Authors call on publishers to limit their use of AI
An open letter from authors including Lauren Groff, Lev Grossman, R.F. Kuang, Dennis Lehane, and Geoffrey Maguire calls on book publishers to pledge to limit their use of AI tools, for example by committing to only hire human audiobook narrators.
The letter argues that authors' work has been 'stolen' by AI companies: 'Rather than paying writers a small percentage of the money our work makes for them, someone else will be paid for a technology built on our unpaid labor.'
Among other commitments, the authors call for publishers to 'make a pledge that they will never release books that were created by machine' and 'not replace their human staff with AI tools or degrade their positions into AI monitors.'
While the initial letter was signed by an already impressive list of writers, NPR reports that another 1,100 signatures were added in the 24 hours after it was initially published.
Authors are also suing tech companies over using their books to train AI models, but federal judges dealt significant blows to those lawsuits earlier this week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
7 minutes ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI employees share their 3 favorite tips for using ChatGPT
If you ever happen to see Nick Turley, the head of ChatGPT at OpenAI, muttering to himself on a weekday morning, it might be because he's talking to a chatbot. Turley said that ChatGPT's voice feature is his favorite tip for using the technology on a recent episode of the OpenAI podcast. "On my way to work, I'll use it to process my own thoughts. With some luck, and I think this works most days, I'll have the restructured list of to-dos by the time I actually get there," he said, adding that the voice feature isn't yet mainstream because there are a bunch of small "kinks" still. He said he finds it valuable to force himself to articulate his thoughts aloud, and wants to see the feature improve next year. Mark Chen, OpenAI's chief research officer, said on the podcast that he's a fan of the deep research feature, especially before an introduction. "When I go meet someone new, when I'm going to talk to someone about AI, I just preflight topics," Chen said. "I think the model can do a really good job of contextualizing who I am, who I'm about to meet, and what things we might find interesting." And podcast host Andrew Mayne, who was formerly OpenAI's science communicator and worked on ChatGPT, said he uses the technology when he's out at a restaurant. "I take a photograph of a menu and I'm like, 'Help me plan a meal or whatever, I'm trying to stick to a diet," Mayne said. Turley, however, cautioned against using the same trick for the wine list. "It keeps embarrassing me with hallucinated wine recommendations, and I go order it and they're like, 'Never heard of this one,'" he said. Corporate executives across companies are using AI in their daily lives, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is no different. Altman said on the "ReThinking" podcast in January that he uses it in "the boring ways," for things like processing emails and summarizing documents. When Altman spoke on the OpenAI podcast in June, he said that he uses ChatGPT "constantly" as a father. At the time, he said he was mainly using it to research developmental stages. "Clearly, people have been able to take care of babies without ChatGPT for a long time," Altman said. "I don't know how I would have done that."
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How AI Agents can transform banking operations: 3 principles for ‘endgame', not ‘game over'
AI Agents – a sophisticated type of software capable of planning, reasoning, and executing tasks independently – are fast becoming a serious consideration for banks looking to streamline operations and boost resilience. With organisations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) touting the transformational potential of Agentic AI, banking leaders must focus not only on the technology itself but getting it used effectively. Will AI Agents on balance displace banking jobs, or will they become integral to a new hybrid human-machine operating model? In other words, is it 'game over' for bankers or is this simply the 'endgame'? In the banking sector, where the cost of error is high and regulatory obligations are extensive, finding the answer hinges on more than just technological capability. Instead, it requires a clear understanding of how AI fits into existing systems, how it learns, and most crucially, how it understands the organisation it's deployed in. For AI Agents to be meaningfully integrated into core business operations, they need more than a generalised grasp of the world (what we might call a 'Public World Model'). Agents also require a 'Private World Model', a real-time, contextual understanding of the specific business environment they serve. This Private World Model is what enables AI to move beyond basic task automation and operate with the discretion, safety, and strategic alignment necessary for use in high-stakes settings like risk, compliance, or customer operations. Building it takes more than data. It takes a structured approach that brings business context into every layer of AI deployment. Banks seeking to move from early experimentation to strategic, at-scale adoption should follow these three key principles: For AI Agents to deliver value, they must be embedded into the operating model, not bolted on as isolated tools. That means defining their purpose, boundaries, and how they interact with human teams from the outset. In practice, this requires cross-functional alignment. That means bringing together risk, compliance, technology, and business operations to ensure governance is embedded and responsibilities are clearly allocated. It's about answering the operational questions before the technical ones. For example: What will the agent do? What decisions can it make? How will performance be measured? How will human oversight work? In highly regulated banking environments, this level of discipline is essential. Poorly integrated AI risks duplication, degradation of service quality, or worse, regulatory breaches and reputational harm. Successful AI programmes treat these issues as first-order design considerations, not afterthoughts. The temptation to adopt AI Agents quickly across the enterprise is understandable, but rarely effective. A more sustainable approach begins with well-defined use cases that offer a high return with manageable risk. One clear example is JPMorgan Chase's COiN (Contract Intelligence) platform, which uses AI to review commercial agreements. It reportedly cut error rates by 80% and freed up 360,000 hours of legal review time annually. This isn't a theoretical impact. It's measurable operational efficiency, delivered through structured implementation and ongoing oversight. Banks should look for similarly contained, repeatable tasks that are essential but burdensome. These create ideal environments for AI Agents to demonstrate value while allowing teams to build institutional knowledge and governance muscle before expanding into more complex areas. AI deployment is not a one-off exercise. As business needs change and regulatory frameworks evolve, AI Agents must adapt in parallel. That means embedding feedback loops and performance monitoring from day one. Unlike static software, AI systems learn from data, and that data changes. Ensuring AI Agents remain aligned with business strategy requires structured retraining, robust monitoring, and clearly defined escalation routes when things go wrong. Change management for the human workforce is equally important. As tasks evolve, new skills and new ways of working are needed. Supporting employees through this transition is critical to building trust in AI, ensuring adoption, and maintaining operational integrity. Retail banks must act now to embrace AI Agents before they become the industry standard, rather than a competitive edge. The prize is substantial for those who are first adopters: greater efficiency, faster decision-making, more consistent compliance, and more responsive customer operations. But the route to get there is not through a single piece of technology. It's through a deliberate strategy grounded in business context and operational clarity. By focusing on integration, strategic implementation, and continuous learning, banks can shift from seeing AI as a bolt-on and start treating it as a vital core capability. Rather than triggering 'game over' for bankers, AI's real potential lies in shaping a more agile, resilient and scalable workforce where humans and machines complement one another. That's an endgame worth striving for. David Bholat is Professional and Financial Services Director at Faculty "How AI Agents can transform banking operations: 3 principles for 'endgame', not 'game over'" was originally created and published by Retail Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Watch: AI-powered robots face off in soccer tournament in China
July 2 (UPI) -- The first ROBO League robot soccer tournament took place in China, pitting AI-powered teams of robot players against one another in 3 vs. 3 matches. The tournament, held Saturday in Beijing, drew a crowd of thousands of curious spectators to watch the robots attempt to score goals using strategies determined by AI. "This is the first fully autonomous AI robot football match in China," Dou Jing, executive director of the tournament organizing committee and deputy general manager of Shangyicheng Technology and Culture Group, told the Global Times. "It represents a combination of technological innovation and industrial application, as well as an important window for bringing robots into public life and real-world scenarios." The tournament ended with the THU Robotics team from Tsinghua University defeating the Mountain Sea team from China Agricultural University team 5-3. The event was held in the lead-up to the 2025 World Humanoid Robot Sports Games, which will be held in Beijing in August.
