Gov. Mike DeWine signs Ohio's $60 billion budget, issues 67 line-item vetoes
The 2026-27 measure, which was approved in both state chambers last week, earmarks $600 million in taxpayer dollars for a new Cleveland Browns stadium in Brook Park. The money will come from the state's unclaimed funds trust.
DeWine also signed the provision changing Ohio's income tax to a flat tax rate into law.
Columbus to pay $800K to settle 2020 protest lawsuit
A spokesperson for the governor's office said that DeWine issued 67 vetoes, the most of his two terms as governor.
'This budget builds upon my commitment to make Ohio the best place for everyone to live their version of the American Dream,' DeWine said in a released statement. 'It prioritizes our children, empowers our workforce, and strengthens our communities. We are investing in the people of Ohio, not just today, but for generations to come.'
'As Ohio continues to attract more jobs, it's important that the state continues to invest in our workforce,' Lt. Gov. Jim Tressel said. 'The budget Governor DeWine signed today does just that and much, much more. It enhances support for career-technical education, job training, and apprenticeship programs tailored to Ohio's industries. These investments will help all Ohioans live up to their God-given potential.'
In a statement, the Ohio Democratic Party slammed the budget as, 'disastrous' writing in part, 'Instead of supporting Ohio families, the Republican legislature passed a budget that only helps their billionaire friends and special interests.'
The governor issued 67 vetoes with many of those issues pertaining to education. One of the most notable vetoes includes the cash balance, carry over veto, which would have placed a 40% cap on the amount of collected property tax that public school districts can carry over from the previous year.
DeWine said while the intention to save taxpayer dollars is understandable, it would lead to more districts asking taxpayers to pass levies more often, which would then increase property taxes instead of reducing them.
DeWine also vetoed the Non-Chartered Education Savings account program. It would have allowed students attending non-chartered, non-public schools to receive state funding.
'Diet weed' regulation fails again at Ohio Statehouse
But the governor says it risks taxpayer dollars on programs that may have compromised educational quality, or it could risk student safety referencing issues to former NCNP school Bishop Sycamore. However, the governor says this veto also restores a personal income tax credit for NCNP schools.
Another notable veto was on restrictions on public libraries. The governor called the restrictions vague and said that Ohio already has strict laws on obscenity and material harmful to children and he expects that those laws will be enforced.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chris Selley: We'll thank Travis Dhanraj for 'pulling back the curtain' on CBC News
One of the results of the Liberals' long-unexpected election win earlier this year is that the issue of CBC's future immediately came off the boil — and it wasn't even all that big of an issue during the campaign, despite Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's unambiguous promise to defund CBC's English-language operations entirely. Travis Dhanraj, a balanced and energetic reporter and until recently host of CBC's Canada Tonight, who mysteriously vanished from CBC's airwaves earlier this year, dropped a bomb this week that could bring the issue back to life very quickly, and perhaps very usefully. 'I had no real choice but to walk away,' Dhanraj wrote in an open letter about what he termed his 'forced resignation' from Mother Corp. '(But) I still have my voice. And I intend to use it. Because this isn't just about me. It's about trust in the CBC — a public institution that's supposed to serve you. It's about voices being sidelined, hard truths avoided, and the public being left in the dark about what's really happening inside their national broadcaster.' He accused the network — credibly, it must be said — of 'performative diversity, tokenism, (and perpetuating) a system designed to elevate certain voices and diminish others.' Dhanraj is brown-skinned, and quickly developed a reputation on the Canada Tonight newsmagazine show for inviting, shall we say, non-CBC types on to the public airwaves. (An appearance by Toronto Sun columnist Brian Lilley caused particular consternation among those who carry CBC tote bags.) Kathryn Marshall, who is representing Dhanraj in a planned complaint to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, alleged this week that CBC management assumed Dhanraj would hold a 'liberal world view' because of his skin colour, and were dismayed when it didn't pan out the way they assumed it would. (I should say, knowing Dhanraj slightly and having watched him in action, both at press conferences and on TV, I really have no idea what his 'world view' is … except that it's not hopelessly blinkered. That's a good thing. He's a reporter.) 'When the time is right, I'll pull the curtain back,' Dhanraj wrote, portentously. 'I'll share everything. I'll tell you what is really happening inside the walls of your CBC.' The sooner the better, please! Because it's just possible that this federal government might be serious about implementing reforms at the public broadcaster, and as of yet those proposed reforms amount to very weak and expensive tea. A thousand years ago, in February, the former Heritage minister under the former prime minister proposed what she called a 'new mandate' for CBC. It was unprepossessing, to say the least: A ton of new money, naturally, plus a partial ban on advertising and some changes to how senior management positions are appointed. The CBC-related commitments in Mark Carney's Liberal platform (notwithstanding the promise of $150 million extra funding) were even weaker tea: When you're including 'the clear and consistent transmission of life-saving information during emergencies' as a new imperative for your public broadcaster, you know you're either out of ideas or have a severely dysfunctional public broadcaster. Because communicating life-saving information during emergencies is kind of Job One for broadcast journalism. The first thing CBC did when COVID hit, let us never forget, was to cancel all its local newscasts. It later turned out that calamitous CBC CEO Catherine Tait had hunkered