
Kids' breakfast cereal has gotten unhealthier, a new study finds
We all know that breakfast is an important meal, and even more so for children. Abundant research has demonstrated the benefit of nutritious breakfasts on children's health, well-being and academic performance.
Ready-to-eat cereals are the predominant breakfast choice among American children, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
But that may not be the best option for growing children and adolescents.
In newly launched cereals between 2010 and 2023, there were significant increases in fat, sodium and sugar and decreases in protein and fiber content, according to a new research study in JAMA Network Open.
I wanted to better understand the implications for parents who want to learn about healthier options for their children. To help guide us, I spoke with CNN wellness expert Dr. Leana Wen. Wen is an emergency physician and adjunct associate professor at George Washington University. She previously served as Baltimore's health commissioner and is the mother of two school-aged kids.
CNN: How did these researchers study ready-to-eat cereals?
Dr. Leana Wen: This study utilized a comprehensive database that tracks new product launches for food and beverages. Researchers examined cereal products that launched in the US market between 2010 and 2023 that were explicitly marketed to children ages 5 to 12 years old.
During this period, about 1,200 children's ready-to-eat cereals were launched. Compared to 2010, total fat per serving increased 33.6%; sodium content increased by 32.1%; and sugar by 10.9%. On the other hand, both protein content and dietary fiber content decreased when comparing 2010 to 2023.
Notably, the average amount of added sugar is so high that a single serving of children's cereal is more than 45% of the American Heart Association's total daily recommended limit for children, according to the authors.
CNN: Were you surprised by these findings?
Wen: Frankly, yes. In recent years, many studies have shown the importance of a healthy breakfast to children's well-being. Moreover, studies have demonstrated the problems associated with high levels of added sugar, sodium and fat content in food. Ultraprocessed foods laden with these additives have been associated with a myriad of negative health consequences, including obesity, diabetes, heart disease and premature death.
What's upsetting to me is that many products that are ultraprocessed and contain high levels of unhealthy ingredients are being marketed as being 'healthy.' A 2024 study published in the journal Nutrients found that 60% of foods marketed to children ages 6 months to 36 months on 10 supermarkets' shelves failed to meet recommended nutritional guidelines from the World Health Organization for infant and toddler foods. Virtually none of these meet WHO's standards for advertising— instead they contained inaccurate health claims or failed to have clear labeling.
All of this makes it hard for parents and families who want to choose healthier options for their children.
CNN: What advice do you have for parents who want to feed their children healthier breakfasts?
Wen: Parents should consider options outside of ready-made cereal. Some options for healthy breakfasts include steel-cut oats with honey and fresh fruit and whole-grain bread with peanut butter. Kids may also like eggs; no-sugar-added yogurt, which still has sugar in it; smoothies made with milk and fresh fruit; and homemade muffins. For parents looking for grab-and-go breakfasts, consider fresh fruit, nuts, hard-boiled eggs, muffins, smoothies and whole-grain bagels with low-fat cream cheese.
CNN: What if parents want to serve cereal? What should they look for on the label?
Wen: As a parent who has tried to find healthy cereals for my kids, I know myself that it is very hard to go through the cereal aisle and make sense of the packaging that claim the cereal is healthy.
The best thing to do is to look at the label for each cereal you are considering. First, look for whole grains. Ideally, the label says that the cereal has 100% whole grain. Then, look at the sugar content. It's best to have added sugar of less than 9 grams per serving . According to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 10 grams per serving would already be 20% of the entire amount of added sugar someone is recommended to consume a day, if they have a 2,000 calorie diet. Try to find cereals with no food dyes or low-calorie sweeteners. The Center for Science in the Public Interest has a list of relatively healthier cereals.
From a policy perspective, last year, the US Food and Drug Administration proposed a front-of-package label that would make it easier for consumers to know how products compare with regard to their added sugar, salt and saturated fat content. I think these improved labels can help if they are implemented.
US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made reducing ultraprocessed food a centerpiece of his 'Make America Healthy Again' agenda. Perhaps there will be policy solutions Kennedy will announce that can make it easier for families to opt for healthier choices.
CNN: In the meantime, should parents avoid cereals and switch to other breakfast products? What do you do with your kids?
Wen: I think the takeaway should be simply knowing that many cereals marketed to children are not the most nutritious choices. This doesn't mean children should never be served these cereals but try to serve them in moderation or as a treat.
Since I became aware of just how laden with additives our favorite cereals were, I began to serve my kids these cereals only as a treat, opting usually for milk served with steel-cut oats or whole-grain toast and peanut butter. On days when they have cereal, I make sure to tell them it's a treat — just as I tell them it's a treat when they have cookies and cupcakes. And then I try to make sure that their other meals are healthy.
