At WTO, India Proposes Retaliatory Duties Against US Aver Auto Tariffs
India on Friday proposed imposing retaliatory duties under the WTO (World Trade Organisation) norms against the US over American tariffs imports on the country's auto parts in the name of safeguard measures.
"The proposed suspension of concessions or other obligations would take the form of an increase in tariffs on selected products originating in the United States," according to a notification of the WTO being circulated at the request of India.
India has notified the WTO's Council for Trade in Goods of its proposed suspension of concessions and other obligations under certain WTO provisions.
"This notification is made in connection with safeguard measures extended by the United States of America on imports of automobile parts from India," it said.
On March 26 this year, the US adopted a safeguard measure in the form of a tariff increase of 25 per cent ad valorem on imports of passenger vehicles and light trucks, and on certain automobile parts from India.
These measures apply from May 3, 2025 as regards automobile parts, and for an unlimited duration.
The measures have not been notified by the United States to the WTO, but are, in essence, safeguard measures.
India has maintained that the measures taken by the United States are not consistent with the GATT (General Agreement on Trade and Tariff) 1994 and the agreement on Safeguards.
As consultations sought by India on these tariffs have not taken place, "India reserves the right to suspend concessions or other obligations", the WTO notification added.
The safeguard measures would affect USD 2,895 million imports annually into the United States of the relevant products originating in India, on which the duty collection would be USD 723.75 million.
"Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States," it said.
To ensure the effective exercise of its right to suspend substantially equivalent concessions or other obligations, the multinational body said, India has reserved its right to adjust the products as well as the tariff rates.
"India reserves the right to withdraw, modify, supplement or replace this notification,and/or make a further notification or notifications as and when required," it added.
The development is important as India and the US are actively negotiating an interim trade agreement to boost trade ties.
India has last month taken similar measures against the US tariffs on steel and aluminium.
Commenting on India's decision to reserve rights, think tank Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) said India's WTO notification is a legal and strategic step, signalling its readiness to retaliate against the US safeguard duties on automobiles and parts.
By invoking a provision of the WTO's Safeguards Agreement, India is asserting its rights under international trade rules. "The proposed retaliation -- tariff hikes on US goods worth over USD 700 million -- is proportionate to the injury caused. However, whether India will follow through remains uncertain," GTRI Founder Ajay Srivastava said.
He added that in a similar case involving US steel tariffs, India held back.
Given the sensitive timing of the India-US trade deal and broader geopolitical considerations, this may be more of a warning shot than a guaranteed action, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
Crafting iconic brands for the next billion consumers: ETBWS2025
It was the grand opening that set the stage for the rest of the day at the Brand World Summit 2025 . Sanjiv Mehta , executive chairman, L Catterton India invited Sudhanshu Vats , MD, Pidilite Industries to "do a bit of crystal ball gazing" into India's consumption story, particularly with an eye in 2047 – a century after India gained its independence. Vats responded with a projection of India's economic might. "India by 2047 would be anywhere between a USD20 trillion to a USD30 trillion economy," he declared, emphasising the profound impact this growth would have on per capita income and, consequently, consumption. Vats elaborated on the "magic" that unfolds in consumer spending as per capita income rises. He highlighted that if the economy touched USD 20 trillion, the per capita income would be in the range of USD 12000 and if the economy touched USD 30 trillion then the per capita income would be anywhere between USD18000-20000. "The journey from currently about USD3,000 per capita to almost USD12,000 per capita, which we will definitely go to in 2047, is going to be incredible across categories," Vats asserted, his voice brimming with optimism. He concluded this segment with an inspiring message for the audience: "It's a great time to be in India. It's a great time to be a young leader in India, and it's a fantastic time to be a young marketing leader in India." Vats even envisioned a future where "many Indian brands on the Global Map" would be a common sight. The Untapped Potential: Deep Diving into Consumer Needs Mehta then turned to Narasimhan, inviting her to add a "distinct flavor" to Vats' broad economic outlook. Drawing on her extensive experience in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods ( FMCG ) sector, Narasimhan brought the discussion down to a granular level, using the example of oral care to illustrate India's immense consumption potential. "Even a simple thing like oral care, consumption in