Rare sea Warty Doris slug photographed in Studland Bay
Seasearch and Dorset Wildlife Trust confirmed that Ms Munn's discovery was the species of nudibranch, which gets it name from the warts all over its body. "It's normally associated with warmer waters so it's possibly an indicator of climate change," Ms Munn said.She said there were quite a few of the bright yellow and orange creatures, which can range in length from 30mm to 70mm."It actually breathes through it's bottom so it's quite a cute species," she said.The environmentalist was also able to capture an image of the brightly coloured Warty Doris eggcase, which the slug's use to protect their eggs.
Ms Munn fell in love with the ocean after she used swimming and snorkelling to aid her recovery following a series of car accidents.She said she is out exploring and snorkelling along Dorset's coastline on a daily basis.She blogs her findings, in the hope that it will inspire others to make new discoveries in the local waters."I just want to raise awareness of the marine life that we can find around here and how colourful and beautiful it is," she said.
You can follow BBC Dorset on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prostate cancer checks soar after Sir Chris Hoy reveals diagnosis
Thousands more men are having checks for prostate cancer since Sir Chris Hoy revealed he had been diagnosed with the disease and was terminally ill. The six-time Olympic cycling gold medallist was told in 2023 that he was terminally ill with cancer that originated in his prostate, and shared his diagnosis publicly last year. Despite a family history of prostate cancer – which also affected his father and grandfather – Sir Chris was never offered the PSA test that could have detected it. New NHS data show almost 5,000 extra men have been referred for urological cancer in the six months after Sir Chris, 49, spoke out, a trend described by experts as 'staggering'. The figures, from October 2024 to March 2025, show 138,734 men were given an urgent referral for urological cancers, with prostate cancer the main form of disease. This amounts to an extra 4,962 cases compared with the same six-month period in 2023-24. Separate data show a huge increase in the number of men with a family history of prostate cancer who have assessed their own risk. The number of men with such a history who have used an online risk checker to assess their chances of the disease rose by 77 per cent over the period. Telegraph launches screening campaign The findings have been released as The Telegraph launches a campaign calling for the introduction of targeted screening for prostate cancer. Men are not offered tests currently, even if they have a family history of the disease. Experts believe there is a growing case for targeted screening, meaning that PSA blood tests would be offered to those at heightened risk of the disease. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, hopes to harness AI and data to improve prostate cancer screening for high-risk men which factors in family history, genetics, demographics and other factors. Mr Kyle, writing in The Telegraph, said he hopes researchers can harness the vast amount of health data available to 'develop AI-powered tools that can predict cancer risk' to save thousands of lives a year. The UK National Screening Committee is currently considering whether to recommend the introduction of mass testing. 'I told my story to raise awareness' Sir Chris said: 'I was diagnosed with stage four prostate cancer at 47. By this age, my prostate cancer was advanced and could have been progressing from when I was 45 or even younger. With prostate cancer, the earlier you find it, the easier it is to treat. We need the system to change to enable more men to get diagnosed earlier, and stop them getting the news I got. 'That's why I believe men at highest risk, for example men with a family history like me, or black men, should be contacted by their GP earlier on to discuss a simple PSA blood test that can check for signs of prostate cancer. 'Then if there are any issues, they can get it treated it at an earlier stage. 'I've told my story to help raise awareness about the most common cancer in men and get more thinking about their risk and what they can do, but it shouldn't all be men's responsibility.' The online risk checking tool, published by Prostate Cancer Research UK, asks men simple questions about their family history and ethnicity to determine risk levels, and gives advice about what help to seek. The charity found that the number of men undergoing the check rose by 45 per cent overall, when data from October 2024 to February 2025 was compared with the same period the year before. The sharpest increase by far came from men aged between 45 and 49, with a family history of the disease. In total 10,427 such men checked their risk, compared with 5,891 in the same period the previous years. In total there were 688,796 checks during the period, up from 473, 843 the year before.
BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Peterborough museum displays Doctor Who Tardis console
A replica of a Doctor Who Tardis console is set to go on show as part of an item will go on display for six weeks at Peterborough Museum and Art Gallery as part of the Adventures in Time and Space exhibition. Aimi Rowe, display programmer at the museum, said: "The exhibition has been extremely popular since its opening in May, and curator Derek Handley was keen for visitors to see as many monsters as possible."People will be able to see the replica until 2 November, alongside other Doctor Who items. The console is a replica of the one used by Tom Baker, the fourth Doctor in the BBC piece was brought back to life using the original design blueprints and made by the engineering department at Anglia Ruskin University in Rowes said: "For those that haven't been, yet this is the perfect time to experience the exhibition."Doctor Who actress Sophie Aldred, who played Ace, companion to Sylvester McCoy, gave a talk at the item's unveiling. The museum has extended its opening hours and is now open on Sundays for the 22 July, two new characters joined: Lord Kiv, a slug-like villain from season 23 and a Quark, a robot from season six. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Phrenology and IQ tests: the far-right revival of discredited race science
Phrenology was long ago added to the junk heap of discredited theories. But in the 200 years since the Edinburgh Phrenological Society turned this pseudoscientific method to study the skulls of black Africans, Indians and white Europeans, scientific racism has continued to re-emerge in different guises. In the 19th century, as scientists were intent on classifying the natural world into taxonomic categories, some of Edinburgh's most celebrated intellectuals argued that different human races were so distinct that they ought to be considered separate species. The University of Edinburgh report on its legacy of links to slavery and colonialism notes that non-white populations were invariably depicted as inherently inferior, offering a convenient justification for colonialism. As this view became untenable, scientific racism shifted into the domain of eugenics in the 20th century. Francis Galton, the English statistician who coined the term, argued for social measures aimed at 'improving the stock'. Edinburgh's then chancellor, the former Conservative prime minister Arthur Balfour, was a prominent supporter and became honorary vice-chair of the British Eugenics Education Society in 1913. In the US, eugenics inspired forced sterilisation programmes, which disproportionately targeted African American women and, in Nazi Germany, was the ideological backdrop to the Holocaust. The advent of modern genetics and human population data has shattered the idea that there are biologically distinct groups, or that humans that can be neatly categorised based on skin colour or external appearance. Genetic variation between populations is continuous and does not align with social, historical and cultural constructs of race. Race, as a genetic concept, does not exist. Yet, says Angela Saini, author of a book on the return of race science, 'people don't stop believing falsehoods just because the evidence suggests they are wrong'. As IQ testing became the metric of choice for those seeking to draw conclusions about racial differences – often based on biased or fraudulent datasets – old, discredited arguments resurfaced. The Bell Curve, a 1994 bestseller, argued that IQ was heritable and unequally distributed across racial groups. At the University of Edinburgh, students boycotted the lectures of Christopher Brand, a psychology professor, in which he claimed a genetic basis for white intellectual superiority. After he repeated these arguments in his 1996 book, The g Factor (and stoked further controversy by defending paedophilia), Brand was eventually dismissed, while his book was withdrawn and pulped. With the recent rise in ethnic nationalism and the far right globally, a resurgence of interest is under way into theories of racial exceptionalism. Last year, the Guardian revealed that an international network of 'race science' activists, backed by secret funding from a US tech entrepreneur, had been seeking to influence public debate. Discredited ideas on race, genetics and IQ have become staple topics of far-right online discourse. 'The ideas have absolutely not changed at all,' says Prof Rebecca Sear, an anthropologist at Brunel University of London and president of the European Human Behaviour and Evolution Association. 'If you can provide a measurement – IQ, skull size – that helps give racism a respectable gloss.' Just like phrenology, Sear says, a lot of contemporary scientific racism is simply 'shockingly bad science'. But when communicated in the form of a graph or chart – whether in a 19th-century lecture theatre or on social media today – pseudoscience and credible science can look similar. 'I would love to see a world in which people stop turning to biology to explain socioeconomic and cultural differences, in which nobody is judged by their racial classification,' says Saini. 'But the University of Edinburgh report is a reminder of how even seemingly smart, educated people can come to believe ridiculous things.'
