Indus Water Flow From India To Pakistan's Sindh Drops 17%, Crops Hit
The sowing of Kharif, or monsoonal, crops in Pakistan is taking a hit because of a drop in water from the Indus River System being released from India following the suspension of the water-sharing treaty after the Pahalgam terror attack, a report by Islamabad has indicated.
The latest "Daily Water Situation" Report released by the Pakistan government's Indus River System Authority (IRSA) shows the total water released from the Indus River System to Pakistan's Sindh province on June 16 this year was 1.33 lakh cusecs against 1.6 lakh on the same day last year - a drop of 16.87%.
The water released from the Indus River System to the Punjab province is also slightly less on the same date this year - 1.26 lakh cusecs against 1.29 lakh last year, which represents a 2.25% reduction.
The report indicates that there is less water left in the rivers and reservoirs connected to the Indus River System in Pakistan at a time when the sowing of Kharif crops is on. This is causing problems for farmers in the country and, with the monsoon in the country still at least two weeks away, the crisis is only expected to deepen.
Flood Preparedness Hit?
After suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, India has also stopped sharing information about the water level of the rivers connected to the Indus River System with Pakistan.
So, when the water level of the rivers connected to the Indus River System increases in India, Pakistan, which is downstream, may find itself unprepared if there is flooding.
Treaty Details
The Indus Waters Treaty, which was signed in 1960 and remained in place since then despite tensions between the countries, was suspended by India after the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, in which 26 people were killed.
As part of the treaty, which was brokered by the World Bank, India has full right over the three eastern rivers in the Indus system - Ravi, Beas and Sutlej - while Pakistan got access to around 135 million acre feet (MAF) of water from the three Western rivers - Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab - all of which flow downstream to the country from India.
While Pakistan has objected to the treaty's suspension, India has repeatedly said that "blood and water cannot flow together".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
'Treaties are built on trust which can't flow with terror': Ex-diplomat on India's stand on Indus Waters Treaty
After India junked the Court of Arbitration's ruling on the Indus Waters Treaty, former diplomat Syed Akbaruddin said that treaties are built on trust and trust cannot flow with terrorism. He further said that India must link re-engagement to Pakistan's demonstrable action on terrorism. read more After India rejected The Hague-based Court of Arbitration's (CoA) ruling in the Indus Waters Treaty, former senior diplomat Syed Akbaruddin said that treaties are built on trust and trust cannot flow with terrorism. Last month, the CoA had ruled that it remained competent to arbitrate Pakistan's concerns over the Indus Waters Treaty despite India suspending the treaty. Pakistan had sought the CoA to arbitrate its concerns over India making two hydropower projects on the Indus River System prior to the treaty's suspension. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Days after the Pahalgam attack in which terrorists killed 26 people, India on April 23 announced the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty. India has said that the treaty would not be restored until Pakistan addresses terrorism-related concerns. In an article for The Indian Express, Akbaruddin said that while the CoA's ruling may be procedurally valid as it reflects the logic of legal permanence, the law cannot be blind to context and India did not put the treaty in abeyance lightly. 'It placed the Treaty in abeyance after Pakistan-based terrorists killed dozens of Indians in a brazen attack in Pahalgam on April 22. When blood stains the snow of the Pir Panjal, the abstractions of international law ring hollow. India has not cut off water or violated Pakistan's share. Instead, it has frozen the instruments of cooperation as a wake-up call. The message is stark: Treaties are built on trust, and trust cannot flow when terror does,' noted Akbaruddin, a former Permanent Representative of India to the United Nations. Akbaruddin also said that India must not re-engage with Pakistan on the Indus waters and other issues until there is evidence of action against terrorism. Akbaruddin said that 'India should craft a diplomatic path that links re-engagement to Pakistan's demonstrable action on terror'. 'This is not a compromise. It is conditional justice. If Pakistan wants the benefits of the Indus water system, it must stop using terror as a tool. India must also speak to the world with clarity. It is not undermining peace. It is demanding that peace be real. It is not holding water hostage. It is refusing to be hostage to hypocrisy,' noted Akbaruddin. At the same time, India must expand infrastructure to fully utilise both its entitled share of the eastern rivers and its permissible use of the western rivers under the Indus treaty under a transparent, precise, and speedy manner, noted Akbaruddin.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Iran's ‘Kill Trump, Bibi' Fatwas: Threats To Khamenei Rile Up 400+ Clerics; ‘Duty Of All Muslims…'
Over 400 senior clerics in Iran's religious city of Qom have endorsed a fatwa declaring that any threats made against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei amount to moharebeh, or "waging war against God"—a capital offense in Islamic law. The decree comes amid rising tensions following Israeli statements about assassinating Khamenei. The clerics also called for the prosecution of foreign leaders including Donald Trump, Benjamin Netanyahu, and IAEA chief Rafael Grossi, accusing them of enabling attacks on Iran. Iranian officials allege that Grossi has facilitated espionage and nuclear sabotage through IAEA inspections. Meanwhile, Western nations have condemned the threats and voiced support for the IAEA's independence. #Iran #Qom #AliKhamenei #Moharebeh #Fatwa #iaea #rafaelgrossi #IranIsrael #trump #netanyahu #middleeast #IranClerics #IranNews #NuclearTensions #IranNuclearCrisis Read More
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Schrodinger's Aadhaar in Bihar, it is everything and nothing at the same time