India, universal penetration, which is fantastic," Narasimhan began, highlighting that "every home has a toothpaste and a toothbrush." However, she quickly pointed out the significant gap: "our consumption continues to be half that of Indonesia, a third that of even markets like Brazil." This disparity, she noted, suggests the possibility of a "2x market or a 3x market just by catching up with some other countries." Narasimhan further exemplified this with the category of mouthwash, which has a mere "one per cent penetration" in India, indicating "so much headroom to grow." She emphasised that the core of India's consumption story lies in effectively segmenting the nation's 1.4 billion people. "Perhaps the way to win in India is to take this 1.4 billion, break it up, saying these are manageable sections. They have a need, and we can service that need," she explained, referencing Unilever's "winning in many Indias" strategy. She shared a recent success story from her own experience: "We've launched a purple toothpaste which we thought would appeal to a small set of people, actually much wider than we thought." This anecdote underscored her belief that "there's so much going on in India, if we spend the time to understand the consumers and make sure that we're creating for that need, this vision that you know so many people have for India, 2047 is certainly within our grasp." The Enduring Principles of Marketing in a Digital Age Mehta steered the conversation from macroeconomics to the evolving world of marketing. "I don't think there is any country in the world which is going to drive consumption as India is going to do in the next two decades," he stated emphatically. He then posed a crucial question to Narasimhan, acknowledging her journey through different eras of marketing, from pre-digital to the age of AI. "What has changed and what has not changed in the world of marketing?", he asked. Narasimhan's response was a thoughtful delineation of the immutable principles versus the evolving methods. "I'll start with what has not changed, because I think it's really important," she began. The first fundamental, she stressed, is that "brands that win serve a real need of consumers. They do it in a fashion that is authentic and delivers value, and that's not going to change." She highlighted timeless human motivations, such as a parent's desire for their child's well-being, as examples of needs that remain constant despite technological advancements. The second unwavering principle, according to Narasimhan, is the inherent intelligence of consumers. "Consumers are exceptionally smart. They know value when they see it. If you don't deliver value, you will not survive." However, she acknowledged the seismic shifts in "the how." "If in the past, you could do this absolutely one-way monologue, where you create one piece of advertising, you push that piece of advertising out to millions and millions, and you repeat. And that was the way to build brands," she explained. "Now you have the opportunity to segment, to cohort, to make small sizes, to reach individually and importantly, you have the opportunity for dialogue." She attributed this transformation directly to technology, stating, "Without tech, we would not be able to do these small cohorts... many things, create the dialogue, have the conversation, while yet staying rooted to authenticity and values." Storytelling: The Heartbeat of Brand Building Mehta picked up on Narasimhan's point about the changing methods, specifically asking Vats about the critical role of storytelling in marketing in the current tech-driven landscape. Vats emphatically declared, "Storytelling in marketing and brand building has been very, very essential. Brands were always told through stories or built through stories." While the methods of storytelling have evolved, the essence remains. He introduced his "5 Ps" framework for marketers, with "proposition or its position" being the most critical, largely conveyed through stories. The fifth P, he added, which has become increasingly vital, is "purpose," which again, can be powerfully established through stories. Vats offered a compelling anecdote about Fevicol. Vats recounted, demonstrating how the brand has come to symbolise an "ultimate bond," both in its physical strength and its association with relationships. He further reflected on his experience with other iconic brands like Hamam, Castrol, and Colors, all of which leveraged powerful storytelling. "I thought the brands the past achieved were built by people telling stories almost one on one," Vats mused. In today's tech world, he noted, "all you are doing is, once again through content, building communities, connections, and then building commerce." Narasimhan chimed in, reinforcing Vats' point, observing that many successful founders today begin with a "very personal story." These authentic narratives, she noted, "grip you saying, okay, this makes sense to me, and this is a reason for me to buy into the brand". Timeless Brands: Trust, Consistency, and Relevance Mehta then shifted gears, addressing a common perception that the "era of brand is over." He challenged this notion, citing brands that have "survived the Black Friday" and remain "timeless." He specifically pointed to Colgate as an example, a brand relevant across generations. "What makes a brand timeless?" he asked Narasimhan. Narasimhan