
Inside Japan's race to prepare for war on its doorstep
Successive Japanese leaders have warned that Taiwan could be the next Ukraine – that Xi Jinping could follow Vladimir Putin 's example and launch an invasion that would risk drawing large swathes of the world into another proxy war.
That might all seem hypothetical more than 2,000km away in Tokyo, where the government is currently pushing through the biggest military buildup since the Second World War, doubling its defence budget by 2027 and dramatically expanding the operational capabilities of the Japanese Self Defence Forces (SDF).
But on Yonaguni the threat feels very real indeed, with unprecedented drills carried out in recent months to prepare the island for an evacuation.
Famous across Japan as a holiday destination and for its unique breed of wild horses, Yonaguni is a tiny outpost jutting out of the East China Sea with a population of just 1,700 people. Since 2016 it has hosted an SDF base that now has around 250 personnel, and they and their families make up an important contingent of island life.
During joint US-Japanese exercises late last year known as Keen Sword, the local garrison took part in so-called 'disaster prevention drills' with US forces here for the first time – widely seen as preparations for if Taiwan is attacked. The Independent saw Japanese soldiers pretending to be wounded islanders, carried on stretchers to a waiting American C130 Hercules military transport plane.
The drills involved a number of firsts for Yonaguni, including the first time US-made Osprey aircraft – which would be crucial for logistics in the event of a real evacuation – landed and took off on the blustery island. A spokesperson for the SDF confirmed to The Independent that this was a 'larger exercise compared to ones conducted in the past'.
A delegation of officials also visited from the wider Okinawa prefecture to discuss the finer details of how an evacuation would take place if Taiwan was invaded. They explained to locals that they would be moved to shelters on a larger island in the archipelago, with the injured taken for treatment at hospital – the island does not have one of its own.
The atmosphere on the island is tense, with locals saying the soldiers appear more nervous than usual. And while some find the mock evacuation comforting, the presence of a large garrison here is polarising, with families divided over whether they offer protection or risk making the island a target.
Near Yonaguni's main fishing port Hisako Otomo, the owner of the westernmost shop in Japan, admits the islanders cannot help but feel concerned about the situation with China.
'It's worrying when we see the news,' she says. 'It's scary to have to think about this [an invasion of Taiwan] – to think is it really going to happen?'
China has conducted drills simulating a full blockade of Taiwan – likely the first step in an invasion – on multiple occasions in the past year, including staging its largest military exercises in three decades over the course of a week in December. Across the whole of last year it ordered a record 3,070 sorties by military aircraft across the Taiwan Strait's median line.
Beijing claims self-governed Taiwan as a breakaway province and Xi Jinping has repeatedly vowed to 'reunite' the island with the mainland by force if necessary. The US assesses that China is gearing up to be ready for an invasion, if ordered, by the year 2027.
Despite this standoff occurring on Japan's doorstep, SDF activity on Yonaguni is controversial – not just because of a perception that it could make the island a target, but also because of a broader debate in Japanese society about the role its military should play.
Japan's commitment to its pacifist constitution, put in place at the end of its defeat in the Second World War as a promise that the country would never again be involved in armed conflict, is being tested by both China's aggression towards Taiwan and a North Korean regime that launches missiles over the Japanese mainland, and earlier this year claimed to have successfully test-fired a new hypersonic missile into the Sea of Japan.
Further north and Japan also considers Russia to be a dangerous and unpredictable neighbour, exemplified by Vladimir Putin's decision to invade Ukraine in February 2022.
The previous prime minister of Japan, Fumio Kishida, cited Ukraine as one of the main reasons for tripling Japan's defence budget to 43 trillion yen – around $400bn at the time it was announced – including huge investment in drone capability and the weapons needed to strike back at the likes of North Korea – or even launch a pre-emptive strike, if intelligence suggests an attack is imminent.
Japan is reportedly preparing to deploy its first long-range missiles, capable of reaching North Korea and China, to two bases on Kyushu Island by the end of the current fiscal year in March 2026.
At Japan's ministry of defence, officials explained to The Independent how the five-year plan initiated by Kishida, and supported by his successor Shigeru Ishiba, will take the country's defence-related spending to around 2 per cent of GDP by 2027 – a figure that would have been unthinkable, particularly at the time of a cost-of-living crisis, just a few years ago.
Much of the plan is inspired by the war in Ukraine, including a huge ramping up of Japan's military drone programme – almost non-existent at present. Defence officials said the government was in the process of acquiring and testing different models before deciding where to invest the new funds.
"The Russian aggression over Ukraine shows the deterioration of the global security environment,' says one official, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Both Ishiba and Kishida before him have drawn direct comparisons between Taiwan and the situation in Europe, saying that 'today's Ukraine could be tomorrow's East Asia'.
