logo
Five Years After 2020's 'Racial Reckoning,' Defunding The Police Is As Necessary As Ever

Five Years After 2020's 'Racial Reckoning,' Defunding The Police Is As Necessary As Ever

Refinery2909-07-2025
Sandy Hudson is an activist, public intellectual, creative, and the author of Defund: Black Lives Policing and Safety for All. In this op-ed, she looks back on the five years since 2020's ' racial reckoning ' and makes the case for why defunding the police is the only way to support a model of security and protection that increases public safety overall.
The 2020 uprisings feel like a fever dream. May marked the five-year anniversary of George Floyd's murder, and there's no doubt that the dizzying whitelash that predictably follows groundswells for racial justice is here, replete with its manifold macroscopic abuses against Black psyches — including rumors and calls from noted conservative public figures for President Trump to consider pardoning Mr. Floyd's murderer, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. The most charitable reading of the whitelash and its champions would assume they think there were scores of new policies implemented in response to the so-called 'racial reckoning', and that those imagined policies went 'too far.' Well, that's far from the truth.
In 2020, the 'Defund The Police' movement saw more mainstream coverage than ever before.
And what were those policies activists were calling for? For decades, we have been calling for governments to invest in programs and services that prevent harm, address social issues that can lead to unsafe conditions, and create new emergency services for the crisis issues people may experience and for which a police response is inappropriate. For example, ensuring there are enough properly trained adults in public schools to support child development, like nurses, counselors, and librarians, rather than police; investing in housing support for people who find themselves struggling with housing, rather than policing and harassing the homeless; and implementing new mental health emergency services, through which people in crisis can receive professionally trained medical intervention.
'
There is no reforming an institution that was created for the purpose of violent coercive control into a service that provides safety.
sandy hudson
'
There is such a large proportion of tax dollars allocated to policing as a stand-in strategy for education, housing, mental health, and other social issues, and we calling for policies that actually address these issues directly, rather than tossing them over to the police to deal with through the only tools they have access to: violence. And yes, some of these recommendations began to get public traction in 2020 – many of which are codified in the M4BL-sponsored People's Response Act, and which have the support of several lawmakers, including Congresswomen Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib.
But like everything else emerging from white supremacy, there is nothing rational about the ideas behind the whitelash. Their justifications are based in fantasy. While some major cities, like New York, Los Angeles, Austin, and Minneapolis, initially committed to defunding their police departments and reinvesting in public services and programs to prevent violence, most walked back their promises. In Minneapolis, the 2024 police budget is about $50 million more than what was spent on police in 2020.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Pantheon Books (@pantheonbooks)
And popular meager reforms that allocated more funding to police — like adopting the use of body cameras, providing additional training, or new oversight bodies — have failed to make a dent in police violence. In fact, more people were killed in the United States by police officers in 2024 than in any other year in the past decade. The problem is getting worse; not better. Some successful measures providing non-police options for emergency response, like the CAHOOTS crisis assistance program in Eugene, Oregon, have had to be discontinued due to a winding down of federal support. Trump issued an Executive Order to review and potentially rescind existing consent decrees issued by the Justice Department under previous administrations mandating police reform. And the license the Trump administration is giving policing agencies like ICE to terrorize migrants is indefensible — resulting in the harassment, detention and banishment of veterans, students, children, and hardworking people just trying to provide for their families.
All the while, the police continue to fail at the main thing we're told we need them for: safety.
'
Police are a threat to safety. Black communities know it. Migrant communities know it. Students and faculty engaging in peaceful protests on their campus know it.
sandy hudson
'
There is a reason why the activists and advocates who have been doing this work the longest say the only way forward is to defund the police, and put that funding into programs and services that create conditions of safety, preventing violence and harm before it starts. Besides the fact that policing has proven itself largely ineffective at addressing violence over its 250-year modern history, there is no way a service focused on response could ever address our myriad safety needs in a way that prevents violence altogether. Policing doesn't even accomplish its punitive agenda successfully–University of Utah professor of law Shima Baradaran found the conviction rates after an arrest was less than two percent per year. Her investigation found '97 percent of burglars, 88 percent of rapists, and over 50 percent of murderers get away with their crimes.'
And consider gender-based violence, one of the most common expressions of violence in our society. Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and other forms of gender-based violence are shamefully permitted to fester in our society because we continue to devote the lion's share of the responsibility to address it to police. More than 80 percent of women in the United States have experienced some form of sexual harassment, and one in five will experience a completed or attempted sexual assault — and yet, less than 22 percent of rapes are even reported to the police, in part because victims and survivors are aware of how futile a report can be. The cyclical attempts at reforming police that occur after yet another unbearable incident of police violence or corruption reaches public consciousness never seem to solve the problem because they can't. There is no reforming an institution that was created for the purpose of violent coercive control into a service that provides safety. These objectives are at cross purposes.
Just think of the safest places you know. Are they surrounded by cops? Of course not. But they are well resourced.
While we seemingly always have to do with less public funds for services we know create safer communities, like education, healthcare, housing, and public infrastructure, there is an unending pile of money for police.
Police are a threat to safety. Black communities know it. Migrant communities know it. Students and faculty engaging in peaceful protests on their campus know it. Journalists who are attacked by police while trying to cover demonstrations know it.
That's why it's crucial that we interrupt the cycle. We cannot have another 2020, followed by a series of attempts to implement ineffective reforms, followed by yet another whitelash. Activists and advocates must stay the course. Sometimes movements for justice look like the eruption we saw in 2020, but more often they are slow and steady refusals to stay silent as injustice persists. For all you who were moved in 2020, remember that the only way to prevent the systematic interruption of life caused by police is to remove the resources that enable them to harm us. The only way forward is to defund them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump addresses pardon decision for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, but questions remain
Trump addresses pardon decision for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, but questions remain

