Jersey harbour project needs rethink, campaigner says
'A money pit'
Mr Baker has acknowledged that the harbour's aging infrastructure needs an upgrade, but he doesn't see the value in a complete overhaul of facilities.He said replacing the ferry terminal and moving lift-on, lift-off (lo-lo) freight operations from the New North Quay to Elizabeth Harbour would not be a sound long-term investment."It'll just be a money pit," he said.Ports of Jersey said it would be fully-funding the project but has not provided a total estimated cost for the work.It was previously given permission to borrow up to £150m of States money, and has also awarded a two-and-a-half year contract worth £40m to a UK engineering firm to complete marine construction.Mr Baker said he was concerned that the government would have to put money into the project and would also have to back Ports loans, which would ultimately mean the taxpayer would suffer.He said: "I can't see the economic situation in Jersey improving, it's already desperate... something like this could be the last sort of thing that's really going to push things and turn us really into debt."He added that the island's declining birth rate meant there was no real reason to expand freight facilities.
Environmental campaigner Andrew Le Quesne, from Earth Project Jersey, said the marine development work should not start until Ports has completed comprehensive testing to find out what's in the silt below the harbour.He said toxic chemicals, including PFAS and heavy metals, could be released during dredging work, which would risk polluting wildlife and the marine environment along the island's south-east coast.He said he and other campaigners were not impressed with the environmental standards required for planning approval in Jersey.He said: "The overall level of environmental protection is not being raised at the level and speed that it should be... we should be aspiring to have the highest standards and the highest quality of environment that we can possibly achieve."
Chair of the environment scrutiny panel Deputy Hilary Jeune said it was "extremely important" that Ports of Jersey take environmental issues into consideration during the development. She said it was exciting that the island was going to have a new harbour but Ports of Jersey must tell the public exactly what's going on throughout."I would like to see the Ports of Jersey be much more vocal about the kind of steps that they have taken," she said.
Chief harbourmaster William Sadler said Ports of Jersey takes its environmental responsibilities seriously.It said it has worked hard to satisfy all planning conditions before construction work starts to make sure the marine environment is protected.This has included testing harbour and marine areas for potential contaminants, detailed modelling of the construction and real-time monitoring to protect marine life.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
19 minutes ago
- Sky News
The PM faced down his party on welfare and lost. I suspect things may only get worse
So much for an end to chaos and sticking plaster politics. Yesterday, Sir Keir Starmer abandoned his flagship welfare reforms at the eleventh hour - hectic scenes in the House of Commons that left onlookers aghast. Facing possible defeat on his welfare bill, the PM folded in a last-minute climbdown to save his skin. 0:23 The decision was so rushed that some government insiders didn't even know it was coming - as the deputy PM, deployed as a negotiator, scrambled to save the bill or how much it would cost. "Too early to answer, it's moved at a really fast pace," said one. The changes were enough to whittle back the rebellion to 49 MPs as the prime minister prevailed, but this was a pyrrhic victory. Sir Keir lost the argument with his own backbenchers over his flagship welfare reforms, as they roundly rejected his proposed cuts to disability benefits for existing claimants or future ones, without a proper review of the entire personal independence payment (PIP) system first. PM wins key welfare vote - follow latest 4:31 That in turn has blown a hole in the public finances, as billions of planned welfare savings are shelved. Chancellor Rachel Reeves now faces the prospect of having to find £5bn. As for the politics, the prime minister has - to use a war analogy - spilled an awful lot of blood for little reward. He has faced down his MPs and he has lost. 4:38 They will be emboldened from this and - as some of those close to him admit - will find it even harder to govern. After the vote, in central lobby, MPs were already saying that the government should regard this as a reset moment for relations between No 10 and the party. The prime minister always said during the election that he would put country first and party second - and yet, less than a year into office, he finds himself pinned back by his party and blocked from making what he sees are necessary reforms. I suspect it will only get worse. When I asked two of the rebel MPs how they expected the government to cover off the losses in welfare savings, Rachael Maskell, a leading rebel, suggested the government introduce welfare taxes. Meanwhile, Work and Pensions Select Committee chair Debbie Abrahams told me "fiscal rules are not natural laws" - suggesting the chancellor could perhaps borrow more to fund public spending. 0:45 These of course are both things that Ms Reeves has ruled out. But the lesson MPs will take from this climbdown is that - if they push hard in enough and in big enough numbers - the government will give ground. The fallout for now is that any serious cuts to welfare - something the PM says is absolutely necessary - are stalled for the time being, with the Stephen Timms review into PIP not reporting back until November 2026. 1:10 Had the government done this differently and reviewed the system before trying to impose the cuts - a process only done ahead of the Spring Statement in order to help the chancellor fix her fiscal black hole - they may have had more success. Those close to the PM say he wants to deliver on the mandate the country gave him in last year's election, and point out that Sir Keir Starmer is often underestimated - first as party leader and now as prime minister. But on this occasion, he underestimated his own MPs. His job was already difficult enough - and after this it will be even harder still. If he can't govern his party, he can't deliver change he promised.
