
Sixty years after Bloody Sunday, civil rights leaders in Selma continue fight
On a Sunday morning 60 years ago, activists rewrote the story of the civil rights movement in their own blood on the streets of Selma, Alabama. State troopers turned their truncheons on a peaceful march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge at the behest of Alabama's stridently and infamously racist governor George Wallace, protecting Alabama segregation and white supremacy.
John Lewis, then the chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, later served in Congress – and as a moral force in American politics – for decades. He bore scars from the beating he took that day through the rest of his life.
How should Americans meet today's challenges to civil rights and democracy? That question percolates among the activists and visitors crowding Selma's streets this weekend as the Trump administration wages an intense, wide-ranging war on America's anti-discrimination policies.
'We have a tyrant that's running the federal government,' said Delvone Michael, a political strategist from Maryland. Lewis would be going from campus to campus, mobilizing for a confrontation, he said. Michael described the moment as a stress test of American resolve that isn't being met with sufficient opposition either in Congress or the street.
'We don't see the people that are actually standing up like what happened here, where everyday people stood together and raged against the machine,' Michael said. 'You're not seeing that right in this moment, at the scale necessary to stop this guy.'
Progressive congressional leaders are hearing this criticism.
'We've got to make sure that we're not normalizing this moment and stepping up and being unafraid, and I think we are still here playing by the same book when they don't follow one.' said congresswoman Nikema Williams as she walked up the bridge on Sunday afternoon. Williams serves in the Atlanta house seat vacated by Lewis's death in 2020.
The moment today is designed to create chaos, she said. Activists say it should be answered with the kind of effort civil rights leaders of Lewis' era presented in the face of strident, violent opposition, if the gains of that generation are to be maintained.
'Don't get me wrong, the last 70 years have not brought us where we should be, but the last 70 years made significant progress in this country, and we have been the beneficiaries,' said Marc Morial, former mayor of New Orleans and president of the National Urban League. 'What falls to us is to ensure that our children and children's children are not going to litigate the battles of our grandparents.'
The election of Donald Trump has led the civil rights division of the justice department to end investigations of discrimination against racial minorities in cases like the 'goon squad' assaults in Mississippi and the death of Tyre Nichols in Memphis. Trump fired two commissioners of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission – in violation of the law – and its acting chairman has pledged to root out 'unlawful DEI-motivated race and sex discrimination' instead of its prior role protecting workers of color against race-based discrimination.
'I got a lot of folks saying, what are we going to do?' Morial said. 'And they almost are looking for a one punch knockout. Isn't that one lawsuit? Isn't there one political move? This is a long trench warfare.'
The US supreme court last year established a doctrine of absolute immunity for acts committed by a president 'within their core constitutional purview,' and at least presumptive immunity for official acts within the outer perimeter of their official responsibility. The 6-3 ruling creates a predictable flash point in the conflict between an authoritarian government and American civil rights: a moment when Trump faces a court decision he doesn't like.
'We're going to fight in the courts wherever we can, and it's not going to be enough,' said Margaret Huang, president and CEO of the Southern Poverty Law Center. 'We're actually going to have to mobilize people around the country. There are a lot of people who are upset right now, but they're not standing up, they're not seeing themselves as protagonists of this story.'
Caleb Jakes, 20, of Newark, described generational despair.
'Too many of us are stuck between fear and anxiety,' he said of other Black twentysomething looking at the world on fire. 'So many of us are paralyzed just from imagining that even if I went for it, it's not going to happen … The regular way of trying to get the system to work in my favor just aren't appealing enough anymore to merit the effort to stay after it.'
People under 20 have known nothing except losses – economic crisis, civil rights rollbacks and political turmoil, added Donneio Perryman, 20, from Chicago. 'Most of us, if we are not stricken by poverty and trying to get out, are just trying to make a way for ourselves and our families right now as our main goals and not the entirety of our race.'
Activists regularly suggest that Trump may be looking for a rationale to invoke the Insurrection Act, declare martial law and turn troops or police on protesters, tempering their enthusiasm for mass demonstrations.
'There are some of us who are going to be willing to bleed,' Huang said. 'Not everybody has to. We are not asking everyone to lay down their lives, but we are saying to everyone that this is your fight, and you have to be counted when the chips are down.'
Sixty years ago, demonstrations that led to conflicts also led to progress.
'We went where we were called,' said Andrew Young, former ambassador to the United Nations and a contemporary of Martin Luther King and Lewis who marched in Selma in 1965. 'Amelia Boynton came to see Dr King just that before Christmas, and he told she told him that Jim Clark would not let them hold meetings in their churches because he said they were too political.'
