
Greens founder is booted from his own party as he takes a parting shot: 'I knew I was gone'
Drew Hutton, who established the Australian Greens in 1991 with future parliamentary leader Bob Brown, has been kicked out of the Queensland branch he had established following a state council meeting on Sunday.
The 78-year-old environmental activist said the state branch he set up 35 years ago had been taken over by extreme transgender activists, who he argued had downplayed the dangers of puberty blockers and the need for biological women to have separate change rooms from biological men.
'The QLD Greens state council has just expelled me from the party,' he said.
'I knew I was gone the moment I walked into the room.'
Hutton, who also set up the Lock The Gate alliance in 2011 to campaign against coal seam gas mining on agricultural land, said environmentalists were now outnumbered in the party he set up.
'Not one environmental activist in the room. The only issues the Greens are really interested in are queer and transgender,' he said.
'When people learn what they are really on about, the Greens will be lucky to ever win a seat again.'
Queensland Greens convener Gemmia Burden said delegates had voted to expel Hutton for breaching party rules on transgender issues.
'Delegates from Queensland Greens branches have upheld the Constitution and Arbitration Committee's (CAC) ruling to expel Drew Hutton for breaching the Queensland Greens Code of Ethics,' she told Daily Mail Australia.
'This decision reflects the Greens' position as endorsed by its membership - that trans rights are non-negotiable human rights, a position publicly reaffirmed in 2022.
'No one should be subjected to violence or hate speech on the basis of their gender, nor their race, sexual identity, ethnicity, or religion.
'Respectful debate is the fundamental basis upon which members of the Queensland Greens make decisions, and the vast majority of members do so without breaching party rules.'
Burden said Hutton's comments 'went beyond respectful and robust discussion - they were harmful to the safety and wellbeing of people within the party and the broader community'.
Greens leader Larissa Waters, who hails from Queensland, is declining to intervene to save Hutton's membership.
'This was an independent decision of the party, via the governance processes established by the membership, and with a clear outcome. Nobody is above the rules,' she said.
The 78-year-old environmental activist said the state branch he set up 35 years ago had been taken over by transgender activists who had downplayed the need for biological women to have separate spaces from biological men (he is pictured protesting in 1983)
'Good governance means that people can put their case forward, including the right to appeal a decision. In this case the appeal was unsuccessful.'
But former Queensland Greens senator Andrew Bartlett, who was previously also a party campaign convener, said Hutton's expulsion highlighted how Greens members were now self-censoring their opinions on transgender issues.
'I don't think the party has a good capacity for self-reflection and for handling differences of opinion that are seen as critical for those that are in control,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
'Most political parties have a core group of people that have the main control and power over things, and I don't think they take criticism of them very kindly and that leads to people not speaking at all when they do have concerns; I think is unhealthy for any organisation.
'If they have some general concerns, they feel like they've just got to keep their mouths shut.'
Bartlett said former Greens leader Adam Bandt, who said trans rights were 'non-negotiable', had set the tone of the party nationally.
'It's not unique to Queensland - it's a view amongst the wider party that we need to be unequivocal,' he said.
He added Hutton's membership status should have been dealt with two years ago.
'It's been sitting there for like two years bubbling away - I think it's better if there's significant concerns about a serious difference of opinion that's seen as important enough, then it's better to try and bring it to the surface quickly,' Bartlett said.
Hutton had a series of Facebook posts in April criticising the transgender movement in the UK, arguing biological women needed safe spaces from biological men and that puberty blockers were a bad idea.
'A recent YouGov survey in the UK showed huge majority opposition to biological males, self-identifying as females, having access to women's sport and change rooms,' he said.
'Also majority support for biological sex as the defining element of woman and almost universal opposition to giving puberty blockers to children.
'Any political party supporting the extremist trans agenda will be lucky to make double figures once their position is widely known.'
Hutton said a Greens member of Chinese ancestry had written to him comparing his treatment to something out of the Chinese Communist Party.
'I'm getting many messages from Greens members expressing support for my appeal against suspension,' he said last week.
'Here is a particularly moving statement this Chinese-Australian member has sent to his branch reminding us that this is an issue about real people as well as principle.'
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government won a landslide majority in the lower house of Parliament but needs the Greens in the Senate to pass legislation opposed by the Coalition.
