
Woman's boyfriend begged 90mph drunk-driver to stop before car crash killed her on trip home from Winter Wonderland, inquest hears
Kitchen designer Lillie Clack, 22, from Morden, London, was fatally injured and died days after the crash, in the early hours of Christmas Day in 2021.
On Thursday, the inquest into the death heard that drink driver Charlie Hilton, 25, was chased by police before his Mercedes hit a tree, flipped over and burst into flames.
He was carrying five passengers at the time after offering them a lift home following their night out to Winter Wonderland in Hyde Park.
Residents in Beeches Avenue, Carshalton, south London, grabbed fire extinguishers and rushed to help those involved in the crash. The passengers were pulled from the car but Ms Clack suffered a brain bleed and died in hospital three days later.
Ms Clack's boyfriend Jack Watson, who implored with Hilton to let himself and his partner out of the vehicle, and best friend Delia Casey were among those who were badly hurt.
The car was overcrowded with six people squeezed inside, with not everyone wearing seatbelts, South London Coroner's Court sitting at Croydon Town Hall heard.
The friends had been enjoying a night out at Winter Wonderland in the West End and visited a pub in Morden before accepting a lift home from Hilton.
The passengers were pulled from the car but Ms Clack suffered a brain bleed and died in hospital three days later
In a statement Mr Watson, who was wearing a seatbelt, said he was 'shocked and I remember thinking why is he going so fast' when the car sped away so quickly.
Mr Watson, who was in the back seat, later recalled: 'I think I might have said 'Charlie what are you doing, why are you going so fast'. I think the girls were in shock.'
He remembered seeing police blue lights and sirens and described Hilton's driving as 'dangerous and quick'.
During the journey, he said: 'I thought Charlie could easily lose control. I did not want to be in the car. I felt scared because I had been in a crash before on my bike.'
Mr Watson said 'it felt too fast' and he wanted to get out saying 'it just felt unsafe'.
He remembered saying 'Charlie, slow down. What are you doing? Let me and Lillie out.'
He recalled Hilton telling him to shut up.
Mr Watson cannot recall all the details of the chase, the inquest heard, but he remembered Hilton running a red light at some point before the crash. Hilton did an illegal U-turn and was undertaking and overtaking vehicles.
Mr Watson added: 'I do not remember hitting a tree. The only memory I have is being pulled out on a stretcher and bleeding from my lip.'
He added: 'I remember asking 'where's Lillie?'. I remember being in an ambulance and blood on my jacket but I do not know where the blood came from.
'My clothing was cut off from me - and I knew then that it was bad.'
The passengers have gaps in their recall of the crash but remember feeling 'shocked' as the car raced away, continuing to build speed, it was said.
Hilton was told by his passengers a police vehicle had turned its blue lights on behind them and was indicating for him to stop. Instead, he sped up and was driving so fast that the passengers bumped their head on the roof of the car as they were chased by police, the inquest heard.
In a statement, Ms Casey who was sitting on the front seat said: 'Everyone was shouting inside the car. There was a lot going on and I was just feeling very fearful for everyone in the car. The speed we were going at made me feel terrified.
'It feels like I was only in there for a few seconds. It feels like a blur.
'Even after I visited Lillie's tree I still have no memory of the accident.'
Ms Casey said she 'was not my usual self' but was not drunk when she got into the car and was not wearing a seatbelt.
She added that 'at no point did Charlie appear drunk to me. He did not seem to be drunk as he was not talking loud and he was not stumbling.'
Ms Casey was among a group of friends who had been to the pub and had accepted a lift from Hilton to drop them off at her home a few minutes away.
Her boyfriend had won a 6ft inflatable banana at Winter Wonderland earlier that day which blocked the view of the friends of who got in to the back seat.
Nadia Avent, who was in an taxi when she saw the car explode in the early hours, said: 'The car overtook [the] taxi at great speed. It looked like a video game because of the speed he went past us.'