Boynton was a young Selma activist who organized the march from Selma to Montgomery after an Alabama state trooper killed Jimmie Lee Jackson while he tried to protect his mother from being beaten after an earlier protest. Selma was considered beyond salvation by civil rights activists at the time, but Jackson's murder and Boynton's plea drew marchers.
King told Young not to go, Young said.
'We thought they would just turn us around,' Young said of the state troopers. 'They didn't even give them time to pray, or to discuss anything. They just immediately charged.'
The beatings on the Edmund Pettus Bridge shocked the nation. Pictures of Lewis on the ground with a trooper looming over him, or of Boynton laying broken in the street amid tear gas and horses, ran on the front page of newspapers across the country. ABC News interrupted a documentary about Nazi war crimes as the attack unfolded, cutting to show the violence live in Selma.
The metaphor was not lost on the public or lawmakers. Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1965 five months later.
What is the next Selma?
'I don't know. And I shouldn't know,' Young replied. 'I mean, there's nothing, yet I see all the signs. I see the things that people are saying.'
The streets of Selma fill with marchers every year on this Sunday in March, commemorating the events of 1965. This year has drawn an unusually large crowd. Hotel rooms are full for 30 miles in every direction.
Selma itself is caught in amber. Like many towns in Alabama's Black Belt, Selma has been losing population for decades. Many buildings downtown are a ruin, pock-marked by damage from a tornado in 2023 and unchanged since Bloody Sunday. The march has become a carefully stage-managed parade, with politicians jockeying with the scions of the movement for position at the front of the procession where they can be seen by throngs of photographers from across the country.
The march was scheduled in waves, with thousands of people grouped in time slots by the hour for their chance to walk and be seen.
'I think part of the reason that so many of us came to Selma is because we really draw inspiration in people who had no reason really to believe that they could get freedom,' said Jocelyn Frye, president of the National Partnership for Women and Families. 'They were facing what may have looked like an all-powerful force, but they had a faith and desire to work for something bigger and better, and I think we're here because we have that same spirit.'
The memorial of Bloody Sunday gives the city an economic boost, but after the crowds leave, little changes, said Gary Ransom, a Selma photographer pushing for redevelopment.
'We've always been in the spotlight because of all the historic things that happened here,' Ransom said. But between the hurricane and a growing gun violence problem, Selma has been bleeding population, 'because the kids don't have nowhere to go or nothing to do.'
For Bernard Lafayette, a civil rights leader and attorney who marched in Selma on Bloody Sunday, the answer is to build a Black economic fortress that can withstand attack.
'We're still commemorating Bloody Sunday 60 years later,' he said. 'It's time to make a paradigm shift.' Lafayette has been raising capital to build a factory to manufacture solar panels in Selma. Asked what a 20-year-old activist like Lewis might be expected to do today, Layfayette's answer was blunt.
'They should be saying, 'To hell with them and focus on manufacturing,' Lafayette said. 'Focus on our resources. Focus on the $2tn per year that we generate. White folks are never going to help us. They enslaved us. We have to come to our own rescue. We have to save ourselves, and we can only do that by using our resources for our people.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Epstein furor undermines public trust, Republican election hopes, two US lawmakers say
WASHINGTON, July 27 (Reuters) - The uproar over disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could undermine public trust in the Trump administration, as well as Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in the 2026 midterm elections, two U.S. lawmakers said on Sunday. Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who want the House of Representatives to vote on their bipartisan resolution requiring full release of the government's Epstein files, said the lack of transparency is reinforcing public perceptions that the rich and powerful live beyond the reach of the judicial system. "This is going to hurt Republicans in the midterms. The voters will be apathetic if we don't hold the rich and powerful accountable," Massie, a hardline conservative from Kentucky, told NBC's "Meet the Press" program. Republicans hope to add to their current 219-212 House majority - with four seats currently vacant - and 53-47 Senate majority in November 2026, although the U.S. political cycle traditionally punishes the party of the sitting president during midterm elections. The Washington Post reported late on Sunday that Trump was increasingly frustrated with his administration's handling of the furor around Epstein. Even so, the president was hesitant to make personnel changes to avoid creating a "bigger spectacle" as his top officials underestimated the outrage from Trump's own base over the issue, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources. Khanna said Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered "a crisis of trust" by saying there was no list of Epstein clients after previously implying that one existed. The change in position unleashed a tsunami of calls for her resignation from Trump's MAGA base. "This is about trust in government," the California Democrat told "Meet the Press." "This is about being a reform agent of transparency." President Donald Trump, who on Sunday announced an EU trade deal in Scotland, has been frustrated by continued questions about his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and 2019 death by suicide in prison. Massie and Khanna believe they can win enough support from fellow lawmakers to force a vote on their resolution when Congress returns from its summer recess in September. But they face opposition from Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent lawmakers home a day early to stymie Democratic efforts to force a vote before the break. Johnson, who also appeared on NBC's "Meet the Press," said he favors a non-binding alternative resolution that calls for release of "credible" evidence, but which he said would better protect victims including minors. "The Massie and Khanna discharge petition is reckless in the way that it is drafted and presented," Johnson said. "It does not adequately include those protections." Massie dismissed Johnson's claim as "a straw man" excuse. "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted," he said. "They're hiding behind that." Trump has tried and failed so far to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term. On Saturday, Trump repeated his claims without evidence that 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and other Democrats should be prosecuted over payment for endorsements from celebrities including Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce and the Reverend Al Sharpton. Last week he accused former President Barack Obama of "treason" over how the Obama administration treated intelligence about Russian interference in U.S. elections nine years ago, drawing a rebuke from an Obama spokesperson. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch Trump ally, said on Sunday that Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's director of national intelligence, had found new information that investigators initially discovered no evidence of Russian election interference but changed their position after Obama told them to keep looking. "I'm not alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me," Graham told "Meet the Press." Democratic Representative Jason Crow dismissed Gabbard's claims, telling the "Fox News Sunday" program that the national intelligence director had turned herself into "a weapon of mass distraction." The Department of Justice has said it is forming a strike force to assess Gabbard's claims.


