Jeffrey Epstein Had No 'Client List', Says FBI, New Video Busts Murder Conspiracy Theory
The findings are part of a detailed investigation that challenges popular narratives suggesting Epstein's death was a result of foul play or cover-ups by powerful elites
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in a ground-breaking new report, has put to rest long-standing conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein's death, confirming that the disgraced financier died by suicide and had no secret 'client list" as speculated by some of his high-profile associates.
The findings are part of a detailed investigation that challenges popular narratives suggesting Epstein's death was a result of foul play or cover-ups by powerful elites.
Epstein, who was awaiting trial on charges of sex trafficking involving minors, was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell in August 2019. His sudden death, coupled with his connections to high-profile figures, quickly fuelled a slew of theories, ranging from murder by those fearing exposure to claims of a hidden list of powerful clients who allegedly engaged in criminal activities.
However, the FBI's review of the case, published by the US Department of Justice (DOJ), reaffirmed that Epstein's death was the result of suicide by hanging. The report also debunked rumours that Epstein had a list of influential clients who were potentially involved in illegal activities. The FBI investigation found no evidence to support such claims, asserting that allegations of blackmail and extortion by Epstein were unfounded.
'Client List' Theories Debunked
Since Epstein's arrest, numerous theories have emerged, claiming he had compiled a 'client list" involving prominent figures, including former US Presidents, British royalty, and business tycoons. Conspiracy theorists speculated that Epstein had extensive knowledge of powerful individuals' alleged misconduct, leading to claims that these individuals may have had a hand in his death to prevent the exposure of their secrets.
However, the DOJ's findings suggest that no such list existed. According to the investigation, despite Epstein's connections to many influential figures, there is no evidence that he maintained a list of clients or partners in illicit activities. The claims surrounding the so-called 'client list" have been consistently debunked by both the FBI and independent investigators.
Justice Department Releases New Evidence
In addition to dispelling the client list theory, the DOJ released new video footage from the night of Epstein's death, showing that he was alone in his cell at the time of his death, supporting the conclusion of suicide. The footage also shows that there were no signs of foul play or external interference.
The revelation has sparked mixed reactions, with some of Epstein's survivors and critics of the system questioning the thoroughness of the investigation, especially given the high-profile nature of the case. However, the DOJ's report aims to provide transparency, emphasising that all available evidence was reviewed to ensure a fair conclusion.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US airports to drop shoe removal rule? TSA begins rolling back 9/11 security measure
In a shift in post-9/11 US airport security policy, passengers at several major airports in United States are no longer being asked to remove their shoes during standard preflight screenings, CBS News has confirmed. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) appears to be phasing out the longstanding rule at select locations, with no official announcement made thus far. According to CBS report citing officials familiar with the development, the no-shoe-removal rule is no longer being enforced at airports including Baltimore/Washington International, Fort Lauderdale International, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky, Portland International, Philadelphia International, and Piedmont Triad International Airport in North Carolina. Further reports from CBS News correspondents in Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and New York City's LaGuardia Airport suggest that the relaxed protocol is being observed there as well, despite not being officially listed among the initial locations. The change affects only travellers going through standard TSA screening lines. Passengers enrolled in TSA PreCheck—who have undergone a pre-screening process—were already exempt from the shoe-removal requirement. While the TSA has not publicly announced the policy shift, a statement given to CBS News noted that both the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security are "always exploring new and innovative ways to enhance the passenger experience and our strong security posture." The shoe-removal requirement was formally implemented in 2006, several years after British national Richard Reid, now known as the "shoe bomber," attempted to blow up an American Airlines flight in December 2001 using explosives concealed in his footwear. Though Reid's plot was foiled by passengers and the flight landed safely in Boston, the incident prompted heightened security measures across US airports. Initially voluntary, shoe removal soon became a mandated practice at security checkpoints across the United States. The recent rollback marks one of the first major relaxations of that protocol in nearly two decades. While the change may come as a welcome relief to frequent flyers, it is not yet universal. Travellers flying from US airports not listed in the initial phase should still expect to remove their shoes unless they are part of the TSA PreCheck programme. There is no timeline yet for a nationwide rollback, but CBS report citing industry insiders suggest more airports could be added quietly in the coming weeks.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Jagraon: Rare political unity: Oppn, farm unions join hands to protest land pooling policy
