Signature collection can begin to get referendum to repeal higher education law on Ohio's ballot
The first major hurdle to get a referendum on the November ballot to repeal Ohio's massive higher education law has been cleared.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost certified the title and summary language for a referendum that would repeal Senate Bill 1, set to take effect at the end of June.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
S.B. 1 bans diversity efforts, regulates classroom discussion, prohibits faculty strikes, creates post-tenure reviews, puts diversity scholarships at risk, and creates a retrenchment provision that blocks unions from negotiating on tenure, among other things. The law affects Ohio's public universities and community colleges.
'My certification of the title and summary… should not be construed as an affirmation of the enforceability and constitutionality of the referendum petition,' Attorney General Dave Yost said in a letter certifying the petition.
Members of the Youngstown State University's chapter of the Ohio Education Association are behind efforts to get the referendum on the Nov. 4 ballot.
With the title and summary language approval, petitioners can now start gathering signatures. About 248,092 signatures are needed — 6% of the total vote cast for governor during the last gubernatorial election. The signatures must be from at least 44 of Ohio's 88 counties. The signatures would likely be due at the end of June.
Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose would then have to verify the signatures before the measure is referred to the Ohio Ballot Board to determine the language that would appear on the November ballot.
The last time a referendum passed in Ohio was 2011 when voters overturned an anti-collective bargaining law.
Some of Ohio's public universities have started making decisions because of S.B. 1. Ohio University announced it will close the Pride Center, the Women's Center and the Multicultural Center. The University of Toledo is suspending nine undergraduate programs in response to a controversial new higher education law that is set to take effect this summer.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
7 times JD Vance probably should have just stayed home on the couch
JD Vance looking like a dweeb as always. Vice President JD Vance can't go anywhere! Vance has a history of being off-putting, making people uncomfortable, and getting booed basically everywhere he goes. But now, President Donald Trump's second in command can't even go to his home state of Ohio without having the population make their dislike of him very clear. And it's not just states or the happiest place on earth that don't want him around; entire countries want nothing to do with him, either. He may only have a 47.4 unfavorable rating from Real Clear Polling, but if the crowds that gather every time Vance tries to exit a plane or car are any indication, people really don't like him. We can't imagine why. Here are 7 places that the populace has made it clear that he should steer clear. Ohio Even in his home state of Ohio, Vance isn't guaranteed a warm welcome. On July 28, the vice president visited the Metallus steel mill in Canton, Ohio to brag about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, but was met by a few dozen protestors with a giant sign accusing Vance of 'protecting pedophiles' in reference to The Trump administration's refusal to release the files related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the Ohio Capital Journal reports. Nantucket Last week, Vance traveled to Nantucket for a Republican National Convention Committee fundraiser and was met by boos from protesters who trolled the vice president with giant posters of the AI-generated bald Vance Meme and protest signs with messages like 'go hump a couch,' in reference to the hilarious rumor that he once made sweet sweet love to a piece of furniture. Disneyland After Trump started gleefully ripping families apart as part of his 'immigration policy,' ICE protests sprang up all over Los Angeles, so when Vance decided to roll into town to take a family trip to Disneyland, the protestors set up camp outside the park. But that's not all, once he arrived, Vance and his family were met with people confronting, heckling, and recording them. Also, if you haven't seen him running while at Disneyland, do yourself a favor and check it out now. You can thank us later. San Diego Vance is so unpopular that he can't even have dinner without facing hate. Over Fourth of July weekend, Vance was heckled and booed while coming out of a sushi restaurant with his wife. "Hope your Michelin-starred sushi was worth it with 82 people dead in Texas! Thanks for cutting the National Weather Service,' someone can be heard shouting in the video, while another person says, "Get the hell out of San Diego, a******!" The Kennedy Center As Vance and his wife Usha took their seats at a National Symphony Orchestra concert at Washington's Kennedy Center back in March, the concert hall filled with booing, jeering, and