers to power AI to compete with China and enable him to ease environmental restrictions to build more power plants fueled by gas, coal and nuclear. Top economic rivals, the U.S. and China, are locked in a technological arms race over who can dominate AI. At the same time, Trump has issued executive orders and signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that curtails the use of incentives for wind and solar energy, which dominate the queue of new power generation waiting to connect to the electric grid. Guterres also appealed to governments to ready new national climate plans to deliver the goals of the Paris climate agreement by September that will lock-in a transition away from fossil fuels. He said this moment is an opportunity for governments to meet all new electricity demand with renewables and use water sustainably in cooling systems.


Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
Can States Handle Disasters Without FEMA? The Legal Gaps Business Leaders Should Know
HUNT, TEXAS - JULY 6: Vehicles sit submerged as a search and rescue worker looks through debris for ... More any survivors or remains of people swept up in the flash flooding on July 6, 2025 in Hunt, Texas. Heavy rainfall caused flooding along the Guadalupe River in central Texas with multiple fatalities reported. (Photo by) A year already marked by record-smashing heatwaves, catastrophic storms, and deadly flash floods is forcing business leaders to reckon with an unsettling question: What happens if the federal government pulls back from disaster response? The idea of handling disasters without FEMA is not an abstract worry. In recent weeks, political debates have intensified over proposals to reduce federal spending on disaster relief or even eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) after the 2025 hurricane season, as reported by NBC News. Former President Trump and some congressional leaders have floated plans to shift primary responsibility for disaster recovery to state governments—a move that could leave businesses navigating a patchwork of legal systems without the backstop they've come to rely on for decades. This uncertainty comes as disasters batter communities from coast to coast. In the first half of 2025 alone, the U.S. suffered at least 15 billion-dollar weather disasters, including historic flooding, tornado outbreaks, and prolonged heat waves, according to Yale Climate Connections. Just this past weekend, flash floods devastated Kerr County, Texas, forcing rescues and shutting down businesses in a region still recovering from earlier storms. For business owners, investors, and insurers, this brewing shift raises urgent questions: If FEMA disappears, can state laws and budgets fill the gap? Will private enterprises have to shoulder more responsibility for disaster planning and recovery? And which states are prepared—or dangerously unprepared—to protect their residents and economic lifelines in a post-FEMA landscape? A Federal Safety Net Under ThreatALTADENA, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 30: People walk past a FEMA sign following a press conference at the ... More Altadena Disaster Recovery Center on January 30, 2025 in Altadena, California. House Democratic leaders and local officials held the press conference near the Eaton Fire burn zone to call for federal disaster assistance following the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles County. (Photo by) Since its founding in 1979, FEMA has been the cornerstone of America's disaster response. It funds emergency shelters, debris removal, rebuilding grants, and cash assistance for displaced families. Critically for businesses, FEMA programs like the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) grant fund projects that reduce future risks, a crucial buffer as extreme weather grows more frequent. Yet the agency has long faced political crossfire, with critics labeling it bloated or inefficient. Earlier this year, a lawsuit was filed against the Trump administration's previous halt to BRIC funding for certain states, highlighting how political swings can upend even well-established federal programs. If proposals to wind down FEMA proceed, business leaders would be left relying on a fragmented patchwork of state disaster laws—many of which, my research suggests, lack the resources or legal frameworks to handle large-scale crises. State Disaster Laws Are A Patchwork of Authority Every U.S. state has laws empowering governors and local officials to declare emergencies and coordinate response efforts. Yet those powers vary widely in scope, funding, and legal protections for vulnerable communities. Despite these structures, most states still rely heavily on FEMA for funding, specialized teams, and logistical support. Without FEMA, states would have to cover enormous costs themselves. For example, after Hurricane Harvey, Texas received over $13 billion in FEMA aid, money that state coffers alone could not match. The Business Risks Of A FEMA Void Businesses have more skin in this game than ever. Beyond humanitarian concerns, legal and financial risks loom if federal safety nets vanish. Federal aid often helps cover costs insurers won't, such as temporary housing, debris removal, and infrastructure repair. Without that aid, insurance companies may face larger payouts or withdraw entirely from high-risk markets. In Florida, for example, multiple insurers have already exited the market due to hurricane risks, leaving businesses scrambling for coverage. A weakened federal role could mean higher premiums, stricter underwriting, or outright denial of coverage in disaster-prone regions, especially for small and midsize enterprises without deep cash reserves. If state laws differ significantly on evacuation orders, business owners may be caught between conflicting mandates. For instance, if local officials order an evacuation, but state law vests that authority only in the governor, businesses face legal ambiguity about when to close operations, protect staff, or move inventory. Disaster response gaps also raise potential civil rights issues. Federal laws like the Stafford Act prohibit discrimination in disaster aid based on race, disability, or language. Many states lack comparable mandates, meaning vulnerable communities—and businesses serving them—could fall through the cracks if federal oversight disappears. Companies with operations across multiple states face a regulatory minefield if FEMA's uniform national standards vanish. Without coordinated federal logistics, restoring supply chains and reopening businesses could take longer, increasing downtime and losses. Which States Are Ready? Which Aren't? Few states are fully prepared to absorb FEMA's responsibilities. According to my analysis of disaster laws across the South and Mid-Atlantic, only a handful—like Virginia and Texas—have begun integrating equity planning, vulnerable population registries, and robust local emergency powers into state statutes. Other states, particularly smaller ones with limited budgets, may lack: That leaves gaps businesses can't ignore. A company operating in Virginia might navigate disaster recovery relatively smoothly, while the same company in Mississippi or Georgia could face a chaotic patchwork of legal obligations, prolonged closures, and community backlash. What Business Leaders Should Do Now While FEMA's fate remains uncertain, businesses should: FEMA's potential dismantling would represent the biggest shift in American disaster management in generations. Businesses that fail to prepare for handling disasters without FEMA amidst a state-led disaster regime risk higher costs, legal headaches, and reputational damage. Disasters don't respect state lines, but the laws governing them increasingly do. For business leaders, understanding those legal boundaries might be the key to survival in a future where the federal safety net is no longer guaranteed.


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Coca-Cola confirms it will launch cane sugar version in US amid Trump ‘enthusiasm'
Coca-Cola Company confirmed on Tuesday that it will launch a cane sugar version of its iconic drink in the U.S. amid President Trump's ' enthusiasm,' coming less than a week after the president revealed the change on social media. 'As part of its ongoing innovation agenda, this fall in the United States, the company plans to launch an offering made with U.S. cane sugar to expand its Trademark Coca-Cola product range,' the company said in a news release. The Atlanta-based company said the addition is 'designed to complement the company's strong core portfolio and offer more choices across occasions and preferences.' Trump said in a post on Truth Social last week that Coca-Cola agreed to use cane sugar in its flagship drink instead of high-fructose corn syrup. 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so,' the president wrote on Wednesday. 'I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!' The soft drink giant did not confirm the change last week, but said it appreciated Trump's 'enthusiasm' for the brand and that more details on 'new innovative offerings within our Coca‑Cola product range will be shared soon.' The soda sold in the U.S. is usually sweetened with corn syrup, while other countries — like Mexico, already use cane sugar. The 'Mexican Coke' is also sold in the U.S. Trump has been a longtime aficionado of Diet Coke, with the president having a red button installed at the Resolute Desk during his first term. When pressed, a staffer would bring the drink to the president.