She added that she saw 'the car exploding in front of us' and then dialled 999 to inform the emergency services.
Sergeant Alexander Gill said that his police car was doing 90mph in a 40mph zone during the chase and Hilton's Mercedes was 'greatly getting away'.
He did not have a record of Hilton's speed but accepted an observation from the assistant coroner for London South, Sebastian Naughton, that 'when you are driving at 100mph and you think he was going upwards of 100mph?'
The car was travelling between 70mph and 80mph in the seconds before the crash, the inquest was told.
PC Mathew Reed, who examined the scene after the crash, said the car had gone over a raised zebra crossing just seconds before the collision.
This made the vehicle become 'unstable' and 'speed is a contributory factor' in how the driver would have handled the vehicle.
He could not say how significant not wearing a seatbelt could have been as a cause of Ms Clack's death.
He said 'seatbelts do save lives' and noted that 'passengers not being restrained' would have moved around in the car when it hit the tree.
In February 2023, Hilton was jailed at the Old Bailey for 10 years and six months after pleading guilty to causing Ms Clack's death by dangerous driving, three counts of causing serious injury, failing to stop when directed and driving above the alcohol limit.
He was also disqualified from driving for five years after his release from prison.
Ms Clack's mother has spent years campaigning for Lillie's Law, which would see all drunk drivers who kill have their licences revoked permanently.
petition set up by the family has gained more than 40,000 signatures.
The inquest continues.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Met Police release footage as more than 1,000 arrests made using live facial recognition technology
More than 1,000 criminals, including a paedophile found with a six-year-old girl, have been arrested by the Metropolitan Police using live facial recognition (LFR) cameras. David Cheneler, 73, was among 93 registered sex offenders held by Met officers using the controversial technology since the start of last year. He was discovered with the girl after he was identified by a camera on a police van in Camberwell, south London, in January. Cheneler, from Lewisham, was jailed for two years in May after admitting breaching his sexual harm prevention order by being with a child under the age of 14. The Met said a total of 1,035 arrests have been made using live facial recognition technology - where live footage is recorded of people as they walk past, capturing their faces, which are then compared against a database of wanted offenders. If a match is determined, the system creates an alert which is assessed by an officer, who may decide to speak to the person. They include more than 100 people alleged to have been involved in serious violence against women and girls (VAWG) offences such as strangulation, stalking, domestic abuse, and rape. Image: Adenola Akindutire admitted charges including robbery. Pic: Met Police Adenola Akindutire was stopped during an operation in Stratford and arrested over the machete robbery of a Rolex watch, which left the victim with life-changing injuries after the attack in Hayes, west London. Police said the 22-year-old, who was linked to a similar incident and had been released on bail, was in possession of a false passport and could have evaded arrest if it wasn't for the technology. Akindutire, of no fixed address, admitted charges including robbery, attempted robbery, grievous bodily harm, possession of a false identity document and two counts of possession of a bladed article and faces sentencing at Isleworth Crown Court. Image: Darren Dubarry was stopped on his bike. Pic: Met Police Image: Dubarry was caught with stolen designer clothes. Pic: Met Police Darren Dubarry, 50, was already wanted for theft when he was caught with stolen designer clothing in Dalston, east London, after riding past an LFR camera on his bike. The 50-year-old, from Stratford, east London, was fined after pleading guilty to handling stolen goods. Lindsey Chiswick, the Met's LFR lead, hailed the 1,000 arrest milestone as "a demonstration of how cutting-edge technology can make London safer by removing dangerous offenders from our streets". "Live Facial Recognition is a powerful tool, which is helping us deliver justice for victims, including those who have been subjected to horrendous offences, such as rape and serious assault," she said. "It is not only saving our officers' valuable time but delivering faster, more accurate results to catch criminals - helping us be more efficient than ever before." The Met say "robust safeguards" are in place, which ensure no biometric data is retained from anyone who walks past an LFR camera who isn't wanted by police. Almost 2 million faces scanned But human rights group Liberty is calling for new laws to be introduced to govern how police forces use the technology after Liberty Investigates found almost 1.9 million faces were scanned by the Met between January 2022 and March this year. Read more from Sky News: Leaseholders to get stronger rights, powers and protections PM told to 'use Rayner - people like her' Charlie Whelton, Liberty policy and campaigns officer, said: "We all want to feel safe in our communities, but technology is advancing quickly, and we need to make sure that our laws keep up. "Any tech which has the potential to infringe on our rights in the way scanning and identifying millions of people does needs to have robust safeguards around its use to protect us all from abuse of power as we go about our daily lives. "There is currently no overarching law governing police use of facial recognition in the UK, and we shouldn't leave police forces to come up with these frameworks on their own. "Almost two million faces have been scanned in London before Parliament has even decided what the laws should be. "We need to catch up with other countries, and the law needs to catch up with the use. Parliament must legislate now and ensure that safeguards are in place to protect people's rights where the police use this technology."