The Greens lost three of their four lower house seats at the last federal election in May, including the Queensland electorates of Brisbane and Griffith, as voters also kicked out former leader Adam Bandt in Melbourne.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Australia to lift import ban on US beef after Trump tariffs tiff
Australia will lift restrictions on the import of beef from the US, a trade barrier which had angered the Trump beef has effectively been banned from the country - which has some of the strictest biosecurity laws in the world - since 2003 after an outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as mad cow White House cited the restrictions when explaining tariffs imposed on Australia in April, as part of US President Donald Trump's so-called Liberation Day Australian government has denied the timing of the decision was related to the trade tiff, saying a decade-long department review found the US had improved beef safety measures. Canberra technically lifted the ban on US beef in 2019, but cattle from Mexico and Canada remained on the blacklist, and the integration of their supply chains meant this essentially barred beef from the States the US has recently introduced better cattle tracing protocols, allowing authorities to track where they were raised and respond more effectively in the event of a disease Agriculture Minister Julie Collins said the department had undertaken a "rigorous science and risk-based assessment" and was now "satisfied" that the US is managing any biosecurity threats."This decision has been purely based on science," she said in a statement."The Albanese Labor government will never compromise on biosecurity."But the opposition has suggested the government may have done just that."It looks as though [the ban has] been traded away to appease Donald Trump, and that's what we don't want," Nationals leader David Littleproud told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)."I want to see the science."Cattle Australia chief executive Will Evans, however, told the ABC he was "comfortable" with the decision and that the industry had to "put faith" in the added that US was an important trading partner with whom Australia needed to maintain a good US is Australia's biggest beef export market, worth A$14bn (£6.8bn, $9.2bn) last singled out the industry when imposing what he called "reciprocal" tariffs of at least 10% on all Australian a report by Meat and Livestock Australia released in June found the beef tariff had not hurt trade, which had risen by about a third so far this year.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Albanese government plotted to maintain native forest logging in NSW if court battle was lost, documents show
The Albanese government was so worried a court case could halt native forest logging in northern New South Wales that it drew up plans to essentially sidestep federal environment laws in the event of a loss, documents released under freedom of information laws (FoI) reveal. The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, played a key role as the commonwealth and NSW governments worked to ensure some logging could continue in the face of any 'adverse decision' and to manage a potentially volatile situation between loggers and environmentalists. In the end, the planning wasn't needed, because the government won the case. Justice Melissa Perry ruled in the federal court in 2024 that the north-east regional forest agreement (RFA) was legitimate, despite the fact it was amended in 2018 without fresh scientific studies regarding the impact on threatened species. The initial 20-year RFA between the commonwealth and the state of NSW commenced in 2000. Shortly before it was due to expire, it was varied and extended for at least a further 20 years. The North East Forest Alliance conservation group challenged the 2018 north-east RFA on the grounds it was not a 'regional forest agreement' within the meaning of the RFA Act and therefore neither the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act nor the RFA Act applied 'to exempt forestry operations … from the approval processes'. The alliance argued the new agreement didn't properly assess 'environmental values' including old growth, wilderness, endangered species and world heritage values, along with 'principles of ecologically sustainable management'. If the federal and state governments had lost the court case, there could have been an immediate halt to logging in northern NSW forests and lengthy processes to assess areas one by one under the commonwealth's environment laws. The Albanese government was concerned such a decision could lead to environmentalists demanding an end to logging. The prime minister wrote to his environment and agriculture ministers in 2023 seeking updates on how to deal with any forestry shutdown, the FoI documents show. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter Forestry Corp of NSW and other private forest owners would have been forced to put in approximately 1,700 applications to show their activities were consistent with federal environment laws. That process would have taken months. In July 2023, the then environment minister, Tanya Plibersek, and then agriculture minister, Murray Watt, wrote to Albanese stating: 'Thank you for your correspondence dated 23 May 2023, regarding forest management and seeking advice on strategy and preparedness to manage the impacts on communities if the federal court finds … that the north-east regional forest agreement as varied in 2018 is not a regional forest agreement for the purposes of the … Act.' The ministers, in their letter, said: 'While we await judgment, our departments have been working closely with the NSW government to consider implications for forestry operations in north-east NSW and options for government to prepare for and manage potential impacts of an adverse decision.' A separate ministerial briefing note to Plibersek in November 2023 states: 'This area is highly biologically diverse, supporting approximately 300 threatened species and approximately 22 endangered or critically endangered ecological communities listed as matters of national environmental significance under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Listed threatened species in the region include species that attract public attention and focus such as the Greater Glider, Swift Parrot and Koala.' The federal department of environment warned that the number of assessments needed if they lost the court case would be 'extremely high' and officers would need to be transferred from other sections to handle the workload. There would also be political and economic fallout for the government, the department warned in the briefing. 