
Abu Dhabi Agency Earns Second Carbon Neutrality Certificate
The Environment Agency,Abu Dhabi (EAD) has announced that it received its second Carbon Neutrality Certification from Applus+.
Applus+ is a verification agency accredited by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This milestone makes EAD the first regulatory body in the UAE to receive this certification twice.
EAD revealed that this achievement further confirms its commitment to tackling climate change and promoting environmental sustainability in Abu Dhabi.
Dr. Shaikha Salem Al Dhaheri, Secretary General of EAD, commented on the announcement. She stated that receiving the certification again reflects EAD's dedication to building a sustainable future for Abu Dhabi.
She reported that EAD offset its carbon emissions for the period from 2020 to 2022. The agency aims to inspire other government entities and encourage the private sector to adopt sustainable practices.
According to EAD, any greenhouse gas emissions were assessed by GE3S and verified by Applus+.
EAD's carbon neutrality approach included identifying and addressing emissions from: Energy consumption in buildings and chilled water
Waste generation and fuel use in vehicles and generators
To reduce its environmental footprint, the agency is taking several steps.
It is upgrading its vehicle fleet to hybrid models to cut fuel use and emissions. It has also replaced all lighting systems with energy-efficient LED lights and sensors. Smart water systems were installed to optimize usage and reduce waste.
Additionally, EAD reported that it adopted environmentally friendly air-conditioning systems at all its facilities.
In its ongoing sustainability efforts, the agency is integrating solar panels into new projects. These projects are aligned with LEED Zero Carbon standards to reduce energy use and emissions.
EAD emphasized that this achievement supports broader climate action goals. The agency continues to lead in environmental stewardship and aims to inspire other organizations to adopt carbon management strategies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
6 hours ago
- Al Etihad
UAE to lead new COSPAS-SARSAT International AI Committee for Search & Rescue Innovation
6 July 2025 13:14 ABU DHABI (WAM)In a landmark decision during its virtual session on June 13, 2025, the global COSPAS-SARSAT organisation established a new international working group focused on artificial intelligence applications in satellite-aided search and rescue systems, with the UAE appointed as development follows the successful series of international meetings hosted by Abu Dhabi from May 27 to June 5, 2025, where key advancements in space-based search and rescue technologies were UAE's National Guard Command, through the National Search and Rescue Centre, presented a comprehensive working paper that laid the foundation for the creation of this specialised proposal, widely recognised for its innovation, calls for the integration of AI into Mission Control Centre (MCC) operations to enhance the performance, speed, and accuracy of distress signal processing across satellite networks. By leveraging intelligent data analysis and cross-system integration, the initiative aims to significantly improve global response times and operational efficiency in life-saving move was praised by representatives from 45 countries and major international organisations, including the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), and the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), who acknowledged the UAE's leadership in advancing humanitarian rescue capabilities through cutting-edge the newly adopted framework, the UAE-led working group will coordinate technical collaboration among member states, develop AI-driven tools for mission control systems, and foster global readiness and responsiveness in search and rescue committee also formally commended the UAE for its transformative contributions, underscoring its strategic role in modernising the COSPAS-SARSAT system and reinforcing its position as a key player in international emergency response efforts. Looking ahead, the committee will work to establish global standards for AI integration in space-based search and rescue systems, promote knowledge exchange, and welcome new partners eager to contribute to this forward-looking initiative.


Arabian Post
11 hours ago
- Arabian Post
BRICS Push for IMF Overhaul and Shifts in Global Finance
Finance ministers from the BRICS nations have pressed the International Monetary Fund to adopt sweeping reforms that would recalibrate its governance and better represent developing economies. They jointly advocated for a modernised quota formula, increased voting power for emerging and low-income countries, and the installation of a merit-based leadership system, rather than the customary European-led management. Meeting in Rio de Janeiro ahead of the BRICS summit, ministers from Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and the newly included members—Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE—united behind a common proposal for the December IMF review. The reforms propose redistributing IMF quota shares to reflect current economic realities, shifting influence away from traditional powers, and safeguarding the interests of poorest nations. A new allocation model is being pushed that would weigh countries' gross domestic product and purchasing power parity, considering currency strength. This aims to boost representation for low-income countries and elevate the voice of underrepresented economies. Ministers also urged the appointment of future IMF heads to be merit-based and regionally diverse, moving away from the de facto European incumbent who traditionally leads the Fund. ADVERTISEMENT The proposal further endorses launching a guarantee mechanism via the New Development Bank, a multilateral financial institution founded by BRICS, to reduce borrowing costs and stimulate development investment in Global South countries. This supports the broader strategy of building complementary structures to traditional Bretton Woods institutions, including the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement and BRICS PAY. Success of the push relies on gaining traction at the IMF's December meeting. Historically, the Fund's governance structure has favoured wealthier, developed nations; a shift would significantly alter the global financial hierarchy. Developing countries have long called for quota reforms; prior changes in 2010 and 2011 incrementally increased quotas for emerging economies, but critics argue the pace has been insufficient. Russia had previously gone further, in October last year urging BRICS to construct an IMF alternative—complete with separate payment mechanisms and financial infrastructure—as a counterweight to Western dominance. The current move stops short of abandonment but signals growing impatience with the status quo in Washington-led multilateral bodies. Within the expanded BRICS bloc, the cohesion displayed in the statement marks a key moment. Representatives noted the increasing complexity of aligning ten members, yet emphasised unity on financial governance. This coordination underscores the group's ambition to act as a collective voice for the Global South. Figures in global finance have responded with caution. Analysts note that while the IMF is under pressure to reform, it also faces domestic constraints from major shareholders reluctant to dilute their influence. Achieving consensus in the Fund's governance, which requires a high threshold for amendments, remains a formidable challenge. However, proponents view the NDB's emerging role in providing financial guarantees and infrastructure loans as a signal that BRICS can provide parallel solutions to the IMF's framework. The bank, which commenced operations in Shanghai and now includes several regional offices, continues to champion infrastructure and sustainable development while aiming to harmonise with global financial systems. As December approaches, the spotlight turns to how the IMF and its political stakeholders will respond. Failure to address BRICS' concerns risks deepening perceptions of inequity in global economic governance. For now, ministers have staked a bold claim: reshape multilateralism to reflect today's economic map—and they have the renewed unity to back it.


Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
US consultancy firm involved in GHF aid scheme modelled plans to 'relocate' Palestinians
A consulting firm involved in the scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation entered into a multimillion-dollar contract to develop the initiative and modelled a plan to "relocate" Palestinians from Gaza as part of its work, a Financial Times investigation has revealed. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) helped design and run the US and Israeli-backed scheme which aimed to supplant United Nations-led aid coordination mechanisms in Gaza. The chaotic roll out of the programme has seen 600 Palestinians killed and another 4,000 wounded by Israeli forces while attempting to access aid. The firm has disavowed its involvement in the project, claiming in a statement in June that it had initially provided "pro bono support" for the project, but two senior partners that led the work "failed to disclose" its full nature and had subsequently carried out "unauthorised work" on the project. It said that the partners have since been fired and an investigation has been launched into the firm's involvement in the scheme. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But according to sources familiar with the project who spoke to the Financial Times, the BCG were more enmeshed with the scheme than the firm has publicly acknowledged, with the company contracted to perform $4m worth of work over a period of seven months. Over a dozen BCG staff worked directly on the project, dubbed "Aurora", between October and late May. Senior figures at the firm were reported to have discussed the initiative, but the BCG said they were misled about the scope and nature of the work by the partners helming the project. 'My journey to get aid in Gaza was like Squid Game' Read More » "The lead partner was categorically told no, and he violated this directive. We disavow this work," the BCG said. The work included financial modelling for the post-war reconstruction of Gaza, commissioned by Israeli backers, with one scenario envisioning the "voluntary relocation" of Palestinians from the enclave. This would have involved paying out "relocation packages" to 500,000 people worth $9,000 per person to induce people to leave the territory. The model assumed a quarter of Palestinians would opt to leave Gaza, with three-quarters of them unlikely to return. It estimated the cost of forced expulsion of Palestinians to be $23,000 cheaper, per Palestinian, than the costs of providing support to them in Gaza during reconstruction. According to BCG, this side of the operation was conducted without the knowledge of senior management and against their instructions. Involvement in security operations The revelations also raise questions about BCG's involvement in developing the security aspect of the initiative. According to sources familiar with the early stages of BCG's work on the initiative, the firm was initially contracted by Washington-based security contractor Orbis to develop a feasibility study for a new aid operation on behalf of the Tachlith Institute, an Israeli think tank. BCG was chosen for the project because of its connections with Phil Reilly, a 29-year veteran of the CIA who worked at Orbis. He was a senior adviser to BCG's defence practice where the two fired partners, Matt Schlueter and Ryan Ordway, worked. Middle East Eye previously reported that Reilly served as a senior adviser at BCG for eight years, and began discussing Gaza aid with Israeli civilians while still in his advisory role in early 2024. The BCG did not answer MEE's questions regarding its involvement in the security operations to support GHF, what role it had played with the foundation and who had asked the firm to get involved initially. Reilly dropped his advisory role with BCG and went on to found Safe Reach Solutions (SRS), a private military company which became the main security provider for the GHF. According to the report, half a dozen staff shifted to "more detailed business planning" for the SRS and GHF. This work was helmed by the US defence practice, while the initial pro-bono phase was billed to BCG's social impact practice helmed by Rich Hutchinson. Ex-CIA officer running Gaza aid security advised Boston Consulting Group Read More » By January, the BCG was contracted by McNally Capital, a Chicago-based private equity firm which owns Orbis, to plan GHF's ground operations from Tel Aviv. The SRS signed an initial contract with the group worth over $1m to cover eight weeks of work to develop SRS's operations in Gaza, with travel approvals given by officials in BGC's risk management operation. The group told the Financial Times that it was "pleased to have supported the establishment of SRS as an important step toward meeting the full scope of the humanitarian need in Gaza". Funding sources for both GHF and SRS remain unclear. Both are registered in US tax havens, with scant details available in public records. A source previously told the Financial Times that the GHF had been pledged $100m from a country they refused to name. Reuters reported on Friday that UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to open bank accounts for the GHF, with the foundation's lack of transparency over its funding cited as being one of the main stumbling blocks in the discussions with the banks. A GHF spokesperson said it has "spoken about initial funding from Europe, but we don't disclose donors for their privacy". GHF's scheme has seen 400 aid distribution points across the enclave replaced by four militarised distribution sites, where millions are forced to risk death in the hope of receiving aid. Israeli troops have admitted to deliberately shooting and killing unarmed Palestinians waiting for aid in the Gaza Strip, following direct orders from their superiors.