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MPs like Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana will NOT be prosecuted for supporting terror group Palestine Action
MPs who voice support for the controversial protest group Palestine Action in the Commons will be shielded from prosecution under terror laws by parliamentary privilege. Despite officially being branded a terrorist organisation, MPs like Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana will be able to openly back the group from the safety of the chamber. And they will not face the same legal consequences that would apply to any ordinary Briton making similar comments in public or online, The Times reports. The parliamentary loophole means that MPs can champion or even encourage Palestine Action, despite the fact that anyone else doing so outside Parliament could face up to 14 years behind bars. It comes after a damning vote in the Commons saw MPs move to proscribe Palestine Action - placing it alongside terror groups including Hamas, al-Qaeda and Islamic State. But 26 MPs voted against the move, including nine from Labour 's Left, such as Dianna Abbott, Clive Lewis and Richard Burgon - all of whom served under Jeremy Corbyn. The ban was backed overwhelmingly by 385 votes to 26, with the House of Lords also giving its seal of approval. A limp attempt by a Green peer to derail the decision failed miserably, rejected by 144 to 16. But despite the crackdown, Commons officials confirmed that MPs who speak in support of Palestine Action during official proceedings - including debates, questions, or committees - cannot be prosecuted thanks to parliamentary privilege. Parliamentary privilege is a centuries-old protection originally designed to safeguard democracy. The controversy comes just days after two military planes were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton, with the damage – claimed by Palestine Action – running to a staggering £7 million. Four suspects have since been charged by counter-terrorism police. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, and Jony Cink, 24, both of no fixed abode, along with the north London duo of Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, of Barnet, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22, of Cricklewood, appeared at Westminster magistrates' court. The Crown Prosecution Service said it submitted 'that these offences have a terrorist connection'. The defendants, who held hands and smiled as they entered the dock, spoke only to confirm their names. They also made peace signs, blew kisses and waved at supporters in the public gallery. Yet, under House Rules, any MP can still praise the group's actions without fear, as long as they do so within the parliamentary estate. Guidance for MPs states: 'This allows you to speak up on behalf of constituents, express an opinion, or condemn corruption, malpractice or even criminal activity without fear of legal action, as long as you do so in proceedings of the House. 'This protection extends to written proceedings: for example, written and oral questions, motions, early day motions, and amendments tabled to bills and motions. 'Anyone giving evidence to a committee of the House also has this protection, which is a safeguard for witnesses and also ensures that select committees are not obstructed in their inquiries by threats of legal action, or any other kind of threat against witnesses.' Lord Hanson, a minister at the Home Office, defended the move to remove Palestine Action's 'veil of legitimacy'. He said: 'I will always defend the right of British people to engage in legitimate and peaceful protest and to stand up for the causes in which they believe. 'But essential as these rights are, they do not provide a blank cheque for this particular group to seriously damage property or subject members of the public to fear and violence. 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations if they were motivated by Islamist or extreme Right-wing ideology, and therefore I cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action. 'By implementing this measure, we will remove Palestine Action's veil of legitimacy, tackle its financial support, degrade its efforts to recruit and radicalise people into committing terrorist activity in its name.' But predictably, Jeremy Corbyn hit back, claiming the move would have a 'chilling effect' on protest. 