logo
SGF Mayor reflects on time in office, highs and lows, and city's future

SGF Mayor reflects on time in office, highs and lows, and city's future

Yahoo08-04-2025
SPRINGFIELD, Mo. — Springfield Mayor Ken McClure isn't sure if emotions will get the best of him when his final days as mayor are over.
One thing he's sure of is that he's ready to focus on his next chapter.
'I'm ready to be done. I'm grateful for the opportunity, the honor of a lifetime, but it takes a toll on you physically and mentally,' McClure said. 'I've been in office eight years as mayor, it's time.'
Elected in 2017, McClure says their focus was on tax issues to improve various departments in the Queen City.
'The purpose of that was to deal with some very real public safety problems we had made for two new fire stations. We were not able to fund those. We went to the voters and said, we need your approval, we can do this, and that was the real key,' McClure said. 'We were able to add to that with renewals again for our quarter rates for capital approval, tax, transportation and taxes. We were able to extend those which had been three and four years at a time to 20 years to allow us to go out and do longer term projects without having to splice them up in the various segments.'
Then, 2020 happened.
'That was something that certainly no one anticipated, but no one anticipated the depth of the impact that it was going to have. We declared a state of civil emergency. I read the city code, and once that happens, that responsibility falls on the mayor and the things that I had to do, I never dreamed would be something with which I would be faced,' McClure said. 'I'm so proud of the way the city stepped up those who were wanting to protect, those who were wanting to express their views, those who were wanting to protect them, and everyone did their job. That was a tough time. 2021, we were the hotspot in the nation for the Delta Variant. People were calling us all the time on national media. I went on Face The Nation on one Sunday morning to talk about where we are, and my advice was, 'be prepared for this because it's coming, make sure that you get your vaccination plans out.'
In 2023, McClure was on the Council for one of the largest purchases in city history: Hammons Field.
'We were faced with a very real possibility that the Springfield Cardinals were going to leave. We had to do something with Hammons. I like to say that I was tied up with the Hammons' bankruptcy, and I tell people I learned more about bankruptcy law than I ever cared to know.' McClure said. 'We finally got where we needed to be signed, a long term lease with the Cardinals, and we were able to purchase Hammonds Field, and I think that's going very well, both for the city and for the team. We're grateful for that.
McClure says they were able to get more done in his last years in office.
'We got a comprehensive plan done, got our housing study done, where we're looking at how best to deal with housing needs,' McClure said. 'Those are areas that we had some highlights and the new capital last November with the voter approval on the three quarters and sales tax. No tax increase, but it recognized the obligation that we have for police, fire, pension fund, but also the fact that we've got several opportunities to implement our comprehensive plan, and the voters, 63% of them said, yes, we want to do that.'
The mayor says there's been a fair share of stress in the volunteer role.
'It was a stressful time, but the stress came up until you weighed what you have to do. Once I made the decision, I was fine with that. The stress came in weighing all the pros and cons, but I want to say this. We have a united Council, nine members counting myself, and we're on the same page. I want to give credit to all of my colleagues on there; One for being supportive. Secondly, voicing their support, and then third, standing behind their decision, and that really made it easier for me,' McClure said. 'I remember telling some folks in 2020, I will do what I need to do, but there's no way I could win another term as mayor. I was willing to do that. You do what you have to do for the community and well, if I did end up costing me an election in 2021, so be it, but the stress came in weighing all the consequences and the pros and the cons. Typically, once I make a decision, I'm at peace.'
McClure, like many, agrees that hindsight is 20/20 and Ozarks First asked him if there was anything he would have changed over his last eight years.
'I would only take one vote back. Of all the votes I can, and that was when we had the request in front of city council to take the property to the extreme southern end of a national and sunshine. There was a request from a couple to turn that into a grandpa's house, simliar like a Ronald McDonald house, for people who had patients at Mercy and the neighborhood was very, very opposed to that. We ended up as a council voted 9-0 and killed it. I was one of the nine. I think had we approved that, much of the controversy you see now would not be there,' McClure said.