Japan views Putin's decision to invade Ukraine as a failure of effective deterrence, and while the defence ministry official admitted it was impossible 'to quantify deterrence', the argument is that a stronger Japan can help discourage China's Xi Jinping from following Moscow's example.
'Japan is enhancing its defence capabilities as a whole, including having the garrisons in the southwestern regions [nearest Taiwan],' they said. 'And this is to clearly show that Japan will not accept any unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force.'
One key part of the spending plan involves upgrading the Japanese military's ageing equipment infrastructure to the latest models, such as replacing outdated F15 fighter jets with F35s from the US.
And Japan wants to go one step further in the future, with an active role in developing cutting-edge military technology. It has signed an agreement with Britain and Italy to jointly design and build the next generation of stealth fighter, a programme known as GCAP.
Yet even with all this new spending, Japan will still be heavily reliant on the US for its defence, a relationship that is being strained by the transactional approach Donald Trump takes to international relations.
Prime minister Ishiba was one of the first world leaders to meet with Donald Trump at the start of his second administration, travelling to the White House on 7 February, and the US president him as doing a 'fantastic job' leading a 'strong and proud nation'.
Trump's defence secretary Pete Hegseth visited Japan at the end of last month and called the country an 'indispensable partner in deterring communist Chinese military aggression", including across the Taiwan Strait.
Yet Trump has also been highly critical of the US-Japan security partnership, which allows American troops to be stationed on Japanese soil in exchange for a commitment to protect Japan in the event of an attack. 'We pay hundreds of billions of dollars to defend them,' Trump complained in comments to reporters at the White House earlier this month. "They don't pay anything,' he added.
Asked if a Trump White House was entitled to ask even more of Japan, an official at the Japanese foreign ministry said the situation had already 'drastically changed' after decades of post-war history when Japan typically spent no more than 1 per cent of GDP on its defence forces.
The official suggested Japanese diplomats would explain that historical context to the Trump administration. 'The US is always giving us pressure to develop our defence capabilities, including the budget.
'Because of the change of Japan's policy, the drastic change, I believe that perception from the US should also change,' they said, on condition of anonymity.
'There is a genuine sense that Japan has done quite a lot,' says Matake Kamiya, professor of international relations at the National Defense Academy of Japan. 'I mean, 2 per cent of defence-related spending – that was totally unthinkable before the Ukraine war started. Possessing offensive capability under the name of counter-attack capability, that was politically too sensitive.'
Nonetheless there remain red lines that Japan would never cross, even if China were to launch an all-out invasion of Taiwan within plain sight of the islanders on Yonaguni. In such a scenario there's still no realistic prospect of Japan deploying its newly expanded forces to help protect the island. At most, Japan would provide logistical support to allies – letting the US use its bases closest to the action, for instance.
Despite the shifting attitudes towards pacifism among the Japanese public, any active combat role for its defence forces, even in an international peacekeeping operation, is unthinkable, says professor Kamiya.
If Trump is to truly understand the limitations of Japan as an ally, he will need to get to grips with this aspect that is so fundamental to the country's psyche, borne out of the trauma of the Second World war.
Terumi Tanaka, co-chair of the Nihon Hidankyo organisation representing Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivors that won last year's Nobel Peace Prize, calls the expansion of Japan's defence forces 'abominable'.
'Japan has a constitution with Article Nine, and this is based on the reality that we were attacked with this awful nuclear bomb, and so out of reflection on that, Japan abandoned any kind of military power,' he tells The Independent.
He said those like him who had experienced the horrors of war owed it to younger generations to stand up for the principles of pacifism, and prevent it being abandoned. 'We're trying to prevent that, that's what I'm doing every day.'
Back on Yonaguni, the way contingency plans for a Taiwan invasion are being solidified gives residents the impression that a crisis has never been closer, says local tour guide Saori Matsuda. 'I know that the SDF people are really concerned about the situation,' she says. 'I see that the tension is very high.'
Matsuda, a fourth generation resident of the island, says she supports the drills and the expansion of Japan's military forces, given 'the global situation'.
Many residents of Yonaguni have long felt an affinity for Taiwan and there were talks of establishing a ferry link between the two in 2023, before China ramped up its pressure on Taipei.
