CM vows to resolve issues facing overseas Pakistanis
During the meeting, it was decided to appoint focal persons for the overseas Pakistanis in the Chief Minister's Office, Chief Secretary's Office and IG's Office. The focal persons of the Punjab government will play their effective and vibrant role in resolving the issues and problems pertaining to the overseas Pakistanis.
On this occasion, it was agreed to take prompt measures to make the Overseas Pakistanis Commission Punjab active and dynamic. The Chief Minister directed to resolve the issues of overseas Pakistanis on a priority basis.
MD Overseas Pakistanis Foundation Afzaal Bhatti gave a detailed briefing about the issues and matters of overseas Pakistanis belonging to Punjab. He also apprised the CM about the issues of OPF housing societies and schools.
The Chief Minister directed to resolve the problems of Overseas Pakistanis without any delay. She outlined that the current government is taking all possible steps to resolve the problems of Overseas Pakistanis at the earliest.
She said that overseas Pakistanis are the valuable asset of our dear homeland.
MD Overseas Pakistanis Foundation congratulated Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif on the success of Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos.
He emphasized that all Overseas Pakistanis stand shoulder to shoulder with the government and the Pakistan Army. He highlighted that the overseas Pakistanis celebrated the glorious victory in the war against India across the globe.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pak-India conflict: Indian opposition assails Modi for failures
KARACHI: Indian opposition parties on Tuesday assailed Prime Minister Narendra Modi for failures in the Pakistan-India four-day conflict earlier this year. As New Delhi launched deadly air strikes on Pakistan in early May over allegations about the Pahalgam attack, which Islamabad denied, PAF downed six Indian jets in its response. After tit-for-tat strikes on each other's airbases, it took American intervention on May 10 for both sides to finally reach a ceasefire. Speaking in the monsoon session of the Indian lower house of parliament, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi said Modi's government 'lacked the political will to fight Pakistan and, because of that, asked the armed forces to attack with their hands tied behind their backs,' according to NDTV. 'If Modi ji has even 50 per cent of the courage that Indira Gandhi had, then clearly say in parliament — Donald Trump is lying,' Gandhi, who is a member of the opposition Congress party, said. He added that the Indian prime minister should state that neither did Trump broker a ceasefire, nor have any of India's planes had been shot down. 'Don't make the army a means to save your image, Modi ji,' Gandhi said. 'The defence minister said the most shocking thing. He said that, at 1:35 am, we called Pakistan and told them we had hit non-military targets and didn't want an escalation,' he added. The Indian leader of the opposition said the Indian defence minister did not understand what he revealed, adding, 'The Director General of Military Operations was told by the government to ask for a ceasefire at 1:35am that very night.' 'You told the Pakistanis exactly what you would do, that you would not hit military targets. You told them directly that you don't have the political will to fight. It's like you are telling them, 'We have slapped you, but we won't slap you further',' Gandhi said. Referring to the Indian Chief of Defence Staff's admission that Indian jets had been shot down by Pakistan, he said, 'CDS Gen Chauhan should have the guts to say that my hands were tied behind my back by my own government.' He added that not a single country has condemned Pakistan. Deputy Leader of the Congress party in the lower house, Gaurav Gogoi, said, 'You think 35 Rafale jets are enough — we don't think so. Even losing one would be a big loss,' according to Indian news outlet the Economic Times. 'The media, which gets its information from you, made it seem like we would wake up in Karachi the next day — but you stopped short,' Gogoi added. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi said, ' Agencies failed. This falls under the home minister — did he resign? Did he even take responsibility?' She also questioned why PM Modi agreed to stop the war. Leader of the Opposition of the Upper House Mallikarjun Kharge questioned if the Indian government had prior notice of the Pahalgam attack, saying, 'PM [Modi] cancelled his schedule three days before the Pahalgam attack — was the govt aware in advance?' 'Trump says five jets were shot down. If he's your friend and you campaign for him, why are you silent on this?' Kharge asked PM Modi. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
From citizens to collaborators to collateral damage
Listen to article What is the cost of denial and non-closure in the face of an ongoing genocide? The plight of the fourth- and fifth-generation descendants of nearly 300,000 patriots — still confined to 6x6 cages in Bangladesh - is systematically pushed aside by more media-savvy and politically-palatable priorities. With each passing day, the likelihood of historical inclusion for Pakistanis caught in the conflict of 1971 — widely viewed by influential voices in activism, advocacy, academia and authority as those who 'stood on the wrong side of history' — continues to wither. And yet, I find myself still owning a cause that even many within this community (arguably the most doomed among those who have themselves endured genocide and ethnic cleansing) have chosen to ignore, as an act of pragmatism, if not quiet apathy. Various telling examples of this eradication persist in academic literature that "convincingly" confirms not only the genocide of Bengalis but, in many cases, may aggrandise it. Recently, I came across mentions of a forthcoming book, Citizens to Traitors by Dr Ilyas Chattha, with endorsements from eminent historians like Ayesha Jalal and Bina D'Costa. The book studies the 'internment of Bengalis in Pakistan between 1971 and 1974', following the 'liberation of Bangladesh'. Although I have not had access to the full text, the existing previews moved me to respond. (This reference was not part of my original op-ed.). I congratulate him for addressing this heartbreaking chapter. While respecting the academic intent, the claim merits further