Oil market's ho-hum response to Iran strike seen as "remarkable"
Why it matters: "It's remarkable to have such a limited risk premium in the face of this uncertainty and potential for escalation," oil scholar Ben Cahill of the University of Texas-Austin told Axios via email.
Driving the news: There's geopolitical risk premium built into what's a well-supplied market — you can see the initial jump when Israel struck Iran on June 13.
But prices are not heading into orbit despite Iran's parliament weekend saber-rattling about closing the Strait of Hormuz.
Brent prices rose around 5% when trading opened last night but quickly fell back.
Traders don't appear to believe — for now — that the conflict will expand in ways that significantly stymie oil flows in the region.
What they're saying: "The market continues to shrug off more geopolitical risk than I would have thought possible a few years ago," Cahill said.
"But that's been the story of the oil market since Oct 7, 2023, and arguably since Abqaiq," he said, referring to the 2019 strikes on the vital Saudi crude oil stabilization center.
The intrigue: The aftermath of Iranian proxies' strikes on the site offers a lesson, said Ellen Wald, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.
"[T]raders learned from the Abqaiq attacks that Aramco has incredible reserves of crude oil stored away and the ability to tap into that to ensure the uninterrupted flow of oil."
With the Saudis currently holding back considerable output, an oil market disruption would be temporary, she adds.
Zoom in: Wald told Axios it would be "incredibly difficult" for Iran to block the strait that handles about a fifth of the global oil trade.
Ships can be re-routed away from the Iranian portion of the channel that also includes Omani waters, she notes.
Israel and the U.S. have air superiority, so attempted naval action could be deterred from above.
"Iran also doesn't want to jeopardize its own oil exports," she said via email.
Catch up quick: Iran's parliament yesterday offered a symbolic endorsement of closing the waterway, but any decision would rest with regime leaders.
Yes, but: Iran retains capacity to interfere with the strait in ways that prompt shippers to avoid it, RBC Capital Markets' Helima Croft said in a note, though extended closure would be very tough given the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet in Bahrain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
US deadlines in Ukraine are a gift to Putin and Xi
President Trump's announcement this week of a shortened window of '10 to 12 days' for Russian President Vladimir Putin to reach a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine reflects a continued evolution in his rhetoric. His growing frustration with Moscow and his willingness to speak plainly about Russia's escalation send a signal that many in the U.S. and Europe have been waiting to hear. But while the shift in tone signals growing frustration, it has not translated into action. Russia reads the action as a continued pause in pressure, which it has used to intensify its offensive against Ukrainian homes and hospitals. Russian forces are now making their fastest territorial gains in more than a year, and their attacks are becoming more sophisticated. Swarm tactics using Iranian-designed Shahed drones, now mass-produced and adapted inside Russia with Chinese parts, are overwhelming Ukraine's air defenses at an alarming rate. In just one day last month, Russia launched 728 drones, decoys and missiles in a single coordinated wave. Ukrainian interceptors and radar crews are doing heroic work, but they are stretched to the limit. The U.S. has tools at its disposal that remain unused. For months, a bipartisan sanctions bill, co-authored by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and backed by 85 senators, a veto-proof majority, has been ready to move. The legislation would impose steep secondary tariffs on countries like China, India and Brazil that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, and would significantly raise the cost of doing business with Moscow. But in July, Senate leadership pulled the bill from consideration after President Trump suggested he would act if Russia failed to move toward peace within 50 days. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said he would 'hold off' on advancing the bill, signaling that Congress would defer to Trump's timeline. House leaders followed suit. That decision was a mistake. While it is encouraging to see President Trump express increasing resolve, deferring congressional action in the hope that Putin will suddenly negotiate has only given Moscow more time and space to escalate. Every week of delay is a missed opportunity to tighten the financial pressure on Putin's war machine. And the clock is not just ticking in Ukraine. The broader contest involves China, too. Beijing's role in this war has become increasingly visible. Chinese companies are supplying entire weapons systems, not just components. Chinese-made drones and decoys are helping Russia saturate Ukrainian airspace. Chinese officials have even welcomed delegations from occupied Ukrainian territories and continue to sell heavy machinery to companies operating there. European officials report that China's foreign minister recently told the EU that Beijing does not want Russia to lose the war and fears that a Russian defeat would allow the U.S. to focus more squarely on Asia. Ukraine has responded accordingly. In early July, Kyiv arrested two Chinese nationals on espionage charges after they allegedly attempted to steal information about Ukraine's Neptune missile program. Days earlier, President Volodymyr Zelensky imposed sanctions on five Chinese firms accused of supporting the Russian war effort. These are not symbolic gestures, they are signs that Ukraine is increasingly realistic about the stakes and about China's alignment with Moscow. Support for Ukraine is not a distraction from U.S. competition with China. It is a critical part of it. Weakening Putin's military capacity weakens a key pillar of China's global strategy. And allowing Russia to continue its aggression without consequence would embolden Beijing's worst instincts from the Taiwan Strait to the South China Sea. To its credit, the Trump administration has begun voicing stronger concerns about Beijing's role. In the recently concluded round of trade talks, senior U.S. officials reportedly raised objections to China's purchase of sanctioned Russian oil and its sale of more than $15 billion worth of dual-use technology to Moscow. These are important warnings — but without follow-through, they risk being absorbed into the pattern of delay that Moscow and Beijing are already exploiting. The Graham-Blumenthal sanctions bill should move forward. It represents the most serious effort yet to impose real costs not only on Russia, but on the network of countries (especially China) helping it survive sanctions. It complements, rather than competes with, the administration's efforts to pressure Moscow. And it sends a message that the U.S. is serious about backing up its warnings with action. Countdowns can be useful. They create urgency. But urgency without follow-through is no substitute for strategy. What matters now is not how many days remain on the clock, but whether we are using each one to act. Jane Harman is a former nine-term congresswoman from California and former ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, who most recently served as chair of the Commission on the National Defense Strategy. She is the author of 'Insanity Defense: Why Our Failure to Confront Hard National Security Problems Makes Us Less Safe.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is LeBron James's reported international league legit - or just a ploy for NBA ownership?
