IMF warns tariffs aren't the answer to global imbalances
In its annual External Sector Report, which assesses imbalances in the 30 largest economies, the IMF noted that external surpluses or deficits were not necessarily a problem, but could cause risks if they became excessive.
It said prolonged domestic imbalances, continued fiscal policy uncertainty, and escalating trade tensions could deteriorate global risk sentiment and elevate financial stress, hurting both debtor and creditor nations.
The report took aim at US President Donald Trump's imposition of higher import tariffs against nearly every trading partner, which his administration says is aimed at increasing revenues and righting longstanding trade deficits.
'A further escalation of the trade war would have significant macroeconomic effects,' it said, noting that higher tariffs would reduce global demand in the short term and add to inflationary pressures through rising import prices.
Rising geopolitical tensions could also trigger shifts in the international monetary system (IMS), which in turn could undermine financial stability, it said.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
This year's report, based on 2024 data, showed the widening of global current account balances was due largely to increased excess balances in the world's three largest economies – the United States, China and the euro area.
The deficit in the United States widened by US$228 billion to US$1.13 trillion or 1 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP), while China's surplus increased by US$161 billion to US$424 billion and the euro surpluses expanded by US$198 billion to US$461 billion.
In an accompanying blog, IMF chief economist Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas said excessive surpluses or deficits stemmed from domestic distortions, such as overly loose fiscal policy in deficit countries and insufficient safety nets that caused excessive precautionary savings in surplus countries.
Changes aimed these domestic drivers – not tariffs – were needed, he said. That meant China should focus on boosting consumption, Europe should spend more on infrastructure and the US needed to reduce large public deficits and rein in fiscal spending, he said.
The report was based on data collected before approval of a massive tax cut and spending bill, which the Congressional Budget Office on Monday said would add US$3.4 trillion to the US deficit over 10 years, causing further pressure.
'Public deficits in the United States remain excessively large and the recent broad depreciation of the Chinese yuan – together with the US dollar – runs the risk of widening current account surpluses in China,' he wrote.
Rising tariffs had little impact on global imbalances, Gourinchas said since they tended to reduce both investment and savings in the tariffing country, leaving current account balances little changed.
Uncertainty about tariffs could also undermine consumer and business confidence, increase financial market volatility and lead to persistent appreciations of the US dollar, the IMF report said. However, it noted the dollar had depreciated 8 per cent since January, its largest half-year decline since 1973.
It acknowledged the continued dominance of the US dollar, but said growing geoeconomic fragmentation could pose risks in the future, and recent weaker demand for US Treasuries could reflect concerns about the US fiscal trajectory.
Increased use of China's yuan in international trade and finance, a 'softening in the United States' role as world banker and insurer' and the emergence of alternative payment systems and private digital assets could eventually lead to changes in the use of international currencies.
'While the risks of serious dislocation in the IMS remain moderate, rapid and sizable increases in global imbalances can generate significant negative cross-border spillovers,' Gourinchas wrote in the blog.
'A major risk for the global economy is that countries will instead respond to rising imbalances by further raising trade barriers, leading to increased geoeconomic fragmentation. And while the impact on global imbalances will remain limited, the harm to the global economy will be long-lasting.' REUTERS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
19 minutes ago
- Business Times
Germany's Merz welcomes EU trade deal with US
[BERLIN] German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Sunday welcomed the trade deal between the United States and the European Union, which he said avoided 'needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations' - even as many industries criticised it. 'We have thus managed to preserve our fundamental interests, even if I would have wished for more relief in transatlantic trade,' he said in a statement released soon after the deal was announced. The agreement sets 15 per cent tariffs on most exports from the European bloc. The United States is Germany's main trading partner. Merz said he was particularly relieved for the car industry, which before Sunday's accord was facing tariffs of 27.5 per cent. In addition to cars, Germany's chemical and machinery industries are particularly dependent on exports to the United States. And Germany's powerful BDI federation of industrial groups said the accord would have 'considerable negative repercussions' and sent 'a fatal signal to the closely interdependent economy on both sides of the Atlantic'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Germany's chemical trade association VCI said the accord left rates 'too high'. 'When one expects a hurricane, you rejoice at a simple storm,' it said in a statement. 'An escalation was avoided, but the cost is high for both sides.' The country's BGA exporters association called it a 'painful compromise' that creates an 'existential threat' for many companies. Clemens Faust, head of the prestigious IFO economic institute, said the agreement represented a 'humiliation for the EU that reflects the imbalance in power'. There are still many details in the accord that need to be ironed out, and the Chancellor expressed his 'full support' for the European Commission 'for the negotiations that will now begin'. German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said the agreement was 'a good thing as a first step. 'We will now assess the outcome of the negotiations and its impact on the economy and employment in Germany,' he added. AFP