'The people of Taiwan say they are not part of China. My heart says I support them,' says Matsuda. 'I don't understand why China says what it is saying. I do feel nervous about it. We don't know what China is going to do – it looks like China could do anything.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
A day in the life, in photos, of one family's search for food in Gaza
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
David Lammy and JD Vance bonded over ‘dysfunctional' childhoods – and a Diet Coke
David Lammy has spoken of his friendship with the US vice-president, JD Vance, as the pair can relate over their 'dysfunctional' working-class childhoods. In a series of interviews with the Guardian, conducted over several weeks, the foreign secretary opened up about a 'wonderful hour and a half' spent with Vance over drinks at the US embassy in Italy in May alongside the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner. Lammy said he had been to mass at Vance's home and counted him as a 'friend', saying the vice-president 'relates' to him over their shared background. 'I remember being at the inauguration of the new pope in Rome with Angela Rayner and JD Vance,' he said: 'I don't think JD and Angela will mind me saying that they were having a couple of drinks … I really wanted a glass [of rosé] but instead I had a Diet Coke.' The foreign secretary said they were all 'not just working-class politicians, but people with dysfunctional childhoods'. 'I had this great sense that JD completely relates to me and he completely relates to Angela. So it was a wonderful hour and a half,' he said. In his interview, Lammy spoke of feeling guilty over the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy's, highly awkward first meeting with Donald Trump and Vance in the Oval Office, where the men berated him over the war. 'If I'm being honest, I felt, arrghhh!' Lammy said. 'Why hadn't I done more to support our Ukrainian colleagues in preparation for their meeting?… I was being a bit hard on myself. But I still felt guilty.' The foreign secretary also touched on his discomfort over Keir Starmer's 'island of strangers' speech about immigration, which drew criticism that the prime minister was echoing the rightwing politician Enoch Powell. 'I think the use of language was poor,' he says. 'Poor choice. And if someone had shown me the speech, I would've said, 'Take that out'.' On the subject of Gaza, Lammy spoke of his 'days of deep frustration, deep sadness' over the war with Israel. He said things were 'desperate for people on the ground, desperate for the hostages in Gaza', that the world was 'desperate for a ceasefire, for the suffering to come to an end'. He also said he '100 per cent' wanted to go to Gaza 'as soon as I can get in'. Speaking before the government decided to move on to a path to recognise Palestine as an independent state, the foreign secretary described it as a 'card you can only play once'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion In the interview, the Lammy looked back over his career and his difficult childhood, including the effect of his father – an alcoholic who was violent towards his mother, and who left for the US. 'My father didn't come back. Psychologically that is devastating. There must have been a bit of me that blamed myself. I question whether he did, in fact, love me.' His father later died of throat cancer without his son seeing him again. Lammy said he could not emotionally handle the idea of it at the time, but added: 'I'm quite a forgiving person, my nature is wanting to build bridges, to reach out. It's why I think I'm not bad at this role.' He described his sense of purpose as foreign secretary, saying: 'This is the first time in my life where I do not have impostor syndrome. I genuinely have a sense of being in the right place at the right time for this job.'


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump played the EU at its own game... and won
Squaring off across the table from Ursula von der Leyen was Donald Trump, banging his fists and demanding a 30 per cent blanket tariff. The clubhouse of the Trump Turnberry golf course had become the unlikely setting of a face-off between the two global superpowers – and ultimately, the EU's humiliation. The Telegraph has spoken to insiders who were in the room when the negotiations were taking place and has seen diplomatic notes that paint a clear picture. It's one of Mrs von der Leyen, the European Commission president, bowing to pressure from the US and being beaten at the bloc's own game. She had just agreed to the US imposing 15 per cent tariffs on EU goods entering America, while Britain had come away with a rate of 10 per cent. And at the end of it all, she and her team of EU negotiators had to put their thumbs up, their smiles not reaching their eyes, as they stood next to Mr Trump who boasted of the 'biggest deal ever made'. US officials had played hardball for the weeks and months leading up to the high-stakes showdown. Panicked European officials had turned to their Japanese counterparts for advice before flying to Scotland, asking for their advice on how to be successful like them. But ultimately, the EU was beaten by a dealmaker who played the bloc's game better than they could have played it. Over the years, Brussels has used the size of its single market to reinforce the need for trading partners to make concessions, rather than the other way round in talks over deals. And European leaders have voiced their frustration at the move. France's leaders described it as a 'dark day' for Europe and that the bloc hadn't been feared enough going into the talks. Trump plays hardball After a round of golf, the stage was set for the American negotiating team, including Mr Trump. A no-deal deadline was set for Friday, Aug 1. Without a pact Brussels would be subjected to the 30 per cent tariffs set out by the president in a letter to Mrs von der Leyen just two weeks earlier. European firms doing business in America would have become uncompetitive overnight if the EC president didn't shake hands on a pact. To secure this deal, the German eurocrat was told she would have to stomach a number of concessions, signing on the dotted line of an agreement that would be considered one-sided in favour of the Americans. Brussels also knew this