USA Today

time12 hours ago

  • USA Today

Trump addresses pardon decision for Sean 'Diddy' Combs, but questions remain

President Donald Trump is breaking his silence on pardoning Sean "Diddy" Combs for the first time since he was acquitted of the most serious charges in a federal sex-crimes trial last month. In an interview that aired Friday, Aug. 1 on Newsmax with host Rob Finnerty, Trump discussed the possibility of presidential pardons for convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, Combs and former Rep. George Santos. After Finnerty asked, "Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Would you consider pardoning him?" Trump responded: "Well he was essentially, I guess sort of, half-innocent. I don't know what they do, he's still in jail or something. He was celebrating a victory but I guess it wasn't as good of a victory." Trump 'should not pardon' Sean 'Diddy' 'Diddy' Combs, Megyn Kelly says On July 2, jurors found Combs not guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking ex-girlfriends Casandra "Cassie" Ventura Fine and a woman known as "Jane" in his sweeping trial that nearly lasted two months. He was convicted July 2 on two of the five counts against him for transporting those same women for prostitution, which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years per count. During the interview, Trump said "probably..." before pausing and revealing to Finnerty, "You know, I was very friendly with him, I got along with him great, seemed like a nice guy. I didn't know him well, but when I ran for office he was very hostile." The Newsmax host noted then that "he said some not so nice things about you, sir." "Yeah, and it's hard. You know, like you, we're human beings and we don't like to have things cloud our judgement, right?" the president continued. "But when you knew someone and you were fine and then you run for office and he made some terrible statements… so I don't know... it makes it more difficult to do." Then, Trump replied, "I'd say so," when Finnerty clarified by asking if it was "more likely a no for (pardoning) Combs?" In the interview, Trump was seemingly referencing Combs' expletive-filled 2017 comments in The Daily Beast, essentially saying that "(Black people) don't really" care about Trump. "The tomfoolery that's going on in D.C., that's just regular everyday business to Black folks," Combs told the left-leaning outlet in-part, adding later in the interview that he had to "keep it focused on that self-love that we need to give our race." Trump first weighed in on the possibility of pardoning Combs on May 30 in the Oval Office. "Nobody's asked" about a pardon, the president said. "But I know people are thinking about it. I know they're thinking about it. I think some people have been very close to asking." Trump added, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He really liked me a lot." Despite last month's verdict, Combs' legal saga continues. On Wednesday, July 31, lawyers for Combs requested his acquittal, or a new trial altogether, in court documents reviewed by USA TODAY. A day earlier, conservative host Megyn Kelly urged Trump against potentially pardoning Combs. Kelly said in an X post on July 30 that "Trump should not pardon Diddy" because "he doesn't deserve it." "He's a Trump hater. He's a woman abuser. MAGA is already upset over elites seeming to cover for each other. This would not help. GOP struggling w/young female voters, most of whom will HATE a Diddy pardon," Kelly wrote. Contributing: Taijuan Moorman

