
Supreme Court of Texas Issues Unanimous Ruling in Favor of Houston Mother in Landmark Parental Rights Case
The ruling reverses a judgment handed down by a Harris County district court judge in 2020 that granted a lifetime protective order against Christine Stary on behalf of her three minor children. The order came about five months after Ms. Stary was accused of injuring her youngest child in an incident at her home, but criminal charges stemming from the incident were dismissed.
Holly Draper, CEO and managing partner of The Draper Law Firm, represented Ms. Stary before the state's highest court in tandem with former Texas Supreme Court Justice Eva Guzman, on behalf of the Family Freedom Project, which works on legislation and cases that impact the right of families to raise their children.
Ms. Draper argued that the order granted against Ms. Stary violated her client's constitutional rights because it prohibited her from having any contact with her children forever without meeting the required level of evidence. Ms. Stary also was barred from raising evidence of domestic violence committed by her ex-husband.
The Supreme Court's opinion delivered by Justice Jane Bland says in part, "We hold that constitutional due process requires clear and convincing evidence to support a protective order prohibiting contact between a parent and her children under the statute authorizing protective orders of longer than two years."
Ms. Draper said, 'My client lost almost five years of time with her children due to this unconstitutional protective order, and she can never get that back. She is thrilled with the court's ruling and looks forward to the opportunity to build back a relationship with her children. With this ruling, no parent will have their rights terminated without the constitutionally protected standard of clear and convincing evidence.'
You can read the Supreme Court of Texas opinion on this case here.
About The Draper Law Firm
The Draper Law Firm is a family law boutique in North Texas. Its attorneys handle family law cases in all DFW counties and represent family law clients in appeals statewide. The firm previously prevailed in the Supreme Court of Texas in one of the biggest parental rights cases in Texas history, In re C.J.C. To learn more, visit draperfirm.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
17 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Behind Trump's decision to tax Brazil to save Bolsonaro
'This is nothing more, or less, than an attack on a Political Opponent -- Something I know much about!' President Donald Trump posted online Monday. 'It happened to me, times 10.' Bolsonaro said he had been pushing senior White House officials to place sanctions on the Brazilian judge overseeing his father's prosecution. Advertisement Then, on Wednesday, Trump opted for something far more damaging: a 50% tariff on all Brazilian imports starting Aug. 1, retaliation for what he called a 'witch hunt' against Jair Bolsonaro. The shift from imposing sanctions on a single judge to threatening an entire nation of 200 million with harsh tariffs was Trump's decision alone, according to two people familiar with the meeting at which the president discussed his decision and who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a private conversation. The move showed Trump's new willingness to use tariffs to settle political scores, regardless of questions of legality, because of their sheer power to cause economic destruction and impose intense political pressure. 'I love it,' Steve Bannon said in an interview Thursday. Bannon had long called on Trump to take action against the Brazilian Supreme Court justice, Alexandre de Moraes, but he said that even he hadn't thought of tariffs. Advertisement Now, he said, Brazil's road out of the sudden crisis is simple: 'If you drop the trial and drop the charges, the tariffs go away.' Doesn't that sound like extortion? 'It's MAGA, baby,' Bannon replied. 'It's a brave new world.' Eduardo Bolsonaro, a right-wing Brazilian pundit named Paulo Figueiredo and lawyers for Rumble, a video site popular with conservatives that has been banned in Brazil, have been lobbying senior administration officials and members of Congress for months. Congress has held hearings, and White House officials have been briefing Trump, Bannon said. Trump has not needed much convincing. 'Trump decided to come out swinging with full force. That really says a lot about Trump, doesn't it?' said Eduardo Bolsonaro, who has been living in Texas since February while under investigation in Brazil for interfering in his father's case. 'It's that same witch hunt he also suffered in the United States, and that generates a lot of empathy.' Eduardo Bolsonaro has spent years building inroads to Trump's world, learning English and showing up in Washington before the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida resort, on election night in 2024. He said he has dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Trump's decision has now created the biggest diplomatic crisis between the Western Hemisphere's two most populous nations in more than a decade, as well as a major challenge for President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil just as he begins to position himself as a candidate in next year's elections. Advertisement Lula has responded swiftly and forcefully, saying Brazil would not drop the charges against his predecessor and would place its own new tariffs against American imports. 