Yahoo Sports senior NBA reporter Vincent Goodwill is joined by SNY's Ian Begley to discuss the report that the Lakers superstar met with Nikola Jokic's agent about potentially launching an international professional league -- and what's the real motive behind the move. Hear the full conversation on 'Good Word with Goodwill' and subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube or wherever you listen. View more Video Transcript The internet was abuzz with LeBron James, Maverick Carter, his business partner, and Nikola Jokic's agent on a boat, sipping wine somewhere, throwing off his sports, those people over there, and my friend Nick Wright. He's very close with LeBron and his people and mentioned that conversation was about an international basketball league, almost similar to LIV Golf with the Saudis and their money. I don't think this is going to be Saudi money, but just an alternative basketball league. They're planning on it being six men's teams. Six women's teams. Full-time responsibility for players, which means you cannot play in the NBA and play in this international basketball league. Players can get equity. Do you see this as, let's just say, a leverage ploy for a guy like LeBron because we know LeBron wants to get in on NBA expansion and NBA ownership, or is this a viable alternative to poach real-time NBA talent? Yeah, I think more so the former because we know he wants to own a team. They've been vocal about that. They haven't been operating in the shadows. They've been very public with that. And so, um, if that's the goal. Then the other league funding this other, getting involved in this other league doesn't make a lot of sense, unless you're trying to tamp down what you might have to pay to get in the NBA and using this as kind of, something to say, hey, Adam Silver, we've got the guys together, we have the money together. We could do this, you need to figure something out for us on the other end. So maybe its that you look at valuations and the sales of these teams and Celtics and Lakers, and I can only imagine how high that number is, to get into Seattle or get into Vegas, expanding into these new cities. It's going to be an astronomical figure. So, LeBron, part of, I believe, Fenway Sports Group, would have to put together a significant amount of money to get in. Maybe that's the factor here that that is kind of behind the scenes that, we're not really thinking about reporting on, but maybe that's what's there ultimately. Close
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Startup launches project to create fuel for near-infinite energy machines: 'We can do it in a facility the size of a Starbucks'
If Austin's Hexium successfully delivers a key fusion fuel isotope, it will be thanks to a storyline that includes lithium, lasers, and technology developed in the 1980s. And it will all amazingly happen inside a building the size of a Starbucks, one of the men behind the effort told TechCrunch. "We don't have to build a facility the size of a Costco or a football stadium," co-founder Jacob Peterson said in the story. "We can do it in a facility the size of a Starbucks, and we achieve good economics at very small scale, and then we just parallelize our process." Peterson and co-founder Charlie Jarrott have already been making headlines for California-based Focused Energy, which was founded to develop laser-based fusion power at a $65 million facility. Hexium is intended to gather a key part of fusion fuel from lithium, a complicated and necessary hurdle for labs from around the world that are trying to harness the power of the sun. The process often involves huge magnetic machines designed to contain swirling plasma and extreme heat. "I realized no one is working on this supply chain stuff," Jarrott told TechCrunch. While Focused and Hexium use lasers, the process is different at each company. For the latest effort, the laser tech dusts off a U.S. Department of Energy approach called atomic vapor laser isotope separation to corral lithium isotopes. Lithium-6 is the rare one needed for fusion fuel. The government had planned to use lasers to complete the same task for uranium isotopes for common fission power plants. But after the Soviet Union fell, nuclear fuel was more widely available from old Russian weapons-grade uranium, according to the TechCrunch story. Unlike fission, fusion does not produce long-lasting nuclear waste or carry a meltdown risk, answering safety concerns from critics. Fusion combines particles, creating new atoms to make energy; fission splits them. The challenge for fusion is sustainably maintaining reactions that involve temperatures hotter than the sun, all per government reports. Hexium announced $9.5 million in seed funding in the spring. The experts are tweaking the government laser process to accommodate lithium. They can hone low-energy beams to separate lithium-6 from lithium-7 in vapor metal clouds. The lasers will condense lithium-6 into a liquid, where it will run into a trough for collection. The isotope will be sold to fusion labs to make fuel. Lithium-7 can be used in traditional nuclear operations, all according to TechCrunch. Hexium's website also noted medical and industrial uses for the collected isotope. The team plans to have a pilot plant running this year making up to hundreds of pounds of lithium-6. Should we be harnessing the ocean to power our homes? Absolutely Leave it be It depends I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. It's an exciting update for nuclear energy, which produces abundant power with no heat-trapping air pollution. NASA links rising temperatures to increased severe weather risks, including floods. However, fusion isn't yet ready for sustainable production. And nuclear power is increasingly costly and slow to develop, Colorado energy think-tank co-founder and physicist Amory Lovins told The Cool Down. He said that solar and wind projects are the fastest, cheapest form of energy to build in response to growing grid demand. It's an energy source that can be leveraged at home, as well. Tax credits of up to 30% expire at the end of the year, thanks to President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, but EnergySage can help you lock in the rebates before they expire. The incentives and the right installer can save you thousands of dollars. What's more, the tech can reduce or eliminate your power bill. North Carolina State University's Clean Energy Technology Center has a database of perks offered at the state level, as well. At Hexium, the founders see potential in fusion immediately, specifically providing a key resource to make the fuel needed for experiments. "There isn't a single company that is going to make the fuel for those companies," Jarrott told TechCrunch. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