McClure says zoning and disputes between neighborhoods and developers may never go away, but there needs to be a solution.
'They are contentious and both sides need to be heard and be listened to. You need to try to meet their objectives. I believe sometimes it's easier done than others. Most of our rezoning cases for approved by unanimous vote in council and planning and zoning. So you talking about really, the ones that are the most controversial ones but I look at these issues as really growing pains that the city has. We're at 170,000 plus, the third largest city in the state. We're going to continue to grow. Our metropolitan statistical area is the fastest growing one in the city,' McClure said 'These are growing pains and I still feel that in spite of a lot of positive input for growth and high growth element in this community, and some people do not want to grow, I think we have to grow. We do not grow, we're going to go into a death spiral. As you look forward to that in the next few months and years, I think the community is going to have to wrestle with that if we want to grow or do we want to say, no, we're satisfied with where we are.'
The two running for McClure's seat, Jeff Schrag and Mary Collette have both said to an extent, they're encouraged by development on a local level.
'I know both of the candidates well and that makes me feel good that we'll be headed in the right direction. I think the job for the successful candidate is going to be to manage all of that debate, all of that discussion that goes on, and you have to be you have to be willing to listen to folks and hear what their concerns are,' McClure said. 'Sometimes you can address them, sometimes you can handle problems. Many times you can't address them in the way that they would like, but managing all of that is key. It's a challenge.'
One issue McClure won't have to deal with is any potential impacts from newly imposed tariffs from President Donald Trump, but he's hopeful there's no negative impact at all.
'That will be a challenge that I've had not had to face. I'm trying to follow news reports like everyone else on the tariffs and the impact that they have. We saw what happened with the stock market Thursday, Friday of last week. I think somebody said $4 trillion of wealth was lost and conveyed how the tariffs will impact us,' McClure said. 'We are on the cusp of a lot of good things happening with manufacturing coming in, business is coming in, and we're looking at how best to implement a comprehensive plan. I do worry about that and that's a challenge. I am very optimistic about the future of Springfield. My advice right now is to keep your powder dry. Wait to see how it all plays out and make sure that when you act, that you act accordingly.'
OzarksFirst asked McClure if he had any advice for whoever wins Tuesday's election.
'If I can be of help to my successor, I'm more than willing to do that, but they need the time to get themselves acclimated and have a new direction, and I intend to give them my full support and be of help which I can. My best advice to them and learn the lay of the land and just see how things are structured. You have to get to work. You have to work with the council and the mayor is just one of nine members,' McClure said. 'We've got a great city staff, we've got a great set of resources in our community, We've got a great field of collaborators within our community. We've got to be able to capitalize on that, and so the next mayor will have a lot of resources.'
McClure says it's been a fulfilling eight years.
'I've been honored to serve the city. A lot of people say it's bittersweet and I know there's no bitter about it. It's sweet for me to be able to do this,' McClure said. 'I would do it all again. But I'm glad I don't have to do it again.
The still-current Mayor says he has no plans, except what he keeps telling his grandson.
On April 22, he'll have a good breakfast, maybe make some coffee, and if the weather's nice, maybe sit outside for a bit.
'I feel good about my time, and I feel proud of that. I'm grateful for the support,' McClure said. 'I'm just grateful for the community giving me the opportunity. It's something I never would have dreamed that they wanted me [to do].'
Springfield's next mayor will be sworn in on April 21.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paramount to pay Trump $16 million to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit
Paramount to pay Trump $16 million to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit

Boston Globe

time11 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Paramount to pay Trump $16 million to settle '60 Minutes' lawsuit

The deal is the clearest sign yet that Trump's ability to intimidate major American institutions extends to the media industry. Many lawyers had dismissed Trump's lawsuit as baseless and believed CBS would have ultimately prevailed in court, in part because the network did not report anything factually inaccurate, and the First Amendment gives publishers wide leeway to determine how to present information. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But Shari Redstone, the chair and controlling shareholder of Paramount, told her board that she favored exploring a settlement with Trump. Some executives at the company viewed the president's lawsuit as a potential hurdle to completing a multibillion-dollar sale of the company to the Hollywood studio Skydance, which requires the Trump administration's approval. Advertisement After weeks of negotiations with a mediator, lawyers for Paramount and Trump worked through the weekend to reach a deal before a court deadline that would have required both sides to begin producing internal documents for discovery, according to two people familiar with the negotiations. Another deadline loomed: Paramount was planning to make changes to its board of directors this week that could have complicated the settlement negotiations. Advertisement A spokesperson for Trump's legal team said in a statement that the settlement was 'another win for the American people' delivered by the president, who was holding 'the fake news media accountable.' 'CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle,' the spokesperson said. The size of the settlement, $16 million, is the same sum that ABC News agreed to pay in December to settle a defamation case filed by Trump against the network and one of its anchors, George Stephanopoulos. Paramount's board was concerned that paying a higher amount to settle the case could increase the company's exposure to potential legal actions from shareholders accusing it of bribery. The sale of Paramount would end the Redstone family's decades-long control of CBS News and Paramount Pictures and put it in the hands of David Ellison, the son of Larry Ellison, a tech billionaire who has backed Trump. Brendan Carr, the chair of the Federal Communications Commission, has said that the president's lawsuit against Paramount was not linked to the FCC's review of the company's merger with Skydance. Paramount has also said that the two issues were unrelated. Trump sued Paramount for $10 billion last year, claiming that '60 Minutes' deceptively edited an interview with former vice president Kamala Harris in order to interfere with the election. The transcript of the interview showed that Harris gave a lengthy answer to a question about Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister. About 21 seconds of that answer aired in a preview of the interview on 'Face the Nation,' another CBS News show. A different seven-second part of the answer aired the next day in a prime-time episode of '60 Minutes.' Advertisement Trump said in his lawsuit that CBS's actions amounted to 'news distortion' that was aimed at tipping the scales in favor of the Democratic Party. Paramount disputed that characterization. Even before its resolution, Trump's lawsuit — and Redstone's apparent willingness to entertain a settlement — had engulfed CBS News in turmoil. Tensions within the network over how to handle the president's legal attacks contributed to the resignation of the '60 Minutes' executive producer, Bill Owens; the CBS News president, Wendy McMahon, was later forced out. Watching the case with Trump unfold, many CBS journalists believed the long-term credibility of '60 Minutes' was at stake. Scott Pelley, the veteran '60 Minutes' correspondent, said last month that any settlement would be 'very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies.' Executives at CBS and Paramount applied more scrutiny than usual to segments on '60 Minutes' that could be construed as critical of the Trump administration. CBS News has not killed a story because of the pressure, but Owens, when he resigned in April, said he 'would not be allowed' to make independent journalistic decisions. McMahon said when she left that it had 'become clear the company and I do not agree on the path forward.' Redstone told the board she was recusing herself from its discussions of how to handle the Trump suit, given that her financial stake in the pending Skydance deal is so much greater than the stakes of other shareholders, whose interests the directors are expected to represent. This spring, she was diagnosed with thyroid cancer and has recently been receiving treatment. Advertisement Even before her diagnosis, though, she told board members that she wanted the company to explore a settlement with Trump. Redstone has said she wants to avoid a protracted legal war with the president that could cost hundreds of millions of dollars and jeopardize other divisions that have business with the government. Redstone has also told confidants that she harbors concerns about the editorial judgment of CBS News. She has acknowledged being troubled by some of her network's news coverage and on occasion has raised those concerns publicly and spoken to corporate leadership. Senators, such as Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, have warned that any payment by Paramount to Trump could be construed as a bribe, and stated that they would consider holding a congressional hearing on the matter. This article originally appeared in

Trump Gets Paramount to Cough Up Millions to End ‘60 Minutes' Suit
Trump Gets Paramount to Cough Up Millions to End ‘60 Minutes' Suit

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Gets Paramount to Cough Up Millions to End ‘60 Minutes' Suit