In a rare show of unity, leaders of all major political parties in opposition and prominent farmer organisations came together on one platform in Jagraon on Monday to oppose the Punjab government's land pooling policy. Punjab Congress president Amarinder Singh Raja Warring added that while land acquisition has existed since British times, it was the Congress-led UPA government under Dr Manmohan Singh that brought a transformative law requiring 80% consent from landowners before any acquisition. (HT Photo) The protest held at the local tehsil checkpoint, saw participation from senior Congress, Shiromani Akali Dal, and BJP leaders, along with several grassroots-level farmer leaders and activists. Addressing the crowd, former Punjab chief minister Charanjit Singh Channi launched a scathing attack on chief minister Bhagwant Mann, accusing him of handing over Punjab's agricultural land to outside forces. 'Before the elections, I warned people that the 'outsiders' do not care about Punjab. But no one listened. Today, we see the consequences,' Channi said. He vowed that if Congress is voted back to power, reversing this policy would be their first decision. 'Every inch of land taken will be returned to the farmers,' he promised, calling upon all Punjabis to unite against the government's move. Punjab Congress president Amarinder Singh Raja Warring added that while land acquisition has existed since British times, it was the Congress-led UPA government under Dr Manmohan Singh that brought a transformative law requiring 80% consent from landowners before any acquisition. 'Despite this protection, if the land is forcibly taken, we will not stay silent. The Congress will launch a full-scale agitation and will gherao the GLADA office in Ludhiana on July 14,' he announced. MLA Sukhpal Khaira alleged that the CM has become a mere puppet in the hands of Delhi leadership. 'This is not just about land—it's a calculated strategy to erase Punjab's identity as an agriculture-based state. The land will be handed over to corporate mafias,' he said. Voicing similar concerns, Akali leader and MLA Manpreet Singh Ayali, BJP's advocate Vikramjit Singh Sindhu, and former Akali MLA SR Kler stressed that the land pooling policy is a direct threat to the entire state. 'This is a fight for Punjab's future. If our land is lost, our economy will collapse. The CM is merely following orders from Delhi,' they claimed. The protest was also addressed by several other leaders and representatives of various organisations including Congress general secretary Capt Sandeep Sandhu, Didar Singh Malak and Gurvinder Singh Panna from the Land Pooling Policy Sangharsh Committee, former MLAs Tarsam Jadha and Kamaljit Singh Brar, former Congress district president Karanjit Soni Ghalib, former chairman Satinderpal Singh Kaka Gurwal, Kamaljit Singh Mallah, engineer Jagdeep Singh, and farmer leaders Mahinder Singh Kamalpura, Jagtar Singh Daharka, Gurdial Singh Talwandi, among others. Government's position The Punjab cabinet had last month given its nod to the land pooling policy and asserted that not even a single yard will be forcibly acquired from land owners. Under the land pooling policy, a land owner will be given 1,000 square yards of residential plot and 200 square yards of commercial plot in fully developed land in lieu of one acre of land, the state government had said earlier. The government had also said that the land pooling policy was designed to foster transparent and planned urban development across the state.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' does not exist, says Justice Department
Jeffrey Epstein did not maintain a client list, the Justice Department acknowledged Monday as it said no more files related to the wealthy financier's sex trafficking investigation would be made public despite promises from Attorney General Pam Bondi that had raised the expectations of conservative influencers and conspiracy theorists. The acknowledgment that the well-connected Epstein did not have a list of clients to whom underage girls were trafficked represents a public walk-back of a theory that the Trump administration had helped promote, with Bondi suggesting in a Fox News interview earlier this year that such a document was sitting on my desk for review. Even as it released video from inside a New York jail meant to definitively prove that Epstein killed himself, the department also said in a memo that it was refusing to disclose other evidence investigators had collected. Bondi