shouts of 'You ruined this place!' from the crowd. This came after Trump sacked the chairman of the Kennedy Center board and appointed himself instead, and named Usha as one of the new board members, all while vowing to change the Kennedy Center's offerings because he deemed them to be too 'woke.' Greenland In March, Vance and Usha arrived in Greenland on a controversial trip as part of Trump's bizarre push to take Greenland from Denmark, but instead of being welcomed with open arms by the locals, Vance was ignored by the people of Greenland and told the trip was 'highly aggressive' by the government. People protested the trip outside the airport where Vance landed, and organizers of a dog sled race, the second lady intended to attend, announced they never invited her. Ouch. Canada Conservative Canadian MP Jamil Jivani, who befriended Vance while the two were at Yale, uninvited his old friend to the Great White North after Trump's comments about Canada becoming the 51st state and the administration's threats of tariffs. 'They need to probably reconsider some of their rhetoric and their policy before coming to Canada,' Jivani told Politico. 'Our country should deserve more respect before being able to welcome them.' Vermont Vermont's normally very welcoming people gathered by the thousands to protest Vance when he and his family descended on the state for a ski trip. People lined the streets leading to the ski resort with protest signs expressing concerns about the state of democracy, climate change, the war in Ukraine, and LGBTQ+ rights, and aimed their ire at the vice president, the Maine Morning Star reported. And stores Listen, the whole story about Vance d*cking down a sectional might have been just a rumor that got out of control, but furniture stores aren't taking any chances! This article originally appeared on Pride: 7 times JD Vance probably should have just stayed home on the couch RELATED The internet can't stop mocking JD Vance for being the 'antichrist' after the Pope's death 30 HILARIOUS reactions to JD Vance allegedly in drag as #SofaLoren trends & we CACKLE JD Vance made a mockery once again, this time he's besieged with devastating AI eyeliner videos
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
A new Crew star is Palestinian — fans can't fly his flag
The Crew's big summer signing is Palestinian, and a leaguewide MLS policy will bar Columbus fans from celebrating his heritage at their stadium. Why it matters: Wessam Abou Ali is the presumed new star of the Crew attack, a striker who represents the marquee signing fans have clamored for since Cucho Hernández's departure in February. Now, those fans are seeking an exception to the rule ahead of Abou Ali's arrival, which comes as MLS tries to avoid controversy related to the war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Catch up quick: The Crew recently announced Abou Ali's signing in a reported $8.5 million transfer from Al Ahly, the biggest club in Egypt. Depending on bonuses, he could be the team's second-most expensive signing ever. Born in Denmark to Palestinian parents, he debuted for the Palestinian national team last year. Abou Ali can appear for the Crew when his P-1 visa is processed later this summer, according to the team. Flashback: Shortly after the war in Gaza began in October 2023, MLS issued a " temporary measure" banning in-stadium signs, banners, flags and tifos that reference the ongoing conflict, per The Athletic. Zoom in: That measure also placed "a moratorium on allowing new country flags into stadiums," league spokesperson Lauren Hayes has confirmed to Axios. Asked directly if Crew fans would be permitted to bring Palestinian flags in support of Abou Ali, Hayes declined to answer. Yes, but: Hayes says "there's a process in place" for supporters groups to ask teams to permit new flags in a stadium, which the team can pass on to MLS for approval. Leadership of Columbus' Nordecke fan group told Axios they've requested to the team's fan liaison that they be allowed to bring Palestinian flags to the stadium. A Crew spokesperson didn't answer an Axios inquiry as to whether the team would make that request to the league office, and said the team had "no specifics to share at this time." Context: Israeli striker Tai Baribo is the Philadelphia Union's leading goal scorer. Hayes says Israel flags are allowed at Philadelphia's Subaru Park because he was signed in August of 2023, before the new policy was enacted. Between the lines: Crew fans have frequently brought flags of new players' home countries to games without pushback, spokesperson Collin Hill tells Axios. Last year, Algerian flags were allowed when Canadian-born defender Mo Farsi chose to represent the Algerian national team, Hill says. In March, dozens of fans were allowed to bring Ukraine flags into the Nordecke as a show of support for Ukrainian defender Yevhen Cheberko, who was signed in 2023. What they're saying: Morgan Hughes, a longtime Crew support organizer and founder of the #SavetheCrew movement, tells Axios that Crew fans' activism is in the team's DNA.