Numbers can be mysterious. Ask a mathematician. Or ask an UIDAI official, and he will confirm the mysterious properties of the number that we call Aadhaar. It can be described in several ways, with poetic vexations or with something like what the fick, depending on where you have been asked to produce this number, under what circumstances and with what results. Fick You is probably what many people in Bihar are muttering nowadays as they produce their Aadhaar number again and again and are told that the number, despite its 12 digits, means zero, absolutely zero, total nada!advertisementThe story of Aadhar would be comical if it wasn't tragic or hassling for the people of this country. You see, almost 15 years after Aadhaar started making a presence in our lives, no one — not even UIDAI, or Nandan Nilekani, whose brainchild it is — knows the nature of this back in 2020, when I was more active on Twitter, one of my tweets went somewhat viral. It went like this: 'Aadhaar is nothing. Aadhaar is everything. Aadhaar is anything UIDAI wants it to be. Aadhaar is the stick. Aadhaar is the carrot. Aadhaar is the cake you can have and not eat. Aadhaar is also the cake you can have and eat. It's Schrodinger's Aadhaar.' Schrodinger's Aadhaar: The phrase, inspired by Schrodinger's cat that is neither dead nor alive, is not new. It has been bandied about since 2017. I used it in 2018 in one of my tweets. But it struck a particular nerve among Twitter users from India in 2020 because, by then, the Aadhaar number had become the metaphorical Chimera, changing on a daily basis its shape, identity, purpose and use. By 2020, at least those of us who had always seen through its charade had firmly realised that Aadhaar was everything and yet it was a decade later, as the Election Commission of India conducts its voter roll verification in Bihar, we are still trying to find an answer to what is Aadhaar. Decades ago, economist Joan Robinson said that 'Whatever you can rightly say about India, the opposite is also true.' In 2025, we can use the same words to describe Aadhaar. The argument nowadays is that Aadhaar is proof of address, and not identity. This seems rather strange because Aadhaar started as a number that would provide each person a unique identity. The UIDAI itself has a 'unique ID Authority' in its name. When the government created UIDAI, it did so with an express purpose and told it to 'generate and assign UID to residents.' And because it was an ID, it was tied to a person's biometrics, such as fingerprints and eye scans, in ways not even the Indian Passport is when the World Bank — or rather World Bank economist Paul Romer — described Aadhaar, it was deemed 'the most sophisticated ID programme in the world.' The same people who are now saying that Aadhaar is not an identity proof and that it is just an address proof, are the ones who until a year ago would slam the certificate from Romer — but described as a certificate from the World Bank — in the faces of Aadhaar has been Aadhaar's story throughout its existence. The number might have been born out of the necessity of identifying actual MGNREGA beneficiaries, its purpose and characters have changed again and again to suit the whims and fancies of this government department or fact, seeing how government departments use it, it has also been captured by private individuals and private organisations, who use it without any oversight or proper guidelines. The result is that Aadhaar is used in 10,000 ways. It is demanded by security guards when you enter a residence complex. It is demanded by guards at the airport. It is demanded by the courier services when their porters come to deliver goods. It is demanded by banks. It is demanded, in various ways and for sundry purposes, by almost all government departments. It is even demanded when you go to a hospital, are laid on to a stretcher and rushed into an emergency Supreme Court, in 2017, limited its scope, but the march of Aadhaar continued left-right, left-right and centre. The government, in almost all its communication on the matter, has deemed Aadhaar not mandatory because by the law, as explained by the Supreme Court, it can't be mandatory for walk into any government department for any citizen service, from registry of property to setting up a business, and the first thing that is 'mandatory' is Aadhaar. The contradictions run deep and wild, and in hilarious ways. The UIDAI says that we should never provide a copy of Aadhaar to anyone. You see, Aadhaar is supposed to be just a digital number, which can only be used in conjunction with a biometrics machine for authentication purposes in some very specific settings. Yet, the same authority allows people to create these cool-looking cards with the Aadhaar number on them, which are then demanded at every nook and corner of the country by this person or principle, I am opposed to a number becoming a defining identity of a person. Any number. My objections are the same which led Yevgeny Zamyatin to write We, a novel that, in 1921, became one of the first books to be banned by communist Soviet Russia. The novel, which explores a totalitarian society structured on the basis of science and mathematics, assigns every citizen a number. There are no names because names lead to an individual identity, free and unique, whereas 'We' is all about uniformity and conformity. And, of course, a number makes surveillance I also understand this is a utopian idea. In this time of Dataism, which Yuval Noah Harari calls the religion of the 21st century, a national number of residents can have its uses. For example, the Social Security Number in the US. So, we can have a use for something like Aadhaar. India is a big country. It is also rather chaotic, with bureaucracy and paperwork drowning everyone and everything. A national number can help the problem in India is that even the best ideas have a habit of turning into a nightmare here. There are a number of reasons for that, but in the case of Aadhaar, it is due to plain avariciousness of the government as well as private companies that want a unique identifier to link all the data of being a tool for a specific purpose, Aadhaar, by design, has been turned into a digital monster, a sort of Cthulhu that has tentacles in everything. And because it is supposed to exist and be used everywhere, in 2025, it no longer has any sanctity to serve any purpose. This is the reason why it is accepted everywhere now but is not considered a serious document anywhere. This is also the reason behind the flip-flop on Aadhaar. One day it gets accepted, the next day it might not.(Javed Anwer is Technology Editor, India Today Group Digital. Latent Space is a weekly column on tech, world, and everything in between. The name comes from the science of AI and to reflect it, Latent Space functions in the same way: by simplifying the world of tech and giving it a context)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Must Watch