Sky News
19 minutes ago
- Sky News
Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' has sparked ugly debate - so why is it so controversial?
It is certainly big - 940 pages long - but on the question of beauty, Congress is divided. Donald Trump's"big, beautiful bill" has sparked ugly debate - both for its ambitious scope and for the political manoeuvring that's gone on around it. Elon Musk branded it "political suicide" for Republicans and threatened to fund challenges against those who back it in next year's midterm elections. But the president hit back, suggesting he would consider cutting Musk's lucrative government contracts or even deporting him back to South Africa. The "big, beautiful bill", or HR 1 to give the proposed legislation its proper title, is Mr Trump's signature spending and tax policy. It extends tax cuts he secured in 2017 and bankrolls his second-term agenda in the White House. 1:34 • Permanent tax cuts: Extending relief from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act • Small business support: Doubling the small business expensing limit to $2.5m (£1.8m) to help businesses expand and hire staff • Child tax credit: Expanding the child tax credit and making it permanent, benefiting 40 million families • Making housing affordable: Expanding the low-income housing tax credit to kickstart construction of affordable homes • Defence and border security: Allocating $170bn (£123bn) for border security alone, including $46bn (£33bn) for completing the border wall • Made-in-America incentives: Providing tax breaks and incentives for domestic manufacturing to promote US industry • Healthcare and social welfare: Implementing restrictions on Medicaid, which provides healthcare for millions of Americans, and reducing funding for certain healthcare and nutrition programmes. Clash over 'monster' debt bill Musk, Mr Trump's former ally and the man who established the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), claimed the bill "raises the debt ceiling by $5trn, the biggest increase in history." "DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon," was President Trump's response. The national debt currently stands at $37trn (£27trn) and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill could add $2.4trn (£1.7trn) to that over the next decade. 1:25 Bill splits Republican ranks Republican Senator Thom Tillis voted against the bill and, following criticism from the president, announced he would not seek re-election in North Carolina. He said he couldn't support it due to his concerns about the impact cuts to Medicaid would have on people in his state. Democrats in the Senate forced a full reading of all 940 pages and then a vote-a-rama, a series of marathon voting sessions. In the House of Representatives, it passed by a single vote, 215-214. In the Senate, Vice President JD Vance, had to cast the deciding vote to break a tie (50-50). Legislatively, the progress of the bill has been a case study in the complexities of American law-making. Strategically, it represents a mammoth effort to consolidate the president's policy agenda and secure his legacy.
Times
22 minutes ago
- Times
Sandbanks keeps crown as UK's most expensive seaside town
Sandbanks in Dorset has retained its crown as the UK's most expensive coastal area to buy a house, with an average asking price of £1.28 million. While properties in the Poole neighbourhood, dubbed 'Britain's Palm Beach', have fallen 3 per cent year-on-year, asking prices in the area are still over three times more expensive than the national average of £378,240, according to analysis by Rightmove. Research by the online property portal showed that Sandbanks is now the only coastal area in Britain with average asking prices above the £1 million mark. • Homes in exclusive seaside areas fall in value after tax raids Sandbanks, which has been home to many millionaires, including Harry Redknapp, the football manager, and Sir Geoffrey Boycott, the cricketer, has topped the list for a number of years. Canford Cliffs, also in Poole, came in second place despite average asking prices in the area down 9 per cent year-on-year. Buyers looking for a house in the area can expect to pay an average of £974,635. It was followed by Milford-on-Sea in Hampshire, which had an average asking price of £728,460. Saltcoats in Ayrshire, Scotland, was again named the cheapest coastal area despite seeing a 13 per cent jump in average asking price to £122,208. Peterlee, in Country Durham, saw a 6 per cent increase in its average asking price to £122,246, but was ranked the second cheapest coastal area in the UK. Other cheap coastal areas on Rightmove's list included Ashington and Blyth, both in Northumberland, Bootle in Merseyside, and Grimsby in Lincolnshire.