TIMELINE: Evolution of Mamdani's defunding police rhetoric to this week's 'damage control'
TIMELINE: Evolution of Mamdani's defunding police rhetoric to this week's 'damage control'

Fox News

time13 hours ago

  • Fox News

TIMELINE: Evolution of Mamdani's defunding police rhetoric to this week's 'damage control'

New York City socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani made headlines this week when he attempted to walk back his long track record dating back to 2020 of criticizing the New York Police Department and calling for it to be defunded. On Wednesday, Mamdani told reporters after the death of an NYPD officer in midtown Manhattan that he is "not running to defund the police" and is "a candidate who is not fixed in time, one that learns and one that leads, and part of that means admitting, as I have grown, and part of that means focusing on the people who deserve to be focused about." Mamdani added that his past calls to defund the police had been made out of "frustration" over the death of George Floyd. Fox News Digital reviewed his comments on positions on police dating back to the days after Floyd's death. June 5, 2020 "Two cops knocked a harmless old man to the ground and let him bleed out on the pavement," Mamdani posted on X. "All that's happened to them is a suspension without pay - and their colleagues think even that's too much. There's no reforming this system. Defund the police." June 28, 2020 "We don't need an investigation to know that the NYPD is racist, anti‑queer & a major threat to public safety," Mamdani posted on X. "What we need is to #DefundTheNYPD. But your compromise uses budget tricks to keep as many cops as possible on the beat. NO to fake cuts – defund the police." July 3, 2020: "We need a socialist city council to defund the police," Mamdani posted on X. November 6, 2020 "Queer liberation means defund the police," Mamdani posted on X. November 7, 2020 "Nature is healing," Mandani posted on X in response to a user mocking and laughing at seeing a police officer "crying inside his car." December 7, 2020 "City Council tried to make the NYPD reduce its overtime budget by half," Mamdani posted on X. "They simply refused. There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt. Defund it. Dismantle it. End the cycle of violence." June 5, 2021 In an interview with SAAG interactive, Mamdani again pushed the idea of defunding the police while suggesting the department for investing in "apartheid" by working with Israel's IDF. December 19, 2024 "As Mayor, I will disband the SRG, which has cost taxpayers millions in lawsuit settlements + brutalized countless New Yorkers exercising their first amendment rights," Mamdani posted on X, pledging to disband the New York Police Department's Strategic Response Group (SRG), a unit that was first on the scene responding to the deadly midtown Manhattan shooting that left an NYPD officer and several others dead last month. Mamdani's long history of anti-police rhetoric has resulted in heavy skepticism from many that his Wednesday press conference truly represents an abandonment of a desire to defund or hamstring police. "Zohran 'Nature Is Healing' Mamdani's Wednesday presser struck me as a cynical and transparent attempt at damage control in response to an incident that served as a violent and somber reminder to New Yorkers of the enormous daily risks taken on their behalf by the men and women of the NYPD," Rafael Mangual, senior fellow and head of research for policing and public safety at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, told Fox News Digital this week. "But even under the tragic circumstances in which the press conference was held, Mamdani balked at multiple opportunities to explicitly retract or apologize for his long and sordid history of anti-police statements."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store