Zarah Sultana quits Labour 'to set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn'
The poll most notably suggested such a party would finish first among 18 to 24-year-olds, on 32%.
In a statement posted on X, Sultana, who represents Coventry South, said that the project would also involve 'other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country'.
She said that 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'.
She added: 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and lift 400,000 children out of poverty. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much.'
She urged people to 'join us'.
Meanwhile, Govanhill writer and poet Jim Monaghan wrote on Twitter/X that he is part of the "interim Scottish Secretariat" of the group.
"It's on," he wrote. "Some of us have been holding on to this information as things have developed.
"I am a member of the new party and part of the interim Scottish 'Secretariat'. Let's talk, let's build. Another country is possible."
Sultana was one of seven MPs who had the Labour whip suspended last summer when they supported an amendment to the King's Speech which related to the two-child benefit cap.
Four of the seven had the whip restored earlier this year but Sultana was not among them.
READ MORE: Zarah Sultana hits out at Keir Starmer's Gaza genocide denial
Corbyn led Labour from 2015 to April 2020, stepping down after the party's loss at the 2019 General Election.
He was suspended from Labour in 2020 after he refused to fully accept the Equality and Human Rights Commission's findings that the party broke equality law when he was in charge, and said antisemitism had been 'dramatically overstated for political reasons'.
He was blocked from standing for Labour at last year's General Election and expelled in the spring of 2024 after announcing he would stand as an independent candidate in his Islington North constituency, which he won with a majority of more than 7000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
29 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
More than three out of five people think Starmer does not respect them
While in opposition, Sir Keir sought to make the concept of 'respect' central to his pitch to voters, and research from UCL suggested this played a key role in convincing the public to back him and the Labour Party. But a survey from More In Common and the UCL Policy Lab, published on Tuesday, suggested 63% of the public now thought the Prime Minister did not respect people like them, almost twice the 32% that thought so before the 2024 election. And while 41% of the public thought Sir Keir did respect them before the election, that figure has fallen to 24%. The poll also suggested that a perceived lack of respect from political elites was driving support for Reform UK, with supporters of that party more likely to think politicians as a whole disrespect them. Some 85% of Reform supporters said they thought politicians did not respect their contribution to society, while 86% thought politicians did not respect their values. But while Reform leader Nigel Farage scored more highly than the two main party leaders on respecting the public, 50% of those surveyed still said he did not respect people like them. That compared to 56% for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and 63% for Sir Keir. And just 33% thought Mr Farage did respect them, compared to 24% for both Mrs Badenoch and Sir Keir. Tuesday's poll has been published alongside a report from More in Common and the UCL Policy Lab examining how public opinion has changed since the general election. It found 77% of people still thought it was time for change, while the most popular answer to the question of what had changed since Labour came to power was 'nothing'. Marc Stears, director of the UCL Policy Lab, said: 'What voters want to know most of all is: who does this Government stand for? What kind of people does it most respect? Whose interests does it put first? 'A lot of the electorate thought they knew the answer to that one year ago. Now they're not so sure.' The joint poll surveyed more than 7,000 people in May and June this year.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Shovel-ready' renewables prioritised as grid connections queue gets shake-up
New 'shovel-ready' wind and solar farms will be prioritised to connect to the grid, operators said as they kickstarted moves to shake up the gridlocked connections queue. The existing first-come, first-served approach to the grid connections queue, which operators say has led to unviable and speculative schemes holding up clean energy projects that are ready to plug in, has been scrapped. The National Energy System Operator (Neso) said it was opening a three-week application window on Tuesday for more than 5,000 energy generation and demand projects in the queue to submit evidence to support their connection to the grid as it undertakes a major reordering of the system. The new plan will see clean energy projects that can be up and running by 2030 prioritised, in a bid to help Labour hit its goal to near fully powering the country with clean electricity by the end of the decade, and to boost economic growth. Neso said the connections queue had grown tenfold in just five years, and currently stands at 738 gigawatts (GW) – more than four times the amount of clean energy generation that is required by 2030 to meet Government goals. The assessment process, which will prioritise projects on the basis of how ready they are and alignment with the UK's clean energy goals, aims to connect the 170 GW of power needed by 2030. Kayte O'Neill, chief operating officer, National Energy System Operator, said: 'Neso opening the evidence window today is a key moment in the once-in-a-lifetime transformation of our electricity network, and a vital step for delivering clean power by 2030, while also helping supercharge economic growth for Great Britain. 'By prioritising agreements for projects that are critical and shovel-ready, developers will get the certainty they need to support investment decisions. 'It also gives energy consumers, from households and hospitals to electric car charging stations and data centres, the confidence of clean and stable power for generations to come. 'We advise all applicants to ensure they submit the correct evidence, so that we can assess applications fully and fairly.' Energy minister Michael Shanks said: 'Today marks a milestone in our work to overhaul the connections queue and unleash ready-to-go clean power projects that will help us reach our 2030 target. ' Developers in the queue now have the chance to demonstrate to Neso that their projects are ready to progress.' He added the move would take Britain closer to an energy system that takes the country 'off the rollercoaster of global fossil fuel markets and can bring bills down for good'. Applicants in the queue have until July 29 to submit evidence, with those meeting the criteria placed in a 'gate 2' queue and receiving an updated connection offer, prioritising those due to connect in 2026 and 2027. Neso said it aims to have made all offers for projects needed to meet the 2030 goals by early next year. Those who do not meet the criteria will get a 'gate 1' offer, remaining in the system but without a connection date. They can reapply through future biannual application windows or withdraw their scheme.
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
More than three out of five people think Starmer does not respect them
While in opposition, Sir Keir sought to make the concept of 'respect' central to his pitch to voters, and research from UCL suggested this played a key role in convincing the public to back him and the Labour Party. But a survey from More In Common and the UCL Policy Lab, published on Tuesday, suggested 63% of the public now thought the Prime Minister did not respect people like them, almost twice the 32% that thought so before the 2024 election. And while 41% of the public thought Sir Keir did respect them before the election, that figure has fallen to 24%. The poll also suggested that a perceived lack of respect from political elites was driving support for Reform UK, with supporters of that party more likely to think politicians as a whole disrespect them. Some 85% of Reform supporters said they thought politicians did not respect their contribution to society, while 86% thought politicians did not respect their values. But while Reform leader Nigel Farage scored more highly than the two main party leaders on respecting the public, 50% of those surveyed still said he did not respect people like them. That compared to 56% for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and 63% for Sir Keir. And just 33% thought Mr Farage did respect them, compared to 24% for both Mrs Badenoch and Sir Keir. Tuesday's poll has been published alongside a report from More in Common and the UCL Policy Lab examining how public opinion has changed since the general election. It found 77% of people still thought it was time for change, while the most popular answer to the question of what had changed since Labour came to power was 'nothing'. Marc Stears, director of the UCL Policy Lab, said: 'What voters want to know most of all is: who does this Government stand for? What kind of people does it most respect? Whose interests does it put first? 'A lot of the electorate thought they knew the answer to that one year ago. Now they're not so sure.' The joint poll surveyed more than 7,000 people in May and June this year.
