
John Cullerton and Jason Barickman: Illinois higher education is poised to win big
Thanks to additional General Assembly funding, districts have added badly needed positions and programs to support student learning and well-being. Because of EBF, districts have funding predictability, allowing them to plan for the future in ways that are good for students. The new formula and steadfast investment allowed Illinois to withstand the impact of COVID-19 better than the nation as a whole and to rebound with more energy. Today, Illinois is one of the top-performing states in the nation for student academic growth.
It is time to bring that same transformational effort to our public universities. Over the past 20 years, the value of a college degree has grown. Yet, during that same period, Illinois has slashed its support for public universities from roughly 15% of its revenue (matching the national average) to a mere 2%. New research from the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability finds that inflation-adjusted spending has fallen 42% since fiscal year 2000, while tuition has more than doubled. This has placed a considerable burden on low- and middle-income families, making it increasingly difficult for students to afford a higher education degree, the report says.
A recent survey of Illinois residents revealed that more than half of Democrats, independents and Republicans say the state should increase funding to public universities. When state support withers, tuition rises. That is exactly what has happened in Illinois, which now has the unwelcome distinction of being one of the least affordable places in the country to attend college. We are pricing out the next generation and depriving universities of the resources they need to serve their students well. In doing so, we are depriving Illinois of college graduates, future leaders, and the services, programs and goods that Illinois communities rely on across sectors. If we do not address this structural problem today, we will all pay the price tomorrow.
The good news is there is legislation on the table that would not only address this issue, but also do so in a way as powerful and transformational as EBF. Two bills — Senate Bill 13 filed by Sen. Kimberly Lightford and House Bill 1581 by Rep. Carol Ammons — take the best of EBF and adjust and apply core principles to the complex world of four-year colleges. Working with experts, stakeholders and university leaders, they have crafted a first-ever formula for Illinois' public universities. Better still, the proposed formula considers the resources institutions need to fulfill their mission, run effective programs, and meet the needs of students from different regions, economic and academic backgrounds, while also taking into account the resources each university can bring to bear.
For the first time, the formula allows the state to understand how well funded each university is compared with their unique needs. None of our institutions is fully funded. Some universities have 40% of what research tells us is needed to effectively serve students; others have 88%. Both bills call on the state to invest at least $135 million in new funds each year for the next 10 to 15 years to bring the system as a whole closer to full funding. Like EBF, the legislation ensures that new funding follows need: The adequate and equitable funding formula ensures that institutions furthest from adequacy receive a greater share of new dollars to help catch them up. Transparency and accountability measures will track the connection between new funding, affordability and student outcome.
The proposed new university funding formula is based on a simple, powerful principle: Let's understand what each university needs to fulfill its unique mission and serve its unique student population, then let's make sure we have a plan to get resources where they are needed. This has been a winning strategy in K-12, and we hope the General Assembly and governor will embrace this effort with the same bipartisan support and sense of purpose they brought to passing (and then funding) EBF.
In an increasingly partisan world, Illinois continues to demonstrate that we can come together to solve problems to build a strong future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
14 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Jasmine Crockett Calls Trump 'Wannabe Hitler' Over Epstein Files
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Representative Jasmine Crockett, a Texas Democrat, delivered sharp criticism of her Republican colleagues during a Saturday afternoon MSNBC interview, accusing them of showing loyalty to what she called a "wannabe Hitler" in reference to President Donald Trump. The remarks came amid growing controversy over the Trump administration's handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related files. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email on Sunday for comment. Why It Matters Epstein, a convicted sex offender, died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting further sex trafficking charges. The disgraced financier had well-documented connections to powerful figures, and his death has long prompted numerous conspiracy theories, particularly about a "client list" and the way in which he died. From lawmakers and attorneys to concerned voters, many say that full transparency is essential to restoring public trust and bringing clarity to one of the most high-profile criminal investigations in recent memory. The controversy has created fractures within Trump's own Make America Great Again (MAGA) base while highlighting broader questions about government transparency and executive accountability. What To Know During her Saturday MSNBC appearance on Alex Witt Reports, Crockett addressed Trump's reversal on releasing Epstein files after initially pledging transparency. The lawmaker predicted her Republican colleagues would avoid taking decisive action on the matter, noting that several GOP lawmakers "just skipped a previous vote this week." Crockett suggested Republicans are deliberately protecting Trump from potentially damaging revelations because "they understand that it is most likely problematic for him as well as the MAGA brand." The Texas Democrat characterized Republican loyalty to Trump in stark terms, saying lawmakers want to "pledge their loyalty" to someone she described as a "wannabe Hitler." She expressed skepticism that Republicans would support any measures "that may harm them or their fearless leader." Meanwhile, Trump's frustration with critics became evident in his Saturday Truth Social post, where he announced instructing the DOJ to release grand jury testimony related to Epstein. However, he simultaneously dismissed demands for broader transparency, writing that "nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request." The administration's handling has drawn criticism across party lines. Attorney General Pam Bondi previously claimed an Epstein client list was on her desk but now says no such list exists. The DOJ subsequently requested unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein and convicted British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, though critics argue this represents only a fraction of available evidence. Scrutiny intensified following a Wall Street Journal report about a birthday letter from Trump to Epstein containing suggestive content. Trump has since sued the newspaper and found Rupert Murdoch, seeking at least $10 billion in damages. What People Are Saying Rep. Jasmine Crockett during a Saturday MSNBC interview: "They want to show that they're loyal to this, you know, I don't even know what to call him," she continued. "I've called him so many things, but this wannabe Hitler for sure. They want to pledge their loyalty to him, and they know that he does not want this released." She continued: "I think they also are concerned about the damage that it may do. If he's trying to hide it, they understand that it is most likely problematic for him as well as the MAGA brand, as well the Republicans. So, I don't anticipate that they will be on board for doing anything that may harm them or their fearless leader." President Donald Trump called out the Wall Street Journal over its report on Friday, writing on Truth Social: "If there was a 'smoking gun' on Epstein, why didn't the Dems, who controlled the 'files' for four years, and had [then Attorney General Merrick] Garland and [former FBI Director James] Comey in charge, use it? BECAUSE THEY HAD NOTHING!!!" MAGA loyalist Laura Loomer said during a livestream last week: "Pam Bondi is a coward. She didn't even sign her name to the memo. This isn't transparency—it's a cover-up." Rep. Ralph Norman, a South Carolina Republican, told CNN: "I think that the American people need to see what's in there, and that's not hard to understand. Across the board, government's supposed to work for us. If there's nothing there, show the blank sheet." FBI Director Kash Patel on X last week: "The conspiracy theories just aren't true, never have been. It's an honor to serve the President of the United States @realDonaldTrump — and I'll continue to do so for as long as he calls on me." Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) arrives for the House Democratic leadership elections at the U.S. Capitol Nov. 19, 2024. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) arrives for the House Democratic leadership elections at the U.S. Capitol Nov. 19, 2024. Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images What Happens Next The release of grand jury information is expected to take weeks or possibly months, as legal teams review transcripts to determine what can be safely disclosed without exposing victims or sensitive details. Congressional Democrats are expected to continue pressing for comprehensive document release, though Crockett expressed skepticism about Republican cooperation.


Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Andy Beshear introduces himself to South Carolina, with an eye toward 2028
'We have an identity crisis and we don't have a voice leading the party,' said South Carolina state Rep. Hamilton Grant, who met Beshear in Columbia, S.C., Wednesday afternoon. 'For everybody who's not from South Carolina, visits South Carolina, wants to be president … it's a jump ball.' South Carolina gained its first-place perch in the presidential nominating calendar in 2024, but it's not clear whether that will change ahead of 2028 . The Democratic National Committee will review the early state process ahead of the primary. Beshear is beginning to build his national operation . He's popping up at major donor conferences and recording a podcast. Former Kamala Harris campaign spokesperson Lauren Hitt is consulting for him, and he hired a new set of fundraisers this spring. On Thursday morning, Beshear met privately with state legislative leaders, taking questions one-on-one and soliciting advice, according to two members who attended the South Carolina confab. But he starts off lesser known than Newsom or Buttigieg, both of whom have built national followings as they consider 2028 runs. Early national polling puts Harris, Buttigieg and Newsom at double-digit support already, while Beshear garners about 2 percent. Luck, the state legislator, said Beshear 'lacks the star power,' of Newsom, 'but he's actually the guy who could do the job' of winning in a red state. 'Nobody knew who the governor of Arkansas was either, but it's certainly a more challenging media environment now,' Michael Morley, who managed then-Rep. Tim Ryan's 2020 presidential primary campaign, said in reference to Bill Clinton. 'He has time to introduce himself, and my informed assumption is that's part of what he's doing here.' At the state's AFL-CIO convention and Georgetown County Democrats' fundraising dinner, Beshear previewed his potential 2028 pitch: He said Democrats need to talk 'like normal human beings,' trading 'abuse disorder' for 'addiction.' He urged them to eschew policy bullet points in favor of relating to voters' everyday lives. And he argued he won deep-red Kentucky because voters know the 'why behind what I do, and because they know about that, even when I do something that they may disagree with, they know I'm coming from the right place.' 'Democrats have a huge opportunity to seize the middle and win back voters who have been increasingly skeptical of our Democratic brand,' Beshear told the county Democrats. 'But it's going to take focus, and it's going to take discipline. We have to talk to people and not at them.'


Axios
43 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump touts U.S. as "most respected country" as he marks six months in office
President Trump touted the U.S. as the "hottest" and "most respected country in the world" on Sunday as he reached the six-month mark of his second White House term. The big picture: Trump's second term has come with a series of challenges both at home and abroad, though he has seen some successes with the passage of the " big, beautiful bill" and the Supreme Court ruling in his favor in several significant cases. In a Truth Social post Sunday, the president claimed his second term is "being hailed as one of the most consequential periods of any President." "In other words, we got a lot of good and great things done, including ending numerous wars of Countries not related to us other than through Trade and/or, in certain cases, friendship," he continued. "Six months is not a long time to have totally revived a major Country. One year ago our Country was DEAD, with almost no hope of revival. Today the USA is the 'hottest' and most respected Country anywhere in the World. Happy Anniversary!!!" he wrote. Zoom out: Trump's administration has negotiated three ceasefire deals between six countries since he took office in January, but efforts to generate an agreement between Russia and Ukraine, as well as Israel and Hamas haven't materialized. During his 2024 campaign, Trump repeatedly said he would end the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours if he returned to the White House. Between the lines: In a separate Truth Social post, Trump touted his approval ratings, claiming that his numbers among Republicans have gone as high as 95% in "various polls." It's unclear which polls the president was referring. According to Gallup, Trump's June approval rating was 40% among voters across both parties, down from 47% when he took office in January. When broken down by party, 86% of Republicans approved of Trump's job as president in June. 36% of Independents and 1% of Democrats agreed. A CBS News/You Gov poll published Sunday showed similar numbers. Overall, the president had a 42% approval rating, with 89% of GOP, 32% of Independents and 5% of Democrats giving their approval. Zoom out: Trump said in his post that his numbers had been boosted by "Radical Left Democrats" exposing the "Jeffrey Epstein hoax."