CNN: Do you have other advice for families trying to make more nutritional choices?
Wen: It's best to aim for meals with whole foods that are minimally processed, such as whole grains, fresh fruits, leafy green vegetables, legumes, fish and lean meat. Also keep in mind that what kids drink is just as important as what they eat. Stay away from sodas, juice drinks, energy drinks and other drinks with caffeine and high amounts of added sugar.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Weight loss jabs linked to lower dementia and stroke risk
Weight loss jabs may offer a protective effect against dementia and stroke, according to a new study. People with type 2 diabetes and obesity who are taking the drugs are also less likely to die prematurely, researchers found. Academics said the benefits of drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro – including for managing weight and blood sugar levels – are well known, but other health benefits of the popular drugs remain 'unclear'. The study saw experts from Taiwan examine date on 60,000 people from around the world, with an average age of 58, who had type 2 diabetes and obesity. Around half were given GLP agonist drugs semaglutide and tirzepatide – which are sold under the brand names Wegovy and Mounjaro. Semaglutide is also the main ingredient for the type 2 diabetes drug Ozempic. GLP agonists can reduce a person's appetite; slow down their digestion; reduce the amount of sugar the liver makes and they help the body to make more insulin when needed. The other half used other anti-diabetic medication. During a seven-year follow-up period, researchers found that people given the GLP agonist drugs appeared to have a 37% lower risk of dementia and a 19% reduced risk of stroke. GLP-1s like #Ozempic, #Saxenda, #Wegovy, or #Mounjaro are not an easy #weightloss hack. Find out more about:🔵what they are ❓🔵how they're used 💊🔵who they help 💪 🔗Learn more: — EU Medicines Agency (@EMA_News) January 4, 2025 They were also 30% less likely to die during the follow-up period. And when researchers looked at the data further they found even greater benefits in people aged 60 or older, women, and those with a body mass index score of 30 to 40. They found no differences in Parkinson's disease or brain bleeds. The academics said their findings suggest 'potential neuroprotective and cerebrovascular benefits' of the drugs but they called for more studies to confirm the findings. 'These findings suggest that semaglutide and tirzepatide may offer neuroprotective and cerebrovascular benefits beyond glycemic control, potentially improving long-term cognitive and survival outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes and obesity,' they wrote in the journal JAMA Network Open. Commenting on the study, Professor Tara Spires-Jones, director of the Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences at the University of Edinburgh and group leader in the UK Dementia Research Institute, said: 'This is a very interesting study adding to evidence that GLP1 receptor agonists are associated with a lower risk of dementia in people with type 2 diabetes and obesity. 'This type of study cannot determine whether the drugs reduced disease risk by directly protecting the brain. 'It is highly likely that effectively treating type 2 diabetes and obesity would reduce dementia and stroke risk as they are known risk factors for these conditions. 'Further work is needed including randomised clinical trials to confirm these drugs are protective in people with diabetes and obesity and other trials are needed to determine whether these drugs will be protective in people who do not have type 2 diabetes and obesity.' Dr Richard Oakley, associate director of research and innovation at Alzheimer's Society, said: 'It is well established that diabetes and obesity can increase your risk of developing dementia. 'This study supports existing evidence that shows these drugs may reduce dementia risk, particularly for people aged 60 and over who are living with type 2 diabetes and obesity. 'Although interesting, we can't draw conclusions from this study alone as it is an observational study, only a small number of people who took part went on to develop dementia and as the impact of these drugs on different types of dementia is not clear. 'There are clinical trials currently looking at whether drugs like these can be used to treat early-stage Alzheimer's disease, so this is a really exciting area being explored in the research fight against dementia.'
