Richard Li's FWD rises in HK debut, reversing earlier decline
The insurer's stock climbed as much 2.1 per cent to HK$38.80 on Monday, reversing a drop of as steep as 2.5 per cent. It was at HK$38.40, up 1.1 per cent, at the midday break.
The debut comes after the tycoon – son of famed Hong Kong businessman Li Ka-shing – tried to take the company public in New York in 2021, which was abandoned after regulatory scrutiny. Subsequent efforts to list at home in Hong Kong were stalled as the city's IPO entered a prolonged slump.
Now, with Hong Kong's equity markets rebounding, Li is seizing a more favourable window to raise capital for the crown jewel of his business empire. Investors' sentiment has been buoyed by a wave of multibillion-dollar deals, with IPOs and follow-on offerings raising US$37.4 billion so far in 2025 – the highest since the record-breaking year of 2021 and a sharp jump from US$5.1 billion during the same period last year.
'It's been a long journey,' FWD chief executive officer Huynh Thanh Phong said in a Bloomberg TV interview. 'Hong Kong, as you can see, is back in a big way, and we're extremely happy to be part of that comeback story post-Covid.'
The city's stock benchmark, the Hang Seng Index, has risen about 20 per cent for the year. Insurers have been particularly hot lately, with shares of AIA Group and Prudential each rising at least 35 per cent since their April lows.
Richard Li, who founded the company in 2013, owns a 66.5 per cent stake in FWD through various corporate entities. His stake in FWD accounts for two-thirds of his US$6.1 billion net worth at the IPO price, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.
The insurer plans to use the proceeds to reduce debt, support growth and enhance its digital capabilities. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
De-dollarisation and shifting safe havens
[SINGAPORE] Donald Trump's second term as US president has reasserted America's economic might with a mix of bombast, brinkmanship, and a brand of economic nationalism that is as familiar as it is destabilising. The recent passage of expansive tax reform has raised serious questions about US debt sustainability; the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects a deficit of US$1.9 trillion for this fiscal year alone, with federal debt forecast to climb to 118 per cent of GDP by 2035. Moody's downgrade of the US credit rating to Aa1 is not just a symbolic fall from grace, it marks the twilight of the era of 'risk-free' US Treasuries. Elevated yields at the long end of the yield curve reflect investor anxiety over the sheer scale of US refinancing needs. Trump's tariff war aims to fire on two fronts – checking Chinese expansion and plugging a widening US fiscal gap. But here, too, the math is sobering. Even under the most aggressive assumptions – universal tariffs at 20 per cent – the projected revenue gain is a modest US$185.2 billion, barely sufficient to cover annual debt interest payments. Divergence, de-dollarisation and defensive shifts As we enter the third quarter of 2025, three themes dominate the investment landscape: pragmatic de-escalation in tariff tensions, divergent equity performance, and fiscal headwinds which are negative for government bonds and the dollar – but positive for gold. The abrupt de-escalation of US-China tensions has caught markets off guard. After months of hawkish rhetoric, a US-China trade truce is finally underway. With Republican rifts in his backyard, waning poll numbers, and the need to refinance US$7.8 trillion in debt, Trump's embrace of progressive policies underlines efforts to reframe Republicans as the working-class party ahead of 2026 midterms. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Nevertheless, the damage has been done. Despite rising Treasury yields, the dollar tumbled 10.8 per cent in the first six months of 2025, underscoring the growing scepticism about the greenback's long-term viability as the global reserve currency. Post Liberation Day, gold, long considered a hedge against inflation and uncertainty, has decoupled from its traditional inverse correlation with bond yields. Central bank demand for gold reached 1,045 tonnes in 2024 – 121 per cent above the 2010 to 2021 historical average – signalling a broader de-dollarisation trend that extends beyond geopolitics into fundamental shifts in reserve management. Our strategic positioning reflects these tectonic shifts. US equities remain slightly underweight, primarily due to overstated earnings expectations (11 per cent versus 7 per cent in other developed markets, or DMs) and the dollar's structural weakness. Still, pockets of strength remain. Technology, bolstered by resilient AI demand and Nvidia's recent strong guidance, offers a compelling case for selective exposure. Europe, by contrast, benefits from