'Brazil is a sovereign nation with independent institutions and will not accept any form of tutelage,' he said in a statement Wednesday. The feud between Trump and Lula began Sunday. Irritated by the Brazilian president's comments about unfair trade during a gathering with fellow leaders from the BRICS alliance of emerging economies, Trump issued a warning: any country aligned with the group's 'anti-American' policies would face an additional 10% tariff. The next day, Trump singled out Brazil. 'Brazil is doing a terrible thing on their treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro,' he said in a post. 'He is not guilty of anything, except having fought for THE PEOPLE.' Lula, the man who defeated Bolsonaro in the polls, struck back. 'He needs to know that the world has changed,' he told reporters. 'We don't want an emperor.' Two days later, Trump announced the 50% tariffs, citing the prosecution of Bolsonaro and orders by Moraes to tech companies to remove accounts that he said threatened Brazil's democracy. Trump also incorrectly cited a trade deficit. The United States, in fact, ran a $7.4 billion trade surplus with Brazil last year. Lula, whose approval ratings have been waning, now finds himself in a bind. On one hand, a tariff war with Brazil's second-biggest trading partner could deliver painful economic shocks before the election. On the other, caving to Trump on a criminal case that many in Brazil view as critical to preserving the nation's democracy would be antithetical to Lula's politics. He has for years criticized the history of U.S. interference in Latin America, including support for the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964-85. Advertisement Trump's tariffs are the 'interference of one country in the sovereignty of another,' Lula said in an interview on national television Thursday night. 'And, more seriously, the interference of a president of one country in the judiciary of my country.' He said he planned to call on the World Trade Organization, which was created to coordinate global tariffs and trade rules, to weigh in on the levies -- but that he had no plans to call Trump. 'Right now, I have nothing to discuss with the president,' he said. The Brazilian government is studying the possibility of applying tariffs to specific American industries, but it is cautious about imposing broad-based reciprocal tariffs, since those are likely to hurt Brazilian companies that rely on imported U.S. materials, according to a senior Brazilian official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss closed meetings. If Lula cannot stave off the tariffs, Brazil's economy stands to suffer. The United States is the top buyer of Brazilian steel and coffee, and the second-largest buyer of Brazilian beef. Trade between the two countries had been deepening. Brazilian exports to the United States reached a record $40.3 billion in 2024, accounting for about 15% of Brazil's total shipments abroad. And in recent months, Brazil had been a winner in the global tariff war. Its beef exports to the American market doubled and its coffee shipments increased by over 40% in the first five months of the year, as threats of tariffs by Trump on other major exporters like China and Vietnam made Brazilian products more attractive, according to an analysis by Logcomex, a trade data provider. Advertisement Some analysts said the crisis creates political opportunity for Lula, whose declining popularity had left him slightly trailing Jair Bolsonaro in polls for next year's election. (Bolsonaro is actually not eligible to run until 2030 after Brazil's electoral court ruled he sowed baseless doubts about Brazil's election systems.) 'Lula should be as happy as ever,' said Thomas Traumann, a political analyst and former press secretary for a leftist Brazilian president. 'He now has a foreign enemy, and anything that happens economically he can blame on Trump and Bolsonaro.' The new tariffs would take effect just before Bolsonaro is poised to stand trial on charges that he oversaw a vast conspiracy to cling to power after losing the 2022 election to Lula. Brazilian prosecutors say he aimed to overturn the vote, dismantle the courts and hand special powers to the military. After Bolsonaro lost the election, thousands of his supporters set up camp in front of army barracks across the country, demanding a military intervention. On Jan. 8, 2023, thousands of those supporters stormed federal buildings in Brazil's capital. Prosecutors accuse Bolsonaro of encouraging them. In the most explosive charge, prosecutors also say Bolsonaro was aware of a plot to assassinate Lula, Moraes and the vice president-elect. Bolsonaro has denied the accusation. Brazilian police point to digital evidence, like cellphone records and USB drives, that show a government official twice printed out the assassination plans at the presidential offices. On one of those occasions, Bolsonaro was at the offices, while in the second instance the official brought the plans to the presidential residence, prosecutors said. Bolsonaro has denied plotting a coup, but he told the Supreme Court last month that he and other officials studied ways to hold on to power using 'other alternatives within the constitution.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Miami Herald