CNA
37 minutes ago
- CNA
EU, US strike biggest trade deal
TURNBERRY, United Kingdom: The United States and European Union on Sunday (Jul 27) clinched what President Donald Trump described as the "biggest-ever" deal to resolve a transatlantic tariff stand-off that threatened to explode into a full-blown trade war. Trump emerged from a high-stakes meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf resort in Scotland to announce that a baseline tariff of 15 per cent would be levied on EU exports to the US. The deal, which the leaders struck in around an hour, came as the clock ticked down on an Aug 1 deadline to avoid an across-the-board US levy of 30 per cent on European goods. "We've reached a deal. It's a good deal for everybody. This is probably the biggest deal ever reached in any capacity," said Trump. Trump said the 15 per cent tariff would apply across the board, including for Europe's crucial automobile sector, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. As part of the deal, Trump said the 27-nation EU bloc had agreed to purchase "US$750 billion worth of energy" from the US, as well as make US$600 billion in additional investments. Von der Leyen said the "significant" purchases of US liquefied natural gas, oil and nuclear fuels would come over three years, as part of the bloc's bid to diversify away from Russian sources. Negotiating on behalf of the EU's 27 countries, von der Leyen had been pushing hard to salvage a trading relationship worth an annual US$1.9 trillion in goods and services. "It's a good deal," the EU chief told reporters. "It will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic," she said. She said bilateral tariff exemptions had been agreed on a number of "strategic products", notably aircraft, certain chemicals, some agricultural products and critical raw materials. Von der Leyen said the EU still hoped to secure further so-called "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be "sorted out" in coming days. Trump also said EU countries, which recently pledged to ramp up their defence spending within NATO, would be purchasing "hundreds of billions of dollars worth of military equipment". "BEST WE COULD GET" The EU has been hit by multiple waves of tariffs since Trump reclaimed the White House. It is currently subject to a 25 per cent levy on cars, 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10 per cent, which Washington threatened to hike to 30 per cent in a no-deal scenario. The bloc had been pushing hard for tariff carve-outs for critical industries from aircraft to spirits, and its auto industry, crucial for France and Germany, is already reeling from the levies imposed so far. "Fifteen percent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get," acknowledged von der Leyen. Any deal will need to be approved by EU member states, whose ambassadors, on a visit to Greenland, were updated by the commission Sunday morning. They were set to meet again after the deal struck in Scotland. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz rapidly hailed the deal, saying it avoided "needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations". The EU had pushed for a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the US before tariffs would apply. Trump appeared to rule that out, saying steel was "staying the way it is", but the EU chief insisted later that "tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place" for steel. "THE BIG ONE" While 15 per cent is much higher than pre-existing US tariffs on European goods, which average around 4.8 per cent, it mirrors the status quo, with companies currently facing an additional flat rate of 10 per cent. Had the talks failed, EU states had greenlit counter tariffs on US$109 billion of US goods including aircraft and cars to take effect in stages from Aug 7. Trump has embarked on a campaign to reshape US trade with the world, and has vowed to hit dozens of countries with punitive tariffs if they do not reach a pact with Washington by Aug 1.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
How reliable is the 60/40 portfolio in downturns? Adding private debt not a panacea
[SINGAPORE] A big argument in favour of an investment in private markets is that the traditional 60/40 balanced portfolio (60 per cent stocks, 40 per cent bonds) is no longer as reliable or robust as it traditionally was. The steep portfolio loss in 2022 when stocks and bonds fell at the same time – and each asset class by double digits – has likely scarred most investors. It is no coincidence that since that year, strategists and bankers have redoubled efforts to persuade investors to invest in assets that are less correlated with public markets. Institutions and private wealth advisers alike are pinning their hopes on private markets to drive not just overall portfolio returns but also dampen risk. BlackRock chairman Larry Fink in his 2025 letter wrote that the future standard portfolio may have the allocation of 50/30/20 – that is, 50 per cent stocks, 30 per cent bonds and 20 per cent in private assets such as infrastructure, real estate and private credit. 'Generations of investors have done well following (the 60/40) approach, owning a mix of the entire market rather than individual securities. But as the global financial system continues to evolve, the classic 60/40 portfolio may no longer fully represent true diversification,' he wrote. The big question dogging the 60/40 method is not so much that of the risk and return of equities, but rather of bonds. Have bonds lost their ability to diversify? It is significant that the three types of private assets Fink cites are those that come closest to bonds. Infrastructure, real estate and private credit all generate a yield. Private assets also show lower correlation with public markets. Retail investors are able to access listed infrastructure and real estate investment trusts. Private debt is currently confined to accredited investors. And, in today's environment, there may be reasons for caution in private debt, which I will touch on shortly. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Strategists are not calling for the scrapping of the 60/40 portfolio, but to enhance its diversification benefits. Still, some fund managers maintain that the 60/40 approach continues to prove its value even without private markets, and the 2022 experience was an outlier. Morningstar noted that 2022 was the single year over a 150-year period that bonds failed to provide diversification benefit in a downturn. Could it happen again? 60/40 portfolio's track record Erin Browne, Pimco managing director and portfolio manager, said that the 60/40 portfolio has proven its resiliency – not just over the past decade but over more than 30 years. Browne, based in Pimco's Newport Beach office, looks after the firm's multi-asset strategies. Pimco manages more than US$2 trillion in assets. 'Our portfolio is up by around 10 per cent year to date, and the (reference) 60/40 is up by 8 per cent. It really has proven to be a good core ballast of delivering portfolio returns over different market environments and histories. This year is no different,' she said. Pimco's data shows that since 1990, a global 60/40 portfolio has returned just 0.7 per cent less than global stocks on an annualised basis, but with 37 per cent less volatility. 'The US stock-bond correlation has gotten more negative over recent months, with the one-year correlation dropping from 0 to minus 15 per cent. This is particularly valuable in an uncertain macro environment; both stocks and bonds can benefit from a soft landing amid central bank rate cuts,' she added. 'If growth deteriorates faster than expected, high-quality bonds provide a ballast. Finally, the long-term track record and easy-to-understand benefits of a 60/40 allocation allows investors to stay invested rather than attempt to time the market, which typically causes underperformance.' Browne said inflows into Pimco's multi-asset offerings are not just from retirement savers, but also more broadly from investors looking to build a 'strong, stable bellwether' as their core portfolio. 'Flows are really coming from investors looking to create the core of their asset allocation strategy, where they're able to participate in continued upside in equities, and also have some diversification.' She believes volatility is likely to be elevated given the geopolitical and macroeconomic shifts, from a 'unique unipolar world' to a multi-polar world, and from global cooperation to fragmentation. 'There will be friction in that change… Growth is also slowing on a global basis, and that creates pockets for disruption within global markets and equities, which creates more volatility.' Morningstar research found that the poor performance of the 60/40 portfolio in 2022 was due to a painful bear market in bonds that actually began around 2020. In its analysis of how the 60/40 portfolio performed over 150 years, it found that the crash of the 2020s was the only one where the decline of the 60/40 portfolio was more painful than that of an all-stock portfolio. That is, while the deepest drawdown of the 60/40 portfolio was shallower than the all-equity portfolio, it has taken the 60/40 portfolio longer to recover. In the 2020s, the downturn in equities – brought on by the Ukraine war, higher inflation and supply shortages – coincided with a bear market in bonds. 'While the stock market recovered to its previous high in September 2024, the bond market has not yet fully emerged from underwater. This decline was so severe that it prevented the 60/40 portfolio from returning to its previous high until June 2025 – marking the only time in the past 150 years that the 60/40 portfolio experienced more pain than the stock market,' it said. 'Nonetheless, even in this once-in-150-years bond bear market, the depth of the decline experienced by a 60/40 portfolio was less than that of either the stock market or the bond market alone.' Pimco's Browne argued that the starting point of bond yields is key for an investor. 'I don't think fixed income as a risk diversifier is dead. There's real potential for fixed income to continue to deliver not only on income return but also diversification,' she noted. 'In 2020 inflation ran very high, and the starting points of yields were exceptionally low in a negative or zero-rate environment. But where we are today is quite different. The starting point of yields today provides a really nice cushion to protect portfolios in risk-off events, with 10-year yields exceeding 4 per cent. Yields tend to be very highly correlated with the expected return of the asset over the next five years.' Caution on private credit What about private credit as a bond proxy? Despite an attractive yield, it is not a panacea for returns or lower risk. There is also reason for caution when almost every private banker or sales person trots out private debt offerings. According to an article in the Financial Times, the GIC itself is cautious as the asset class is untested in a major credit default cycle. GIC chief investment officer Bryan Yeo reportedly said the investment company is 'raising the bar in terms of further deployment in the private credit space', adding: 'We're now at a part of the cycle where we feel that spreads are a lot tighter, and valuations are also higher.' Pimco is wary as well. It noted in its mid-year report that credit spreads remained tight relative to historic averages despite signs of 'elevated secular recession potential', which reflects some complacency in public and private credit markets. Private credit, it said, is vulnerable to broad risk asset repricing due to its 'large allocations' into technology and artificial intelligence disruptors. 'Amid limited fiscal space, a genuine credit default cycle – unlike the recent 'buy the dip' era – may unfold for the first time in years, catching many investors unprepared… We express caution in areas of private corporate credit where capital formation has outpaced investable opportunities, leading to potential disappointment.'