for weeks had suggested more material was going to be revealed "It's a new administration and everything is going to come out to the public, she said at one point after a first document dump she had hyped angered President Donald Trump's base by failing to deliver revelations. That episode, in which far-right influencers were invited to the White House in February and provided with binders marked The Epstein Files: Phase 1 and Declassified" that contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain, has spurred conservative internet personalities to sharply criticise Bondi. After the first release fell flat, Bondi said officials were poring over a truckload of previously withheld evidence she said had been handed over by the FBI. In a March TV interview, she claimed the Biden administration sat on these documents, no one did anything with them, adding: Sadly these people don't believe in transparency, but I think more unfortunately, I think a lot of them don't believe in honesty. But after a months-long review of evidence in the government's possession, the Justice Department determined that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted, the memo says. The department noted that much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and only a fraction" of it would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial. One of our highest priorities is combating child exploitation and bringing justice to victims," the memo says. "Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither of those ends." The two-page memo bore the logos of the Justice Department and the FBI but was not signed by any individual official. Conservatives who have sought proof of a government cover-up of Epstein's activities and death expressed outrage Monday over the department's position. Far-right influencer Jack Posobiec posted: We were all told more was coming. That answers were out there and would be provided. Incredible how utterly mismanaged this Epstein mess has been. And it didn't have to be. Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones wrote that next the DOJ will say Actually, Jeffrey Epstein never even existed,' calling it over the top sickening. Elon Musk shared a series of photos of a clown applying makeup appearing to mock Bondi for saying the client list doesn't exist after suggesting months ago that it was on her desk. The client list hubbub began when Bondi was asked in a Fox News interview whether the department would release such a document. She replied: It's sitting on my desk right now to review. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and Justice Department spokesperson Chad Gilmartin said Monday that Bondi was referring to the overall Epstein case files. Among the evidence that the Justice Department said Monday it has in its possession, and will not be releasing, are images of Epstein, images and videos of victims who are either minors or appear to be minors, and more than 10,000 "downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography. The memo does not explain when or where the videos were located, who and what they depict and whether they were newly found as investigators scoured their collection of evidence or were known for some time to have been in the government's possession. The Associated Press published a story last week about unanswered questions surrounding possible video evidence after Bondi cited the existence of tens of thousands of videos that she said showed Epstein with children or child porn. Multiple people who participated in the criminal cases of Epstein and socialite former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell told AP that they had not seen and did not know of a trove of recordings along the lines of what Bondi had referenced. Indictments and detention memos also don't allege the existence of video recordings and neither Epstein nor Maxwell were charged with possession of child sex abuse material even though that would have been easier for prosecutors to prove than the sex trafficking counts they faced. The AP did find reference in a filing in a civil lawsuit to the discovery by the Epstein estate of videos and pictures that could constitute child sex abuse material, but lawyers involved in that case said a protective order prevents them from discovering the specifics of that evidence and the Justice Department did not respond to a detailed list of questions from AP about the videos Bondi was referencing. Epstein was found dead in his jail cell in August 2019, weeks after his arrest on sex trafficking charges, in a suicide that foreclosed the possibility of a trial. The department's disclosure that Epstein took his own life is hardly a revelation even though conspiracy theorists have continued to challenge that conclusion. In November 2019, for instance, then-Attorney General William Barr told the AP that he had reviewed security footage that revealed that no one entered the area where Epstein was housed on the night he died, and expressed confidence that Epstein's death was a suicide. More recently, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have insisted in television and podcast interviews that the evidence was clear that Epstein had killed himself.