Paramount Global will pay $16 million to Donald Trump's presidential library to end his $20 billion lawsuit over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris—but won't apologize. The company announced the settlement just before midnight on Tuesday, hours ahead of Paramount's shareholder meeting and with no notice posted on its investor relations page. The $16 million includes Trump's legal fees and matches the sum Disney paid Trump's library to settle his defamation suit over an interview ABC's George Stephanopoulos did with GOP Rep. Nancy Mace. 'No amount will be paid directly or indirectly to President Trump or Rep. Jackson personally,' Paramount said in a statement. 'The settlement will include a release of all claims regarding any CBS reporting through the date of the settlement, including the Texas action and the threatened defamation action.' The two sides also agreed that 'in the future, 60 Minutes will release transcripts of interviews with eligible U.S. presidential candidates after such interviews have aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns." Paramount stipulated that the settlement 'does not include a statement of apology or regret.' Trump's demand for an apology was one of the holdups during the months long settlement talks, according to The Wall Street Journal. 'With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit,' a spokesperson for President Trump's legal team said in a statement. 'CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle. President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American People as he continues on his singular mission to Make America Great Again.' Trump sued Paramount and CBS for $10 billion in October after CBS aired a special 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The network teased the Monday edition of the show on Face the Nation, which airs on Sundays, with a garbled Harris answer on Israel's war in Gaza. But when the episode aired the next day, it featured a different portion of Harris' answer. Trump, who did not participate in the episode, claimed the change amounted to distortion, though CBS said it followed standard journalistic editing for timing reasons. He upped his request to $20 billion earlier this year. Still, the case launched a maelstrom of headaches for Paramount—and its controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone—as it sought to complete its merger with David Ellison's Skydance. Federal Communications Chairman Brendan Carr tied the episode to his review of the case, prompting concerns that the settlement could be perceived as a bribe. Paramount on Wednesday pointed to its past statement on the merger, saying the lawsuit was separate from the Skydance review and it would 'abide by the legal process to defend our case.' But despite legal experts' opinions that Trump could lose the lawsuit, Paramount entered into settlement talks with Trump's legal team in April. If the merger is approved, it would net Redstone a $2.4 billion payout for her family's share. The eight-month chaos has claimed multiple casualties at 60 Minutes and CBS News, including its beloved executive producer, Bill Owens, and CBS News and Stations President Wendy McMahon. Owens claimed he had lost journalistic independence over the program as Redstone tried to keep tabs on any negative stories involving Trump, according to Puck. 'Having defended this show—and what we stand for—from every angle, over time with everything I could, I am stepping aside so the show can move forward," Owens said in his resignation. The pursuit of a settlement, and the loss of Owens, infuriated the show's premier league of correspondents, which includes the likes of Lesley Stahl, Anderson Cooper, and Scott Pelley. The group of top journalists sent a letter to Paramount's co-CEOs George Cheeks, Brian Robbins, and Chris McCarthy, and warned them that a settlement would risk damaging the show's reputation, according to Status News.

Commanders held dinner for D.C. Council on Monday night
Commanders held dinner for D.C. Council on Monday night

NBC Sports

time12 hours ago

  • NBC Sports

Commanders held dinner for D.C. Council on Monday night

Wine 'em, dine 'em. Get their votes. ('Em.) On Monday night, Commanders leadership held a dinner for the members of the D.C. Council to discuss the stadium deal on which the Council eventually vote. Via WUSA9, roughly six members of D.C. Council attended the dinner at Milano's, an 'upscale' spot in Georgetown. (There was a quaint time in American history when activities like this would include a discussion as to whether any ethics rules had or hadn't been violated.) The team needs seven to say 'yes.' Currently, they have four. Per the report, a small group of protestors gathered outside, with signs urging the Commanders to pay for their own stadium. The Commanders want to move things along, so that the stadium will be ready to go in 2030. D.C. Council has been proceeding on its own timeline. 'Frankly, a big reason I'm here is to reiterate that we need some time to do this,' Ward 3 Council member Matthew Frumin said. 'We're in the middle of the budget process, there's a ton going on.' Public hearings are set for July 29 and July 30. Then, D.C. Council will be in recess until the middle of September. D.C. Council chair Phil Mendelson will not commit to a prompt vote when the group returns to work. The deal between the team and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has a timeline premised on approval by D.C. Council by July 15. Barring an unexpected development, that won't be happening. The current pressure point for getting the deal done quickly is to position D.C. to host matches during the 2031 FIFA Women's World Cup. For the team, the sooner they get their new stadium, the sooner they get out of the dilapidated building in which they now play.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store