logo
New senator Ellie Whiteaker wants to be in the room where change happens

New senator Ellie Whiteaker wants to be in the room where change happens

West Australian2 days ago
Western Australia's newest senator was drawn to the Labor Party as the home of aspiration. The kind of place where a girl from Kalgoorlie, the first in her family to go to university, could find a way to change the world for everyone.
Ellie Whiteaker will join the red leather benches of the Senate on Tuesday after seven years at the upper echelons of the WA Labor party machinery.
She leaves behind big shoes to fill for new branch secretary Mark Reed after overseeing two of the party's biggest ever wins in this year's state and federal elections.
'The WA Labor Party is a campaigning powerhouse. There's no doubt about that… and that's not happened by accident,' she told The West Australian in her first interview as a senator-elect.
Other Labor insiders agree, with one saying Senator Whiteaker had exceeded the expectations of when she was appointed the party's first female secretary in 2022, and presided over one of its greatest wins.
But the 32-year-old is already looking ahead to her next challenge and focusing on how WA can play a role in the second-term Albanese government.
'The last seven years of my life being the assistant secretary and then the secretary has truly been a real honour, and I'm really proud of the work that we've done, but I think now is the right time for me to do something different and contribute in another way,' she said.
'As another strong voice from WA in the federal team, it's a good time to get in and focus on how WA can play a role in those really key national priorities.'
She nominated the renewable energy transition, the 'bold manufacturing agenda' and Defence as areas where WA was at the forefront of the agenda.
Living in Cockburn, she takes a particular interest in the progress on AUKUS and the upgrades of the Henderson shipbuilding strip, saying, 'There's lots of opportunity right on our doorstep.'
There has been criticism of slow progress on vital upgrades to civilian and defence infrastructure needed so Australia can maintain its own nuclear-powered submarines.
But Senator Whiteaker said it was important that the work be done right.
'I don't think anyone pretends that it's something that's going to happen overnight,' she said.
'It's a long-term strategy and a long-term approach, and I'm very confident that we'll get there.'
In taking off her party secretary hat, Senator Whiteaker is conscious that life is about to change in many ways – although she jokes that 'once a campaign director, always a campaign director'.
Within hours of speaking to The West, she was introducing Anthony Albanese at a nationally broadcast press conference, receiving credit from the Prime Minister for her campaign prowess.
'I said, when I came here … that I wasn't just about holding the seats that we won in 2022 I was about building on them – and build on them we have,' Mr Albanese said.
'I do want to give a shout out to Ellie as well, not just as senator-elect, but the WA campaign here.'
She will soon be juggling life as a senator with the career of husband David Scaife, a minister in the WA Government, and the demands of their son William, who turns two at the same time she heads to Canberra.
'I joke that I'll probably see more of her as a senator than I did as the campaign director of WA Labor. It's probably only half a joke,' Mr Scaife said.
Senator Whiteaker is approaching the personal challenge the same way she did running a campaign: lots of research, an extensive network of helpers and rigorous logistics systems.
'Over the last almost decade, you just see that more and more women and men have entered the parliament with young families and so I'm quite encouraged by that,' she said.
'There's lots of people doing the juggle, and lots of people from WA also, of course, Zaneta (Mascarenhas), Patrick (Gorman) and Matt (Keogh) and soon Tom (French), all adding to the WA kid contingent in Canberra.'
Senator Whiteaker and Mr Scaife met in Young Labor – he jokes they're a 'sad political love story' before she says, semi-horrified, he's guaranteed that will be the headline – after being drawn to the party because of their roots in regional WA, growing up in families of 'pretty modest means' and seeing the impact of having access to good public education and good jobs.
'We both grew up in families where education was really fundamental to that aspiration,' Senator Whiteaker said.
'And so I think that that very much drove us to the Labor Party, that focus on those bread and butter issues, things that really impact people's lives.
'Politics for me has always been of interest, because it really does make a difference in every part of everyone's lives. And so I want to be where those decisions are being made and be able to influence them wherever I can.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate passes massive US tax cut and spending bill
Senate passes massive US tax cut and spending bill

