Sutton cafes and takeaways with the lowest food hygiene scores
Environmental health officers visited premises across the borough between February and July 2025, handing out ratings based on food handling, cleanliness, and safety standards.
Three places were given a hygiene score of 1, meaning major improvement is necessary.
Seven others were rated 2, indicating some improvement is needed.
The ratings follow inspections by Sutton Council under the Food Standards Agency's national scheme. The scores range from 0 (urgent improvement required) to 5 (very good hygiene standards).
While businesses in England are not legally required to display their rating, all results are published online.
The rating does not reflect food quality, customer service or presentation, but focuses purely on hygiene, cleanliness and food safety management.
Low hygiene ratings in Sutton (Feb–Jul 2025)
Rated 1 – Major improvement necessary
Galaxy Cafe, 80 High Street, Carshalton — inspected June 3
Indiya Indiya, 354 High Street, Sutton — inspected June 18
Sureyan Express, 20 The Market, Wrythe Lane, Carshalton — inspected April 16
Rated 2 – Some improvement necessary
Chicken World, 28 High Street, Cheam — inspected March 5
Chopstick House, 64 Banstead Road, Carshalton — inspected April 23
COB / Authentic Biryani / Sensei Burger / Maki Kazzo / Nzalad, 1–3 Marshall's Road, Sutton — inspected April 15
Dosa Bhavan, 364 High Street, Sutton — inspected June 3
Ellachi Belmont, 13 Station Road, Belmont — inspected April 1
Esquires Coffee House, Unit 1 Level 1, St Nicholas Centre, Sutton — inspected March 8
Serans, 147 Stafford Road, Wallington — inspected June 19
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bank ‘must cut rates six times' over next year to boost ailing economy
Andrew Bailey must slash interest rates six times over the next year to bolster flagging growth, economists have warned. The Bank of England Governor and his colleagues on the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) are expected to cut borrowing costs from 4.25pc to 4pc this Thursday. But a growing cohort of economists predict Bank officials will be forced to go much further over the next 12 months. Six cuts would take the base rate to 2.75pc next year – the lowest level since late 2022. Peder Beck-Friis, an economist at Pimco, an investment company, said higher taxes, slower growth and the weakening jobs market will all push the Bank to cut rates further next year. 'While inflation has been surprisingly firm, we see good reasons to expect a slowdown. Regulatory price hikes, including in employment taxes, have pushed prices up, but wage growth is softening and the labour market is weakening,' he said. Companies are passing the £25bn increase in employers' National Insurance contributions on to customers, but 'once this tax shock fades, we expect inflation to ease, as seen in other developed countries'. 'We expect the Bank to accelerate rate cuts later this year, with the policy rate settling near 2.75pc next year,' he said. Michel Nies, from Citi, predicts rate cuts in August and November before an acceleration from December in the wake of 'very likely tax increases in the autumn Budget', taking the base rate to 2.75pc. He cites the weakening jobs market as the critical factor. The economy has lost 178,000 employees on payroll over the past year. Businesses in particular are taking a beating: 'The divergence between public and private sector employment growth continues to widen with the former still masking a sustained contraction in the latter,' Mr Nies said. Bruna Skarica, at Morgan Stanley, also expects cuts to 2.75pc because unemployment has risen to 4.7pc, the highest rate in four years. 'The build-up of slack in the labour market ... can only result in pay and price disinflation over time,' she said. 'The laws of economic gravity can be delayed, but not denied.' These economists remain in the minority, and even this week's anticipated rate cut will not be entirely uncontroversial. Policymakers are cutting interest rates even though inflation, at 3.6pc and rising, is well above its 2pc target. However, monetary policy takes as long as two years to feed through to consumer prices, meaning this week's rate decision will only fully pass through to inflation in mid-2027 - and will have little effect on the rise in living costs this year. Jack Meaning, a former Bank of England economist now at Barclays, forecasts a three-way split on the MPC. He anticipates that two policymakers will vote to hold rates, two for a double cut to 3.75pc, and the majority of five backing a move to 4pc. 'Despite these divergent views on both sides, we think the centre of the committee, and ultimately the decisive bloc, will continue on a gradual and careful quarterly rate cutting path, until it reaches 3.5pc in February 2026,' he said. The most recent three-way split came in May, when external MPC members Swati Dhingra and Alan Taylor voted for a half percentage point rate cut to 4pc. Earlier in the year, Mr Taylor said he favoured 'pre-emptive' rate cuts given the growing 'risk of demand stalling' in the economy. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge to decide fate of River Island after landlord rebellion
