I'm not keen on the Clooneys' ‘no phones' rule for guests
Hmm. I'm fine with shoes-off households (although you reap what you sow when it comes to the state of my socks or my toes). But the phone basket is reminiscent of those aggressively jocular pub signs that say: 'No wifi – talk to each other.' What if you're dealing with a family or work situation, need to hide in the loo and stroke your shiny pocket rectangle to recharge your social batteries, or want to show George a cool meme of an anteater posing? Yes, the Clooneys are the A-est of A-list, with attendant privacy concerns and young children. But if you can't trust people to behave properly, what are they doing in your home?
Most house rules imposed on guests feel iffy to me. My husband still recalls, horrified, a sign he saw at an acquaintance's that read: 'In this home, we eat, we clear away and then we talk.' Isn't hospitality about being expansively welcoming and tolerant? If you can't manage that, don't have people over (as someone with the relaxed and patient forbearance of a wounded honey badger, this is my default option).
But having talked it through with friends, I'm coming round. Clooney food would probably be excellent, as one said, and fellow guests fascinating – I wouldn't want to be distracted by junk WhatsApps from 'recruitment consultants' when I should be committing every detail of the menu, interior, conversation and outfits to memory for future boasting. So, on balance, I think I'm pragmatically, if not philosophically, OK with it. I'm sure Amal will be thrilled. I look forward to my kitchen supper invitation.
Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New footage shows Donald Trump taking a Club World Cup winners' MEDAL as his gatecrashing escalates as it emerges he's keeping the original trophy in the Oval Office
New footage has shown US President Donald Trump receiving a winners' medal from FIFA president Gianni Infantino, before he joins Chelsea for their Club World Cup trophy lift. Trump was spotted among the Chelsea players as they lifted the new trophy, pictured alongside captain Reece James after the Blues had stunned Paris Saint-Germain with a 3-0 win in the final. Cole Palmer was the star of the show within the 90 minutes, with two goals and an assist for Joao Pedro to net the third in a rampant 45 minutes for the Blues. However, the celebrations were somewhat gatecrashed by the US President, who made a surprise appearance for the big moment. Trump was seen being handed a medal by Infantino, with pictures showing him holding onto the award during the ceremony. Yet Trump has now claimed that his involvement in the tournament has not ended with the trophy celebrations on Sunday, as he will now hold onto the real trophy, with Chelsea taking home a replica. Trump was seen still holding onto the prize later on in the victory ceremony on Sunday '[Fifa] is doing fantastically well for [football in America], it's a growing sport, it is a great sport,' President Trump told Dazn. 'They said: "Could you hold this trophy for a little while?". We put it in the Oval Office and then I said: "When are you going to pick up the trophy", and [Infantino] said: "We're never going to pick it up, you can have it forever in the Oval Office". 'And they actually made a new one [for Chelsea] but right now [the original] is in the Oval.' As such, Chelsea - who won the competition and pocketed a hefty prize purse - were given a replica version to take home. Clubs are usually given the legitimate trophy after winning silverware for their celebrations back home and open-top bus parades, with the cup later switched out. Mail Sport has approached FIFA for comment. Viewers of DAZN's coverage were also able to watch an unlikely exchange, as Infantino introduced Trump to Palmer, as the Chelsea and England star walked up to collect his player of the tournament prize. Lip reading expert Jeremy Freeman revealed Trump had words of admiration for Palmer, after watching his stunning performance in the final. ' Chelsea 's biggest fan. I'm a big fan of you. So well done you,' Trump said, according to Freeman. Palmer, who has be known to offer few words in post-match interviews, reportedly replied 'Thank you' before rejoining his team-mates. The 23-year-old's reaction to Trump's decision to remain on stage during Chelsea's trophy presentation, however, has garnered the biggest reaction from fans. The US President had been given the honour of presenting the trophy to Blues captain Reece James, with the expectation that he would then step aside, as it customary. Infantino was seen attempting to usher Trump away from Chelsea players, but the US president remained in place, standing either side of James and Sanchez. Trump's refusal to leave the stage left Chelsea players bewildered with Palmer appearing to say, 'What's he doing?'. Speaking post-match, Palmer admitted 'I knew he was going to be here but I didn't know he was going to be on the stand when we lifted the trophy so I was a bit confused, yeah.' Further light has been shed on Trump's presence in the trophy presentation, with his interactions with Chelsea captain James and goalkeeper Sanchez having been revealed. Palmer had appeared baffled by Trump's continued presence during the trophy presentation Palmer admitted at a press conference that he was 'a bit confused' by the situation While Palmer appeared confused in the background, Freeman revealed James had asked for Trump's permission to lift the trophy. As Palmer said 'No, no, just wait, wait…wait…wait', James was seen turning to the US President to seek his approval. James reportedly said 'I can lift?', with Trump responding 'Oh we can, good!' According to Freeman, Sanchez had been open to Trump remaining on the stage and being part of the celebrations. 'Please, sir,' the goalkeeper said to Trump, according to Freeman, before asking him 'Want us to lift the trophy next to you?' With Trump having signalled his approval, Sanchez was seen motioning for James to lift the trophy and kick-start the celebrations.
