Letters to the Editor: DCC, heritage and Gaza
The Dunedin City Council has nearly chalked up four decades of moving beyond the legacy of the pre-1989 local body amalgamation.
With amalgamation of the St Kilda borough, it was promised a new South Dunedin Public Library would be established. What a battle that has been, to see this promise honoured.
Then, until 1989, with Green Island being a separate borough, the sewage from the Dunedin City hill suburbs, directed down Kaikorai Valley, could not continue on into another borough for treatment, so was (ingenious idea at the time) channelled through a pipe, via the original 1870s Caversham railway tunnel and through South Dunedin to Musselburgh.
Since 1989, the much larger Dunedin City Council has had the opportunity to rectify this anomaly. Even with the lobbying from the cycling fraternity in recent decades to upgrade the original 1870s Caversham railway tunnel and turn it into an integral part of a new cycle way, the lobbying has certainly not fast tracked the removal of the sewage pipe.
Come on DCC bureaucracy, stop treating the South Dunedin community with the blatant contempt that has become all too obvious. None of our local streets should be subjected to repeats of contaminated flood waters such as those of our respective residents in Surrey St, who have been putting up with this diabolical situation for several decades now. The cumulative four decades of bureaucratic culture in the DCC reminds one of the phrase: to push water uphill. Heritage and housing
Re Lyndon Fairbairn's comments (Opinion ODT 2.7.25) in "A masterclass in how to block progress" I would note that Dunedin is renowned for its heritage appeal. Christchurch, sadly, has very few heritage places to retrofit.
The current carbon copies of homes crammed in together, built in 10+ Dunedin suburbs, diminishes the streetscape of each suburb. They do not enhance the heritage look and feel of Dunedin as a whole.
As a past developer, I budgeted for the cost of "red tape", that you say, "stifle progress". As a prudent financier I totally concur with the councillor, who claimed we were "leading the industry". The checks and balances were made to protect others.
On one hand you say, "once New Zealand's fourth largest city, Dunedin is falling behind" yet at the same time also urge, "the needs of a growing population". Which is it?
The comments about Dunedin having poor housing catastrophises, is unnecessary and harsh. As a prudent landlord who ensures that each apartment is totally Healthy Homes compliant, I find it alarming to read your evaluation of Dunedin rentals and see that as not becoming from a professional man like yourself.
I have seen so many two-storeyed wooden lookalike, little boxes. Are we creating the slums of the future?
We must make retrofitting our first option to protect our heritage established by the early pioneers (who fled from a lack of space, overcrowding and oppressive conditions) and give people appealing, interesting, architecture that will meet Healthy Home requirements, to live in.
[Abridged — length. Editor.] Fitting session
How ironic that David Seymour accuses Te Pāti Māori of "insane views" and being in Parliament to "wreck it" (democracy) when it is his party's Regulatory Standards Bill that is the real wrecking ball for democracy. Likewise Shane Jones calling the Otago Regional Council the "Kremlin of the South Island" when it is his party trumpeting the fast-track legislation which is attempting to sideline the democratic process. When the cap fits. Painting a reminder of respected literary figures
Congratulations to Quinn Bailey and others involved in the Connect[ed] exhibition at the Dunedin Public Art Gallery. ( ODT 3.6.25).
The painting that features prominently behind Quinn is worthy of a bit more mention than the title, Artist and Dunedin Writer Friends . This work by the late Dunedin artist Ivan Hill was featured at the Artists and Writers Exhibition back when the gallery was still located at Logan Park circa 1994. Ivan depicts himself floating downward with a glass of wine and surrounded by tumbling kereru to join his writer friends.Those featured include George Griffiths, Hone Tuwhare, Errick Olssen, Peter Olds, Cilla McQueen, Brian Turner and Roger Hall.
If Ivan were alive today he would take great pride in knowing his work would feature in this worthwhile health/art concept It's a scandal
Page 3 ODT 24.6.25: $16m support package for Ukraine. Headline below: Housing project cuts 'perfect storm' for rise in homelessness. People living in tents locally while our government scatters money frivolously. Scandalous. Mayor's letter post-Gaza vote slap in face
Thank you for your article on the mayor's letter ( ODT 3.6.25): it does help mitigate the shock at this slap in the face for it not to be swept under the rug.
As one of those who got the ball rolling, the main thing I'd like readers to understand is that we came to the Dunedin City Council with this, to ask them for cross-party support.