The Independent
34 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tulsi Gabbard becomes ‘weapon of mass distraction' as Trump White House grapples with Epstein fallout
Critics have accused Tulsi Gabbard of trying to shield Donald Trump's administration from scrutiny through her recent claims that top Obama administration officials should be prosecuted for leading a 'coup' against the president in 2016 by investigating Russian efforts to help his campaign. The allegations and conspiracy theories 'would be sad if they weren't so dangerous,' Democratic Rep. Jason Crow told Fox News on Sunday. 'She has turned herself into a weapon of mass distraction, is what I've been calling it." Crow accused Trump's national intelligence director of 'trying to curry and get back into favor with Donald Trump and has concocted these theories to do so,' an apparent reference to Gabbard and Trump's public disagreement over the state of Iran's nuclear program. This month, Gabbard spearheaded the release of materials regarding the then-outgoing Obama administration's attempts to probe Russian influence operations during the 2016 election. Critics saw the release as an attempt to distract from continued criticism of the Trump administration for its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and the president's ties to the late financier, who died in prison while awaiting a federal sex trafficking trial. 'Nothing in this partisan, previously scuttled document changes that,' Senator Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told The Hill after the disclosures. 'Releasing this so-called report is just another reckless act by a Director of National Intelligence so desperate to please Donald Trump that she is willing to risk classified sources, betray our allies, and politicize the very intelligence she has been entrusted to protect,' he said. Gabbard claims the Obama materials, including a declassified 2020 Republican report from the House intelligence committee, reveal his 'years long coup' against Trump. She claims that top Obama officials pushed to override past intelligence findings to allege that Russians specifically wanted to boost the Trump campaign, rather than undermine faith in the U.S. election system more generally, and has called for Obama and others to face criminal charges. Trump has echoed such claims, sharing a fake, AI- generated video of Obama being arrested and thrown in jail on his Truth Social account. As evidence of the alleged coup, Gabbard honed in on past conclusions that Russian actors did not successfully hack digital voting infrastructure or change vote counts, suggesting these findings clashed with intelligence officials' later assessments that Russia sought to help Trump. Susan Miller, a former CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment, said Gabbard was 'lying.' 'We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected,' Miller told NBC News, adding that intelligence officials had briefed Trump on their findings and he had thanked them. 'At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time,' she said. Obama's office issued a rare public statement denouncing Gabbard's allegations. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' a spokesperson said. The White House has pushed back against the argument that Gabbard's investigation is a partisan play. 'The only people who are suggesting that the director of national intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her standing with the president are the people in this room who constantly try to sow distrust and chaos among the president's Cabinet,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a Wednesday briefing. 'And it's not working,' she said. Multiple assessments have backed up the intelligence community's original findings of a general, one-way Russian influence operation that sought to boost Trump through tactics like hacking Democratic party materials and spreading disinformation online, even though the Trump campaign itself wasn't shown to have collaborated on the effort. Special counsels have investigated both the underlying 'Russiagate' claims and the origins of the FBI investigation into the Trump campaign without uncovering any intentional 'coup' by the Obama administration. A bipartisan 2020 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee — which Marco Rubio was leading at the time — concluded intelligence officials put together a 'coherent and well-constructed intelligence basis for the case of unprecedented Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.' During the 2024 election, Trump and his allies campaigned on a promise to rid the federal government, and in particular U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies, of politicization, arguing he had been a victim of partisan backlash — with two impeachments, two federal indictments and several criminal and civil cases, including a felony conviction on 34 counts. Since taking office, however, Trump has faced criticism that he is in fact driving politicization of those same entities, through actions like sanctioning law firms that worked with political opponents and calling for the prosecution of his various real and perceived critics. Over the weekend, the president ranted on social media and threatened to prosecute Kamala Harris, Oprah Winfrey and Beyonce while lashing out at news networks whose 'licenses could, and should, be revoked,' claiming without evidence that Democrats spent millions 'probably illegally' seeking high-profile celebrity endorsements during the 2024 campaign.