agreement was needed to avert a nastier, more chaotic transatlantic trade war that would have left Europe without its most important ally until at least January 2029, when Mr Trump's second term comes to an end. To achieve this, member states agreed that they would have to stomach a blanket tariff because of a belief that the US president wouldn't settle without one, a source familiar with the negotiations told The Telegraph. Maros Sefcovic, the EU's trade commissioner, had briefed capitals that they simply wouldn't be able to do business in the US if that tariff rose to the 30 per cent demanded by Mr Trump. Therefore, they needed to settle on a number that would be an increase on the status quo originally charged on European imports into America – 14.8 per cent, according to one official. Some might argue that this was the EU being made to take a taste of its own medicine, with the bloc usually the first negotiator to reach for hard deadlines and use its size and strength to extract concessions from prospective partners. And it worked, the bloc had blinked. Before Mrs von der Leyen headed to Scotland, European capitals signed off on a mandate, perhaps for the first time, that would use a trade deal to increase tariffs from the current number. Behind the scenes For 24 minutes, the US President and the commission chief held an impromptu press conference under the eight chandeliers in the glamorous ball room at Trump Turnberry. With the Brussels and White House press packs ushered out, the real talks could begin. Mr Trump opened with his gambit of 30 per cent tariffs on all European products imported into America. The commission's first offer was 'high single digits', a source briefed on the wrangling said. The White House delegation stood firm as their European counterparts began slowly ratcheting their number closer to the American's figure. But ultimately, the commission's team kept their cool, at the recommendation of the Japanese, the most recent country to sign an agreement with the US. The Telegraph can reveal that a top aide to Mr Sefcovic had reached out to his Japanese counterpart for help on handling the Americans before the talks. 'They come in shouting the high number, and all you have to do is hold your cool and they diminish as you push back,' a source said, describing the advice. The other tactic deployed by the Europeans was to woo Mr Trump with some large numbers presented to him on a single sheet of A4 paper. Eurocrats had used their build-up to prepare an offer on paper that the US president would see as a major victory. That was an offer to buy billions of dollars worth of American military technology – born out of Nato's recent decision to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. The EU pledged to purchase $750bn (£565bn) worth of energy from the US over the next three years. And then there was a further promise that European companies would invest $600bn (£452bn) by 2028. These, European officials claim, are non-binding, not really worth the paper they were written on. The numbers were calculated using publicly available order information and information from trade associations. But this was enough to convince Mr Trump to settle at a tariff rate of 15 per cent, covering about 70 per cent of EU exports and totalling about €780bn (£588bn) worth of trade. In return, US imports into the EU will not face higher tariffs. 'This is probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity, trade or beyond trade,' Mr Trump declared. 'It's a giant deal,' he added, referring to the $600bn and $750bn promises. 'That's going to be great.' The US president's claims of victory and the deal were met with derision in Europe. Emmanuel Macron, the French president, said the bloc hadn't been 'feared' enough in the talks, which opened the door to the concessions. François Bayrou, Macron's prime minister, described it as a 'dark day' for Europe and accused the Commission of bowing to American pressure. Michel Barnier, the EU's former Brexit negotiator, said accepting tariffs was an 'admission of weakness'. 'This weakness is not inevitable. It results from poor choices that ensure neither the sovereignty nor the prosperity of the continent and its states,' he wrote on social media. Friedrich Merz, the German chancellor, meanwhile said it would cause 'considerable damage' to his country's economy, the largest in the Eurozone. In comparison, Britain had negotiated a tariff rate of 10 per cent, five less than the EU, in its own deal with Washington. This was hailed by Brexiteers as evidence that leaving the bloc was the right thing to do. Paris and Berlin had been the two capitals pushing hardest for the bloc to take a more robust stance in the trade talks. The French had especially pushed for a package of €93bn (£81bn) of retaliatory tariffs to be unleashed to bring Mr Trump and Washington to heel. There were also calls from Paris to clamp down on American tech firms doing business in Europe. 'This was a big red button nobody was willing to push,' an EU diplomat told The Telegraph, spelling out fears that Europe's economy is reliant on American payment services. But Mrs von der Leyen, who was particularly dovish, argued that this would spill over into other sectors and potentially spell an end to what is a crucial alliance for Europe, especially in security. Fears that the White House and Pentagon would withdraw security guarantees for Europe and cut off weapons supplies to Ukraine overshadowed the talks. But the commission president and her top officials also steeled member states for a longer-term game. Devil in the detail Gabrielius Landsbergis, a former Lithuanian foreign minister, said: 'The only way I can explain to myself why the EU commission would choose to humiliate Europe by accepting the 15 per cent tariff is that they hope to appease Trump enough for him to maintain US security commitments in Europe.' Now Mr Trump has his victory, the devil would be in the detail as the terms are finalised, Mrs von der Leyen's team told member states. The commission will be looking to quietly enlarge a list of products that are exempted from tariffs in more technical talks with Washington. Eurocrats are already briefing that Britain's deal, despite having a lower tariff rate, doesn't protect key European industries, such as beef farmers.