18 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Behind Trump's decision to tax Brazil to save Bolsonaro
Since March, the son of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro has been roaming the halls of the White House. Eduardo Bolsonaro, 41, is a sitting Brazilian member of congress, but his latest job has been to convince U.S. officials that a dangerous Brazilian Supreme Court justice wants to throw him and his father into prison, simply for fighting against what they claim was a stolen election. And in multiple visits to Washington over the past several months, he has found a sympathetic audience. 'This is nothing more, or less, than an attack on a Political Opponent -- Something I know much about!' President Donald Trump posted online Monday. 'It happened to me, times 10.' Bolsonaro said he had been pushing senior White House officials to place sanctions on the Brazilian judge overseeing his father's prosecution. Then, on Wednesday, Trump opted for something far more damaging: a 50% tariff on all Brazilian imports starting Aug. 1, retaliation for what he called a 'witch hunt' against Jair Bolsonaro. The shift from imposing sanctions on a single judge to threatening an entire nation of 200 million with harsh tariffs was Trump's decision alone, according to two people familiar with the meeting at which the president discussed his decision and who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a private conversation. The move showed Trump's new willingness to use tariffs to settle political scores, regardless of questions of legality, because of their sheer power to cause economic destruction and impose intense political pressure. 'I love it,' Steve Bannon said in an interview Thursday. Bannon had long called on Trump to take action against the Brazilian Supreme Court justice, Alexandre de Moraes, but he said that even he hadn't thought of tariffs. Now, he said, Brazil's road out of the sudden crisis is simple: 'If you drop the trial and drop the charges, the tariffs go away.' Doesn't that sound like extortion? 'It's MAGA, baby,' Bannon replied. 'It's a brave new world.' Eduardo Bolsonaro, a right-wing Brazilian pundit named Paulo Figueiredo and lawyers for Rumble, a video site popular with conservatives that has been banned in Brazil, have been lobbying senior administration officials and members of Congress for months. Congress has held hearings, and White House officials have been briefing Trump, Bannon said. Trump has not needed much convincing. 'Trump decided to come out swinging with full force. That really says a lot about Trump, doesn't it?' said Eduardo Bolsonaro, who has been living in Texas since February while under investigation in Brazil for interfering in his father's case. 'It's that same witch hunt he also suffered in the United States, and that generates a lot of empathy.' Eduardo Bolsonaro has spent years building inroads to Trump's world, learning English and showing up in Washington before the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot and at Mar-a-Lago, Trump's Florida resort, on election night in 2024. He said he has dined with Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Trump's decision has now created the biggest diplomatic crisis between the Western Hemisphere's two most populous nations in more than a decade, as well as a major challenge for President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil just as he begins to position himself as a candidate in next year's elections. Lula has responded swiftly and forcefully, saying Brazil would not drop the charges against his predecessor and would place its own new tariffs against American imports. 'Brazil is a sovereign nation with independent institutions and will not accept any form of tutelage,' he said in a statement Wednesday. The feud between Trump and Lula began Sunday. Irritated by the Brazilian president's comments about unfair trade during a gathering with fellow leaders from the BRICS alliance of emerging economies, Trump issued a warning: any country aligned with the group's 'anti-American' policies would face an additional 10% tariff. The next day, Trump singled out Brazil. 'Brazil is doing a terrible thing on their treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro,' he said in a post. 'He is not guilty of anything, except having fought for THE PEOPLE.' Lula, the man who defeated Bolsonaro in the polls, struck back. 'He needs to know that the world has changed,' he told reporters. 'We don't want an emperor.' Two days later, Trump announced the 50% tariffs, citing the prosecution of Bolsonaro and orders by Moraes to tech companies to remove accounts that he said threatened Brazil's democracy. Trump also incorrectly cited a trade deficit. The United States, in fact, ran a $7.4 billion trade surplus with Brazil last year. Lula, whose approval ratings have been waning, now finds himself in a bind. On one hand, a tariff war with Brazil's second-biggest trading partner could deliver painful economic shocks before the election. On the other, caving to Trump on a criminal case that many in Brazil view as critical to preserving the nation's democracy would be antithetical to Lula's politics. He has for years criticized the history of U.S. interference in Latin America, including support for the military dictatorship that ruled Brazil from 1964-85. Trump's tariffs are the 'interference of one country in the sovereignty of another,' Lula said in an interview on national television Thursday night. 