exploration. Many Bengalis, including public figures who chose to remain Pakistani, were accorded full rights. Many still travel freely to and from Bangladesh. Those who renounced Pakistani citizenship, including students, diplomats and military personnel who supported the creation of Bangladesh, left peacefully, selling their assets without reports of violence or harassment in West Pakistan. The contrast in East Pakistan was stark: thousands of pro-Pakistan civilians, mostly Biharis, were mercilessly executed by Muslim Bengali Mukti Bahnis. Women were raped, killed, or abducted. As documented in Blood and Tears by Qutbuddin Aziz, this brutality has long been concealed. Survivors were displaced, exiled from homes, and left to rot in wretched camps. Over five decades later, these shelters remain symbols of betrayal not just by Bangladesh but by Pakistan too: the country they defended and the country that denigrated them. It seems that books like Dr Chattha's, along with many other theoretical works on 1971, almost entirely eliminate the Bihari version of history. Is this a minor oversight? Or does it expose a patent pattern in South Asian historiography to centre those who align with profitable storylines, while stifling those whose tribulations are dismissed as unmarketable? Academics must draw a line between selective amnesia that serves political convenience and the pursuit of historical truth. I hope I am mistaken. For the sake of intellectual honesty, I imagine that all such academics would be writing about the genocide of my community, deliberately undocumented and denied. As someone who has lived through this erased history, I request the State to investigate the 'internment' and share the truth with us, the citizens, no matter how ugly it may be. This is a matter of the country's image. I wish I had access to the opinion-shapers to tell the story of how Biharis and other non-Bengali Urdu speakers were relegated from loyal citizens to stateless 'collaborators'. Today, my people are shelved as 'collateral damage', deserted by Pakistan (repatriation froze long ago), and marginalised even by those who claim to champion minority and human rights. I wish I could engage with elite students of elite universities to emphasise what it feels like to be on a US fellowship, only to find your host is a Bangladeshi American who proudly says he was a freedom fighter and assassinated Biharis. I wish I could elucidate what it feels like to look around at fellow Pakistanis and find no support, only silence and solidarity with the dominating-hateful narratives. I wish I could conduct simulation workshops with Pakistani youth, who frequently use social media for gaining information. I would assign roles as pro-Pakistan Biharis and ask, would you cooperate with the army in intelligence gathering? Could you resist local rebels trained in guerrilla warfare? Could you remain neutral, and if so, would anyone believe you? Such morally grey history still defines the reality of my community. The slaughter and devastation of my people in East Pakistan carried out with the reinforcement of international and regional players has been rebranded as the butchery of Bengalis. Through my single-handed research and podcast work with survivors, I have recorded some indescribable testimonies. Nonetheless, due to power inequities and very real risks, many of those responsible for perpetuating this propaganda against Biharis cannot be named. Many ordinary, educated eyewitnesses to the 1971 tragedy are still alive. Yet voices like theirs are never invited to share their lived truth. To simply say: Bengalis were not traitors to begin with. And the stranded Biharis were never traitors either. They stood with the state and its soldiers, not the separatists, and are still paying the price. How long must new generations of those ill-fated Pakistani citizens who committed the "crime" of supporting the central state continue to tolerate the signs of genocide? What message does their horrific end send to anti-state voices in today's Pakistan? Please just take a look. Empathy, not sympathy. That is all we ask. But that remains a distant dream. Personally, I do not see either Biharis or Bengalis as villains, only victims of a conflict in which the majority had little say, little consent, and were forced to choose sides. Yet some form of remorse, and some measure of compensation, must follow. The difference between the two lies in the state: the former remain stateless; the latter have a homeland of their own. The reality, however, is far harsher, far darker, than I could ever fully express. Pakistan, I still love you!
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Ex-Indian minister slams Modi over Pahalgam: ‘Don't blame Pakistan without proof'
NEW DELHI: Former Indian Home Minister P Chidambaram has said that there is no evidence of Pakistan's involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist attack; the attackers were Indian nationals. Chidambaram, who is a member of the opposition Congress, questioned the Modi government 'Why does the Indian government assume that the attackers came from Pakistan? Has the government identified them as Pakistanis?' Congress leader P Chidambaram triggered a massive political controversy with his comment in an interview, in which he said 'homegrown terrorists' could be involved in the Pahalgam terror attack. He also said that 'there is no evidence' so far that the killers came from Pakistan. Chidambaram in an interview with The Quint said, 'Have they identified the terrorists? Where they came from? I mean, for all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There's no evidence of that.' Chidambaram also questioned BJP government's 'silence' on the issue. 'And why is the Prime Minister not speaking on Operation Sindoor? Why do you think there's a reluctance to have a debate in the temple of democracy? That's what Parliament is. After all, Prime Minister Modi has addressed the nation. He's addressed various rallies,' he said. Reacting sharply to his remarks, BJP's IT cell head Amit Malviya posted on 'X' that 'Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan'. 'Why is it that every time our forces confront Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad's defence lawyers than India's opposition?' Malviya asked. As row erupted over his remark, Chidambaram in a post on X said, 'The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!'