down for the pandemic in Brooklyn. She was last heard defending senior executives' bonuses, even as the network was shedding hundreds of jobs, as something akin to the divine right of kings and queens. Amazingly, she kept her job until her recently extended contract expired in January this year. If I believed that an extra $150 million a year would fix what ails CBC, I wouldn't lose sleep over spending it. My complaints about CBC are myriad and easily Google-able. And it pains me the extent to which Canadian news — including private outlets such as this one, as well as CBC — is now subsidized by the Canadian taxpayer. But the simple fact is that if that support disappeared tomorrow there would be a hell of a lot less news out there, and that's never a good thing. But I don't believe an extra $150 million would make much difference; I think it would just disappear into the gaping maw of middle management, emboldening them to get even more in the way of journalists simply doing the work they want to do. CBC news needs to be torn down to the studs and rebuilt, not tinkered with at the margins. So what Dhanraj and Marshall are teasing here is tantalizing, because it speaks to something existential about the CBC's news organization — something conservatives have always believed. It's not 'for Canadians'; it's for certain kinds of Canadians. That has never been any public broadcaster's mandate. And it is, perhaps, why the ratings are so poor. I feel terrible for Travis Dhanraj, but I can't wait to see what's behind that curtain. National Post cselley@ Chris Selley: We aren't slaves to AI, unless we want to be Chris Selley: Angst over flying the Canadian flag was pure media invention
19 minutes ago
Lawsuit filed against plan to use unclaimed funds for new Cleveland Browns stadium
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Ohio Republicans' strategy for funding a new domed stadium for the Cleveland Browns using residents' unclaimed funds violates multiple provisions of the state and federal constitutions, according to a class action lawsuit filed in county court. Former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann and former state Rep. Jeffrey Crossman, both Democrats, filed the expected legal action in Franklin County Common Pleas on Monday on behalf of three named Ohio residents, as well as all other individuals whose unclaimed funds were being held by the state as of June 30, 2025. They have asked the court for an injunction stopping the plan. The lawsuit argues that taking money from the state's Unclaimed Funds Account to pay for the stadium that Haslam Sports Group is planning for suburban Brook Park, south of Cleveland, violates constitutional prohibitions against taking people's private property for government use, as well as citizens' due process rights. The city of Cleveland has fought the plan. The litigation challenges specific provisions in the state's two-year, $60 billion operating budget that diverts more than $1 billion in unclaimed funds to create an Ohio Cultural and Sports Facility Performance Grant Fund and designate $600 million for the Browns as its first grant. Republican Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has spoken out against using unclaimed funds for such a purpose, having gone so far as to urge DeWine to veto it. However, the state's top lawyer has said he believes the plan is legally sound.
Politico
21 minutes ago
- Politico
Arrington sees another chance to notch conservative wins, spending cuts in second megabill
House Budget Chair Jodey Arrington says Republicans shouldn't give up on advancing certain priorities that were cut out of their 'big, beautiful bill' for not complying with Senate rules, telling reporters Tuesday that lawmakers will try again in follow-up budget reconciliation packages. 'There may be a longer list of things that were kicked out by the Senate parliamentarian as non-compliant with the Byrd rule — I think we should make another run at that and look for ways to structure the provisions so that it's more fundamentally budgetary in impact and policy,' the Texas Republican said during the press call Tuesday afternoon. 'I suspect that's why they were kicked out.' The so-called Byrd rule limits what provisions can be included in a bill moving through Congress through the reconciliation process, which allows lawmakers to skirt the 60-vote filibuster threshold in the Senate. Arrington specifically pointed to one provision stripped in the Senate from the House-passed megabill that would have prohibited Medicaid coverage for gender affirming surgeries, and another that would have banned noncitizens from tapping into Medicaid resources. 'I think those — we need to spend more time' crafting the provisions to pass muster with the parliamentarian, Arrington said. 'I don't think we spent enough time to look for a pathway to success on them, and that's sort of the landscape, as I see it, of the opportunities in another reconciliation bill.' Echoing Speaker Mike Johnson 's recent comments, Arrington said he suspects GOP leaders will attempt to do two more party-line packages in the 119th Congress, with the next one slated for the fall. Arrington added members would likely demand that those additional measures be drafted under circumstances where both chambers adhere to the same budget framework, avoiding a repeat of the most recent scenario where House and Senate Republicans each gave their committees different deficit reduction targets. He lamented the fact that the Senate did not comply with the House's aggressive instructions for writing iits version of the megabill, but credited fiscal hawks for helping secure $1.5 trillion in savings in a final product, and noted that it was not 'feasible' to expect the full magnitude of cost savings would be acheived in a single reconciliation bill — 'politically, at least.' As it currently stands, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law over the weekend, is 'front loaded with costs and back-end loaded with savings,' which Arrington said should compel Republicans to make sure the administration follows through in 'mak[ing] sure the savings actually happen.' 'That was a concern among conservative budget hawks,' Arrington said. 'When I think about the Budget Committee's role going forward, one of the things that we need to do … is keep the pressure on the Senate, on the House and the administration to be diligent in implementation and enforcement.'