Eater
9 hours ago
- Eater
D.C. Council Signs Off on a Tipped-Wage ‘Compromise'
The city's nearly decade-long debate on how to pay tipped restaurant workers came to a head around dinnertime on Monday, July 28, when the D.C. Council narrowly voted (7-5) for a new 'compromise' amendment to keep the tipped wage in place, for now, without stripping Initiative 82 entirely. For Jonathan Nelms, the owner of D.C.'s first Georgian restaurant Supra, 'I-82 has been the biggest contributing factor to our going from being a profitable restaurant to losing money last year.' But proponents of the hotly contested issue say Monday night's move essentially waters down the D.C. voter-approved ballot initiative that was designed to bring the base wage for tipped workers up to the level of the minimum wage by 2027. The newly passed amendment partially repeals Initiative 82, a contentious law in effect since 2023 that would have eventually eliminated the city's 'tipped minimum' wage and would require employers to make up for the rest. If I-82 went on as planned, the tipped minimum wage would have gone up from $10 to $12 on July 1. The D.C. Council paused that increase during an emergency vote in early June. Under the newly passed amendment co-sponsored by councilmembers Christina Henderson and Charles Allen, the current base wage for tipped workers will stay put at $10 until July 2026. After that, it will slowly tick up every two years as a percentage of the regular minimum wage until it reaches 75 percent of the full minimum wage by 2034. There were a number of last-minute amendments on the overall 2026 budget bill, but the partial repeal of pay equity for restaurant workers sparked a chaotic uproar inside the Wilson Building. Those in support of keeping I-82 in its original form swiftly disrupted proceedings with a shouting match, causing Council chair Phil Mendelson to call upon D.C. Protective Services police force to clear protestors from the building and lock down the chambers. Smaller restaurants did not embrace 1-82, and owners came out of the woodwork in full force for a marathon testimony hearing in June that lasted well over eight hours. Eric Heidenberger, whose hospitality group runs of Shaw's Tavern, 801, Prost DC, Madhatter, the Bottom Line, and Vagabond, says I-82 has 'made it near impossible for a small, independent operator to make ends meet,' noting a few of his locations have experienced a 30-percent decline in customer foot traffic since I-82's implementation. American standby Brookland's Finest closed after a decade this spring, in part, due to payroll challenges Initiative 82 presents. Brookland's Finest 'The decline in sales, coupled with a doubled increase in labor costs, has put a significant strain on the viability of our D.C. operations,' he says. If I-82 stayed as is, he anticipated having to close half of his D.C. portfolio. 'Plenty of businesses, both longtime and newly opened, tell me the math just doesn't work, and others say they're simply not going to open up any more restaurants here,' said Allen, ahead of the Monday night vote. 'This [amendment] is a step that we can take that provides several years of stability.' The new law will also require D.C. Council to stay on top of economic trends that affect the restaurant industry, including employment and wages, by conducting a bi-annual study. The polarizing topic has been a hot-potato agenda item for the D.C. Council for three months now. In early May, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced her 2026 budget proposal would include language to repeal I-82, which won by a 74-percent landslide at the D.C. polls in 2022. Supporters believe the measure would reduce restaurants' wage violations and boost pay. Opponents like Restaurant Association Metropolitan Washington argue it hurts independent operators, slashes pay for some servers, and spikes labor costs. Several D.C. restaurants like Sticky Rice, Haikan, and Brookland's Finest cited the existing measure, among other financial hurdles, as part of the cause for their recent closures. Way back in 2018, I-77 – a similar voter-approved ballot initiative that would gradually eliminate the tipped wage – was struck down by D.C. Council. While RAMW still favors a 'full repeal' of I-82, its newly amended language that slows down wage hikes is 'a win for the industry' that addresses the 'need to bring greater balance to a policy that has contributed to record closures and job losses … and provides operators with more clarity and a stronger foundation to plan for the future.' RAMW embarked on a campaign to roll back I-82 in recent months, releasing results from a recent poll of 400 D.C. voters who say Initiative 82 has hurt (46 percent) rather than helped (9 percent) the independent restaurant industry in D.C. 