BRICS nations to denounce Trump tariffs
Emerging nations representing about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output are set to unite over what they see as unfair US import tariffs, according to sources familiar with summit negotiations.
Since coming to office in January, Trump has threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive tariffs.
His latest salvo comes in the form of letters due to be sent starting Friday informing trading partners of new tariff rates expected next week on July 9.
Diplomats from 11 emerging nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, have been busy drafting a statement condemning the economic uncertainty.
Any final summit declaration is not expected to mention the United States or its president by name. But it is expected to be a clear political shot directed at Washington.
'We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration,' Marta Fernandez, director of the BRICS Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University said.
This is particularly the case for China, which has only recently negotiated with the US to lower steep tit-for-tat levies.
'This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction' between the world's two leading economies, Fernandez said.
- Xi no show -
Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the BRICS have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to Western power.
But the summit's political punch will be depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who is skipping the annual meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president.
'I expect there will be speculation about the reasons for Xi's absence,' said Ryan Hass, a former China director at the US National Security Council who is now with the Brookings Institution think tank.
'The simplest explanation may hold the most explanatory power. Xi recently hosted Lula in Beijing,' said Hass.
The Chinese leader will not be the only notable absentee. War crime-indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin is also opting to stay away, but will participate via video link, according to the Kremlin.
Hass said Putin's non-attendance and the fact that India's prime minister will be a guest of honor in Brazil could also be factors in Xi's absence.
'Xi does not want to appear upstaged by Modi,' who will receive a state lunch, he said.
'I expect Xi's decision to delegate attendance to Premier Li (Qiang) rests amidst these factors.'
Still, the Xi no-show is a blow to host President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who wants Brazil to play a bigger role on the world stage.
In the year to November 2025, Brazil will have hosted a G20 summit, a BRICS summit, and COP30 international climate talks, all before heading into fiercely contested presidential elections next year, in which he is expected to run.
- Middle path -
Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose nation is still reeling from a 12-day conflict with Israel is also skipping the meeting.
A source familiar with the negotiations said the BRICS countries were still in disagreement over how to respond to the wars in Gaza and between Iran and Israel.
Iranian negotiators are pushing for a tougher collective stance that goes beyond referencing the need for the creation of a Palestinian state and for disputes to be resolved peacefully.
Artificial intelligence and health will also be on the agenda at the summit.
Original members of the bloc Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been joined by South Africa and, more recently, by Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia.
Analysts say that it has given the grouping more potential international punch.
But it has also opened many new fault lines.
Brazil hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues.
'BRICS (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East,' Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. - AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
9 minutes ago
- The Star
Opinion - Blaming Cambodia, hiding the truth: Thailand's dangerous game of cybercrime deflection
PHNOM PENH: While pointing fingers at its neighbour, Thailand quietly shelters the very crimes it accuses others of. In a recent statement reported by The Nation Thailand, a spokesperson for the Thai government attempted to frame Cambodia as the epicentre of Southeast Asia's cybercrime crisis. The accusation was neither new nor surprising — but it was profoundly hypocritical. For years, Thailand has sought to portray itself as a victim of transnational crime while deflecting attention from the fact that it is, in reality, a regional hub for cybercrime, drug smuggling and human trafficking. Rather than promoting honest regional cooperation, Thailand has chosen a path of political distraction — one that not only damages bilateral relations but also undermines genuine efforts to tackle organised crime across Southeast Asia. A convenient scapegoat Thailand's claims that Cambodia is the source of scam networks are a tired and convenient narrative, crafted to distract from the deep-seated criminal infrastructure operating within its own borders. Thai government officials continue to emphasise arrests of their nationals abroad, yet turn a blind eye to domestic trafficking networks, recruitment hubs and cyber-scam training centres operating under their own jurisdiction. Several international investigations have documented how Thai border provinces, such as Sa Kaeo, Tak, Chiang Rai and Mae Sot, serve as launchpads for scam syndicates. These criminal groups recruit, transport and traffic both Thai and foreign nationals into scam compounds in Laos, Myanmar and, occasionally, Cambodia. Victims — often young people desperate for jobs — are funnelled through Thailand by well-organised networks that Thai authorities have failed, or refused to dismantle. When Thai police do act, it's typically after pressure from international partners — not from any consistent domestic policy. In early 2024, Thai and Chinese police cooperated in Chiang Mai to investigate scam recruitment rings, yet similar networks continue to flourish elsewhere in the country. Why? Because for every arrest, many more are protected, hidden, or ignored by local officials. Drugs, human trafficking, and complicity Thailand's involvement in transnational crime extends beyond cyber scams. It remains a key player in the Golden Triangle's narcotics trade, one of the largest drug-producing and smuggling regions in the world. Methamphetamine and ketamine, smuggled in staggering quantities, often pass through Thai territory on their way to global markets. Worse still is Thailand's role in human trafficking. According to reports from Amnesty International and others institutions, Thailand has become both a source and a transit country for trafficking victims — especially those lured into scam centres in neighbouring countries. Thai nationals, foreign workers and even minors have been recruited via Thai-based agencies, smuggled across borders and forced into online scam operations. Yet instead of addressing its own complicity, the Thai government has adopted the strategy of deflection — targeting Cambodia with vague accusations while avoiding accountability at home. Dangers of political deflection Blaming Cambodia serves a political purpose. It helps Thai leaders avoid uncomfortable questions from the international community and the Thai public. It also allows them to project an image of law and order, even as corruption, weak enforcement and deliberate inaction allow criminal operations to flourish within Thailand itself. This approach is not only irresponsible — it is dangerous. It undermines regional trust, weakens cross-border collaboration and fuels unnecessary diplomatic tensions. Rather than building joint frameworks to combat transnational crime, Thailand has chosen to use Cambodia as a scapegoat. But the truth is harder to bury than officials may think. Cambodia's constructive approach Unlike Thailand's pattern of blame and evasion, Cambodia has publicly acknowledged the presence of scam operations on its territory and taken direct action. The Cambodian government has launched multiple raids, cooperated with foreign embassies, deported thousands of foreign suspects and strengthened its cybercrime laws. Cambodia has also welcomed multilateral cooperation, including working with UN agencies and neighbouring states. If Thailand is sincere about combating cybercrime, it should match Cambodia's transparency and willingness to cooperate — instead of waging a media campaign based on distortion and denial. Thailand's cybercrime problem is not Cambodia's creation — it is of Thailand's own making. From its porous borders and complicit officials to its role in trafficking and drug smuggling, Thailand has more to fix at home than to criticise abroad. If the Thai government truly wants to solve the regional crime crisis, it should begin by confronting the networks, enablers and institutions within its own territory. Otherwise, its repeated finger-pointing at Cambodia will be seen not as leadership — but as cowardice disguised as diplomacy. [Roth Santepheap is a geopolitical analyst based in Phnom Penh. The views and opinions expressed are his own.]