'Given the time required to complete environmental approval processes, we expect there will be sustained pressure over many months after the judgment to provide support to both the larger public and smaller private operators.' The environment law requirements would be seen as a barrier to the resumption of logging operations and could lead to calls for an industry transition package, the department said. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion One memo noted that the Victorian government had paid out $875m in industry support to close down its native timber industry. Bureaucrats also advised that 60% of NSW's high-grade sawlogs were coming from north-east forests and that this could leave NSW with a timber shortage. Another memo, also dated November 2023, explored several alternatives to keep the industry operating and effectively sidestep federal environment laws. The details were heavily redacted but included giving the state power to authorise logging under a special bilateral agreement between the federal government and NSW. A national interest exemption under the federal environment laws was also considered. This would have involved Forestry Corp applying to the federal environment minister and was seen as a possible short-term solution. Fast-track assessments were considered for Forestry Corp. This would still have taken six to nine months and there were concerns Forestry Corp lacked the scientific information about threatened species needed to quickly apply. There was also a suggestion Forestry Corp could 'self-assess' to determine any impacts of national environmental significance. The department was warned, however, that it could expect to receive complaints from environmentalists that Forestry Corp's activities were already breaching federal law. The Australian Conservation Foundation said the FoI documents showed that if the carve-out for native forest logging from federal environmental laws was to end, the environment department was prepared. 'For the sake of Australia's much-loved wildlife, we need to move to a post-RFA world,' the foundation's national biodiversity policy officer, Brendan Sydes, said. 'The environment minister, Murray Watt, should bring native forest logging under the national nature law as part of the reforms of the EPBC Act he's promised to introduce into parliament early next year. 'Failing to close the native forest logging loophole will mean threatened species like koalas and greater gliders continue to get pushed closer to extinction.'


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labor lifts ban on US beef, saying new measures ‘effectively' manage biosecurity risks
Labor will lift restrictions on imports of US beef, easing tensions with the Trump administration as the federal government seeks relief from punishing US tariffs on steel and aluminium. The government confirmed on Thursday morning that the Department of Agriculture would allow the imports into Australia, saying the US now 'effectively' manages biosecurity risks in beef production. A ban on beef from cows raised and slaughtered in the US was lifted in 2019 but restrictions remained on beef from cattle raised in Canada and Mexico but slaughtered in the US. Changes to make protections more robust introduced in late 2024 and early 2025 allow for meat from those countries to be traced through supply chains to their source farm. The concession is expected to help pave the way for the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, to argue the case to Donald Trump that Australia should be given exemptions from the US's 50% tariff on steel and aluminium, and a looming 200% tariff planned for pharmaceuticals. Sign up: AU Breaking News email The US president specifically cited Australia's restrictions on beef imports when he announced his 'Liberation Day' tariff regime. Australia faces a 10% baseline tariff on all products exported to the US. During the federal election campaign, Albanese said Australia would not change or compromise any biosecurity rules, 'full stop, exclamation mark'. Despite the comments, a concession on beef had been expected from Australia. The agriculture, fisheries and forestry minister, Julie Collins, said the government wanted fair and open trade, which significantly benefited the cattle industry. 'The US beef imports review has undergone a rigorous science and risk-based assessment over the past decade,' she said. 'The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry is satisfied the strengthened control measures put in place by the US effectively manage biosecurity risks. 'Australia stands for open and fair trade – our cattle industry has significantly benefited from this.' The new arrangements are due to come into place from 28 July, with Australian importers able to apply for permits to handle fresh beef products from the US, the largest buyer of Australian beef, ahead of China, in a $14bn market. The shadow finance minister, James Paterson, called for Albanese to explain the new arrangements. He said farmers needed reassurance there would be no risk to their businesses. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The prime minister himself has said that we couldn't relax the restrictions on the importation of US beef because of serious biosecurity concerns,' Paterson told Sky News. 'So if the government has found some way of dealing with that issue, protecting our domestic agricultural industry from the introduction of foreign diseases and pests, then they should say so.' The Nationals frontbencher Bridget McKenzie warned against sacrificing farmers for 'deficiencies' in the government's handling of the US alliance. 'We need a biosecurity arrangement that's based on science,' she told Channel Nine. 'We would be concerned around, particularly the protocols on the slaughtering of beef out of Canada and Mexico, because we do not want to bring those diseases into our country and our farmers and our industry shouldn't be sacrificed because the PM can't get his act together on this relationship.' McKenzie said Nationals MPs 'will be very concerned if our $11bn beef export industry is sacrificed to actually make up for the deficiencies in the Anthony Albanese-United States diplomatic relationship.'