'We have to try lifting ourselves': USAID workers fired months ago are still scrambling for jobs
Wayan Vota, who spent decades improving technology across developing countries, created a Substack site to help his former colleagues search for new jobs. But he doesn't have one himself.
Sara Gopalan, who worked as a USAID contractor for 20 years, surveyed nearly 100 other humanitarian aid workers who, like her, are currently searching for new employment.
Roughly 95% said they had lost savings and retirement funds, 60% lost access to health care, and 37% have already lost their housing. Many said they will have trouble paying their bills in the coming months.
"The job market is now flooded with these highly-skilled professionals, many of whom have dedicated 10, 20, 30, or even 40 years to international development work," said Gopalan, of Silver Spring, Maryland, who has applied for more than a dozen jobs. "The burden of pivoting after, say 30 years, feels insurmountable and weighs heavily on their heart."
The former aid workers also reported experiencing anxiety, depression, grief, stress, and even shame. It wasn't just the loss of a job, Gopalan said, it was the destruction of their career and their life's passion.
Those feelings resonate with Lindsay Alemi, a contracted worker who lost her job in March.
"I worked through three administrations and worked through all of the ebbs and flows, as we helped some of the poorest regions in the world," said Alemi, 39, who also lives in Silver Spring.
"To have done everything as a good Samaritan your whole life and then to see people call USAID a scam and a fraud, is gut-wrenching," said Alemi, who has done humanitarian work since she was in college. "This is more than just a job for us, this is a calling."
Billionaire and top Trump adviser Elon Musk called USAID a "criminal organization" earlier this year, without providing evidence, saying it was "time for it to die."
The aid organization was the first target in the massive cuts that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has made across the federal government in what he calls an attack on wasteful spending.
Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates slammed Musk and the administration for the USAID cutbacks, saying they would lead to the death of millions of children around the world. 'The picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one,' Gates said in an early May interview with the Financial Times.
And though Americans like to complain about how many of their tax dollars support the rest of the world, nearly 9 in 10 Americans (86%) overestimate how much of the federal budget goes to international aid, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation poll released in March.
USAID comprises less than 1% of the U.S. federal budget, roughly $40 billion a year. About $1 for every $167 the government allocates is used for foreign aid. For decades, USAID has had bipartisan support in Congress because it built good-will for the United States abroad, helped combat infectious diseases that might spread here, and prevented local problems from becoming global ones.
The KFF poll found that two-thirds of Americans agree with Gates that eliminating USAID will lead to more illness and death globally, but almost half (47%) believe that dissolving it will reduce the deficit and help fund domestic programs.
Of those surveyed, believe the U.S. spends too much on foreign aid, but when they were informed that foreign aid accounts for a tiny percentage of spending, that percentage dropped to 50% among Republicans, 39% among independents and just 15% of Democrats.
"We live in the largest country that is willing and wants to support others; there's a moral obligation to lift those less fortunate," Vota said. "Now, we have to try lifting ourselves."
Vota had been working as a senior digital management adviser, in a role primarily funded by USAID. For two decades, he'd worked to improve technology across Africa and Asia, including in Nigeria, Ghana, Zambia, Malawi, Tanzania, and Indonesia.
Now 52, Vota told USA TODAY he was recently passed over for a private sector tech job because, despite his time in "crazy" cities like Jakarta, he was told they doubted he could keep up with the pace.
Another hiring manager near his Chapel Hill, North Carolina home worried Vota wouldn't be a good salesman, though Vota let him know: "I have convinced adult men in Tanzania to go for voluntary medical circumcision, and I increased our rate of circumcision by 50% …If I can convince grown men to get circumcised, I think I can sell plumbing supplies in North Carolina."
He didn't get the job.
The Substack site Vota created the day after he was laid off, called Career Pivot, helps his former USAID colleagues update their resumes and actively search for new jobs.
The free site features job listings as well as mental health resources, discussion boards, and networking events. A major emphasis of Career Pivot is helping former federal employees and contractors translate their skills into terms the private sector understands.
The site has more than 12,000 subscribers, he said, many of whom are mid-to-senior-level staffers who have spent the majority of their professional lives in the international development field.
"There are thousands ofhumanitarian workers with deep, rich, beautiful experiences who are self-motivated and dedicated, who are struggling to define their value to private sector employers who speak a completely different language," said Vota, comparing the site to a startup which now also helps former federal employees from other agencies.
Gopalan, 42, a married mother of three kids, is among those using Career Pivot. has spent more than 20 years working as a USAID contractor for five organizations monitoring, evaluating and creating policies for USAID-funded programming for developing countries, before being put on a DOGE-implemented administrative leave. Her job ends June 1.