The Star
10 minutes ago
- The Star
Russia's Rybakov says BRICS is not anti-American
FILE PHOTO: Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov attends the BRICS Meeting of Ministers of Foreign Affairs in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, April 28, 2025. Mauro Pimentel/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo
The Star
19 minutes ago
- The Star
Thaksin pushes for entertainment complex, legalisation of online gambling
BANGKOK: Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra addressed the ongoing debate surrounding the government's Entertainment Complex policy during a special broadcast of "Breaking Through Thailand's Deadlock," aired live on Nation TV on Wednesday (July 9). The show was hosted by three senior editors from the Nation Group. Thaksin responded to comments made by Anutin Charnvirakul, leader of the Bhumjaithai Party, who claimed that the decline in Chinese tourism to Thailand—down by 70-90%—was primarily due to the Thai government's Entertainment Complex policy. Anutin suggested that the Chinese government had previously issued multiple warnings about the policy. Thaksin responded by stating that the reality was that the issue coincidentally aligned with the Bhumjaithai Party's policy of opposing the Entertainment Complex, which is why it became such a major news story. Thaksin clarified that the policy had not yet been implemented and therefore had no impact on the tourism sector. He pointed out that the actual issue was related to safety concerns, which were being addressed through the government's push for Smart City development. Thaksin stated that once Smart Cities are established, they would enhance safety and ensure greater protection for tourists. Additionally, Thaksin emphasized that the installation of AI-powered cameras across the country would significantly increase safety, further alleviating concerns over tourist security. When asked whether changing the Interior Minister would improve safety, Thaksin replied that it should indeed enhance safety, particularly regarding call centres and fraud. He also pointed out that some Chinese nationals running call centres in Thailand frequently travel through Myanmar, residing in apartments worth billions. Thaksin clarified that people viewed the entertainment complex as a casino, but in reality, it was an investment in tourism. He compared it to a country investing in a ski resort, which would rely on additional revenue streams, such as concerts, to make it financially viable. The Entertainment Complex would offer a variety of entertainment, including a casino, which would take up no more than 10% of the space. He stressed that not everyone could access the casino, as there would be a strict Know Your Customer (KYC) system in place to ensure that only those with legitimate income could participate. Thaksin himself, as a politician, was not allowed to enter casinos in Thailand. He added, 'It's not like anyone can just walk in without any income or tax records. These people have learned from the casinos in Cambodia; it's completely different.' When asked whether the government, with its slim majority and lack of stability, should continue pushing this policy, Thaksin responded, 'We can't afford to wait. We need to take action. If the government doesn't make it, then there will be another election. We do what we can and do our best.' He said he told his daughter, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, 'Our duty is to work for the country, to give it our all. Whatever comes of it, that's what we'll get. We can't afford to say 'wait.' We must act now.' He also stated that Thailand's economy is losing a tremendous opportunity due to underground activities, especially online gambling, which involves a massive annual turnover of 150 billion baht. Each online gambling session generates 2.5 to 4 million baht, but the money flows out of the country without contributing to the domestic economy. This does not include the money lost through licensed gaming content that Thai people play, which amounts to over 50 billion baht, nor the 70-80 billion baht lost due to scams like call centre fraud. Combined, these figures total more than 280 billion baht, not to mention the money involved in drugs and other illegal activities circulating outside the system. All of this represents the underground economy, which is estimated to be worth around 300 billion baht annually, causing Thailand to miss out on potential revenue or the chance to bring this off-the-books economy into the formal system. Another important point he raised was that legalising online gambling could allow Thailand to control and address the impacts on affected groups, especially the youth. Thaksin proposed that if online gambling were brought into the open with strict regulations, such as using Digital ID for identity verification before playing, setting an age limit to prevent those under 20 from participating, and implementing a real-time monitoring system via a dashboard, it would allow the government to manage it effectively. He explained, 'Today, we know exactly who is playing and which network they're using—whether it's True, AIS, NT, or 3BB—but we can't do anything because it's all underground. If we bring it into the open, we can control it better, collect taxes, and protect children from being exploited. If someone develops a serious addiction, we can immediately intervene and offer treatment.' Thaksin emphasised that the underground economy must be addressed, stating, 'We need to be bold enough to talk about it and take action, because today, it's becoming 'half of the country's GDP' that isn't accounted for in the system. If we continue to ignore it, we'll miss out on a huge opportunity.' - The Nation/ANN