'No one is 100-percent happy here. We want workers to be able to have the annual wage growth and restaurants to be able to have more manageable labor costs, and we think that this strikes the balance,' says Ward 2 councilmember Brooke Pinto, who voted 'yes' on the amendment. Fair Price Fair Wage, an advocacy coalition that includes local restaurant workers' union Unite Here, is furious over I-82's partial repeal. 'How many times do D.C. voters have to approve this before it actually happens?' said One Fair Wage president Saru Jayaraman, in a statement on Monday. 'This isn't just a rollback of wages — it's a rollback of democracy. Councilmembers sided with a corporate lobby that spreads lies and bankrolls influence.' Advocates are now fielding options like ballot referenda to recall efforts and voter education campaigns to reinstate I-82 in full. Ward 4 Councilmember Janeese Lewis George agrees that overturning the will of the voters was not the way to go and says not all restaurant failures can be fully attributed to I-82. 'It is not our job to remove all risk from the restaurant industry,' she says. Other U.S. cities like Chicago are also dealing with impacts of the hotly debated ordinance, and Massachusetts voters recently rejected a tip credit elimination and minimum wage hike law. Jonathan Nelms, owner of Georgian restaurant Supra and longtime D.C. resident, spoke out at the June hearing about the motives behind enforcing I-82. 'Why did the government feel the need to get involved in private enterprise? I don't think you did. I think an out-of-state organization came in and ran these campaigns for deceiving initiatives that have fooled D.C. voters twice,' he says. 'They all failed to understand that we as restaurant owners have to pay the difference, the tip makeup.' D.C. chef Rock Harper, who runs fried chicken joint Queen's Mother, echoed that sentiment as a small business owner who's far from a Stephen Starr. 'I wish I was a part of this 'millionaire class.' I live in a little joint across the bridge. I've worked almost 30 years to try to get my business up and this [I-82] thing is hurting us and not working the way it was intended,' he says. He reveals he lost $40,000 in December, and I-82 was one big factor as to why. The early years of I-82 has also impacted Better Hospitality Group, which runs Boardwalk Bar & Arcade, Easy Company, and Takoda. 'Our longest-standing team members have left the D.C. hospitality market and our current team members are struggling to get by due to decreased tips and the limited number of shifts we have available,' says CEO Ryan Seelbach. 'We're reaching the point of the $35 hamburger. It's not sustainable.' — Andrew Kline, Partner vertias He says I-82 has left owners like himself with three options: decrease staffing levels, on top of raising menu prices or adding service fees to guest checks; or close. Veritas Law co-founder Andrew Kline, who represents many of RAMW's members, also broke down the pitfalls of I-82 during the June hearing. 'You can't triple front-of-house wages without having a replacement source of revenue,' he says. 'The numbers are astronomical. I mean, we're reaching the point of the $35 hamburger. It's not sustainable.' Northern Virginia-based data firm MarginEdge, which represents about 600 small restaurant owners in D.C., tracked a nearly 16-percent average spike in D.C. menu prices from May 2023 (soon after I-82 went into effect) to July 2025. (While MarginEdge can't directly attribute these increases to I-82, it notes that 'prices have risen significantly over that same period.') 'The reality is, there's not a playbook,' says MarginEdge CEO Bo Davis, who also runs local sushi chain Wasabi. 'Prices on menus are going to have to be higher in D.C. than other markets. It's challenging for people to swallow.' The budget will now go to Bowser, and the bill will be sent to President Donald Trump for submission to Congress for final approval. Eater DC All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