To the question "is it appropriate for council to be requesting the government to ask their own MPs to support a minor opposition party's Bill?" I'd say emphatically yes, it is. Because council were given a clear roadmap. They were told: "Only six more coalition MPs are needed to give this an urgent first reading at central government. Thanks to a new tool, Standing Order 288, MPs can vote their conscience. We don't believe a good conscience stops deadlocked at political party lines. Here at local level, you're also a broad political church. You have community backing. So you have an opportunity here, with somewhat lower stakes, to light the path for the higher-ups."
That's why Cr Garey said the mayor's letter undermined the whole idea. Councillors were directly asked to consider a conciliatory approach and they chose to make it party political and divisive.
Faced with the ethical dilemma of "might this give a party we disagree with a windfall?" versus "how can we help alleviate locals' suffering?" detractors decided the former was more important.
It was irrelevant who had introduced this Bill. We all would have preferred the sitting government to put forward their own legislation well before more than the combined tonnage of Dresden, Hamburg and London in World War 2 was dropped on Gaza.
It is a small strip of land roughly the size of Invercargill but home to 2.1 million people, half of whom are children.
Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Opinion: community wellbeing about more than roads and water
Because of climate change, South Dunedin needs several billion dollars spent on it, either in costs that will be borne by those who live there, or in prevention by many more of us who don't. It's critical that whatever is done, the wellbeing of the nearly 10,000 people who live there is considered as much as the money. Our sense of home and shared spaces is bound intimately into our health — physical and mental — and our opportunity for fulfilled lives, individually and together. Perhaps some of this money might have been saved if at every local body election, the electorate hadn't swung hard at the "keep rates low" target; meaning maintenance and smart upgrades were constantly deferred. It's the "wicked cycle" of voting, electing, feeling like not much is happening, building frustration, diminishing trust, lower turnout, curdling into resentment about councillor pay and public expenditure for others (some loathe the stadium, others think DPAG should charge an entrance fee), while the deferred maintenance mounts up. Partly, it's that most of us don't understand how much decision-making is out of councillors' hands, to a degree we'd never put up with in central government. It's hard to get stuff done in local government. But the thing is, we live here together. The four wellbeings — social, economic, cultural, and environmental — baked into the Local Government Act really matter. Do the bus routes make sense and is there a stop near yours? Are there speed limits outside your children's school? Does your significantly older community have an immensely popular swimming pool for physio, exercise, connection? Are there playgrounds near your children's home, do your kids adore reading time at the library? Is there an arts / film / music festival? Fireworks at New Year? These are the places where we come together and are Dunedin, and what makes Dunedin a great place to live. Yet here we are again, with government looking to remove the four wellbeings in favour of roads and water, which are somehow neutral of quiet neighbourhoods, accessible parks, safe schools, community, belonging. As if we were not people but units. But if the DCC or ORC don't take care of this ... who will? If you would like to support the mission's work with a donation, please visit and search for the Methodist Mission.
Scoop
4 days ago
- Scoop
Dunedin Airport Art Protest
Remember that its a climate emergency and in 2018 our government committed to halving emissions by 2030 under the terms of the historical Paris Agreement? Tuesday July 22nd 2pm at Dunedin airport Recently I began a small ongoing 'art meets activism project' with my colleague, Craig Hilton, in which a person simply stands in a high profile place with a small A3 sign saying 'It's a Climate Emergency'. This well dressed person (me) stands somewhere quietly with a small A3 sized sign around my neck saying 'It's a Climate Emergency' and any interesting interactions with passersby or the authorities are documented by Craig. He is not obviously part of 'the protest' but just standing somewhere close by in case something happens which is worth documenting. Yesterday we went out to Dunedin airport, which is jointly owned by the Dunedin City Council, who declared a climate emergency in 2019 and the government, who declared one in 2020. You might think someone standing there with a small and uncontroversial sign reminding the airport of its owners stated policy wouldn't provoke much of a reaction at all? Well, you'd be wrong. It only took a couple of minutes before airport security and police turned up and asked us to leave. It should be noted that I approached the information desk as soon as we arrived and introduced myself and said I'd be wandering around a little bit with this sign and they didn't seem to think it would be a problem. Our timing wasn't random – we were there to greet some of the passengers coming off one of Jetstar's three new direct flights a week from the Gold Coast to Dunedin. These new international flights have provoked a price war with Air New Zealand with both companies offering a greater range of discounted international flights. Remember that it's a climate emergency and in 2018 our government committed to halving emissions by 2030 under the terms of the historical Paris Agreement? The man