relative fiscal sustainability and resurgent defence spending. Asia ex-Japan remains a deep-value play, with valuations at a 33 per cent discount to DMs and earnings growth forecast at 12.4 per cent. In fixed income, stagflation risks and long-end volatility have risen. Spikes in long-duration Treasuries and Japanese government bond yields reflect sticky inflation unlikely to subside given tariff uncertainties, labour market constraints, and money supply growth. On both a three-month and 12-month basis, we downgrade DM government bonds to Neutral as higher long-term yields and curve steepening are expected. In credit, stay with quality in the A/BBB bucket and adopt a duration barbell approach with two to three-year and seven to 10-year investment-grade exposure. We like US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), capital securities, and short-duration quality credit. Our two to three-year CIO Liquid+ strategy remains well-positioned for stagflationary conditions. We remain less convinced on high yield given spread-widening risks. In private assets, seek opportunities in middle-market buyouts and growth private equity. Middle-market companies possess lower purchase multiples, providing room for larger future value expansion. Besides, the requirement for lower leverage in middle-market deals augers well for their outlook in a high interest rate environment. Nuclear energy: Igniting Prometheus' atomic flame If the first half of the 21st century has taught investors anything, it is that the future often looks unthinkable – until it happens. Nowhere is this more evident than in nuclear energy. Once a byword for risk and controversy, nuclear power is quietly re-emerging as a compelling investment thematic, driven by a perfect storm of geopolitical, environmental, and technological tailwinds. First, let us consider the state of energy security. With ongoing conflict in the Middle East, tensions in Europe, and the weaponisation of trade routes, dependence on fossil fuels has become a strategic liability. Supply chains built on the whims of energy cartels or vulnerable chokepoints are no longer tenable. While the nuclear supply chain remains imperfect, it offers a viable avenue for energy diversification. Second, climate imperatives are accelerating policy momentum. Carbon taxation will eventually hit the bottom lines of companies, shifting energy demand towards more sustainable forms of power generation. Nuclear power is uniquely placed to deliver consistent, zero-emission energy at scale. For policymakers seeking to hit net-zero targets without sacrificing industrial productivity, nuclear is becoming not just acceptable, but essential. Third, AI and the growing need for processing power will accelerate energy demand at an exponential scale. With commodity trade increasingly encumbered by protectionism, one way to mitigate the inflationary consequence of such demand would be to introduce feasible substitutes such as nuclear power. Fourth, technological innovation is breaking down old barriers. Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) represent a leap forward, offering lower startup costs and the option to be developed in locations previously deemed unsuitable for larger nuclear power plants. For investors, the implications are clear. The nuclear theme is no longer niche – it is investable. Opportunities span the full value chain: physical uranium as a commodity play; miners who supply it; utilities with substantial nuclear in their energy mix; and manufacturers of next-generation reactor technologies such as SMRs. Much like gold, nuclear represents a long-term hedge – not against inflation, but against energy insecurity, climate inaction, and geopolitical unpredictability. In a world beset by volatility, the atom may yet prove to be a surprisingly stable investment opportunity. Trump's economic strategy has made waves – some intentional, many collateral. While markets are beginning to price in a world of persistent policy risk, stretched fiscal metrics and shifting trade dynamics, this moment also invites a rethink of long-term portfolio construction and the discipline to heed the timeless adage: Time in the market beats timing the market. The writer is chief investment officer, DBS Bank
Business Times
6 hours ago
- Business Times
New York City casinos could become world's biggest, bidders predict