'Surely we should be looking at the issue that Palestine Action are concerned about, and the supply of weapons from this country to Israel, which has made all this possible. If this order goes through it will have a chilling effect on protests,' he said. Critics argue that MPs should not be allowed to hide behind privilege when speaking in support of groups associated with criminal damage and intimidation. But unless rules are changed, those very same MPs can continue to air their views without consequence, while members of the public could be jailed for saying far less. It comes after p ro-Palestine MP Zarah Sultana announced she has quit Labour to join forces with Jeremy Corbyn in creating a new left-wing party. Former opposition leader Corbyn claimed yesterday there was a 'thirst' among voters 'for an alternative view to be put' forward - and did not rule out leading it at the age of 76. He has now been boosted by the arrival of Sultana, who has sat in the Commons as an independent MP since she had the Labour whip withdrawn last year. In response to the Sultana's shock move, Corbyn's former shadow chancellor John McDonnell said: 'The people running Labour at the moment need to ask themselves why a young, articulate, talented, extremely dedicated socialist feels she now has no home in the Labour Party and has to leave.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Former senior police officer who was found with child abuse on her phone is SUING the Met after 'witch hunt destroyed her'
A highly decorated black former police superintendent is suing the Metropolitan Police, claiming she was subjected to a racist and malicious witchhunt that 'destroyed' her career and health. Ex-Superintendent Novlett Williams says the Met forced her out of the job after a six-year legal and disciplinary ordeal, sparked by her conviction over a child abuse video sent to her on WhatsApp, which she insists she never watched. She is now taking the force to an employment tribunal, accusing it of racial and sexual discrimination, harassment, and victimisation. In her testimony, Williams accused the Met of orchestrating a 'campaign of attack' targeting senior black and minority ethnic officers, and claimed the organisation was dominated by a 'white female clique' and 'white male pitbulls'. The Met repeatedly tried to remove her from her post after the video, which showed child abuse, was discovered on her phone. Williams said she didn't report the clip, sent by her sister, because she didn't see it and was the only one of 17 people who received the video to be prosecuted. She has now accused the force of 'disproportionate and malicious attempts' to get rid of her and says she was 'ultimately forced to resign' last year after a long battle that severely impacted her mental and physical health, the Times reports. She was probed in February 2018 after the 54-second video was found on her device. At the time, she had served 39 years in policing and had been awarded the Queen's Police Medal. She told the tribunal that if she were a white male officer, the incident would have been handled internally. 'Despite my absolutely unblemished record, this crime was prosecuted in a way determined to take me down,' she said, claiming the lead investigator pursued the case aggressively because he was 'angry' she had supported a colleague who had complained of racism and bullying. She added: 'I was their most successful and award-winning Black female officer, and they destroyed me.' After being found guilty, she was ordered to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work and register as a sex offender for five years. She was fired despite the judge ruling there was no sexual element to the crime. But the Police Appeals Tribunal slammed the brakes on the Met's move and forced them to reinstate her. In her statement, Williams said returning to work had been 'scary' as she felt she had a 'target' on her back and that she has been in an 'extreme distress and was overwhelmed' that her life had been 'shattered'. The Met lost its fight against the PAT's ruling in the High Court, then hit Williams with a fresh investigation over claims she failed to declare bank cards and an overseas trip, which she was legally obliged to report as a registered sex offender. Williams says the force tried to 'capitalise' on these breaches by pushing her to accept a police caution — something she knew would lead straight to disciplinary action and getting sacked. 'It was a set-up, disproportionate and malicious,' Williams said, adding the Met 'pressured' the Crown Prosecution Service to bring charges against her. When approached by the Times, the Met declined to comment.