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Former MSNBC anchor makes startling admission about Trump despite recent polling
Ex-MSNBC star Chris Matthews believes 'the country is moving toward' Donald Trump as he suffers some negative polling. The former Hardball host had toed the liberal line as recently as April, when he drew a mocking tweet from a White House spokesperson for criticizing Trump's tariff plans. However, in a weekend interview with disgraced former PBS anchor Charlie Rose, Matthews believes the American people are more aligned with the president than ever. 'To be honest with you, the country is moving towards Trump,' he said, dismissing polls showing he's losing popularity. 'These polls, they come out and show him not doing well — I don't buy that. His strength is still greater than the Democratic strength. He is a stronger public figure than the Democratic people,' Matthews added. Matthews showed what he meant by having to go all the way back to former President Barack Obama to name a Democrat as popular as Trump is. 'Obama still has tremendous charisma — but Trump has strength. And I think that's what all voters look for,' he said. 'They want a president who is a strong figure. And he's got it. It's just there. And half the country buys it.' He also praised what Trump has done on immigration, as well as his foreign policy with regard to the drone strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Matthews did dampen ideas of Trump running for a third term but noted that the president was easily more popular and influential than Elon Musk, dismissing any idea of Musk's America Party succeeding. '[Musk] plays the same role as Ross Perot,' he said, referencing the infamous third party candidate who hurt Republicans in the 1992 and 1996 elections and consider those who vote for his party unserious. While some polls have shown Trump on a downward slope, the president improved a hair with voters according to a new exclusive Daily Mail/J.L. Partners poll, even as they give him failing grades for his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Forty-nine percent of voters now approve of Trump's job performance as president, up one point from the tracking survey conducted earlier in July. But he remains underwater as 51 percent disapprove of Trump's job performance, down one point from earlier in the month. The margin of error in the survey of 1,007 registered voters is 3.1 percent. The poll numbers suggest Trump is surviving politically during a punishing news cycle consumed by the Epstein files and his administration's failure to disclose them as he promised during his presidential campaign. The president's job approval is up one percentage point from June and remains his highest rating since May. 'The news saga might have seemed terrible for Trump in the last few days, but it isn't having an impact on his approval rating,' James Johnson, JL Partners co-founder told the Daily Mail. 'In fact, we think it's going up, from 48 percent to 49 percent, making this his best approval rating since May. His ratings with the base is holding up too, unchanged on 91 percent with Republicans,' Johnson continued. But Trump's strong job approval ratings does not carry over to his handling of the Epstein files. Forty-two percent of voters disapprove of his handling of the issue while just 27 percent approve. A significant number of voters, 20 percent, did not appear to care about the case as they neither approved nor disapproved Trump's handling of the issue. In the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump referred to the ongoing saga as a 'witch hunt' indicating he was tired of answering questions from the media about it. Despite the president's best efforts to put the issue behind him, few voters believe in the administration's assessment of the case. Only fifteen percent in the poll said they believed the Justice Department's memo released by Attorney General Pam Bondi concluding that Epstein committed suicide in prison and that the infamous pedofile did not have a 'client list' they could release. Forty-seven percent said they did not believe the administration's account of the Epstein case, and that they believed there was more secrets to uncover. Twenty-three percent said they believed the Trump administration memo, but that there was more to uncover in the case. 'This is despite voters disapproving of his handling of the Epstein scandal. What explains the difference? Voters simply do not rate it highly on their list of priorities,' Johnson said. Ninety percent of the Republican voter base continue to grant the president solid approval ratings, despite their misgivings about the Epstein files. The poll was conducted as Trump furiously contested a Wall Street Journal report that he had signed a letter to Epstein for his 50th birthday which concluded: 'Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret,' and featured a hand-drawn image of a naked woman as well as his signature. Trump decried the news article as 'fake' and filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the company. 'They are judging Trump on other issues - such as the economy, the southern border, and how he is actually running the country. Their grumbles on the Epstein handling are not enough for them to turn on their man,' Johnson said. While the majority of Republicans, 52 percent, give Trump a passing grade on his handling of the Epstein files, just 13 percent of Independent voters feel the same way. Fifty percent of independent voters in the survey said they disapproved of the way the Trump administration has handled the Epstein files case.