A High Court judge is set to decide the fate of River Island this week after the retailer's radical rescue plan failed to secure sufficient support from landlords and lenders. River Island is seeking to close 33 stores, cut rents on a further 71 shops and write off a series of debts, including business rates to councils, to get itself out of severe financial distress. The retailer has warned it will essentially run out of money by the end of the month if unable to back out of those payments, as previously revealed by The Telegraph. Around 80pc of River Island's creditors by value chose to support its plan, drawn up by advisers at PwC, during a vote held last Friday. It needed approval from at least three quarters of creditors to unlock an emergency loan from its own founders, the billionaire Lewis family. However, the company did not secure 75pc of the vote in every individual class of creditor, with some landlords resisting the plans. There are 10 creditor categories, ranging from councils owed business rates to landlords. Store owners include British Land, the Crown Estate and Mike Ashley's Frasers Group. Of the stores that River Island is not proposing to close, the company is aiming for three-year rent cuts of between 75pc and 25pc. The owners of 24 shops are asked to accept zero rental payments. The plan will be put before the High Court on Thursday for a formal decision on whether to approve the restructuring. A spokesman for River Island said: 'River Island circulated its proposals for a restructuring plan to creditors on June 20. In combination with the company's ongoing transformation strategy, the plan is a proactive measure to place the company on a firm footing. 'We have been having positive conversations with key stakeholders and are confident that we will achieve approval of the plan in the coming days.' River Island employs 5,300 staff in its stores and another 950 at its headquarters in Hanger Lane, West London. It blamed its liquidity crisis on 'a sharp rise in the cost of doing business over the last few years' and the shift to online shopping, burdening it with 'a large portfolio of stores that is no longer aligned to our customers' needs'. Some landlords have expressed frustration at the fact that they face financial pain as a result of what they claim is the retailer's mismanagement. 'This is family-run, they've just overstretched, and it's unfair that the landlords will struggle because they haven't maintained their relevance,' one landlord, whose stores are unaffected, previously told The Telegraph. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rachel Reeves under pressure to ‘urgently rule out' tax hikes
The Conservatives are urging Chancellor Rachel Reeves to "urgently rule out" increasing share taxes in the upcoming autumn budget, following the leak of a memo from Angela Rayner suggesting a series of tax hikes. The Tories argue that leaving investors "in limbo" could harm the economy. The party claims that scrapping the £500 dividend allowance would pull an estimated 5.22 million more individuals into paying investment levies. This pressure on ministers comes after a document, reportedly sent by the Deputy Prime Minister to Ms Reeves, was leaked to the press. In the memo, Ms Rayner proposed removing the dividend allowance to generate approximately £325 million annually, as well as axing inheritance tax relief for AIM shares and increasing dividend tax rates, according to The Telegraph. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride commented: 'The Government need to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm. 'Labour don't understand how business works and how to create growth. More taxes on investment, entrepreneurship and saving are the last thing our economy needs right now.' The Government's U-turns over welfare reform and winter fuel payments have left the Chancellor with a multibillion-pound black hole to fill, fuelling speculation that she will seek to raise revenue through tax hikes. The Tories claimed axing the dividend allowance would drag 'an estimated 5.22 million more people into paying dividend tax'. This figure appears to be based on an assumption that at least 8.82 million people in the UK hold shares that pay dividends. Some 3.6 million are already subject to dividend tax, according to data obtained by investment platform AJ Bell through a Freedom of Information request. The Chancellor last year said she would not be 'coming back with more borrowing or more taxes' after her first budget but has since refused to rule out raising specific levies, saying it would be 'irresponsible' to do so. A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'The Conservatives have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget, nor the £22 billion black hole they left – which hammered firms and families across the country. 'Labour is doing more to support business than the Tories ever could. 'We've already delivered three historic trade deals and four interest rate cuts – to reduce costs and put money back in people's pockets.'
