
Ramtek MP Barve raises Pench man-animal conflict issue in Lok Sabha
2
Nagpur: The growing threat of man-animal conflict in the Pench Tiger Reserve region found a voice in Parliament on Tuesday, when Ramtek MP Shyam Barve urged the Centre to take urgent steps to protect tribals while ensuring their livelihoods remain intact.
Speaking in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Barve said that tribals in villages on the fringes of forests have long been suffering due to restrictions imposed after the reserve was declared a national park. "Their farms are located adjoining the forest. Yet, ever since Pench was declared a national park, tribals are stopped from moving freely. The animals have no such restrictions, leading to frequent tiger attacks. In my constituency alone, 11 people have lost their lives in the past three years," Barve said.
Citing official data, the MP said over 700 people have died across the country in man-animal conflicts over the past four years, including more than 200 in Maharashtra. He accused the government of failing to provide alternative means of livelihood for tribals, despite their role in protecting the forest. "The government has not made a single corridor for cattle rearing, nor has it implemented any scheme to support their livelihood," he said, urging the Centre to prepare schemes that balance conservation with human survival.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
He added, "I urge the government to make provisions that can protect their lives and to prepare schemes that will allow them to farm and establish small industries. This government has been in power for 11 years, but it has not paid attention to the tribals. I would like to remind the government through this House that tribals too are citizens of this country."
Barve's remarks came just days after his wife, former Nagpur Zilla Parishad president Rashmi, slammed the state government and forest department for their inability to track down the Parseoni man-eater, which claimed its latest human victim on Sunday.
"There is panic among villagers due to this man-eater. Many of our villagers have to venture into the fields because it is sowing season. But there is a constant fear as a man-eater is still roaming around," she had told TOI earlier, warning that the death toll will keep rising unless decisive action is taken. Parseoni is also part of Barve's Ramtek constituency.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
4 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Do not politicise my meeting with Stalin, says O. Panneerselvam
Former Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam on Monday rejected speculations about his likely association with the ruling DMK and further maintained his objective was to form Amma's government in the 2026 Assembly poll. He clarified that his recent comments on the Centre not releasing funds for Tamil Nadu under the Samagra Shiksha programme were not new, and he had flagged this as early as in August 2024. In a statement, Mr. Panneerselvam termed as 'indecent' the attempts by some to politicise his visit to Mr. Stalin's residence. 'The meeting was not related to politics,' he contended.'It is in the culture of the Tamils to visit and enquire about the well-being of someone, who has been under treatment in a hospital and has returned home, and to extend condolences if there is a loss in the family,' he said in a statement. Recalling his visit to the Chief Minister's residence, Mr. Panneerselvam explained that he visited only to enquire about the health of Mr. Stalin and express condolences over the passing of the latter's brother M.K. Muthu. He also rejected contentions and speculations which termed him as 'DMK's Team B', and he was about to forge an alliance with the DMK and maintained there was 'not even an iota of truth in it'. He recalled in June that he had condemned the Hindu Munnani over remarks made against late leaders Periyar E.V. Ramasamy and C.N. Annadurai. 'I have also condemned former BJP leaders who criticised Amma [former CM Jayalalithaa]. I have also recorded my support for the two-language policy,' he asserted. Mr. Panneerselvam added: 'I also directed to vote against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Rajya Sabha. Irrespective of wherever I am, I will walk on the path laid down by Amma for the rights and welfare of the people of Tamil Nadu.'
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
Colombia's former President Uribe petitions Supreme Court to lift house arrest after conviction
Colombia's former president Álvaro Uribe has petitioned the Supreme Court to lift his house arrest while he appeals a 12-year sentence for witness tampering and obstruction of justice. read more Colombia's former president Alvaro Uribe, the country's first previous leader to be convicted of a crime, petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday for his release while appealing his sentence of 12 years house jail. Uribe's conviction and punishment last Friday marked the end of his long career as one of Colombia's most contentious politicians. The 73-year-old, who is still popular and powerful among conservatives, conducted a rigorous military battle against drug traffickers and the FARC rebel group as president from 2002 to 2010. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Uribe was found guilty of tampering with witnesses in a separate inquiry investigating his suspected involvement with right-wing paramilitaries responsible for atrocities while fighting leftist guerrillas. He was also found guilty of impeding justice. At his sentencing the trial court judge declared him to be a flight risk and ordered him to be placed under house arrest at his home in the town of Rionegro, near Colombia's second city of Medellin. Uribe's lawyers petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday to set him free, assuring he had no intention of leaving his homeland. A law-and-order hardliner, Uribe was a close ally of the United States and retains ties to the American right. He claims his conviction is a political witch hunt by the administration of left-wing President Gustavo Petro. He has until August 13 to appeal his conviction. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has decried the case against Uribe, saying it represented 'the weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges.'


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cabinet nod to amend panchayat act to simplify licence procedures
Panaji: The state cabinet on Monday decided to amend the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, to empower the panchayats to seal any premises if any business is carried out within its jurisdiction without a valid licence from the panchayat. The amendment seeks to simplify the process of issuing repair permission to single dwelling units by giving power to the panchayat secretary to issue repair permission without placing it before a panchayat meeting. The bill seeks to amend the act to reduce the time for the disposal of applications for construction licences from 30 days to 15 days, as envisaged in the reforms proposed in the context of the Business Reforms Action Plan (BRAP), 2024. It will reduce the time for the disposal of applications for occupancy certificates from 45 days to 15 days and for disposal of applications for trade licences from 15 days to 7 days. The amendment seeks to insert a new section in the principal act, as there is no provision to seal premises if any business is carried out without a valid licence from the panchayat. 'If any person, without obtaining a licence from the panchayat, carries on any trade or occupation in any premises within the panchayat jurisdiction, the panchayat shall, after giving an opportunity of being heard to such person, seal such premises,' the bill stated. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 22 Illustrations of a Husband and Wife in Everyday Life Watch More Undo 'Provided that if the application for a licence is already submitted to the panchayat, such premises shall not be sealed till such application is rejected on merit. ' 'No such premises shall be sealed till the expiry of the period given to rectify any defect thereof. An appeal against the panchayat order shall lie before the director, and the director's decision in the matter shall be final, provided that the director shall not grant any interim relief without hearing the panchayat,' the bill said.