Somerset County home sales for the week of July 13, 2025
24 Talmadge Lane. $1,921,000.
28 Benedict Crescent. $1,311,000.
32 Briar Lane. $1,385,000.
5 Carriage Way. $1,825,000.
376 Finch Lane. $560,000.
13 Ashley Court #7113. $528,000.
71 Ashley Court #6671. $560,000.
12 Hills Drive. $1,540,000.
19 Whippoorwill Way. $725,000.
30 Tall Cedar Court. $740,000.
40 Berkley Ave. $960,000.
1 Ambar Place. $900,000.
9 Grove St. $465,000.
1871 Woodland Terrace. $910,000.
336 W 2nd St. $542,000.
510 Church St. $830,000.
610 Encampment Drive. $587,000.
759 Hawthorne Ave. $699,000.
21 Macintosh Road. $920,000.
3349 Lukes Pond Road. $940,000.
1155 Papen Road. $686,000.
1278 Washington Valley Road. $727,500.
2 McManus Drive. $1,050,000.
21 Deer Run Drive. $742,000.
24 Levan Court. $450,000.
30 Murphy Drive. $954,000.
31 Shannon Road. $920,000.
691 Country Club Road. $675,000.
4 Baldwin Ave. $1,170,816.
6 Baldwin Ave. $1,139,518.
9 Ayers St. $1,200,000.
5 Polo Club Road #1. $910,000.
2 Amethyyst Way #H1. $407,000.
221 Columbia Drive #D2. $217,082.
3 Crabapple Lane #C1. $347,500.
42 Crabapple Lane #B1. $306,000.
117 Wescott Road. $690,000.
12 Horseshoe Drive. $1,511,000.
19 Camden Road. $810,000.
23 Hughey Lane. $945,000.
3 Heitz Lane. $1,421,000.
34 Kline Road. $785,000.
4 Lewis St. $860,000.
4 Wraight Court. $1,400,000.
9 Dickerson Road. $785,000.
9 Steele Place. $216,753.
921 Case Drive. $775,000.
36-31 Bloomingdale Drive. $470,000.
147 S 6th Ave. $610,000.
334 N 8th Ave. $480,000.
1914 Bartle Lane. $715,000.
823 Miller Lane. $810,000.
149 Sandford Ave. $520,000.
155 Rockview Ave. $611,000.
188 Sandford Ave. $555,000.
215 Lawrence Ave. $525,000.
62 Mountain Ave. $500,000.
99 Linden Ave. $650,000.
21 Vones Lane. $550,000.
3 Wesley Court. $1,070,000.
74 Autumn Lane. $835,000.
10 Brook St. $499,500.
127 2nd St. $639,000.
