Chignecto Isthmus case waste of Nova Scotia Court of Appeal's time: federal lawyer
HALIFAX — Nova Scotia and New Brunswick's attempt to persuade a panel of judges to conclude Ottawa has responsibility for the infrastructure on the Chignecto Isthmus is a 'waste and abuse' of the court's time, a federal lawyer argued Wednesday.
Lawyer Lori Ward told a three-member Nova Scotia Court of Appeal panel that 'the ultimate issue despite all protestations to the contrary, is funding.'
'It's clear that Nova Scotia writ large designed this reference as a political pressure tactic to be used as ammunition in the political arena and as such we would argue that it's not just a waste of this court's time, it is an abuse of this court's time,' said Ward.
The isthmus has had large dikes since 1671, when Acadian settlers arrived, and there are currently about 35 kilometres of dikes that help protect roads, farms and communities.
Nova Scotia has long maintained that the federal government should pay the entire cost of upgrading protections for the isthmus -- currently estimated at $650 million -- but Ottawa has agreed to pay only half of the project.
In July 2023, the province asked the court to settle the constitutional question of whether the transportation, trade and communication links across the Chignecto Isthmus are within the exclusive legislative authority of parliament. The question of who should fund any upgrades was not part of the court reference.
Nova Scotia was joined in the court case by New Brunswick, while Prince Edward Island was also granted intervener status.
Ward pointed out that even if it's decided that Ottawa has sole jurisdiction over the low-lying, narrow strip of land that connects the two provinces, it would have no obligation to fund projects aimed at preventing catastrophic flooding.
'So what is the point of asking you to find exclusive jurisdiction?' she asked the court.
'Practically speaking things are unfolding as they should be, just like they did in the 1940s,' Ward said. 'Canada has agreed to pay 50 per cent of the cost and is working with the provinces.'
As she did in a hearing in March, Ward asked the court to decline to answer the question, but she added that if it does decide to rule on the merits of the case it should do so 'in the negative.'
The court reserved its decision on Wednesday.
The provinces maintain that Ottawa has the responsibility to protect rail, power and communication lines as well as inter-provincial trade from climate-change impacts, but federal lawyer Jan Jensen argued that this does not require Canada to protect the dikes.
Jensen argued that there was no evidence that the dikes alone are necessary to protect infrastructure such as the rail line.
'It's not clear at what level of sea level rise that the rail line's own embankments and bridges are not sufficient,' he said.
Daniel Boyle, a lawyer for Nova Scotia's attorney general, had argued during a hearing on Tuesday that an eight-metre storm surge would flow over the dikes and submerge the highway and the rail line. At 12 metres, he said 'Nova Scotia would effectively become an island.'
During his reply to the court on Wednesday, Boyle was asked by Justice David Farrar how he could 'divorce himself' from previous comments made by Premier Tim Houston, who recently wrote a letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney seeking confirmation that Ottawa would agree 'should the court decide that paying for the isthmus is a federal responsibility.'
'Counsel for Nova Scotia have consistently throughout this proceeding maintained and made clear that funding is not at stake,' Boyle said. 'Nova Scotia's position has been that the outcome of this proceeding could advance discussions. This is a reference opinion, it's an advisory opinion.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 21, 2025.
The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
LeBlanc ‘encouraged' after meeting with Lutnick, lawmakers ahead of tariff deadline
WASHINGTON - Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc says he's feeling 'encouraged' after meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and American lawmakers in Washington, D.C., ahead of next week's tariff deadline. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to slap Canada with 35 per cent tariffs if there's not a deal by Aug. 1 but the White House has said it would not include goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
LeBlanc ‘encouraged' after meeting with Lutnick, lawmakers ahead of tariff deadline
WASHINGTON – Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc says he's feeling 'encouraged' after meeting with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and American lawmakers in Washington, D.C., ahead of next week's tariff deadline. U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to slap Canada with 35 per cent tariffs if there's not a deal by Aug. 1 but the White House has said it would not include goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. Canada is also being hit with Trump's tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles, and will be impacted by copper tariffs that are also expected to kick in on Aug. 1. LeBlanc says Ottawa will take the time necessary to get the best deal in the interest of Canadians, indicating a new economic and security arrangement may not materialize by Trump's deadline. LeBlanc says he will return to Washington next week for additional meetings. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski says she's hopeful for a return to normal relations with Canada but doesn't sense there will be a deal before Trump's deadline. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2025.
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Canada's trade team downplays chances of deal with Trump by Aug. 1
Social Sharing With the clock ticking on U.S. President Donald Trump's threat to boost tariffs on some Canadian exports to 35 per cent starting Aug. 1, Canada's top trade negotiators are downplaying the likelihood of reaching a deal by that deadline. Dominic LeBlanc, minister responsible for Canada-U.S. trade, and Canada's ambassador to the U.S., Kirsten Hillman, wrapped up two days of meetings with Republican senators. These included a brief sit-down between LeBlanc and Howard Lutnick, the U.S. secretary of commerce and Trump's point man on tariffs. "We've made progress, but we have a lot of work in front of us," LeBlanc told reporters outside a Senate office building on Thursday. LeBlanc said he had a "productive, cordial discussion" with Lutnick and plans to return to Washington next week. He also added some caveats about the path to reaching a deal. "We're going to continue to work toward the Aug. 1 deadline,' he said. "But all of these deadlines are with the understanding that we'll take the time necessary to get the best deal that we think is in the interest of the Canadian economy and Canadian workers." Hillman, who was appointed Canada's chief negotiator with the U.S., also suggested an agreement with the Trump administration is not imminent. WATCH | Dominic LeBlanc speaks after meeting Trump's point man on tariffs: 'Canadians expect us to take the time necessary' to reach a U.S. trade deal: LeBlanc 1 hour ago Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, speaking to reporters in Washington, D.C., said Canada will only accept a deal when there is one in the best interest of workers and the Canadian economy on the table. "It's important for us to recognize that there is a time when the deal is the right deal, and it's important for us to be in a position to continue negotiating until we get to that point," she said. Their comments are the latest evidence that Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is not in a rush to sign a deal with the U.S. Carney said Tuesday that his objective is " not to reach a deal whatever it costs." Following Carney's meeting with Canada's premiers earlier this week, Nova Scotia's Tim Houston said the prime minister isn't dead set on signing a deal by the deadline. Other countries reach tariff deals with Trump This comes amid Trump's announcements this week of framework agreements on tariffs struck with Japan and Indonesia, and reports the U.S. is closing in on a deal with the European Union. Canada may be less panicked than other trading partners about the Aug. 1 deadline because only a small portion of Canada's exports to the U.S. would be affected by Trump's threat of 35 per cent tariffs. That's because most goods enter the U.S. tariff-free under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, or CUSMA. Officials say LeBlanc and Hillman met with five Republican senators in Washington: Kevin Cramer (North Dakota), Roger Marshall (Kansas), Shelley Moore Capito (West Virginia), Tim Scott (South Carolina) and Todd Young (Indiana). Another Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, told reporters in Washington on Thursday that the U.S. shares a lot of security and economic interests with Canada and shouldn't treat it as "just another country" when it comes to tariffs. " I wish that I could say it feels good, that this is all going to be taken care of before the first of August, but I'm not sensing that," said Murkowski, who visited Ottawa on Monday to meet Carney and some of his cabinet ministers