The Advertiser

timean hour ago

  • The Advertiser

Senate passes massive US tax cut and spending bill

US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history." US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history." US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history." US Senate Republicans have passed President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill by the narrowest of margins, advancing a package that would slash taxes, reduce social safety net programs and boost military and immigration enforcement spending while adding $US3.3 trillion ($A5 trillion) to the national debt. The legislation now heads to the House of Representatives for possible final approval, though a handful of Republicans there have already voiced opposition to some of the Senate provisions. Trump wants to sign it into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, and House Speaker Mike Johnson said he aimed to meet that deadline. The measure would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, give new tax breaks for income from tips and overtime pay and increase spending on the military and immigration enforcement. It also would cut about $US930 billion ($A1.4 trillion) of spending on the Medicaid health program and food aid for low-income Americans, and repeal many of Democratic former president Joe Biden's green-energy incentives. The legislation, which has exposed Republican divides over the nation's fast-growing $US36.2 trillion debt, would raise the federal government's self-imposed debt ceiling by $US5 trillion. Congress must raise the cap in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Senate passed the measure in a 51-50 vote with Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie after three Republicans - Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky - joined all 47 Democrats in voting against the bill. The vote followed an all-night debate in which Republicans grappled with the bill's price tag and its impact on the US healthcare system. The vote in the House, where Republicans hold a 220-212 majority, is likely to be close. A White House official told reporters that Trump would be "deeply involved" in pushing House Republicans to approve the bill. "It's a great bill. There is something for everyone," Trump said at an event in Florida on Tuesday. "And I think it's going to go very nicely in the House." Republicans have struggled to balance conservatives' demands for deeper spending cuts to reduce the impact on the deficit with moderate lawmakers' concerns that the Medicaid cuts could hurt their constituents, including service cutbacks in rural areas. A group of more moderate House Republicans, especially those who represent lower-income areas, have objected to the steeper Medicaid cuts in the Senate's plan. The legislation has also drawn criticism from billionaire Elon Musk, the former Trump ally who has railed against the bill's enormous cost and vowed to back challengers to Republican lawmakers in next year's midterm elections. House Democrats are expected to remain unanimously opposed to the bill. "This is the largest assault on American healthcare in history," House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters. "It's the largest assault on nutrition in American history."

Jim Chalmers to lead tax reform roundtable because Labor ‘can't keep up with their spending'
Jim Chalmers to lead tax reform roundtable because Labor ‘can't keep up with their spending'

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Jim Chalmers to lead tax reform roundtable because Labor ‘can't keep up with their spending'

Nationals Leader David Littleproud says the Coalition will have 'an open mind' at Treasurer Jim Chalmers' economic reform roundtable. 'I think it is time for a mature conversation,' Mr Littleproud told Sky News Australia. 'I think it's the right call for Ted O'Brien to go to this summit. 'You also need to look at the spending, and your spending priorities … that's also where I think there's been a lack of understanding and appreciation by the Albanese government. 'They are spending more than they are bringing in, and they need to modernise a tax system because it can't keep pace with their spending.'

Albanese government misses every target of National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short in first year
Albanese government misses every target of National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short in first year

Sky News AU

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Albanese government misses every target of National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short in first year

The Albanese government has failed to meet a single target in the first year of its flagship National Housing Accord, falling more than 55,000 homes short of its annual goal. New figures from the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) reveal the worsening housing crisis amid construction delays and exacerbated supply issues due to immigration. The housing policy, which began in July 2024, aimed to deliver 1.2 million new homes by 2029— or 20,000 homes per month—to improve housing availability and affordability. Analysis by the IPA found that just 185,000 homes have been completed since the accord began, leaving the government over 55,000 dwellings behind schedule. The government's target included 55,000 social and affordable homes, of which just 2,600 were completed in 2024. 'The federal government's National Housing Accord is one year old and already tens of thousands of homes behind target,' Director of Research at the IPA Morgan Begg said. 'In its first year of operation, the National Housing Accord as failed to hit a single target. 'At the same time the federal government is bringing in 1.3 million new migrants over three years, Australia is being set up for a disaster.' The latest forecast from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council projected the government will fall 250,000 homes short of its target by 2029. Meanwhile, bureaucratic red tape has strangled the number of new homes being built as the time taken to build a new dwelling continues to grow. According to findings based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data, it takes 50 per cent longer to build a house in 2025 compared to a decade ago. 'There is unprecedented demand for new homes. Yet it is taking far longer to build them, and it costs significantly more to do so,' Mr Begg said. The IPA also pointed to the contradiction between falling construction rates and rising net migration, with about 1 million migrants set to come in by 2029. The federal budget papers have forecast net overseas migration of 260,000 in 2025-26 and then 225,000 in the subsequent three years. 'There is no plan on how to house new arrivals … This is a manufactured housing disaster,' Mr Begg said. The damning findings follow similar warnings from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC). In its State of the Housing System 2025 report, the council projected that only 938,000 homes would be built by June 2029—over 250,000 homes short of the federal target. It noted that no state or territory was on track to meet its share of the target, based on population. ABS figures show just 177,000 dwellings were completed in 2024—well below the estimated underlying demand of 223,000. The Albanese government increased total housing commitments to $33 billion in the 2025 federal budget, including the $10 billion Housing Australia Future Fund. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil has defended her approach, arguing 'it takes time to turn the tide on a housing crisis a generation in the making'. The Property Council of Australia (PCA) has since called on governments to redouble efforts to boost housing supply productivity. 'We're projected to be 262,000 homes behind the 2029 target but imagine the gap without these reforms,' PCA Chief Executive Mike Zorbas said in a statement. 'We … desperately need to address falls in productivity that mean we're building fewer than half as many homes per hours worked today than in the mid-1990s. 'We need to move from 170,000 homes a year into the high 200,000s to meet the Accord's target. 'That requires bold leadership to dissolve assessment and approval gridlock in key corridors.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store