The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Controversial trad wife Nara Smith slammed as ‘negligent' for promoting ‘dangerous' drink while pregnant
NARA Smith has arguably become one of the most famous trad wives on social media. The 23-year-old mum has gone viral for sharing her home-made recipes, from chewing gum to controversially making her own SPF. 3 And now the controversial mum has been slammed as negligent in a recent recipe video. Taking to social media, Nara, who is currently pregnant with her fourth child, shared her recipe for cookies. All was going well as she showed the delicious soft-baked cookies until she revealed what she was drinking with them. Most people like to have a glass of milk with their cookies, and Nara did just that, but this time, with raw milk. "These hit the spot with some cold raw milk," the mum said as she finished her video, sparking a horrified response from concerned viewers. The drink has been illegal to buy in the UK for forty years due to dangerous bacteria found in raw dairy products. One wrote: "Raw milk while pregnant is actually unhinged." "Raw milk while pregnant is crazy... why is pasteurisation a problem?" added a third. Meanwhile, a fourth said: "Raw milk for why?? You are taking an enormous risk for no reason." Viral trad wife Nara Smith pregnant with 4th child aged 23 - as trolls say 'that's insane, as I'm sure the name will be' The U.S. Food and Drug Administratio said pregnant women run a serious risk of becoming ill drinking raw milk. Listeria, a germ often found in raw milk can cause miscarriage, or illness, or death of the newborn baby. "If you are pregnant, drinking raw milk - or eating foods made from raw milk - can harm your baby even if you don't feel sick," they warned. Nara has gained a massive following on social media due to her 'trad wife' lifestyle. She's often seen in the kitchen baking extravagant meals from scratch while wearing designer dresses worth thousands of pounds. She shares Rumble, four, Slim Easy, three, and Whimsy Lou, one, with Lucky, 27 - whom she tied the knot with in 2020 What is raw milk and the dangers? Most milk goes through pasteurisation before it is consumed. This is where it is cooked to below boiling point to kill off bacteria and micro-organisms. However, raw milk is not pasteurised and can be harmful. As more people drank milk in the 20th Century an increase in milkborne diseases ripped through humans. Tuberculosis, typhoid, scarlet fever and diphtheria were just a few of the serious illnesses spread through raw milk. These diseases were virtually eliminated in humans with the implementation of pasteurisation, in combination with improved management practices on dairy farms. Raw milk can carry dangerous bacteria such as salmonella, e-coli, listeria and campylobacter. A 2019 Public Health England review finds raw milk responsible for 26 outbreaks of intestinal infectious disease in England and Wales between 1992 and 2017. These involved 343 people and resulted in 41 hospitalisations. There were no outbreaks between 2003 and 2013, but seven occured between 2014 and 2017. It's been illegal to sell unpasteurised dairy milk in supermarkets or high street shops in England, Wales and Northern Ireland since 1985 and it's outlawed in Scotland.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Indian film board criticised for cutting ‘overly sensual' Superman kisses
As Indian cinemagoers watched the latest Superman film, many noticed something was amiss. On two occasions as the superhero leaned in for a kiss with Lois Lane, the film suddenly jumped forward, cutting to the aftermath of an embrace. India's censor board had deemed the kissing scenes, including a 33-second smooch, to be 'overly sensual' for Indian audiences and demanded they be cut from the film before its cinematic release. The cuts have prompted an outcry from some viewers, who accused the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) of making arbitrary, overly moralistic demands and having double standards by allowing heavy violence and misogyny to be depicted in Indian films but cutting a kissing scene from a Hollywood film. 'CBFC would allow horrific scenes of violence and sexual assault in a U-certified film that kids are freely allowed to watch, but won't allow consensual kissing in a U/A comic book movie that kids should watch under adult supervision,' one viewer said on social media. Another said: 'So, Superman is NOT allowed to kiss Lois Lane on Indian screens. But all sleazy leading men of Indian films are allowed to pull, grope, assault, stalk, slap, and do whatever they want with their heroines. Are you serious, Indian censor board?' Another fan criticised the jarring interruption caused by the crude cuts. 'The Indian censor board has embarrassed itself with the abrupt cuts they've made to the film. The 'morality' of censorship aside, the way they've managed to mangle the flow is atrocious,' they said. Indian cinema has long had an uncomfortable relationship with on-screen kissing. With the exception of a four-minute kissing scene in the 1933 film Karma, up until the 1990s on-screen caressing was largely kept to hugs or symbolised through imagery such as flowers. While attitudes have relaxed in recent years, the country remains largely conservative and widely religious, particularly outside of urban areas, and more intimate kissing scenes are still subject to the censor's knife. The censor board has also faced accusations of being overly political. The Donald Trump biopic The Apprentice was blocked from cinematic release last year after its director, Ali Abbasi, refused to make cuts demanded by the CBFC. 'I ran away from Iranian censorship only to meet corporate censorship of the US. Now India. Really?' Abbasi said. 'Censorship seems to be an epidemic at the moment.' Similarly, earlier this year censors in effect banned the release of Santosh, an internationally acclaimed film addressing police violence and misogyny in India, after demanding a list of cuts. Sandhya Suri, the film's director, called the cut requests 'disappointing and heartbreaking'.