269 Edgeware Court. $450,000.
28 Valley Wood Drive. $1,300,000.
300 Smithwold Road. $475,000.
35 Magnolia Road. $740,000.
69 Avebury Place. $485,000.
7 Avelon Court. $670,000.
7209 Minuteman Lane. $465,000.
73 Almont Drive. $410,000.
446 Crossfields Lane. $830,000.
1003 Station Road #1402. $710,000.
1 Firethorn Court. $1,605,000.
104 Lavender Way. $688,000.
108 Lavender Way. $665,795.
210 Lavender Way. $876,930.
3 Hardwood Court. $1,290,000.
1 Hill Hollow Road. $1,343,000.
100 Tuttle Road. $933,000.
113 Valley Drive. $2,750,000.
Brad Wadlow is a staff writer for MyCentralJersey.com
This article originally appeared on MyCentralJersey.com: Somerset County home sales for the week of July 13, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ralph Lauren's Quarterly Earnings Preview: What You Need to Know
Valued at a market cap of $17.2 billion, Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is a globally renowned lifestyle and fashion brand. Headquartered in New York, it designs, markets, and distributes premium products across five core categories: apparel, footwear & accessories, home furnishings, fragrances, and hospitality, including luxury restaurants like Polo Bar and Ralph's in Paris. The luxury fashion behemoth is expected to release its Q1 earnings on Wednesday, Aug. 6. Ahead of this event, analysts expect RL to post adjusted earnings of $3.40 per share, representing a growth of 25.9% from $2.70 per share reported in the same quarter last year. The company has surpassed the Street's bottom-line estimates in the past four quarters. More News from Barchart Insider Trading Alert: Here's Who Bought Nvidia and AMD Stock Before the U.S. Chip Deal with China Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 23 As QuantumScape Hits New 2025 Highs, Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold QS Stock? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. For the current year, analysts forecast Ralph Lauren to report an adjusted EPS of $13.63, indicating a 10.5% increase from $12.33 reported in fiscal 2024. Shares of RL have gained 68.7% over the past 52 weeks, significantly outperforming the S&P 500 Index's ($SPX) 12.7% rise and the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLY) 15% return during the same time frame. On May 22, Ralph Lauren released its fourth quarter earnings and its shares rose over 1%. It closed FY2025 on a high note, reporting a Q4 revenue of $1.70 billion, a solid 8% year-over-year gain. Its comparable direct-to-consumer sales jumped 13%, supported by effective pricing, leaner inventories, and reduced discounting. Its adjusted EPS of $2.27 beat Wall Street expectations of $2. The company also announced a 10% dividend hike and a new $1.5 billion share repurchase program. Looking ahead, Ralph Lauren expects low-single-digit revenue growth for FY 2026, with stronger gains in the first half. Analysts' consensus view on RL is fairly bullish, with a "Moderate Buy" rating overall. Among 18 analysts covering the stock, 13 suggest a "Strong Buy," one gives a "Moderate Buy," two recommend a "Hold,' one 'Moderate Sell,' and the remaining analyst gives a 'Strong Sell.' Its mean price target of $308.35 represents a 7.7% premium to current price levels. On the date of publication, Kritika Sarmah did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariff pressure pushes Asia toward American LNG, but at the cost of climate goals
HANOI, Vietnam (AP) — Asian countries are offering to buy more U.S. liquefied natural gas in negotiations with the Trump administration as a way to alleviate tensions over U.S. trade deficits and forestall higher tariffs. Analysts warn that strategy could undermine those countries' long-term climate ambitions and energy security. Buying more U.S. LNG has topped the list of concessions Asian countries have offered in talks with Washington over President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. Vietnam's Prime Minister underlined the need to buy more of the super-chilled fuel in a government meeting, and the government signed a deal in May with an American company to develop a gas import hub. JERA, Japan's largest power generator, signed new 20-year contracts last month to purchase up to 5.5 million metric tons of U.S. gas annually starting around 2030. U.S. efforts to sell more LNG to Asia predate the Trump administration, but they've gained momentum with his intense push to win trade deals. Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is natural gas cooled to a liquid form for easy storage and transport that is used as a fuel for transport, residential cooking and heating and industrial processes. Trump discussed cooperation on a $44 billion Alaska LNG project with South Korea, prompting a visit by officials to the site in June. The U.S. president has promoted the project as a way to supply gas from Alaska's vast North Slope to a liquefication plant at Nikiski in south-central Alaska, with an eye largely on exports to Asian countries while bypassing the Panama Canal Thailand has offered to commit to a long-term deal for American fuel and shown interest in the same Alaska project to build a nearly 810-mile (1,300-kilometer) pipeline that would funnel gas from The Philippines is also considering importing gas from Alaska while India is mulling a plan to scrap import taxes on U.S. energy shipments to help narrow its trade surplus with Washington. 'Trump has put pressure on a seeming plethora of Asian trading partners to buy more U.S. LNG,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, pointing out that Japan had agreed to buy more despite being so 'awash in the fuel' that it was being forced to cancel projects and contracts to offload the excess to Asia's growing economies. 'Not good for Southeast Asia's sustainability goals,' he said. LNG deals could derail renewable ambitions Experts say LNG purchasing agreements can slow adoption of renewable energy in Asia. Locking into long-term deals could leave countries with outdated infrastructure as the world shifts rapidly toward cleaner energy sources like solar or wind that offer faster, more affordable ways to meet growing power demand, said Indra Overland, head of the Center for Energy Research at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Building pipelines, terminals, and even household gas stoves creates systems that are expensive and difficult to replace—making it harder to switch to renewables later. 