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Some of the big US investments being made in AI and energy
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -American companies rolled out a series of big ticket AI and energy investment pledges on Tuesday, part of a push by U.S. President Donald Trump to maintain America's edge in the booming technology sector. Here are some of the biggest announcements timed around the Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University, which is expected to include $90 billion in investments in and around Pennsylvania. Alphabet-owned Google has struck a $3 billion deal with Brookfield Asset Management for electricity generated from two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania. The tech giant will also invest $25 billion in data centers across Pennsylvania and neighboring states over the next two years, Semafor reported on Tuesday. Asset management firm Blackstone plans a $25 billion investment in data centers and energy infrastructure in Pennsylvania, its President and Chief Operating Officer Jon Gray told a panel at the summit. On Monday Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said his company would spend hundreds of billions of dollars to build several massive AI data centers, including a multi-gigawatt data center dubbed Prometheus, which is planned for Ohio. Cloud infrastructure technology company CoreWeave plans to spend up to $6 billion on building a new artificial intelligence data center in Pennsylvania, the company said on Tuesday. The pledges come amid a surge in investments for AI startups, a sign that the field continues to thrive even as venture capital firms are struggling to raise money, a report from PitchBook on Tuesday showed. Sign in to access your portfolio


New York Post
44 minutes ago
- New York Post
Most believe AI helps small businesses compete with larger firms
A new survey has found that one in five are secretly using AI at work, even when there's no official policy for it. And for many, it's paying off. Advertisement According to the poll of 1,000 American business owners, marketers, and salespeople, 77% believe the more they use AI tools for work, the more confident they feel in the quality of their work. 6 A new survey has found that one in five are secretly using AI at work, even when there's no official policy for it. Urupong – Likewise, 75% believe using AI for their business can make it more effective at competing with larger and more well-known businesses. Commissioned by ActiveCampaign and conducted by Talker Research, the survey found 82% of respondents who are using AI in the workplace are using it for marketing — either in imagination (52%), activation (48%), or validation (44%). Advertisement Many others are using it for customer support (31%), operations/people management tasks (28%), and product-related tasks (25%). But despite AI's usefulness, 20% still feel like they've had to 'sneak' AI into their work because it's not officially allowed. Although 48% said they use AI in their work daily, 17% reported they only use AI less than once per month, and an additional 9% 'never' use AI in any official work capacity. 6 According to the poll of 1,000 American business owners, marketers, and salespeople, 77% believe the more they use AI tools for work, the more confident they feel in the quality of their work. SWNS Respondents shared that the main reason they aren't using AI tools at work is connected to various fears surrounding it. One in five respondents is concerned about poor-quality output, while another 21% of employees, specifically, are concerned that AI will replace their job. Advertisement Additionally, 19% fear that patrons and consumers will lose trust in their business, and 17% have heard negative feedback and opinions about AI use from other people. Over half (57%) said they've either had negative opinions about AI themselves or have had negative opinions shared with them from others. Twenty percent admitted they were the biggest critics themselves, while others found negative feedback stemmed from social media comments (20%) or directly from customers and clients (18%). 6 The survey found 82% of respondents who are using AI in the workplace are using it for marketing — either in imagination, activation, or validation. SWNS Advertisement 'While some businesses are still figuring out how to integrate AI into their core operations, many have moved beyond experimentation to strategic implementation, focusing not just on what AI can do for them, but on how it creates measurably better outcomes for their customers,' said Jason VandeBoom, Founder and CEO of ActiveCampaign. 'We're seeing people discover AI's impact on their bottom line in real time, whether that's increased revenue or time saved. Often, it starts with a personal 'aha moment' where they experience AI's power firsthand, which then naturally evolves into professional adoption and business transformation.' The study also revealed that using AI tools in a more personal setting can help resolve some of the fears people have. 6 20% of respondents still feel like they've had to 'sneak' AI into their work because it's not officially allowed. SWNS Nine in 10 have used AI for both personal and work-related tasks. And of them, two-thirds used AI for their personal lives first, taking, on average, six weeks to fully understand what to use it for. In work settings, it takes people just as long on average to understand it, but the payoffs quickly appear afterwards. In a typical week, people said using AI at work saved them 13 hours of time. And it appeared to save more time the more it was used: respondents who used it daily said it saved them 14 hours per week, on average. Those who use it less than once per month only have six hours saved. 6 In a typical week, people said using AI at work saved them 13 hours of time, according to reports. SWNS And during a typical month, AI tools have saved them $4,739 in operational costs. This followed the same pattern, saving more money the more it was used. Daily users saved $5,038 on average, and infrequent users only saved $2,237. Advertisement Many said incorporating AI into their company's workflow has helped them feel more efficient in completing tasks and allocating resources (39%), feel confident about the quality of their work (29%), and feel creative in their marketing approach (37%). They said they found AI especially effective for certain departments, like marketing (82%), design and creative (78%), and analytics (75%). 6 75% of respondents believe using AI for their business can make it more effective at competing with larger and more well-known businesses. IDOL'foto – 'Marketing is where AI really shines because it amplifies human creativity rather than replacing it,' said Amy Kilpatrick, Chief Marketing Officer of ActiveCampaign. 'Our survey shows 82% find AI especially effective for marketing because it handles the time-consuming tasks — like data analysis and content ideation — so marketers can focus on strategy and building genuine connections with their audience. The result is better work delivered faster, which ultimately benefits both the business and the customer.' Advertisement Survey methodology: Talker Research surveyed 1,000 American business owners, marketers, and salespeople; the survey was commissioned by ActiveCampaign and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 21 and June 12, 2025.