On hold: US Supreme Court halts reinstatement of fired federal employees
Gopalan said, according to USAID Stop-Work, a coalition including current and former USAID-related employees and other supporters, nearly 177,000 jobs have been lost among governments and institutions involved in global assistance.
"Whether these are American federal workers or those who receive USAID funding, the dismantling has been done so chaotically, it has caused such irreparable damage, and is so unnecessary to do to public servants," Nidhi Bouri, USAID's former deputy assistant administrator for Global Health, told USA TODAY.
Many of the displaced humanitarian workers are suffering from "layoff trauma," said Dr. Anne Justus, an American Clinical Psychologist living and working in Cairo since 2007. The sudden loss of a job that is appreciated worldwide, but demeaned by many in their homeland, is devastating, Justus said.
"These people are certainly not doing it to be wealthy; they truly want to do global community building, and the ripple effect is widespread and enormous," said Justus, who recently gave a presentation to Vota's Career Pivot members. "They are not even sure about what they are going next."
Whatever jobs the former humanitarian workers may hold going forward, it might not compare to the impactful work they did, said Charles Kenny, a senior fellow for the Center for Global Development. He said those workers who were let go in similar shuttering agencies, including the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Education, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, for example, are facing similar circumstances.
"These are smart, enterprising and driven people, and some will find jobs they like a lot less because it might mean doing a lot less good in the world," Kenny said. "I hope they will find them rewarding in whatever capacity."
'Will I have a job?': Federal workers full of uncertainty, fear over Trump, DOGE plans
As a project manager for a USAID-funded nonprofit, Alemi worked to prevent malnutrition and starvation in Zimbabwe and Madagascar. Her programs spent tens of millions of tax dollars buying crops grown in America ‒ which now may not have a buyer, harming Americans as well as Africans, she said.
Diplomacy dismantled: USAID aimed for 'soft power' but ended up in DOGE's crosshairs. Here's how.
Alemi has applied for about 30 jobs, but other than a few rejections, she's heard nothing. The mother of four said she's getting worried she might lose the home she and her partner bought in 2021 with a 3% mortgage interest rate, less than half the national average.
"No good news yet," Alemi said. "There's nowhere to go for everybody in our sector, so you may have to be open to making an entire career change."
Still, Alemi, Gopalan and Vota say they remain optimistic.
"My dream is that I hope I can get a job by the end of summer," Vota said. "I don't know if that will happen. "
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: DOGE cuts: USAID workers fired months ago still scrambling for jobs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
20 minutes ago
- New York Times
Senators Work All Night on Trump's Bill, Breaking a Record and Twisting Arms
As the sun rose over another steamy day in Washington on Tuesday, senators donned fluffy blankets and pullover sweatshirts to gird against the frigid temperatures inside the United States Senate chamber. They had been there all night debating and voting on consequential legislation carrying President Trump's domestic agenda, including large tax reductions and cuts to social programs that could affect Americans' lives and the nation's fiscal health for years to come. But as the debate rolled into a third day, the bleary-eyed lawmakers could barely keep track of what they were doing. Not long after 7 a.m., Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, said he would withdraw an amendment he had offered — 'whatever the hell the number was,' he added with a chuckle, drawing laughter from his equally exhausted colleagues. The Senate began its so-called vote-a-rama, a marathon of rapid-fire votes that precedes the passage of budget-related measures, on Monday morning around 9:30. More than 45 votes later, dawn broke on Tuesday with no definitive word of when senators would vote on final passage of the measure — though they had passed a different milestone, setting a record for the most active such vote-a-thon in history. It came after Senator John Thune, Republican of South Dakota and the majority leader, worked through the night to secure enough votes from his party to pass its 940-page bill and send the legislation to the House in time to deliver it to Mr. Trump by July 4, as the president has demanded. He appeared on the floor in the early morning hours sipping a red beverage — reportedly an Emergen-C immune booster — drawing a challenge from Democrats who charged him with violating the Senate rule that the only permissible drinks on the floor are water or milk. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Miami Herald
24 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Starbucks' huge new rival opens first US stores
Whether at an airport, gas station, mall, on the street, or even abroad, you will surely stumble across a Starbucks location nearly anywhere. It is one of the world's best-known coffee houses, with over 40,000 locations in 80 countries. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter However, its business has faced some declines over the last few quarters, leading it to enact a huge turnaround strategy to improve its overall business. Related: Starbucks faces huge new rival Recently, U.S. consumers have opted to purchase their daily cup of coffee from smaller chains like Dutch Bros (BROS) , Scooter's Coffee, and 7 Brew Coffee, where traffic has grown more quickly than at Starbucks. Although Starbucks' traffic may be declining slightly compared to past years, none of these smaller chains has convinced enough consumers to switch sides, as their sales have yet to reach the coffee giant's numbers. Image source:Luckin Coffee (LKNCY) entered the coffee market in 2017 when it opened its first store in Beijing, 46 years after Starbucks launched. By then, Starbucks (SBUX) had already become a massive chain, so when this Chinese coffee shop entered its sector, it most likely flew under the radar. However, Luckin Coffee took off quickly and became China's largest coffee chain in 2023, surpassing Starbucks in the region. In less than 10 years since its inception, the chain has already built over 24,000 stores in Asia, and now it's ready to dominate other markets by entering new territories. Related: Starbucks brings back fan-favorite menu item after 2-year hiatus Although Americans might not be familiar with Luckin Coffee, its blue-and-white deer logo is unmissable. It caught people's eye immediately when it was spotted in two locations for the first time in New York City. The chain's logo and "Opening Soon" signs were seen at 755 Broadway and at 800 6th Ave, but the official date for the grand openings was kept a secret for weeks. Luckin Coffee revealed that it officially opened both of its New York City stores as of June 30, marking its debut in the U.S. market. This Chinese coffee chain is known for its high-quality coffee and wide range of menu options at affordable prices. However, with the U.S. having a different economy and currency, it's no surprise that Luckin Coffee's U.S. prices would be higher than those at its Asia locations. More Retail News: McDonald's menu adds new version of a much-mocked classicStarbucks makes huge investment to solve a key problemMcDonald's menu adds new Happy Meal fans will love Over the last few months, Starbucks has made multiple changes to its menu by simplifying it and eliminating extra charges after receiving backlash for raising prices. This is a timely move, given that Luckin Coffee has expanded to the U.S. When comparing their menus, both coffee chains carry handcrafted coffee beverages, frappes, matcha drinks, and refreshers. Their prices are also very similar, with a 16-ounce drip coffee costing $3.45. Now, it's up to U.S. consumers to decide if they will remain loyal to Starbucks or swap it out with the new coffee brand in town. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This is what is driving record high retirement contributions
The average American is putting nearly 8% of their paycheck into their retirement savings, according to Vanguard. Yahoo Finance Senior Columnist Kerry Hannon joins Market Catalysts to discuss what's driving increased contributions, as well as record-high hardship withdrawals. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Americans are saving for retirement in their employer provided retirement plans at record levels according to a new Vanguard report. The average US adults put away nearly 8% of their paycheck last year. Here with the latest, we've got Yahoo Finances Carrie Hannan. Carrie, what's fueling this rise in saving? Yeah, Brad, this is great news, isn't it? And if you pair that with what the employer matches, that gets to almost 12% or to 12% which is a record high. It's right in that 12 to 15% of your salary you should be saving that most analysts recommend. So what's really pushing this is auto enrollment. This is like across for 1k plans, employers are automatically, no waiting period, putting people automatically into their 401k plan. They're deferring them to 4 to 6% of their salary, and generally they're putting them into target date retirement funds. Then, to make it even sweeter, each year, they're doing auto escalation. If the employee doesn't decide to bump up their contribution limit, they say okay, anywhere from 1 to 2%, they're automatically pushing it up. This is super for really fueling retirement savings that fights back against I know you may have felt it, I have inertia, you know, feeling like you're may you're going to make a bad investment so you do nothing. So this is really a super change that we're seeing for retirement savers and and I love seeing these numbers. So, the report also showed more savers opting for the Roth 401k. Why is that? Yeah, isn't it and this again, Brad is something that's still relatively new, but more and more plans are offering a Roth option for their employees to put their contributions aside. Now as you know, it is not you do pay tax on that money. It's not tax deferred, but that automatically goes into it goes into your pay uh into your retirement fund from your paycheck and so you don't you do pay the tax going in, but you're not going to pay the tax on the growth of that investment nor when you withdraw the money at retirement. There are some you know it's it's very uh it's really an incentive that people are kind of understanding, hey, I think I'll do some tax planning for my future today if they don't need the tax deduction right now. And so one blip in the Vanguard report was an uptick in hardship withdrawals from retirement. What does that tell you, Carrie? Yeah, here's the thing. I mean, yeah, I mean it's super cool that there's more people piling money into their retirement savings. This is something a message we've been trying to get out there. Uh but uh this again, the withdrawals from retirement plans were at record highs according to Vanguard last year. This is concerning. It's not a huge amount, I get that, but it's still concerning. And people who are withdrawing from their retirement accounts um with these hardship withdrawals, if you're not 59 and a half, you're paying tax on that and you're going to pay a 10% penalty and you're losing retirement savings for your future. Um this is something that when Vanguard asked people why they were taking these out, it was usually for housing foreclosure for medical expense or uh simply uh in order to to make ends meet. So I think it's really important to pay attention uh to this and we talk about this on this program, emergency savings, people need some financial uh guidance on what they need to have set aside if possible. Carrie, thank you so much. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data