identified three core elements. The first is an "unshaking commitment to delivering quality." She emphasised that "timelessness is a trust. It's a relationship that's built over years, and the key foundation of any relationship... is trust." For an FMCG brand, this translates directly to product quality – if Colgate promises to prevent cavities, it must deliver. The second crucial factor is consistency. "You don't want them to be A one day, B another day, C a third day. Then you're confused," she explained, drawing a parallel to human relationships. Narasimhan questioned whether the constant pursuit of novelty in modern marketing might sometimes sacrifice this vital consistency. "You can tell the same story consistently. You can do it in a refreshed manner and stay consistent. You don't have to change yourself entirely." Finally, the third element is the ability to keep pace with change. "Meats change, food habits have evolved. Therefore what you require from your toothpaste has evolved. Socialising has evolved. Therefore what you require from your toothpaste and oral care regimen has evolved. You need to keep pace with change," Narasimhan concluded. She underscored that these three principles are "all underpinned by this authenticity or purpose" that brands must embody. Mehta summarised Narasimhan's perspective: "the brand is a promise, and the timeless brand is a promise delivered consistently." Marketers as Architects of Innovation Turning to Vats, Mehta brought up Pidilite's reputation for innovative products and asked about the marketer's role in innovation. Vats emphasised the critical importance of staying "connected with your consumer or customer." He explained that "innovation happens by understanding today's needs, or unmet needs." He detailed Pidilite's extensive engagement with its three million users, including carpenters, plumbers, electricians, contractors, and now architects and interior designers. This constant dialogue, he noted, helps them understand what works and what doesn't. This deep consumer understanding fuels Pidilite's innovation engine. "A third of our portfolio is Fevicol today," Vats shared, "A fourth of our portfolio is a portfolio that did not exist, definitely seven years back, maybe even five years back." This continuous evolution, he asserted, is a direct result of "continuously listening to what your customers are saying, what your consumers are saying, and bringing the next product which is needed." He defined Pidilite's "pioneering" spirit as "nothing but listening to your customers and consumers seeing what are the unmet or underserved needs... and how are you plugging that with a brand." Global Ambitions: Indian Brands on the World Stage Mehta then posed a challenging question to Vats, reflecting on Narasimhan's experience of bringing a global brand to India. "What would it take for an Indian brand to become as big as Apple?" Vats identified two key drivers. First, the sheer growth and heft of the Indian economy. He explained that as India's economy expands, so will its exports, often including its brands. He cited Fevicol's presence in 100 countries as an example, noting its recognition in parts of Africa. Second, is the ability to build brands that stay consistent and "start with a human need". Vats highlighted universal human needs like "respect, belonging, love, leadership" as foundations upon which brands can travel globally. "Bring a point of view of yourself as a brand, bring a bit of a and understand the cultural context, first and foremost, of India. But if it is a universal human being, the brand will travel." He stressed the importance of not compromising on quality, aiming to make products that are "best in the world". Embracing AI: The Future of Marketing The discussion concluded with an inevitable topic: Artificial Intelligence (AI). Mehta acknowledged the prevailing fear that AI might displace jobs and asked Narasimhan what marketers need to do to prepare for an AI-pervasive world. Narasimhan asserted, "I don't think that we should see AI as a threat to marketeers, but more as an aid to marketers used properly." She believes AI will enable marketers to achieve the "fundamental thing that we've been talking about, which is, how can I have a one-to-one conversation with somebody?" AI, she added, allows marketers to do this "in a more seamless, faster, more efficient manner". However, she maintained that "the idea of who I am as a brand, what do I bring to you, and what need do I serve? I think it will still need to be served by humans, panel moderators or panel respondents." Mehta concluded the session by summarising the key takeaways. India's unique position on the "cusp of greatness," is driven by a newfound "self belief and confidence". Second, he reiterated that while the means and methods of marketing have dramatically changed with technology, the core principles of marketing remain timeless: "insights, creating products which meet the unmet needs, product superiority, storytelling, occupying the emotional space, building relationship with the consumers". Finally, addressing the AI revolution, he urged marketers to embrace AI, learn prompt engineering, and understand how to use tools like ChatGPT. "We don't expect marketers to learn how to build LLMs, but we certainly expect marketers to use AI, because that would make you a better marketer".
Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
India shines while Asian manufacturing falters amid tariff turmoil
New Delhi: Manufacturing activity across most of Asia's export-driven economies faltered or saw only marginal improvement in June, as global trade tensions—exacerbated by a fresh wave of US tariffs—continued to weigh on sentiment. In this gloomy landscape, India stood out as a rare bright spot. Every major Asian economy that ran a trade surplus with the US last year saw factory output either contract or eke out a tepid rebound last month. That includes China, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, and Malaysia—economies heavily reliant on American demand. The tariff freeze announced by President Donald Trump on 2 April is set to lapse on 9 July, casting further uncertainty over Asia's near-term export outlook. China's manufacturing sector, the region's bellwether, offered a glimmer of hope as the Caixin General Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) rose to 50.4 in June from 48.3 in May—its highest reading since March and a return to expansionary territory. Still, the recovery remains fragile: over the past year, factory activity in China has swung between weak growth and contraction. Vietnam's PMI fell for a third straight month to 48.9 in June, while South Korea and Malaysia both reported sub-50 readings despite slight upticks, indicating continued contraction. Japan's data also showed lacklustre activity. In stark contrast, India's manufacturing sector continued to gather steam. The HSBC India Manufacturing PMI, compiled by S&P Global, rose to 58.4 in June, up from 57.6 in May, marking a 14-month high. This strength was underpinned by solid growth in output, new orders, and employment—even as the global trade backdrop remains shaky. India's performance stands out not just in momentum but in context. While China, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, and Malaysia posted trade surpluses of $295.4 billion, $123.5 billion, $66 billion, $68.5 billion, and $24.8 billion respectively with the US in calendar year 2024, India's surplus was far smaller at $45.7 billion, according to US Trade Representative data. That makes India relatively less exposed to the tariff blowback and explains some of its resilience. 'The tariff war seems to have become a protracted affair, engendering structural changes in its wake as optimism of post-Cold War multilateralism finally dies down,' SBI Capital Markets said in its June Ecocapsule report. 'India seems attractively positioned, with fiscal and monetary policy playing a critical role in navigating these generational changes,' the report added. Yet the picture isn't uniformly bright. India's industrial production growth slipped to 1.2% in May, the slowest in nine months, as manufacturing momentum weakened and mining and electricity output contracted. That's a sharp contrast from the 6.3% expansion recorded in May 2023. While April's figure was revised upward to 2.6%, it still underlines ongoing strain in core sectors. Meanwhile, Moody's Ratings last week downgraded its outlook on sovereign creditworthiness in Asia-Pacific to negative, citing escalating trade policy uncertainty. The agency noted that export-heavy economies in the region—including China, Taiwan, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, and Vietnam—face rising cyclical and structural credit risks due to the tariff shock. 'Many export-reliant APAC economies were hit with very high US tariffs in April,' Moody's said. 'Policy uncertainty is challenging investment decisions and disrupting trade. We now expect the tariff shock to lead to lower economic growth in 2025 and 2026 than previously forecast.' To be sure, sector outlooks are distinct from rating outlooks, which, in addition to sector dynamics, also reflect issuers' specific characteristics and actions.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Mint Quick Edit: Elon Musk's new ‘America Party' has spotted a gap in US politics
Next Story Mint Editorial Board There's space for a fiscally responsible voice and Musk's America Party seems keen to stir a rebellion on the right, but his business interests could get in the way of his political venture. Elon Musk himself can't be president of the US as he was not born there, but the country is arguably in need of a political voice for fiscal responsibility. Gift this article Billionaire Elon Musk is not about to exit US politics. Over the weekend, he launched the America Party to take on both the Republican and Democratic parties. Billionaire Elon Musk is not about to exit US politics. Over the weekend, he launched the America Party to take on both the Republican and Democratic parties. This is what Musk had threatened after his falling-out with Republican US President Donald Trump over the latter's One Big Beautiful Bill, which was passed by American lawmakers despite Musk's fierce objections to the huge overload of public debt it would result in. Also Read: X factor: The rise and fall of Elon Musk as a political figure This criticism is valid. Over time, it could lead to the US inflating its debt away, even practising financial repression. It's also true that Musk's own business interests are hurt by the legislation's withdrawal of clean-energy incentives. Tesla, his electric car company, has been doing poorly even with state support. Musk himself can't be president of the US as he was not born there, but the country is arguably in need of a political voice for fiscal responsibility. Also Read: Musk's woes: Tesla hit refresh on its EVs but it hasn't worked The billionaire seems keen to rally Republicans who may privately be alarmed by Trump's governance. Whether he is the ideal leader of such a rebellion on the right is another matter. The wealthy assuming political power is common in America, but Musk's agenda will be under close scrutiny. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