'And you're more likely then to get stuck for longer,' he said. Energy companies that profit from gas or coal are powerful vested interests, swaying policy to favor their business models, he said. LNG burns cleaner than coal, but it's still a fossil fuel that emits greenhouse gases and contributes to climate change. Many LNG contracts include 'take-or-pay' clauses, obliging governments to pay even if they don't use the fuel. Christopher Doleman of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis warns that if renewable energy grows fast, reducing the need for LNG, countries may still have to pay for gas they no longer need. Pakistan is an example. Soaring LNG costs drove up electricity prices, pushing consumers to install rooftop solar panels. As demand for power drops and gas supply surges, the country is deferring LNG shipments and trying to resell excess fuel. The LNG math doesn't add up Experts said that although countries are signaling a willingness to import more U.S. LNG, they're unlikely to import enough to have a meaningful impact on U.S. trade deficits. South Korea would need to import 121 million metric tons of LNG in a year — 50% more than the total amount of LNG the U.S. exported globally last year and triple what South Korea imported, said Doleman. Vietnam — with a trade surplus with the U.S. twice the size of Korea's — would need to import 181 million metric tons annually, more than double what the U.S. exported last year. Other obstacles stand in the way. The Alaska LNG project is widely considered uneconomic. Both coal and renewable energy in Asia are so much cheaper that U.S. gas would need to cost less than half its current price to compete. Tariffs on Chinese steel could make building building gas pipelines and LNG terminals more expensive, while longstanding delays to build new gas turbines mean new gas power projects may not come online until 2032. Meanwhile, a global glut in LNG will likely drive prices lower, making it even harder for countries to justify locking into long-term deals with the United States at current higher prices. LNG deals raise energy security concerns Committing to long-term U.S. LNG contracts could impact regional energy security at a time of growing geopolitical and market uncertainties, analysts said. A core concern is over the longterm stability of the U.S. as a trading partner, said Overland. 'The U.S. is not a very predictable entity. And to rely on energy from there is a very risky proposition,' he said. LNG only contributes to energy security when it's available and affordable, says Dario Kenner of Zero Carbon Analytics. 'That's the bit that they leave out ... But it's pretty important,' he said. This was the concern during the recent potential disruptions to fuel shipments through the Strait of Hormuz and earlier during the war in Ukraine, when LNG cargoes originally destined for Asia were rerouted to Europe. Despite having contracts, Asian countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were outbid by European buyers. 'Events in Europe, which can seem very far away, can have an impact on availability and prices in Asia,' Kenner said. Asian countries can improve their energy security and make progress toward cutting carbon emissions by building more renewable energy, he said, noting there is vast room for that given that only about 1% of Southeast Asia's solar and wind potential is being used. 'There are genuine choices to meet rising electricity demand. It is not just having to build LNG,' he said. ___ Jintamas Saksornchai in Bangkok contributed to this report. ___ Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receive support from several private foundations. See more about AP's climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
House Passes $9bn Claw Back Of Public Broadcasting And Foreign Aid Funds
The House voted to approve the White House's request to scrap $9 billion in previously approved funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting early on Friday, sending the matter to President Donald Trump's desk, after a delay caused by a clash in the narrowly divided chamber over the Epstein files issue. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., hailed the package's passage as a win for "fiscal ... More responsibility and government efficiency." Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved The rescissions package, which will claw back the already-approved funding, was passed mostly along party lines with a 216-213 vote, a day after the Senate cleared it. However, two GOP members, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., and Mike Turner, R-Ohio, voted against the measure along with all Democrats. The legislation will now be sent to Trump's desk, who hailed its passage on Truth Social, saying: 'REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED DOING THIS FOR 40 YEARS, AND FAILED….BUT NO MORE. THIS IS BIG!!!' The president's post attacked public broadcast funding, saying the $9 billion cuts include 'ATROCIOUS NPR AND PUBLIC BROADCASTING, WHERE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS A YEAR WERE WASTED.' The rescissions package will allow the Trump administration to claw back $1.1 billion in funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which helps fund public broadcasters like PBS and NPR, and approximately $8 billion from foreign aid programs, including allocations to USAID. The Senate had passed the package early on Thursday in a 51-48 vote, with two Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, voting against it. After the bill's passage, Mike Johnson tweeted: 'President Trump and House Republicans promised fiscal responsibility and government efficiency. Today, we're once again delivering on that promise…The American people will no longer be forced to fund politically biased media and more than $8 billion in outrageous expenses overseas.'
