New Federal EV Fee Could Cost Owners More Than Twice the Average Gas Tax
The suggested annual EV registration fee, which essentially operates as a tax, is based on a Federal Highway Administration estimation that the average American uses about 550 gallons of gas per year, according to InsideEVs. However, the current federal gas tax is 18.4 cents per gallon, which comes out to about $101 when multiplied by 550, so there's a significant discrepancy with the fee for all-electric models, even if you go with the bill's initial suggestion of charging electric car owners $200 yearly. In other words, if the bill passes, EV owners would be paying an annual registration fee more than twice the average gas tax or the equivalent of the $0.184 tax on 1,389 gallons of gasoline. A proposed $20 annual fee for all drivers that was part of the bill was dropped.
The bill suggests that the $250 EV and $100 hybrid registration fees would generate around $40 billion over the next decade for the Highway Trust Fund (HTF), which pays for a variety of transportation infrastructure projects, Benzinga reports.
"By leveraging states' existing registration systems, the bill assesses an annual registration fee of $250 on EVs and $100 on hybrids (which currently pay a lesser share into the HTF) to ensure they pay for their use of the nation's roads and bridges. Together, these new user fees are expected to increase federal revenues by a conservative estimate of more than $38B over 10 years, all of which will be deposited into the HTF," Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chair Sam Graves said in an interview with Design News.
Consumer Reports notes that seniors, who drive far fewer miles than the average American, would have to pay almost six times the amount of driving the average new car getting 28 MPG. While hybrid owners wouldn't pay as much as EV owners, they would still face an annual fee roughly twice the amount they would pay in federal vehicle gas taxes when driving a less fuel-efficient internal combustion engine (ICE) model. Seniors driving hybrids would have a yearly fee three times that of a gas-powered car. The Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's bill also includes inflation adjustments for the annual EV and hybrid fee but doesn't include inflation adjustments for ICE vehicles. The committee reviewed the bill on Wednesday before it heads to the House Budget Committee.
The Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is right to consider changes to fuel taxes, which haven't been updated since 1993, considering that funding for the Highway Trust Fund has declined since around 2008. Just in 2024, the fund faced a deficit of $20.6 billion. While fuel tax revenues haven't been keeping pace with the increased adoptions of EVs, the revenues haven't experienced any adjustments for inflation, and EV owners appear to be picking up all the slack. EV drivers will also have to pay this significantly higher $250 fee upfront at registration instead of incrementally, like ICE owners would.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Obama, sedition and Trump's urgent need to distract
To any American with an extremely short memory or perhaps a desire only to see the world through Donald Trump's eyes, the recent memo from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the call from President Trump to investigate former President Barack Obama over the memo's claims of 'treasonous conspiracy' over claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election must be alarming. Talk of 'overwhelming evidence' and a 'yearslong coup,' 'seditious conspiracy' and 'treason' sure sound pretty serious. Well, they do until you quickly review your notes and recognize that A, President Trump has an urgent need for distraction given his ties to Jeffrey Epstein and the administration's failure to — despite big promises to the conspiracy-hungry during the presidential campaign — release details of the investigation into the late American financier and sex offender. And B, this is a subject that has been investigated to death with no fewer than four official inquiries, including a 2020 U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee report (written while the GOP had Senate control) and the special report authored by Trump-appointed special counsel John Durham that came out in 2023. And what did they find? There was ample reason to worry about Russian interference in the 2016 race, and it was clear the Kremlin didn't want Democrat Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office. Was then-candidate Trump complicit in these efforts? Nope, not in a manner those various investigators could prove. But Russian interference? There was ample evidence of computer hacking, of digging through emails and of using intermediaries to undermine Clinton (remember WikiLeaks?). Or how about simply remembering Robert S. Mueller III? The special counsel indicted a dozen Russians, none of whom has ever stood trial because they could not be extradited. Even then-U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio (now Trump's U.S. secretary of state) observed that interference signing off on that 2020 report, which concluded 'the Russian government inappropriately meddled in our 2016 general election in many ways but then-Candidate Trump was not complicit.' Hopefully, most people aren't taking these claims of treason seriously. They serve only to diminish Trump and Gabbard. Think those criminal referrals Gabbard has sent to the U.S. Department of Justice will result in a successful prosecution? Even Las Vegas will surely refuse wagers on that long shot. Those who still harbor doubts can go peruse those various reports (and their thousands of pages of findings). The rest of us will just have to be content to recognize that the current president and his cronies lie like rugs when it serves their purpose. Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump to sign executive order to push cities to curb homeless sleeping, drug use on streets
President Trump is set to sign an executive order on Thursday aiming to provide resources that would push cities and states to remove homeless people from sleeping on streets and to crack down on drug use. The order will direct Attorney General Pam Bondi to reverse precedents that limit state and local governments' ability to commit individuals on streets who are at risk to themselves or others, according to a White House fact sheet obtained by The Hill. It also requires interagency work on grants for states to enforce prohibitions on open illicit drug use, urban camping, loitering and squatting, and to track sex offenders. And, it requires redirecting funds to ensure people sleeping on streets and causing public disorder, and suffering from serious mental illness or addiction, are moved to facilities like treatment centers. Additionally, the order ensures that discretionary grants for substance use prevention, treatment and recovery do not go to funding 'drug injection sites or illicit drug use' and it aims to stop sex offenders who receive homelessness assistance from being housed with children, and allows programs to house women and children exclusively. The order, which USA Today first reported on, is described as an effort 'to restore order to American cities and remove vagrant individuals from our streets' in the fact sheet. It aims to redirect federal funds towards tackling substance abuse and the necessity of civil commitment. It is part of Trump's commitment to ending homelessness, according to the fact sheet, and follows a March order that directed the National Park Service to clear homeless encampments and graffiti on federal lands.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Lutnick: TikTok will go dark unless China agrees to US control
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick warned Thursday that TikTok will go dark unless China agrees to a deal in which American owners take control of the popular social media app and its algorithm. 'It's got to come out of Chinese control,' Lutnick told CNBC's 'Squawk on the Street.' 'We've made the decision. You can't have Chinese control and have something on a hundred million American phones. That's just not okay.' 'So, if it's in American control, China can have a little piece, or ByteDance, the current owner, can keep a little piece,' he continued. 'But basically Americans will have control, Americans will own the technology and Americans will control the algorithm.' TikTok has remained online for the past seven months despite a law requiring its parent company ByteDance to divest from the app or face a U.S. ban. The law, passed by Congress last year, was meant to go into effect the day before President Trump took office. However, former President Biden declined to enforce the law in his final days in office, and Trump quickly followed this up with an executive order delaying enforcement. He has since given TikTok two more extensions, as he attempts to strike a deal to keep the app available. The next deadline is set for Sept. 17. Trump said late last month that he had found a buyer for the app, which he described as 'very, very wealthy people.' However, he underscored the deal would likely require the approval of the Chinese government. 'If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen,' Lutnick added Thursday. 'If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark. And those decisions are coming very soon. …. The deal is over to them right now.' The Trump administration had previously finalized a deal on TikTok in April, but the effort was scuttled by the announcement of the president's 'reciprocal' tariff regime, which targeted China and other countries with hefty new import taxes.