[NEW YORK] Bidders for three New York City-area casino licences are projecting revenue that would place them among the most lucrative resorts in the world, according to an analysis of their proposals. In Manhattan, the Freedom Plaza project is expected to generate US$2.2 billion in annual revenue in its first year of operation, rising to US$4.2 billion by year 10, while billionaire Steve Cohen's project near Citi Field in Queens is forecast to produce US$3.9 billion annually by year three, according to executive summaries the bidders filed with the New York State Gaming Facility Location Board. Those sums rival some of the world's top casino performers. Las Vegas Sands' Marina Bay Sands resort in Singapore generated US$4.2 billion in total revenue last year. Wynn Resorts' two Las Vegas casinos, the Wynn and Encore, produced a combined US$2.57 billion in revenue in 2024. The Coney, a resort proposed for Coney Island, is the only project that shared specific revenue estimates by source and year. Its backers, including real estate investor Joe Sitt, project US$669 million in table-game revenue and US$754 million in slot-machine revenue in its first year of operation. By comparison, Wynn's two Las Vegas casinos generated US$611 million from table games and US$446 million from slots last year. Eight bidders submitted proposals on Jun 27. Their bids still need approval from groups of state and local officials, and will be summited to the state location board if they pass muster. The board plans to pick the winners by Dec 1. The projects would bring the first full-fledged casinos to America's most-populous city. The bidders are a mix of billionaires, property owners and established casino operators. Three of the proposals are for Manhattan, with the rest in a suburb or outer borough. Revenue estimates are just projections, and the numbers may change as the bidders update their offers later in the process. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Caesars Entertainment has proposed a casino in Times Square that it said would generate US$23.3 billion in gambling revenue alone over 10 years. A spokesperson for the project called it an opportunity to generate 'historic tax revenue' for the city. 'We see all of Times Square becoming the resort, with local restaurants, hotels and Broadway theaters all directly benefiting,' the spokesperson said. The Avenir, from developer Larry Silverstein, projects US$2.5 billion in gambling revenue in its first full year. 'Locating a destination casino in Manhattan will generate the most revenue for the state, according to New York's own independent study,' the Avenir executive summary said. 'It is not in the economic interest of Manhattan to force its tourists to travel to other boroughs to enjoy gaming and its amenities.' A study by consultants Spectrum Gaming Group projected nearly US$2.1 billion in gambling revenue for a hypothetical Manhattan-based casino, with ones in the outskirts generating far less. MGM Resorts International, which operates a slot-machine-only facility in Yonkers, and Genting Group's Resorts World, which has a similar property next to the Aqueduct racetrack in Queens, said their gambling revenue would more than double if they're allowed to add table games like blackjack and sports betting. MGM projected casino revenue of as much as US$1.39 billion annually, while Resorts World said its casino revenue would jump to US$2.2 billion a year by 2027. Projections from eager developers can sometimes get ahead of reality. The first four casinos to open in upstate New York fell short of initial projections, as did a temporary casino Bally's opened in Chicago in 2023, ahead of a bigger resort it's building there. Bally's, which is proposing a casino at a company-owned golf course in the Bronx, is projecting US$1 billion a year in gambling revenue when it opens. It said the resort would generate US$200 million annually in gaming-related taxes. As part of the New York bidding process, candidates will suggest their own tax rates for their casino revenue, a process designed to maximise the state's take. That last step has not happened yet. Two of the New York bidders said they were using the minimum 10 per cent tax rate on table games and 25 per cent rate on slot machines required by the state to estimate their proposed tax contributions. Others did not specify tax rates. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Jane Street shows dangers of finance as shampoo
INDIAN consumer businesses have long understood that the key to making poor people buy more shampoo is to put a little bit in small, affordably priced plastic sachets. In the past few years, high-frequency traders have used the same formula – risk packaged for as little as US$0.12 – to reap billions of dollars in profits from unsuspecting masses. The whole experiment succeeded beyond anyone's imagination, and India became the world's largest options market by volume. Then all hell broke loose last Friday (Jul 4). By imposing a temporary trading ban on Jane Street Group, one of the biggest names in algorithmic trading, and freezing 48.4 billion rupees (S$720 million) of its past profits, the market regulator in Mumbai has sent shock waves through the corridors of global finance. The Securities and Exchange Board of India's (Sebi) interim order, which has been disputed by Jane Street, accuses the firm of running 'an intentional, well-planned and sinister scheme' of market manipulation. The New York-based quantitative trader, whose spectacular success in Indian equity derivatives garnered US$2.3 billion in net revenue last year, based on a Bloomberg News report in May, said it will further engage with the Sebi. Jane Street 'is committed to operating in compliance with all regulations in the regions we operate around the world', it said. The company has 21 days to file its response. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The probe isn't over yet. The 105-page order has focused on 18 days when options on Bank Nifty, a popular index of India's largest lenders, expired with high profits for some traders. Jane Street, the Sebi says, manipulated intraday prices on 15 of those 18 occasions. On the remaining days, the regulator alleges that the group came in with 'aggressive and large' orders towards the end of trading to force the index to close in its favour. The Sebi will now probe the quant giant's strategies for other indices. The gamification of finance that began during the pandemic never quite went away. That's true almost everywhere. But more developed markets allowed people to scratch their speculative itch in the stock market – or on novel instruments such as cryptocurrencies. Derivatives mania In India, where digital assets are heavily taxed, the cash-equity market is relatively shallow, and capital controls force most household wealth to stay at home, equity derivatives became the focus of a full-blown mania. Towards the end of 2023, the turnover from futures and options on indices and stocks was more than 400 times the value of shares changing hands on the National Stock Exchange in Mumbai. No other market in the world was as lopsided, as I wrote back then. But this is what you get when risk-taking is concentrated in small sachets. The Sebi order illustrates that with an example. A day before contract expiry, the option-market equivalent of being long one underlying share worth 100 rupees may require an outlay of just one rupee, unless the stock is expected to be highly volatile in that period for some reason. To command the same economic interest for 24 hours as an ordinary stock by paying 1/100th of its price is leverage – a feature, not a bug. But the never-ending carnival of options expiring through the week, as had started to happen before the regulator came cracking its whip, was avoidable. As were small contract sizes that lured young men with dreams of quick riches. (Most individuals dabbling in derivatives are men, from the 20-to-30-year-old age group.) Belatedly, some of those infirmities have been addressed, and the ardour has cooled. The Jane Street order will do the rest. Once the shock has been absorbed, the regulator should ban contracts that expire more frequently than once a month. But before the Sebi staff start passing around cigars, they should perhaps recognise what they haven't done yet: Make cash equity great again. One way to do that is by broadening participation. Now may be the time to give individual investors overseas the same unfettered access to cash equity as locals, according to Andrew Peretti, a former buy-side trader in Indian markets. A deeper stock-borrowing-and-lending pool, he says, will make it easy to short overpriced shares. Options sting more Finally, corporate power needs to be reined in. No analyst wants to be thrown into jail for a 'sell' recommendation. A robust cash-equity market is the best protection against potential manipulation from higher derivative volumes. Hopefully, the Sebi order will also end the US$500,000 pay packages for local engineering graduates at high-frequency trading shops. India needs more young talent in science and technology, robotics, and artificial intelligence. RH Patil, who ushered in a modern equity market in India by setting up the National Stock Exchange in 1994, cautioned about letting speculation dominate everything else. 'All those who talk of totally free markets do not recognise that we need broad-based industrialisation and infrastructure development to tackle poverty,' he wrote in 2010. Back then, Patil was upset with the regulator for fuelling a runaway craze for single-stock futures. The post-pandemic frenzy has been a lot worse. The Sebi's own research pegs three-year losses for retail players at US$21 billion. Nine out of 10 derivative traders have lost money. At the very least, the Jane Street investigation should help them understand why they had no chance of winning against the whales. Next time the punters feel tempted by a one-rupee option on a 100-rupee share, they should instead buy 5.5 ml of Unilever's Sunsilk. Options can sting a lot more than a bit of shampoo in the eye. BLOOMBERG