'And, more seriously, the interference of a president of one country in the judiciary of my country.' He said he planned to call on the World Trade Organization, which was created to coordinate global tariffs and trade rules, to weigh in on the levies -- but that he had no plans to call Trump. 'Right now, I have nothing to discuss with the president,' he said. The Brazilian government is studying the possibility of applying tariffs to specific American industries, but it is cautious about imposing broad-based reciprocal tariffs, since those are likely to hurt Brazilian companies that rely on imported U.S. materials, according to a senior Brazilian official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss closed meetings. If Lula cannot stave off the tariffs, Brazil's economy stands to suffer. The United States is the top buyer of Brazilian steel and coffee, and the second-largest buyer of Brazilian beef. Trade between the two countries had been deepening. Brazilian exports to the United States reached a record $40.3 billion in 2024, accounting for about 15% of Brazil's total shipments abroad. And in recent months, Brazil had been a winner in the global tariff war. Its beef exports to the American market doubled and its coffee shipments increased by over 40% in the first five months of the year, as threats of tariffs by Trump on other major exporters like China and Vietnam made Brazilian products more attractive, according to an analysis by Logcomex, a trade data provider. Some analysts said the crisis creates political opportunity for Lula, whose declining popularity had left him slightly trailing Jair Bolsonaro in polls for next year's election. (Bolsonaro is actually not eligible to run until 2030 after Brazil's electoral court ruled he sowed baseless doubts about Brazil's election systems.) 'Lula should be as happy as ever,' said Thomas Traumann, a political analyst and former press secretary for a leftist Brazilian president. 'He now has a foreign enemy, and anything that happens economically he can blame on Trump and Bolsonaro.' The new tariffs would take effect just before Bolsonaro is poised to stand trial on charges that he oversaw a vast conspiracy to cling to power after losing the 2022 election to Lula. Brazilian prosecutors say he aimed to overturn the vote, dismantle the courts and hand special powers to the military. After Bolsonaro lost the election, thousands of his supporters set up camp in front of army barracks across the country, demanding a military intervention. On Jan. 8, 2023, thousands of those supporters stormed federal buildings in Brazil's capital. Prosecutors accuse Bolsonaro of encouraging them. In the most explosive charge, prosecutors also say Bolsonaro was aware of a plot to assassinate Lula, Moraes and the vice president-elect. Bolsonaro has denied the accusation. Brazilian police point to digital evidence, like cellphone records and USB drives, that show a government official twice printed out the assassination plans at the presidential offices. On one of those occasions, Bolsonaro was at the offices, while in the second instance the official brought the plans to the presidential residence, prosecutors said. Bolsonaro has denied plotting a coup, but he told the Supreme Court last month that he and other officials studied ways to hold on to power using 'other alternatives within the constitution.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025


The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Judges rule against Trump appeal in E. Jean Carroll case
A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled to uphold a jury verdict that determined President Trump was guilty of sexually abusing and defaming writer E. Jean Carroll. The three-judge panel issued a mandate to affirm the previous district court ruling despite the president's attempts to appeal the ruling that sided with Carroll, who claimed that he sexually abused her at a New York City department store in the mid-1990s. 'Thursday, July 10th, 2025 So long, Old Man! The United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, bids thee farewell,' Carroll wrote in a post celebrating the ruling on X. However, Trump may attempt to submit another appeal to be considered for review before the Supreme Court. He has 90 days to submit a request to the high court. A White House spokesperson described Carroll's case as 'liberal lawfare' in a statement sent to CNBC. 'The American People are supporting President Trump in historic numbers, and they demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoaxes, the defense of which the Attorney General has determined is legally required to be taken over by the Department of Justice because Carroll based her false claims on the President's official acts, including statements from the White House,' the spokesperson told the outlet. The Hill has reached out to the White House for comment.