from airport security he made it clear he wanted us to leave immediately. We hadn't interacted with any of the passengers coming off the plane and I doubt they even noticed me but apparently we were both causing 'a problem.' As a long-time climate activist and artist I can't help but notice the increasing disconnect between the reality of the terrifying and ongoing ecological catastrophe which is overwhelming the planet and the head down 'business as usual' approach which is being promoted by this government, as well as much of the mainstream media. As a passionate believer in free speech and the right to protest, I find it surprising that an old man standing quietly at the airport with a small sign can provoke a police response. Many people stand at the airport holding small signs to highlight themselves to arriving passengers for 'legitimate business reasons' and it's obvious that my tiny sign wasn't the problem, it was the words on it. I elected not to leave until I was trespassed and was duly taken round the corner to the police part of the airport and given a formal trespass notice from the airport for two years. As a climate activist I stopped flying on planes many years ago so this was hardly an imposition. To be clear – I am not saying I don't want anyone to ever fly again but I do want people to understand that their holiday choices have real world implications which affect us all. A return flight from Dunedin to the Gold Coast for one person produces roughly 1.3 to 2.6 tonnes of CO2 per passenger. The average New Zealander individually produces around 7 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (t CO2-e) per year so if two people take a return trip to the Gold Coast then this one return flight will produce up to five tonnes of emissions which is a big whack of someone's annual total and recent climate models (see – 'The Mortality Effects of Carbon' by Daniel Bressler -published in the journal 'Nature Communications' in 2021) predict that just four return flights with around 250 people on board could produce enough emissions to kill someone by heat related causes by the end of the century, not counting all of the fires and floods etc. I would like people to be more aware of their carbon footprints and try to do the best they can to reduce them at a time when people and animals are already dying all over the world from the effects of this ongoing climate emergency. I am not against people making important visits to see their relatives and for other important reasons but I do want people to know the true possible costs of a quick holiday in the sun.
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Dunedin councillors flooded with 'highly orchestrated' emails after supporting Green Party bill
Each elected member of the Dunedin City Council has received more than 2200 emails. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Dunedin's mayor and councillors have been flooded with thousands of emails after declaring their support for the Green Party's proposal to sanction Israeli politicians. Each elected member of the Dunedin City Council has received more than 2200 emails in what has been described as an orchestrated backlash to their support for the Unlawful Occupation of Palestine Sanctions Bill. Chlöe Swarbrick's members' bill would direct sanctions at Israeli ministers and Knesset members as well as military leaders who support the occupation of Gaza, West Bank and East Jerusalem - similar to sanctions imposed on Russian leadership for its illegal war on Ukraine. Dunedin councillor Christine Garey said the emails, which arrived over several hours on 7 July, appeared to be a campaign from a group based in the United States. The broad, impersonal emails - seen by RNZ - criticised "anti-Israel resolutions that unjustly vilify Israel", and asked recipients not to call for a "financial and military aid boycott of Israel". They began flooding in from about 1:30am, each with a slightly different subject line, Garey said. While only sent to the mayor and councillors, they also featured a CC list of New Zealand and United States leaders. "They were all quite carefully crafted - it was highly orchestrated," Garey said. She reported the emails to the council's IT staff, who she said blocked the senders later that morning. Two and a half weeks earlier, Dunedin City Council's Community Services Committee voted in favour of Mayor Jules Radich writing to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters asking government MPs to back Swarbrick's bill. Half of those around the council table were opposed, but a casting vote from chair Marie Laufiso broke the tie. Garey, who introduced the motion, said the bizarre email response had galvanized her to keep using her voice and influence on behalf of Dunedin's Palestinian community. "It says to me that we have made an impact... we touched a nerve and, to be honest, it's a badge of courage because it attracted this attention. It just reminds us how important this issue is.... the plight of our Palestinian community in Ōtepoti Dunedin," she said. The council previously called for a ceasefire in Gaza and for special humanitarian visas for the families of New Zealand's Palestinian community. Those resolutions had triggered some email traffic but nothing like the most recent onslaught, Garey said. In a statement, Dunedin City Council chief information officer Graeme Riley confirmed each councillor received a total of 2284 emails between 4 and 14 July, relating to the Unlawful Occupation of Palestine Sanctions Bill. The council was not taking any further action, he said. "It is not uncommon for council to receive bulk emails when considering contentious issues, but this example would be at the extreme end of the spectrum in terms of volume." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
